Perinatal outcomes in lesbian couples employing shared motherhood IVF compared with those performing artificial insemination with donor sperm

STUDY QUESTION

In lesbian couples, is shared motherhood IVF (SMI) associated with an increase in perinatal complications compared with artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Singleton pregnancies in SMI and AID had very similar outcomes, except for a non-significant increase in the rate of preeclampsia/hypertension (PE/HT) in SMI (recipient's age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.7-5.2; P = 0.19), but twin SMI pregnancies had a much higher frequency of PE/HT than AID twins (recipient's age-adjusted OR = 21.7, 95% CI = 2.8-289.4; P = 0.01).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Oocyte donation (OD) pregnancies are associated with an increase in perinatal complications, in particular, preterm delivery and low birth weight, and PE/HT. However, it is unclear to what extent these complications are due to OD process or to the conditions why OD was performed, such as advanced age and underlying health conditions. Unfortunately, the literature concerning perinatal outcomes in SMI is scarce.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective study involving 660 SMI cycles (299 pregnancies) and 4349 AID cycles (949 pregnancies) assisted over a 10-year period.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All cycles fulfilling the inclusion criteria performed in lesbian couples seeking fertility treatment in 17 Spanish clinics of the same group. Pregnancy rates of SMI and AID cycles were compared. Perinatal outcomes were compared: gestational length, newborn weight, preterm and low birth rates, PE/HT rates, cesarean section rates, perinatal mortality, and newborn malformations.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Pregnancy rates were higher in SMI than in AID (45.3% versus 21.8%, P < 0.001). There was a non-significant trend to higher multiple rate in AID (4.7% versus 8.5%, P = 0.08). In single pregnancies, there were no differences between SMI and AID in gestational age (278 days (268-285) versus 279 (272-284), P = 0.24), preterm rate (8.3% versus 7.3%, P = 0.80), preterm <28 weeks (0.6% versus 0.4%, P = 1.00), newborn weight (3195 g (2915-3620) versus 3270 g (2980-3600), P = 0.296), low birth rate (6.4% versus 6.4%, P = 1.00), extremely low birth weight (0.6% versus 0.5%, P = 1.00), and the distribution of newborns by weight groups. Cesarean section rate, newborn malformation rate, and perinatal mortality were also similar in SMI and AID. Additionally, there was non-significant trend in hypertensive disorders to an increase in PE/HT among SMI (recipient's age-adjusted OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.7-5.2). Overall, perinatal data are consistent with what is reported in the general population. In twin pregnancies, the aforementioned perinatal parameters were also very similar in SMI and AID. However, SMI twin pregnancies had a very high risk of PE/HT when compared with AID (recipient's age-adjusted OR = 21.7, 95% CI = 2.8-289.4, P = 0.01).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Our data regarding the pregnancy course were obtained from information registered in the delivery report as well as from what was reported by the patients themselves, so a certain degree of inaccuracy cannot be ruled out. Additionally, in some parameters, there was up to 10% of data missing. However, since the methodology of reporting was the same in SMI and AID groups, one should not expect a differential reporting bias. It cannot be ruled out that the risk of PE/HT in simple gestations would be significant in a larger study. Additionally, in the SMI group allocation to the transfer of 2 embryos was not randomized so some bias is possible.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

SMI, if single embryo transfer is performed, seems to be is a safe procedure. Double embryo transfer should not be performed in SMI. Our data suggest that the majority of complications in OD could be related more with recipient status than with OD itself, since with SMI (performed in women without fertility problems) the perinatal complications were much lower than usually described in OD.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was received. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

State of the art in anti-cancer mAbs

Following Milstein’s discovery, the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) became a basic tool for biomedical science. In cancer field, since the first mAb was approved by the FDA a great improvement took place making of them a therapeutic option for many cancer types in the current clinical practice. Today, mAbs are being developed to target different molecules with different mechanisms of action and its target potential is unlimited. However, this huge and fast growing new field needs to be organized to better understand the treatment options we have to confront different cancer diseases. Current cancer targeted immunotherapies aim to achieve different goals like the regulation of osteoclast function, the delivery of cytotoxic drugs into tumor cells and the blockade of oncogenic pathways, neo-angiogenesis and immune checkpoints. Here, we reviewed the most relevant therapeutic mAbs for solid tumors available in current clinical practice.

Polytraumatism and solid organ bleeding syndrome: The role of imaging

In multiple injuries, features of bleeding from solid organs mostly involve the liver, spleen and kidneys and may be treated by embolization. The indications and techniques for embolization vary between organs and depend on the pathophysiology of the injuries, type of vascularization (anastomotic or terminal) and type of embolization (curative or preventative). Interventional radiologists should have a full understanding of these indications and techniques and management algorithms should be produced within each facility in order to define the respective place of the different treatment options.