Social Determinants of Health in Imaging-based Cancer Screening: A Case-based Primer with Strategies for Care Improvement

Health disparities, preventable differences in the burden of disease and disease outcomes often experienced by socially disadvantaged populations, can be found in nearly all areas of radiology, including emergency radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, image-guided interventions, and imaging-based cancer screening. Disparities in imaging-based cancer screening are especially noteworthy given the far-reaching population health impact. The social determinants of health (SDoH) play an important role in disparities in cancer screening and outcomes. Through improved understanding of how SDoH can drive differences in health outcomes in radiology, radiologists can effectively provide patient-centered, high-quality, and equitable care. Radiologists and radiology practices can become active partners in efforts to assist patients along their imaging journey and overcome existing barriers to equitable cancer screening care for traditionally marginalized populations. As radiology exists at the intersection of diagnostic imaging, image-guided diagnostic intervention, and image-guided treatment, radiologists are uniquely positioned to design these strategies. Cost-effective and socially conscious strategies that address barriers to equitable care can improve both public health and equitable health outcomes. Potential strategies include championing supportive health policy, reducing out-of-pocket costs, increasing price transparency, improving education and outreach efforts, ensuring that appropriate language translation services are available, providing individualized assistance with appointment scheduling, and offering transportation assistance and childcare. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

The "Speckle Sign" in the Diagnosis of Posterior Compartment Endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine usefulness of the "speckle sign" in the diagnosis of deep invasive endometriosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study with informed consent waived included 25 women (mean age 20-69 years) with histopathologically confirmed posterior cul-de-sac endometriosis between 2013 and 2018. Transvaginal ultrasound exams of these patients were reviewed by 2 expert radiologists searching for the "speckle sign," defined as irregular obliteration of the posterior cul-de-sac and bright (hyperechoic) internal echoes. The frequency of additional findings such as "kissing ovaries," endometriomas in the adnexa, bowel tethering in the posterior pelvic compartment, retroflexed uterus, adenomyosis, and pelvic free fluid were also analyzed. Data regarding clinical features, histopathologic findings and management were collected through a review of the medical record.

RESULTS

Reader one identified posterior compartment endometriosis in 20/25 patients, and reader two in 22/25 patients, with 96% agreement. Adnexal endometriomas were found in 21/25 patients for both readers (k = 0.70) and were bilateral in 23% of patients. The ovaries were adherent to each other in the midline ("kissing ovaries") in 50% of patients; the bowel was tethered anteriorly in 20%; the presence of adenomyosis was seen in about 27%, and a retroflexed uterus was seen in 24% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The speckle sign could be helpful in making the diagnosis of posterior compartment endometriosis, and the sign is often found in conjunction with other imaging features of endometriosis.

Clinical, Imaging, and Lab Correlates of Severe COVID-19 Leukoencephalopathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients infected with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can develop a spectrum of neurological disorders, including a leukoencephalopathy of variable severity. Our aim was to characterize imaging, lab, and clinical correlates of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) leukoencephalopathy, which may provide insight into the SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 who had brain MR imaging following intensive care unit admission were included. Seven (7/27, 26%) developed an unusual pattern of "leukoencephalopathy with reduced diffusivity" on diffusion-weighted MR imaging. The remaining patients did not exhibit this pattern. Clinical and laboratory indices, as well as neuroimaging findings, were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The reduced-diffusivity group had a significantly higher body mass index (36 versus 28 kg/m², P < .01). Patients with reduced diffusivity trended toward more frequent acute renal failure (7/7, 100% versus 9/20, 45%; P = .06) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate values (49 versus 85 mL/min; P = .06) at the time of MRI. Patients with reduced diffusivity also showed lesser mean values of the lowest hemoglobin levels (8.1 versus 10.2 g/dL, P < .05) and higher serum sodium levels (147 versus 139 mmol/L, P = .04) within 24 hours before MR imaging. The reduced-diffusivity group showed a striking and highly reproducible distribution of confluent, predominantly symmetric, supratentorial, and middle cerebellar peduncular white matter lesions (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight notable correlations between severe COVID-19 leukoencephalopathy with reduced diffusivity and obesity, acute renal failure, mild hypernatremia, anemia, and an unusual brain MR imaging white matter lesion distribution pattern. Together, these observations may shed light on possible SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with leukoencephalopathy, including borderzone ischemic changes, electrolyte transport disturbances, and silent hypoxia in the setting of the known cytokine storm syndrome that accompanies severe COVID-19.

Use of ring-enhancement and focal necrosis to differentiate pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on CT and MRI

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of the ring-enhancing sign and focal necrosis to diagnose adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC), a variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), on MRI and CT.

METHODS

The following features of ASqC and conventional PDAC were evaluated on CT and MRI: tumor size, location, margins, borders (non-exophytic, exophytic), and T1 signal intensity. Two readers, blinded to histopathology results, rated their confidence in detecting ring-enhancement and focal necrosis (FN) on a 5-point Likert scale on both MRI and CT. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa (k).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were included: eight patients with treatment naïve and histologically proven ASqC (six women, mean age: 63, range: 40-75) and 16 patients with PDAC (eight women, mean age: 67, range: 47-83). Statistically significant differences between ASqC and PDAC were seen in tumor size, location, presence of FN, and ring enhancement (p = 0.01-0.037). The readers were more confident in depicting the key differentiating feature ring-enhancement in ASqC on MRI compared to CT (confidence 1.71 ± 0.49 vs. 0.88 ± 0.35, p = 0.017) with moderate inter-reader agreement (k = 0.46 and 0.5, respectively). FN showed substantial inter-reader agreement on MR and moderate agreement on CT (k = 0.67 and 0.5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CT, MRI depicts ring-enhancement in ASqC with greater reader confidence and FN in ASqC with higher inter-reader agreement. The concurrent presence of these two imaging features should raise high suspicion for ASqC.

Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic characteristics of routine-read (RR), structured-reported read (SR), and structured expert-read pelvic (SER) MRI for staging of pelvic endometriosis in a tertiary care academic center.

METHODS

Of 530 patients with endometriosis (2013-2018), 59/530 (11.1%) were staged surgically and underwent pelvic MRI. Radiology reports were considered RR; MRI studies were independently reassessed by SR and SER. Involvement was recorded by compartment [anterior (AC), middle (MC), posterior (PC), adnexal (AX), and other (OC)]. Diagnostic discrepancy between review methods was assessed with McNemar's test. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's unweighted kappa.

RESULTS

Of 295 compartments in 59 women (mean age = 38.8 years; range 20-69), 147/295 (49.8%) had confirmed endometriosis. Overall sensitivity: RR = 42.9%; SR = 86.4%; SER = 74.2%. SR's increased sensitivity was significant for PC (p < 0.001), MC (p < 0.001), AC (p = 0.001), AX (p = 0.038). Higher sensitivity by SER was significant for PC (p < 0.001), MC (p = 0.004) and AC (p < 0.001), but not AX (p > 0.05). Overall specificity: RR = 95.3%; SR = 45.9%; SER = 81.8%. SER specificity was no different than RR for PC or AX (p > 0.5). RR sensitivity relied heavily on detection of AX involvement, whereas SR and SER showed additional sites of disease while maintaining comparable specificity for SER. Overall agreement between SR and SER was fair [k = 0.342 (95% CI 0.25, 0.44)].

CONCLUSIONS

Even at a tertiary care academic center, SER outperforms both SR and RR in the assessment of pelvic endometriosis. Although lack of expertise may negatively impact specificity, use of structured reporting is significantly more sensitive than RR. Therefore, its use can be of assistance in surgical planning and patient counseling.

Structured versus narrative reporting of pelvic MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: impact on clarity, completeness, and surgical planning

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clarity, completeness, and impact on surgical planning of MRI reporting of perianal fistulizing disease using a structured disease-specific template versus narrative reporting for planning of disease treatment by colorectal surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study with waiver of informed consent, a structured reporting template for perianal fistulizing disease MRIs was developed based on collaboration between colorectal surgeons and abdominal radiologists. The study population included 45 consecutive patients who underwent pelvic MRI for perianal fistulizing disease prior to implementation of structured reporting, and 60 consecutive patients who underwent pelvic MRI for perianal fistulizing disease after implementation of structured reporting. Objective evaluation of the reports for the presence of 12 key features was performed, as also subjective evaluation regarding the clarity and completeness of reports, and impact on surgical planning.

RESULTS

Significantly more key features were absent in narrative reports [mean: 6.3 ± 1.8 (range 3-11)] than in structured reports [mean: 0.3 ± 0.9 (range 1-5)] (p ≤ 0.001). The use of structured reporting also increased the percentage of completeness (72.5-88.3% for surgeon 1, and 61.2-81.3% for surgeon 2; p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively), helpfulness in surgical planning (7.1 ± 1.5-7.6 ± 1.5 for surgeon 1, and 5.8 ± 1.4-7.1 ± 1.1 for surgeon 2; p = 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively), and clarity (7.6 ± 1.3-8.3 ± 1.1 for surgeon 1, and 5.2 ± 1.4-7.1 ± 1.3 for surgeon 2; p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively) of the reports.

CONCLUSION

Structured MRI reports in patients with perianal fistulizing disease miss fewer key features than narrative reports. Moreover, structured reports were described as more complete and clear, and more helpful for treatment planning.

Applicability of current NCCN Guidelines for pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability: analysis and pitfalls

PURPOSE

To test the applicability of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN v 3.2017) resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical practice, at a high-volume tertiary referral center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

102 consecutive patients (53 female; mean age 66.2 years, range 34-90 years) with biopsy proven, non-metastatic PDAC were evaluated by our multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer program between July 2013 and February 2016. Retrospective review of staging pancreatic CT angiography was performed, and radiographic features were categorized as conforming to or non-conforming to existing v 3.2017 definitions.

RESULTS

Among 102 patients, 10 (10%) had CTA evidence of vascular involvement that did not conform to existing NCCN Guidelines. Six new scenarios of vascular involvement were identified. The remaining 92 patients presented with resectable (n = 20 [22%]), borderline resectable (n = 42 [45.6%]), or unresectable (n = 30 [33%]) PDAC. Approximately half (n = 21 [51%]) of borderline resectable patients' tumors demonstrated isolated venous involvement, whereas 39% had both arterial and venous involvement. A minority (11%) demonstrated only major arterial involvement. Assignment to unresectable status reflected both arterial and venous involvement (11, 37%), arterial involvement only (10, 33%) patients, and unreconstructible venous involvement in 9 (30%).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, current NCCN resectability guidelines for PDAC do not accurately classify vascular involvement identified in approximately 10% of patients. Revision of the current guidelines could be helpful to clinical practice.