Prognostic role of soluble PD-1 and BTN2A1 in overweight melanoma patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab: finding the missing links in the symbiotic immune-metabolic interplay

Individual response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is currently unpredictable in patients with melanoma. Recent findings highlight a striking improvement in the clinical outcomes of overweight/obese patients treated with ICIs, which seems driven, at least in part, by programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-mediated T-cell dysfunction. A putative role of butyrophilins (BTNs) is under investigation as a novel mechanism of cancer immune evasion and obesity-associated inflammation. This study investigates the role of baseline plasma levels of soluble PD-1 (sPD-1), soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 (sPD-L1), BTN2A1 (sBTN2A1), BTN3A1 (sBTN3A1), along with body mass index (BMI), as predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in metastatic melanoma patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as first-line treatment. In all, 41 patients were included in the study. The baseline plasma level of sPD-1 was significantly lower, and the sBTN2A1 was significantly higher, in long-responder patients to nivolumab or pembrolizumab (median sPD-1: 10.3 ng/ml versus 16.6 ng/ml, p = 0.001; median sBTN2A1: 4.4 ng/ml versus 3.77 ng/ml, p = 0.004). Lower levels of sPD-1 and higher levels of sBTN2A1 were also significantly associated with better overall response rate. Notably, when we further stratified the study cohort using BMI along with sPD-1, patients with BMI ⩾ 25 and sPD-1 < 11.24 ng/ml had longer time to treatment failure after PD-1 inhibitor than other subgroups of patients (p < 0.001). Circulating sPD-1 and sBTN2A1 detection, along with BMI, could give more insights into the immune-metabolic interactions underlying the benefit observed in overweight/obese patients, improving the use of dynamic, noninvasive, biomarkers for patient selection.

Immunometabolic predictive factors in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients treated with avelumab

e21525

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer, associated with a worse prognosis. The link between MCC and immune suppression is well demonstrated. The population of patients with MCC is frequently elderly and frail, making it essential to determine whether the results of clinical trial can be replicated in a real-world setting. Despite the introduction of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided great benefit for some patients with advanced MCC (aMCC), it remains a subsets of patients who are refractory to ICIs or develop acquired resistance over time. Thus, there is a clinical need for predictive factors of ICI response. Methods: Twenty patients with aMCC treated with avelumab were included. The treatment was administered as I or II line. Clinical-pathological characteristics, Body Mass Index (BMI), and response to avelumab were analyzed from a MCC System database prospectively collected. An explorative analysis was performed, for available samples, to investigate: i) the plasma levels of soluble PD-1 (sPD-1), and PD-L1 (sPD-L1) collected at baseline, measured using homemade ELISA assays not yet commercially available, and designed according to investigator specifications; ii) IHC for PD-L1 in tumor samples; iii) the presence/absence/class (brisk vs no-brisk) of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in tumor samples. The primary outcome investigated was the Time to Treatment Failure (TTF). Results: From February 2019 to January 2022, twenty (20) patients were included in the study. The median age was 74 (range 56-83); 10 patients were men (50%) and 10 were women (50%). Seventeen (17) patients (85%) were treated with avelumab as I line, and 3 patients (15%) as II line. The overall response rate was 65% (70.6% in I line patients). One (1) patient (5%) had a complete response (CR), 13 patients (65%) partial response (RP), 4 patients (20%) stable disease (SD), and 2 patients (10%) had a progression disease (PD). Overall median TTF was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: -13.0-30.9). At the time of data analyses, a total of 9 events (progression or death) occurred (45%). Notably, a BMI ≥ 30 was significantly associated with longer TTF (p = 0.004) and objective response rate (p = 0.01). In the explorative biomarker analysis, preliminary data on 6 tumor and plasma samples, showed that plasma sPD-1 > 3.8 ng/ml, and the presence of PD-L1 and brisk TILs on tumor samples, were associated to longer TTF. Conclusions: These finding highlight the complex immune-metabolic interplay in the immunotherapy response. These data extends the previous finding on “obesity paradox” and the role of BMI as predictive factors of ICIs. The data on biomarker analysis warrants further prospective validation.

Safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine for the treatment of classic Kaposi’s sarcoma without visceral involvement

Background:

Classic Kaposi’s sarcoma (CKS) is a rare, multifocal, endothelial cell neoplasm that typically occurs in elderly people with previous infection by human herpes virus-8. Prospective trials are rare, and the choice of drugs relies on prospective trials performed on HIV-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS). Pegylated liposomal anthracyclines and taxanes are considered the standard first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively. Despite the indolent biologic behavior, the natural history is characterized by recurrent disease. This condition of chronic administration of cytotoxic drugs is often associated with immediate/long-term adverse events.

Methods:

This was an observational, retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine in patients with CKS. From January 2016 to September 2021, the patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, with cycles repeated every 21 days. The treatment was administered as first or second line.

Results:

Twenty-seven (27) patients were included in the study. Twenty-one (21) out 27 patients (77.8%) achieved a partial response (PR), including 8 patients with major response (MR) (29.6%) and 13 patients with minor response (mR) (48.2%); 2 (7.4%) showed a complete response (CR), 3 (11.1%) a stable disease (SD), and 1 (3.7%) a progressive disease (PD). Tumor responses were generally rapid, with a median time to first response of 4 weeks (range, 3–12 weeks). Patients who responded had disease improvement with flattening of the skin lesions, decrease in the number of lesions, and substantial reduction in tumor-associated complications. Median duration of response was 19.2 months. Common adverse events were grades 1/2 thrombocytopenia, and grade 1 noninfectious fever. No patient discontinued treatment as a result of adverse events.

Conclusion:

Our study showed that gemcitabine is effective and well tolerated, acts rapidly on cutaneous lesions, and allows substantial symptom palliation, without dose-limiting toxicity. Gemcitabine represents a safe and effective option for the treatment of CKS.

Can the tumor-agnostic evaluation of MSI/MMR status be the common denominator for the immunotherapy treatment of patients with several solid tumors?

Alterations in short-repetitive DNA sequences, known as microsatellite instability (MSI), can reflect deficiencies in Mismatch Repair (MMR) system which represents a major player in DNA integrity maintenance. The incidence of MSI-H/dMMR has been shown to be variable depending on the tumor type. Several studies confirmed that dMMR/MSI status, although less frequent than PD-L1 expression, may better predict response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with solid tumors. In October 2016, the FDA granted pembrolizumab as breakthrough therapy for the treatment of non-CRC, MSI-H/dMMR tumors, providing, for the first time, a tumor-agnostic indication. In the next future, the tissue-agnostic evaluation of MSI-H/dMMR could become the common denominator for the immunotherapy treatment of patients with different advanced solid tumors, in order to select patient subgroups which may benefit from this therapy. In this Review we provided an overview of the main clinical studies describing the association between MSI-H/dMMR tumors and immunotherapy response.

Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge

BACKGROUND

Hereditary breast cancer (BC), ovarian cancer (OC), and pancreatic cancer (PC) are the major BRCA-associated tumours. However, some BRCA1/2-wild-type (wt) patients with a strong personal and/or family history of cancer need a further genetic testing through a multi-gene panel containing other high- and moderate-risk susceptibility genes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study was aimed to assess if some BC, OC, or PC patients should be offered multi-gene panel testing, based on well-defined criteria concerning their personal and/or family history of cancer, such as earliness of cancer onset, occurrence of multiple tumours, or presence of at least two or more affected first-degree relatives. For this purpose, 205 out of 915 BC, OC, or PC patients, resulted negative for BRCA1/2 and with significant personal and/or family history of cancer, were genetically tested for germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in genes different from BRCA1/2.

RESULTS

Our investigation revealed that 31 (15.1%) out of 205 patients harboured germline PVs/LPVs in no-BRCA genes, including PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, MUTYH, MSH2, and RAD51C. Interestingly, in the absence of an analysis conducted through multi-gene panel, a considerable percentage (15.1%) of PVs/LPVs would have been lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing a multi-gene panel testing to BRCA1/2-wt BC/OC/PC patients with a strong personal and/or family history of cancer could significantly increase the detection rates of germline PVs/LPVs in other cancer predisposition genes beyond BRCA1/2. The use of a multi-gene panel testing could improve the inherited cancer risk estimation and clinical management of patients and unaffected family members.

Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast/Ovarian Cancer: Mysterious Signals From the Genome

About 10–20% of breast/ovarian (BC/OC) cancer patients undergoing germline BRCA1/2 genetic testing have been shown to harbor Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUSs). Since little is known about the prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 VUS in Southern Italy, our study aimed at describing the spectrum of these variants detected in BC/OC patients in order to improve the identification of potentially high-risk BRCA variants helpful in patient clinical management. Eight hundred and seventy-four BC or OC patients, enrolled from October 2016 to December 2020 at the “Sicilian Regional Center for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare and Heredo-Familial Tumors” of University Hospital Policlinico “P. Giaccone” of Palermo, were genetically tested for germline BRCA1/2 variants through Next-Generation Sequencing analysis. The mutational screening showed that 639 (73.1%) out of 874 patients were BRCA-w.t., whereas 67 (7.7%) were carriers of germline BRCA1/2 VUSs, and 168 (19.2%) harbored germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Our analysis revealed the presence of 59 different VUSs detected in 67 patients, 46 of which were affected by BC and 21 by OC. Twenty-one (35.6%) out of 59 variants were located on BRCA1 gene, whereas 38 (64.4%) on BRCA2. We detected six alterations in BRCA1 and two in BRCA2 with unclear interpretation of clinical significance. Familial anamnesis of a patient harboring the BRCA1-c.3367G>T suggests for this variant a potential of pathogenicity, therefore it should be carefully investigated. Understanding clinical significance of germline BRCA1/2 VUS could improve, in future, the identification of potentially high-risk variants useful for clinical management of BC or OC patients and family members.

Can the plasma PD-1 levels predict the presence and efficiency of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients?

e14035

Background: The immune response to melanoma has been shown to be locally affected by presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), generally divided into brisk (infiltrating the entire base of the invasive tumor), non-brisk (infiltrating only focally) and absent. Several studies showed that greater presence of TILs, especially brisk, in primary melanoma is associated with a better prognosis and a higher survival rate. Since recent studies revealed an association between PD-1/PD-L1 expression levels and tumor response, the aim of our study was to investigate the correlation between plasma PD-1 and presence/absence/class of TILs in metastatic melanoma patients. Methods: The plasma PD-1 levels were analyzed in 28 patients with metastatic melanoma using a specific ELISA assay. The characterization of TILs in tumor tissue was performed by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was assessed using t-Student and ANOVA tests. Survival curves were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to evaluate significant differences among them. Results: 16 out of 28 patients showed the presence of TILs in primary tumor, 10 of which brisk and 6 nonbrisk. The plasma PD-1 levels were analyzed in relation to the presence/absence of TILs (p = 0.022), brisk TILs versus nonbrisk/absent TILs (p = 0.014), and brisk vs nonbrisk vs absent TILs (p = 0.032). In particular, low plasma PD-1 levels have been shown to be associated with brisk TILs in primary melanoma, intermediate values with nonbrisk TILs, and high expression with absent TILs. Although the low number of samples did not allow us to obtain a statistically significant association between the plasma PD-1 expression levels and overall survival (OS) depending on the absence or presence of TILs (brisk/nonbrisk), however the median survival of patients having brisk TILs was five months higher than other 2 groups of patients with absent and nonbrisk TILs, respectively. Conclusions: This work highlights, for the first time, the potential ability of using the plasma PD-1 levels to predict prognosis also in patients with metastatic melanoma at diagnosis for which it is not possible to identify the primary tumor.