1
|
Gouda MA, Janku F, Wahida A, Buschhorn L, Schneeweiss A, Abdel Karim N, De Miguel Perez D, Del Re M, Russo A, Curigliano G, Rolfo C, Subbiah V. Liquid Biopsy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (LB-RECIST). Ann Oncol 2024; 35:267-275. [PMID: 38145866 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Current evaluation of treatment response in solid tumors depends on dynamic changes in tumor diameters as measured by imaging. However, these changes can only be detected when there are enough macroscopic changes in tumor volume, which limits the usability of radiological response criteria in evaluating earlier stages of disease response and necessitates much time to lapse for gross changes to be notable. One promising approach is to incorporate dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which occur early in the course of therapy and can predict tumor responses weeks before gross size changes manifest. However, several issues need to be addressed before recommending the implementation of ctDNA response criteria in daily clinical practice such as clinical, biological, and regulatory challenges and, most importantly, the need to standardize/harmonize detection methods and ways to define ctDNA response and/or progression for precision oncology. Herein, we review the use of liquid biopsy (LB) to evaluate response in solid tumors and propose a plan toward standardization of LB-RECIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Gouda
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - F Janku
- Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Boston, USA
| | - A Wahida
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Buschhorn
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Schneeweiss
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N Abdel Karim
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, (5)University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - D De Miguel Perez
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - M Del Re
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - A Russo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Papardo Civil Hospital and Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - C Rolfo
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - V Subbiah
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kairemo K, Gouda MA, Buschhorn L, Wahida A, Macapinlac HA, Anderson PM, Subbiah V. Sodium fluoride (Na 18F) PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (NAFCIST): a framework for response assessment in bone tumors. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101575. [PMID: 37517365 PMCID: PMC10400850 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The current Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for measuring tumor response in osteosarcoma may be sub-optimal, as even responsive bone tumors may show limited change in tumor diameters. This limits the use of traditional imaging assessment tools. Therefore, discerning osteosarcoma response to therapy on magnetic resonance imaging before surgery is often difficult, and it is typically evaluated after surgery by assessing the amount of necrosis in resected surgical specimens. To address these challenges, sodium fluoride (Na18F) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans can be utilized to better image bone response to therapy, as, fluoride is avidly taken up by bone. Na18F Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (NAFCIST) has been developed as a novel method to evaluate treatment response using Na18F PET/CT. Current evidence supporting NAFCIST comes from a pilot study that evaluated alpha particle radium-223 in patients with osteosarcoma. In this review, practical guidance for utilizing NAFCIST in the context of bone tumors is illustrated to aid future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Kairemo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M A Gouda
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - L Buschhorn
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Wahida
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H A Macapinlac
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - P M Anderson
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Bone marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, USA
| | - V Subbiah
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, USA.
| |
Collapse
|