1
|
Bhatia K, Columb M, Shelton C, Lie J, Leach S, Froud O, Verma D, Sturgess P, Sawyerr A, Desai J, Gould N, Kumari S, Sen U, Verma P, Kamath P, Koirala A, Kimber‐Craig S, Eccles J, Bewlay A, Eslam E, Radwan M, Hulgur M, Christian J, Aiyad A. Epidural labour analgesia rates during the
COVID
‐19 pandemic in the north‐west of England. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:1055-1056. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.15780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
2
|
Bhatia K, Columb M, Bewlay A, Tageldin N, Knapp C, Qamar Y, Dooley A, Kamath P, Hulgur M. Decision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes for category-1 caesarean sections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1051-1059. [PMID: 33891311 PMCID: PMC8251307 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
General anaesthesia is known to achieve the shortest decision‐to‐delivery interval for category‐1 caesarean section. We investigated whether the COVID‐19 pandemic affected the decision‐to delivery interval and influenced neonatal outcomes in patients who underwent category‐1 caesarean section. Records of 562 patients who underwent emergency caesarean section between 1 April 2019 and 1 July 2019 in seven UK hospitals (pre‐COVID‐19 group) were compared with 577 emergency caesarean sections performed during the same period during the COVID‐19 pandemic (1 April 2020–1 July 2020) (post‐COVID‐19 group). Primary outcome measures were: decision‐to‐delivery interval; number of caesarean sections achieving decision‐to‐delivery interval < 30 min; and a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (Apgar 5‐min score < 7, umbilical arterial pH < 7.10, neonatal intensive care unit admission and stillbirth). The use of general anaesthesia decreased significantly between the pre‐ and post‐COVID‐19 groups (risk ratio 0.48 (95%CI 0.37–0.62); p < 0.0001). Compared with the pre‐COVID‐19 group, the post‐COVID‐19 group had an increase in median (IQR [range]) decision‐to‐delivery interval (26 (18–32 [4–124]) min vs. 27 (20–33 [3–102]) min; p = 0.043) and a decrease in the number of caesarean sections meeting the decision‐to‐delivery interval target of < 30 min (374/562 (66.5%) vs. 349/577 (60.5%); p = 0.02). The incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes was similar in the pre‐ and post‐COVID‐19 groups (140/568 (24.6%) vs. 140/583 (24.0%), respectively; p = 0.85). The small increase in decision‐to‐delivery interval observed during the COVID‐19 pandemic did not adversely affect neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhatia
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M Columb
- Department of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Bewlay
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - N Tageldin
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - C Knapp
- North West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK
| | - Y Qamar
- North West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK
| | - A Dooley
- Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - P Kamath
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK
| | - M Hulgur
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhatia K, Columb M, Bewlay A, Eccles J, Hulgur M, Jayan N, Lie J, Verma D, Parikh R. The effect of COVID-19 on general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section. A cross-sectional analysis of six hospitals in the north-west of England. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:312-319. [PMID: 33073371 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
At the onset of the global pandemic of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), guidelines recommended using regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in preference to general anaesthesia. National figures from the UK suggest that 8.75% of over 170,000 caesarean sections are performed under general anaesthetic. We explored whether general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section changed during the peak of the pandemic across six maternity units in the north-west of England. We analysed anaesthetic information for 2480 caesarean sections across six maternity units from 1 April to 1 July 2020 (during the pandemic) and compared this information with data from 2555 caesarean sections performed at the same hospitals over a similar period in 2019. Primary outcome was change in general anaesthesia rate for caesarean section. Secondary outcomes included overall caesarean section rates, obstetric indications for caesarean section and regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates. A significant reduction (7.7 to 3.7%, p < 0.0001) in general anaesthetic rates, risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.39-0.93), was noted across hospitals during the pandemic. Regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates reduced (1.7 to 0.8%, p = 0.012), risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.29-0.86). Obstetric indications for caesarean sections did not change (p = 0.17) while the overall caesarean section rate increased (28.3 to 29.7%), risk ratio (95%CI) 1.02 (1.00-1.04), p = 0.052. Our analysis shows that general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section declined during the peak of the pandemic. Anaesthetic decision-making, recommendations from anaesthetic guidelines and presence of an on-site anaesthetic consultant in the delivery suite seem to be the key factors that influenced this decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhatia
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University of Manchester, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M Columb
- Department of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative and Intensive Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Bewlay
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - J Eccles
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Oldham, UK
| | - M Hulgur
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - N Jayan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - J Lie
- Department of Anaesthesia, Burnley General Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - D Verma
- Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Parikh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|