Macrophage-derived CCL18 promotes osteosarcoma proliferation and migration by upregulating the expression of UCA1

Osteosarcoma (OS), which is the most common primary malignant bone tumor, has a high incidence of pulmonary metastasis. CCL18 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 18), which is secreted by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), has been found to be increased in various tumors and is associated with tumor metastasis. However, the role of CCL18 in OS remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effect of CCL18 on the OS cell lines MG63 and 143B and explored its potential mechanisms. We found that CCL18 enhanced the proliferation and migration of OS cells and upregulated UCA1 through transcription factor EP300. Subsequently, we further revealed that the downstream Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway participated in this process. In addition, the high expression of CCL18 in both tissue and serum from patients was closely related to pulmonary metastasis and poor survival in OS patients. The tumor xenograft models also showed that CCL18 promoted the metastasis of OS cells. Collectively, our study indicated that macrophage-derived CCL18 promotes OS proliferation and metastasis via the EP300/UCA1/Wnt/β-catenin pathway and that CCL18 may be used as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target of OS. KEY MESSAGES: CCL18 promotes proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma cells by EP300/ UCA1/ Wnt/β-catenin pathway. CCL18⁺ TAMs are significantly correlated with pulmonary metastasis and poor survival in osteosarcoma patients. CCL18 may be used as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target for osteosarcoma.

Continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination as second-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma patients in China: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of response to continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination as second-line chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma patients who were treated with continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination between May 1999 and April 2011 were included in the analysis. Ifosfamide at 12 g/m2 was administered by intravenous continuous infusion over 3 days, and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 was administered as an intravenous bolus injection on day 1. The combination therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

The patients (ages 7-53 years) received a total of 42 cycles of chemotherapy (median: 2 courses; range: 2-5 courses). The overall response rate was 0% and the disease control rate was 22.3%, with four patients having stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 2 months (range: 2-5 months) and 9 months (range: 3-29 months), respectively. Major severe toxicities were leucopenia 7 (38.9%), nausea and vomiting 3 (16.7%) and alopecia 9 (50%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination therapy at this dosage and schedule was found to be well tolerated and moderate effective, which could be considered as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma. Further assessment is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Dihydromethysticin kavalactone induces apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells through modulation of PI3K/Akt pathway, disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential and inducing cell cycle arrest

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the tumor and apoptotic effects of dihydromethysticin kavalactone against human osteosarcoma (MG-63) cells. Antiproliferative activity was measured with the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Apoptosis induction by dihydromethysticin was demonstrated by fluorescence microscopy, quantitative videomicroscopy and Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit. Mitochondrial membrane potential disruption was demonstrated by rhodamine-123 dye using flow cytometry. We also evaluated the effect of dihydromethysticin on PI3K/Akt pathway with an immunoblotting analysis. The results showed that the compound induced dose-dependent as well as time-dependent antiproliferative effects against MG-63 cell growth. Cell death and apoptotic body formation was noticed followed dihydromethysticin treatment at various doses. The percentage of apoptotic cells (early apoptosis+late apoptosis) increased from 6.63% in untreated control to 23.92%, 23.81% and 93.9% in 25 µM, 75 µM and 100 µ Mdihydromethysticin-treated cells respectively. Flow cytometric analysis showed dihydromethysticin induced an increase in G0/G1 cells (apoptotic cells). Furthermore, we observed mitochondrial transmembrane depolarization along with decreased phosphorylation levels for PI3K, AKT (Ser 473), AKT (Thr 308), GSK-3β, and BAD. These reductions were associated with down regulation of AKT and upregulation of both GSK-3β and BAD.

Incidence and risk of hypertension with a novel multi-targeted kinase inhibitor axitinib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To investigate the overall incidence and risk of hypertension in cancer patients who receive axitinib and compare the differences in incidences between axitinib and the other four approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

Several databases were searched, including Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of patients with cancer assigned axitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg orally twice daily with data on hypertension available. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.

RESULTS

A total of 1908 patients from 10 clinical trials were included. The overall incidences of all grade and high grade hypertension in cancer patients were 40.1% (95% CI 30.9, 50.2%) and 13.1% (95% CI 6.7, 24%). The use of axitinib was associated with significantly increased risk of all grade (RR 3.00, 95% CI 1.29, 6.97, P = 0.011) and high grade hypertension (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.21, 2.43, P = 0.003). The risk of axitinib associated all grade and high grade hypertension in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was significantly higher than that in non-RCC. Additionally, the risk of hypertension with axitinib was substantially higher than other approved VEGFR-TKIs, while the risk of all grade hypertension with axitinib was similar to pazopanib (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-, 1.17, P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

While sharing a similar spectrum of target receptors with other VEGFR-TKIs, axitinib is associated with an unexpectedly high risk of developing hypertension. Close monitoring and appropriate management for hypertension are recommended during the treatment.

Incidence and risk of denosumab-related hypocalcemia in cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized controlled studies

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency and relative risk of hypocalcemia in cancer patients receiving denosumab.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed (data from 1966 to October 2012), Embase (data from 1980 to October 2012) and Cochrane Library (up to October 2012) electronic databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Abstracts presented at conferences were also searched. Phase II and III trials of denosumab in patients with any type of cancer that reported occurrence of hypocalcemia were eligible. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity among included trials.

RESULTS

A total of 8990 patients with a variety of solid tumors from seven RCTs were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypocalcemia in cancer patients were 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-9.3%) and 2.0% (95% CI: 0.7-5.5%), respectively. The use of denosumab was associated with significantly increased risk of developing all-grade (RR 1.932, 95% CI: 1.590-2.347, p < 0.001) and high-grade hypocalcemia (RR 4.027, 95% CI: 2.346-6.912, p < 0.001) in comparison with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of denosumab is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing hypocalcemia (p < 0.001). Physicians should be aware of this adverse effect and should monitor cancer patients receiving denosumab.

The prognostic value of survivin expression in patients with colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic role of survivin in colorectal carcinoma remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between survivin expression and survival outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for relevant studies published up to April 2013 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science. Only articles in which survivin was detected by immunohistochemical staining were included. This meta-analysis was done using STATA and Review Manager.

RESULTS

A total of 1784 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. Our results showed that survivin overexpression in patients with colorectal carcinoma was significantly associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.505; 95% confidence interval, 1.197-1.893; P = 0.000) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.323; 95% confidence interval, 1.687-3.199; P = 0.000). The results indicated that a significant relationship between survivin expression and overall survival was also exhibited in studies with an Asian country (hazard ratio, 1.684; 95% confidence interval, 1.477-1.921), patient number >100 (hazard ratio, 1.604; 95% confidence interval, 1.371-1.877), the cut-off level <50% (hazard ratio, 1.449; 95% confidence interval, 1.045-2.010), the percentage of survivin overexpression >50% (hazard ratio, 1.528; 95% confidence interval, 1.056-2.211) and the hazard ratio estimated (hazard ratio, 1.643; 95% confidence interval, 1.262-2.139). Moreover, upregulation of survivin was associated with stages (III/IV vs. I/II: odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.46), the depth of invasion (T3/T4 vs. T1/T2: odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval 0.67-4.74), lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative: odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.26), distant metastasis (positive vs. negative: odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-5.72) and grade of differentiation (well/moderate vs. poor: odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-2.41), but without significance.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicated that upregulation of survivin was associated with poor prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients receiving denosumab: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials

AIMS

The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of the overall incidence and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in cancer patients receiving denosumab.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials identified in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Abstracts presented at the conferences were also searched. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.

RESULTS

A total of 8963 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of ONJ in cancer patients receiving denosumab was 1.7 % [95 % CI: 0.9-3.1 %]. Also, the use of denosumab was associated with significantly increased risk of ONJ in comparison with bisphosphonates (BPs)/placebo treatment (RR 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.05-2.48, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis based on controlled therapies demonstrated an increased risk of ONJ in denosumab therapy, when compared with BPs (RR 1.48, 95 % CI: 0.96-2.29, P = 0.078) or placebo (RR 16.28, 95 % CI: 1.68-158.05, P = 0.017). Similar results were observed in prostate cancer (RR 3.358, 95 % CI: 1.573-7.166, P = 0.002) while there was a non-significantly increased risk of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DONJ) in non-prostate cancers (RR 1.142, 95 % CI: 0.678-1.921, P = 0.618).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of denosumab is associated with an increased risk of developing ONJ when compared with BP treatment or placebo, although the increased risk was not statistically significant between denosumab and BP treatment. Further studies are still needed to establish guidelines for the prevention and effective treatment of ONJ.

Paclitaxel-based versus docetaxel-based regimens in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel and paclitaxel show significant clinical activity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and have been approved for MBC by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but it is still unclear whether a paclitaxel-based regimen improves outcomes over a docetaxel-based regimen in patients with MBC. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the safety and efficacy of these two regimens in MBC.

METHODS

We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that comparing paclitaxel-based with docetaxel-based regimens in patients with MBC in PubMed (up to January 2012), Embase (1980 to January 2012), and the Cochrane databases (up to January 2012). Abstracts presented at conferences (up to January 2011) were also searched. Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

Seven eligible trials involving 1694 patients with MBC were selected. Our results showed that a paclitaxel-based regimen was comparable to a docetaxel-based regimen for MBC patients in terms of OS (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.60-1.27, p = 0.48), PFS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-1.00, p = 0.052), TTP (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.81-1.58, p = 0.46), and ORR (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.88-1.15, p = 0.92), but fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events including anemia (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.023), neutropenia (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93, p = 0.011), febrile neutropenia (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.96, p = 0.041), thrombopenia (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96, p = 0.033), mucositis (RR: 0.082, 95% CI: 0.025-0.27, p < 0.001), diarrhea (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.081-0.47, p < 0.001) and fatigue (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.96, p = 0.039) were observed in the paclitaxel-based regimen. However, limitations of our study needed to be considered when interpreting these results: our study was a meta-analysis of published data, and there was significant heterogeneity among included trials. Potential publication bias might also exist.

CONCLUSION

The present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that both taxane-based regimens have comparable efficacy for patients with MBC, and the paclitaxel-based regimen is associated with less toxicity and better tolerability, especially in older patients and when used in weekly regimens.

Risk of venous thromboembolic events associated with VEGFR-TKIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used in advanced cancers. Concerns have arisen regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism with the use of these drugs. Currently, the contribution of VEGFR-TKIs to venous thromboembolism is still unknown. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence and relative risk (RR) of venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) associated with these agents. Eligible studies included phase II and III prospective trials evaluating US Food and Drug Administration approved VEGFR-TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, sorafenib and vandetanib), and data on VTEs were available. Overall incidence rates, RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of included trials. A total of 14 studies (4,430 patients) were selected for this meta-analysis. The incidence of VTEs related to VEGFR-TKIs was 3% (95%CI: 1.7-5.1%), and there was no statistically significant increase in the risk of VTEs for VEGFR-TKIs versus controls in overall population (RR0.912, 95%CI: 0.617-1.348, p = 0.643). On subgroup analysis, no significant increase in the risk of VTEs was found among different VEGFR-TKIs or tumor types. No evidence of publication bias was observed. The use of VEGFR-TKIs does not significantly increase the risk of VTEs, the risk of VTEs in patients with cancer is driven predominantly by tumor types, host factors and concomitant usage of anticancer agents. These results would provide important information for clinicians who use VEGFR-TKIs to treat patients with solid cancer.

Incidence and risk of hypertension with pazopanib in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSES

To gain a better understanding of the overall incidence and risk of hypertension in cancer patients who receive pazopanib and to compare the differences in incidence among sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib.

METHODS

Several databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of patients with cancer assigned single drug pazopanib 800 mg/day with data on hypertension available. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.

RESULTS

A total of 1,651 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 13 clinical trials were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension in cancer patients were 35.9 % (95 % CI 31.5-40.6 %) and 6.5 % (95 % CI 5.2-8.0 %), respectively. The use of pazopanib was associated with an increased risk of developing all-grade (RR 4.97, 95 % CI 3.38-7.30, p < 0.001) and high-grade hypertension (RR 2.87, 95 % CI 1.16-7.12, p = 0.023). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-grade (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.96-1.53, p = 0.11) and high-grade hypertension (RR 1.29, 95 % CI 0.80-2.07, p = 0.30) between RCC and non-RCC patients. Interestingly, the risk of all-grade hypertension with pazopanib was substantially higher than sorafenib (RR 1.99; 95 % CI 1.73-2.29, p = 0.00) and sunitinib (RR 2.20; 95 % CI 1.92-2.52, p = 0.00), while the risk of pazopanib-induced high-grade hypertension was similar to sorafenib (RR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.75-1.30, p = 0.90) and sunitinib (RR 0.81; 95 % CI 0.62-1.06, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of pazopanib is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing hypertension. Close monitoring and appropriate managements are recommended during the therapy. Future studies are still needed to investigate the risk reduction and possible use of pazopanib in selected patients.

Overall survival benefits for irinotecan-containing regimens as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still debated, and the available data on the benefit of irinotecan-containing regimen as first-line treatment for those patients are controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the survival benefits of irinotecan-containing regimens in this setting. A total of 1,837 patients from ten trials were included in the analysis. Our results showed that irinotecan-containing regimens significantly improved overall survival [OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78-0.94, p = 0.002] and progression-free survival [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.97, p = 0.026); however, the improvement of time to failure (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.77-1.04, p = 0.15), 1-year survival rate [1-year SR: relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97-1.24, p = 0.13] and overall response rate (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.91-1.49, p = 0.24] were nonsignificant. Equivalent frequencies of toxicities were found between the two groups excluding more Grade 3 or 4 fatigue (p = 0.001) in irinotecan-containing regimens. This updated meta-analysis provided strong evidence for a survival benefit of irinotecan-containing regimen as first-line treatment for AGC. A clear advantage of irinotecan-containing over nonirinotecan-containing regimen had not been established. These results should help to inform decisions about patient management and design of future trials.

Effectiveness and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet versus pemetrexed alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

METHODS

We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed in patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate and grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Data were extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

Five randomized clinical trials (totally 1,186 patients) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95, P = 0.007) and overall response rate (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.58-3.62, P = 0.000) in pemetrexed-based doublet group, compared with pemetrexed alone, though the pooled HR for overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76-1.04; P = 0.129) showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, there were more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.77, P = 0.001), thrombocytopenia (OR 6.41, 95% CI 2.57-16.0, P = 0.000), and leucopenia (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.13-5.34, P = 0.024) in pemetrexed-based doublet group. With regard to the risk of grade 3 or 4 anemia (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.17-2.91, P = 0.629) and fatigue (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92-2.35, P = 0.104), there was no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed-based doublet therapy didn't gain any benefit in survival but significantly improved PFS and better ORR compared with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia were observed in pemetrexed-based doublet group.