1
|
Patel K, Asrani SK, Fiel MI, Levine D, Leung DH, Duarte-Rojo A, Dranoff JA, Nayfeh T, Hasan B, Taddei TH, Alsawaf Y, Saadi S, Majzoub AM, Manolopoulos A, Alzuabi M, Ding J, Sofiyeva N, Murad MH, Alsawas M, Rockey DC, Sterling RK. Accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline. Hepatology 2024:01515467-990000000-00805. [PMID: 38489517 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy for non-invasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) in chronic liver disease (CLD). Our aims for this systematic review were to evaluate the diagnostic utility of selected blood-based tests either alone, or in combination, for identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4) and cirrhosis (F4), as compared to biopsy in CLD. APPROACH AND RESULTS We included a comprehensive search of databases including Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Scopus through to April 2022. Two independent reviewers selected 286 studies with 103,162 patients. The most frequently identified studies included the simple aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis (FIB)-4 markers (with low-to-moderate risk of bias) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) and C virus (HCV), HIV-HCV/HBV co-infection, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Positive (LR+) and negative (LR) likelihood ratios across direct and indirect biomarker tests for HCV and HBV for F2-4, F3-4, or F4 were 1.66-6.25 and 0.23-0.80, 1.89-5.24 and 0.12-0.64, and 1.32-7.15 and 0.15-0.86 respectively; LR+ and LR for NAFLD F2-4, F3-4 and F4 were 2-65-3.37 and 0.37-0.39, 2.25-6.76 and 0.07-0.87, and 3.90 and 0.15 respectively. Overall, proportional odds ratio indicated FIB-4 <1.45 was better than APRI <0.5 for F2-4. FIB-4 >3.25 was also better than APRI >1.5 for F3-4 and F4. There was limited data for combined tests. CONCLUSIONS Blood-based biomarkers are associated with small-to-moderate change in pre-test probability for diagnosing F2-4, F3-4, and F4 in viral hepatitis, HIV-HCV co-infection, and NAFLD, with limited comparative or combination studies for other CLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyur Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sumeet K Asrani
- Division of Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Maria Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Levine
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Harvard Medical School
| | - Daniel H Leung
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Duarte-Rojo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan A Dranoff
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
| | - Tarek Nayfeh
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bashar Hasan
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tamar H Taddei
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
| | - Yahya Alsawaf
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Samer Saadi
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Muayad Alzuabi
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jingyi Ding
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nigar Sofiyeva
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mouaz Alsawas
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Don C Rockey
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Richard K Sterling
- Section of Hepatology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duarte-Rojo A, Taouli B, Leung DH, Levine D, Nayfeh T, Hasan B, Alsawaf Y, Saadi S, Majzoub AM, Manolopoulos A, Hafar S, Dundar A, Murad MH, Rockey DC, Alsawas M, Sterling RK. Imaging-based non-invasive liver disease assessment for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline. Hepatology 2024:01515467-990000000-00808. [PMID: 38489521 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transient elastography (TE), shear-wave elastography (SWE), and/or magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), each providing liver stiffness measurement (LSM), are the most studied imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) techniques. To support the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines on NILDA, we summarized the evidence on the accuracy of these LSM methods to stage liver fibrosis (F). APPROACH AND RESULTS A comprehensive search for studies assessing LSM by TE, SWE, or MRE for the identification of significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), or cirrhosis (F4), utilizing histopathology as standard of reference by liver disease etiology in adults or children from inception to April 2022 was performed. We excluded studies with <50 patients with a single disease entity and mixed liver disease etiologies (with the exception of HCV/HIV co-infection). Out of 9447 studies, 240 with 61,193 patients were included in this systematic review. In adults, sensitivities for the identification of F2-4 ranged from 51% to 95%, for F3-4 from 70% to 100%, and for F4 from 60% to 100% across all techniques/diseases, whereas specificities ranged from 36% to 100%, 74% to 100%, and 67% to 99%, respectively. The largest body of evidence available was for TE; MRE appeared to be the most accurate method. Imaging-based NILDA outperformed blood-based NILDA in most comparisons, particularly for the identification of F3-4/F4. In the pediatric population, imaging-based NILDA is likely as accurate as in adults. CONCLUSION LSM from TE, SWE, and MRE show acceptable to outstanding accuracy for the detection of liver fibrosis across various liver disease etiologies. Accuracy increased from F2-4 to F3-4 and was the highest for F4. Further research is needed to better standardize the use of imaging-based NILDA, particularly in pediatric liver diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Duarte-Rojo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Bachir Taouli
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Daniel H Leung
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Deborah Levine
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Tarek Nayfeh
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Bashar Hasan
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yahya Alsawaf
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Samer Saadi
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Samir Hafar
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ayca Dundar
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Don C Rockey
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Mouaz Alsawas
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Richard K Sterling
- Section of Hepatology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beran A, Al-Abboodi Y, Majzoub AM, Ghazaleh S, Sayeh W, Mohamed MFH, Elfert K, Mhanna M, Montalvan-Sanchez E, Musallam R, Jaber F, Bhatti U, Abdeljawad K, Al-Haddad M. Endoscopic Versus Conservative Therapy for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer with Adherent Clot: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3921-3934. [PMID: 37634184 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08078-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peptic ulcers with adherent clots are associated with a high-risk of rebleeding and mortality. However, the optimal management of bleeding ulcers with adherent clots remains unclear. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare endoscopic therapy and conservative therapy to manage bleeding ulcers with adherent clots. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through October 2022 to include all studies comparing the endoscopic and conservative therapeutic approaches for bleeding ulcers with adherent clots. Our primary outcome was rebleeding (overall and 30-day). The secondary outcomes were mortality (overall and 30-day), need for surgery, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with the corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for proportional and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS Eleven studies (9 RCTs) with 833 patients (431 received endoscopic therapy vs. 402 received conservative therapy) were included. Overall, endoscopic therapy was associated with lower overall rebleeding (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.79, P = 0.007), 30-day rebleeding (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.002), overall mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, P = 0.04), 30-day mortality (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.002), need for surgery (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.95, P = 0.04), and LOS (MD - 3.17 days, 95% CI - 4.14, - 2.19, P < 0.00001). However, subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed no significant difference in overall mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.24-2.52, P = 0.68) between the two strategies, with numerically lower but statistically non-significant rates of overall rebleeding (7.2% vs. 18.5%, respectively; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.17-1.05, P = 0.06), statistically lower rate of need for surgery (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.96, P = 0.04) with endoscopic therapy compared to conservative therapy. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis demonstrates that endoscopic therapy was overall associated with lower rates of rebleeding (overall and 30-day), mortality (overall and 30-day), need for surgery, and LOS, compared to conservative therapy for the management of bleeding ulcers with adherent clots. However, subgroup analysis of RCTs showed that endoscopic therapy was associated with numerically lower but statistically non-significant rates of overall rebleeding and a statistically lower rate of need for surgery compared to conservative therapy with similar overall mortality rates. Combined treatment with thermal therapy and injection therapy was the most effective treatment modality in reducing rebleeding risk. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azizullah Beran
- Divison of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, 702 Rotary Circle, Ste 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Yasir Al-Abboodi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Abdul Mounaem Majzoub
- Divison of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Sami Ghazaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Wasef Sayeh
- Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mouhand F H Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Khaled Elfert
- Department of Medicine, St. Barnabas Hospital Health System, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Mohammed Mhanna
- Division of Cardiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Rami Musallam
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Fouad Jaber
- Department of Medicine, University of MO - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Umer Bhatti
- Divison of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, 702 Rotary Circle, Ste 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Khaled Abdeljawad
- Divison of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, 702 Rotary Circle, Ste 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Divison of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, 702 Rotary Circle, Ste 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sawas T, Majzoub AM, Haddad J, Tielleman T, Nayfeh T, Yadlapati R, Singh S, Kolb J, Vajravelu RK, Katzka DA, Wani S. Magnitude and Time-Trend Analysis of Postendoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e31-e50. [PMID: 33901662 PMCID: PMC9799241 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Identification of postendoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma (PEEC) among Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients presents an opportunity to improve survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We aimed to estimate the proportion of PEEC within the first year after BE diagnosis. METHODS Multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases) were searched until September 2020 for original studies with at least 1-year follow-up evaluation that reported EAC and/or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in the first year after index endoscopy in nondysplastic BE, low-grade dysplasia, or indefinite dysplasia. The proportions of PEEC defined using EAC alone and EAC+HGD were calculated by dividing EAC or EAC+HGD in the first year over the total number of EAC or EAC+HGD, respectively. RESULTS We included 52 studies with 145,726 patients and a median follow-up period of 4.8 years. The proportion of PEEC (EAC) was 21% (95% CI, 13-31) and PEEC (EAC+HGD) was 26% (95% CI, 19-34). Among studies with nondysplastic BE only, the PEEC (EAC) proportion was 17% (95% CI, 11-23) and PEEC (EAC+HGD) was 14% (95% CI, 8-19). Among studies with 5 or more years of follow-up evaluation, the PEEC (EAC) proportion was 10% and PEEC (EAC+HGD) was 19%. Meta-regression analysis showed a strong inverse relationship between PEEC and incident EAC (P < .001). The PEEC (EAC) proportion increased from 5% in studies published before 2000 to 30% after 2015. Substantial heterogeneity was observed for most analyses. CONCLUSIONS PEEC accounts for a high proportion of HGD/EACs and is proportional to reduction in incident EAC. Using best endoscopic techniques now and performing future research on improving neoplasia detection through implementation of quality measures and educational tools is needed to reduce PEEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek Sawas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - James Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Thomas Tielleman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Tarek Nayfeh
- Evidence Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Jennifer Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Ravy K. Vajravelu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David A. Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | | |
Collapse
|