Do protons and X-rays induce cell-killing in human peripheral blood lymphocytes by different mechanisms?

Purpose

Significant progress has been made in the technological and physical aspects of dose delivery and distribution in proton therapy. However, mode of cell killing induced by protons is less understood in comparison with X-rays. The purpose of this study is to see if there is any difference in the mode of cell-killing, induced by protons and X-rays in an ex vivo human peripheral blood lymphocyte (HPBL) model.

Materials and methods

HPBL were irradiated with 60 MeV proton beam or 250-kVp X-rays in the dose range of 0.3–4.0 Gy. Frequency of apoptotic and necrotic cells was determined by the Fluorescein (FITC)-Annexin V labelling procedure, 1 and 4 h after irradiation. Chip-based DNA Ladder Assay was used to confirm radiation-induced apoptosis and necrosis. Chip-based DNA Ladder Assay was used to confirm radiation-induced apoptosis.

Results

Ex vivo irradiation of HPBL with proton beams of 60 MeV or 250 kVp X-rays resulted in apoptotic as well as necrotic modes of cell-killing, which were evident at both 1 and 4 h after irradiation in the whole dose and time range. Generally, our results indicated that protons cause relatively higher yields of cell death that appears to be necrosis compared to X-rays. The analysis also demonstrates that radiation type and dose play a critical role in mode of cell-killing.

Conclusion

Obtained results suggest that X-rays and protons induce cell-killing by different modes. Such differences in cell-killing modes may have implications on the potential of a given therapeutic modality to cause immune modulation via programmed cell death (X-rays) or necrotic cell death (proton therapy). These studies point towards exploring for gene expression biomarkers related necrosis or apoptosis to predict immune response after proton therapy.

Occupational exposure to mercury vapour on genotoxicity and DNA repair

We have conducted a population study to investigate whether current occupational exposure to mercury can cause genotoxicity and can affect DNA repair efficiency. Blood samples from 25 exposed workers and 50 matched controls were investigated for the expression of genotoxicity. The data indicate that mercury exposure did not cause any significant differences between the workers and controls in the baseline levels of DNA strand breaks (as measured by the alkaline version of the single cell gel electrophoresis [SCGE] assay) or sister chromatid exchanges (SCE). However, the exposure produced elevated average DNA tails length in the SCGE assay and frequency of chromosome aberrations. In the studies, isolated lymphocytes were exposed to 6J/m2 UV-C light or 2 Gy dose of X-rays in a challenge assay and repair of the induced DNA damage was evaluated using the SCGE assay. Results from the UV-light challenge assay showed no difference between the workers and controls in the expression of DNA strand breaks after exposure followed by incubation in the absence or presence of the cellular mitogen (phytohemagglutinin, PHA). No difference in DNA strand breaks between the workers and controls was seen immediately after the X-ray challenge, either. However, significant differences were observed in cells that were incubated for 2h with and without phytohemagglutinin. Data from the X-rays challenge assay were further used to calculate indices that indicate DNA repair efficiency. Results show that the repair efficiencies for the workers (69.7% and 83.9% in un-stimulated and stimulated lymphocytes, respectively) were significantly lower than that of matched controls (85.7% and 90.4%, respectively). In addition, the repair efficiency showed a consistent and significant decrease with the duration of occupational exposure to mercury (from 75.7% for <10 years employment, to 65.1% for 11-20 years and to 64.1% for 21-35 years) associated with increase of cytogenetic damage. Our study suggests that the occupational exposure to mercury did not cause a direct genotoxicity but caused significant deficiency in DNA repair. Our observations are consistent with previous studies using the standard chromosome aberration assay to show that exposure to hazardous environmental agents can cause deficiency in DNA repair. Therefore, these affected individuals may have exposure-related increase of health risk from continued exposure and in combination with exposure to other genotoxic agents.