Types of noncovalent bonds within complexes of thiazole with CF4 and SiF4

The five-membered heteroaromatic thiazole molecule contains a number of electron-rich regions that could attract an electrophile, namely the N and S lone pairs that lie in the molecular plane, and π-system areas above the plane. The possibility of each of these sites engaging in a tetrel bond (TB) with CF4 and SiF4, as well as geometries that encompass a CH⋯F H-bond, was explored via DFT calculations. There are a number of minima that occur in the pairing of thiazole with CF4 that are very close in energy, but these complexes are weakly bound by less than 2 kcal mol-1 and the presence of a true TB is questionable. The inclusion of zero-point vibrational energies alters the energetic ordering, which is further modified when entropic effects are added. The preferred geometry would thus be sensitive to the temperature of an experiment. Replacement of CF4 by SiF4 leaves intact most of the configurations, and their tight energetic clustering, the ordering of which is again altered as the temperature rises. But there is one exception in that by far the most tightly bound complex involves a strong Si⋯N TB between SiF4 and the lone pair of the thiazole N, with an interaction energy of 30 kcal mol-1. Even accounting for its high deformation energy and entropic considerations, this structure remains as clearly the most stable at any temperature.

Relation between Halogen Bond Strength and IR and NMR Spectroscopic Markers

The relationship between the strength of a halogen bond (XB) and various IR and NMR spectroscopic quantities is assessed through DFT calculations. Three different Lewis acids place a Br or I atom on a phenyl ring; each is paired with a collection of N and O bases of varying electron donor power. The weakest of the XBs display a C-X bond contraction coupled with a blue shift in the associated frequency, whereas the reverse trends occur for the stronger bonds. The best correlations with the XB interaction energy are observed with the NMR shielding of the C atom directly bonded to X and the coupling constants involving the C-X bond and the C-H/F bond that lies ortho to the X substituent, but these correlations are not accurate enough for the quantitative assessment of energy. These correlations tend to improve as the Lewis acid becomes more potent, which makes for a wider range of XB strengths.

Heavy pnicogen atoms as electron donors in sigma-hole bonds

DFT calculations evaluate the strength of σ-hole bonds formed by ZH3 and ZMe3 (Z = N, P, As, Sb) acting as electron donor. Bond types considered include H-bond, halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bond to perfluorinated Lewis acids FH, FBr, F2Se F3As, F4Ge, respectively, as well as their monofluorinated analogues. All of the Z atoms can engage in bonds of at least moderate strength, varying from 3 to more than 40 kcal mol-1. In most cases, N forms the strongest bonds, but the falloff from P to Sb is quite mild. However, this pattern is not characteristic of all cases, as for example in the halogen bonds, where the heavier Z atoms are comparable to, or even stronger than N. Most of the bonds are strengthened by replacing the three H atoms of ZH3 by methyl groups, better simulating the situation that would be generally encountered. Structural and NMR shielding data ought to facilitate the identification of these bonds within crystals or in solution.

Competition between Binding to Various Sites of Substituted Imidazoliums

The imidazolium cation has a number of different sites that can interact with a nucleophile. Adding a halogen atom (X) or a chalcogen (YH) group introduces the possibility of an NX···nuc halogen or NY···nuc chalcogen bond, which competes against the various H-bonds (NH and CH donors) as well as the lone pair···π interaction wherein the nucleophile lies above the plane of the cation. Substituted imidazoliums are paired with the NH₃ base, and the various different complexes are evaluated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The strength of XB and YB increases quickly along with the size and polarizability of the X/Y atom, and this sort of bond is the strongest for the heavier Br, I, Se, and Te atoms, followed by the NH···N H-bond, but this order reverses for Cl and S. The various CH···N H-bonds are comparable to one another and to the lone pair···π bond, all with interaction energies of 10-13 kcal/mol, values which show very little dependence upon the substituent placed on the imidazolium.

Comparison of the Ability of N-Bases to Engage in Noncovalent Bonds

The lone pair of the N atom is a common electron donor in noncovalent bonds.  Quantum calculations examine how various aspect of the base on which the N is located affect the strength and other properties of complexes formed with Lewis acids FH, FBr, F2Se, and F3As that respectively encompass hydrogen, halogen, chalcogen, and pnicogen bonds.  In most cases the halogen bond is the strongest, followed in order by chalcogen, hydrogen, and pnicogen.  The noncovalent bond strength increases in the sp < sp2 < sp3 order of hybridization of N.  Replacement of H substituents on the base by Me strengthens the bond, as also occurs if the atom to which the base N is attached is switched from N to C.  The strongest bonds occur for trimethylamine and the weakest for N2.