Is There a Sex Gap in Outcomes of Comparable Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices?

OBJECTIVES

Historically, females were described as suffering from worse outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, females' preoperative conditions are unique, making direct comparisons with males challenging. This study aimed to select through propensity score (PS) matching two preoperatively comparable populations of females and males and test if any real sex-related difference exists regarding survival and adverse events after LVAD implantation.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center observational study investigated patients who received LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2018. PS matching was applied to balance preoperative heterogeneity between males and females. Primary endpoint was survival at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes and LVAD-related adverse events.

RESULTS

92 fully comparable females(n=46) and males(n=46) were selected after PS matching (median age:57 years, min-max:18-75). 26.1% of patients required preoperative mechanical circulatory support. Females needed more intraoperative fresh frozen plasma (p<0.001) and platelets transfusions (p=0.008) compared to males, but postoperative outcomes were comparable between groups. In-hospital, 1-year and 2-year survival were 78.3%, 69.6% and 65.2%, respectively, with no differences between groups. Survival probability remained comparable up to 8 years of follow-up(p=0.35). Overall, females showed a higher rate of strokes(p=0.039) compared to males in the follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

After reducing preoperative heterogeneity between females and males, survival after LVAD implantation does not differ based on sex. However, differences might exist in terms of higher transfusions and strokes in females. Reducing preoperative sex disparities and developing intraoperative and anticoagulation strategies which acknowledge sex-related variations might help abolishing differences in LVAD outcomes.

Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation

Background

Worse outcomes in women compared to men undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remain an underestimated problem in heart failure (HF) patients. With device miniaturization, less-invasive LVAD implantation techniques have gained relevance, but their impact on outcomes in women is unknown. This study investigates sex-related differences in patients undergoing LVAD implantation through less-invasive procedures.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent isolated LVAD implantation between 2011 and 2018 through less-invasive techniques. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance preoperative heterogeneity. Primary endpoint was two-year survival, and secondary endpoints included long-term survival, surgical outcomes and postoperative adverse events.

Results

Baseline analysis of 191 patients (females 18.3%) showed differences in terms of age [female (median, 52; IQR, 47-61); male (median, 58.5; IQR, 49-66); P=0.005], underlying diagnosis (P<0.001), INTERMACS profile (P=0.009), history of previous cardiac surgery (P=0.049) and preoperative creatinine values [female (median, 110; IQR, 71-146); male (median, 126; IQR, 9-168); P=0.049]. Over a follow-up of 460.68 patient-years, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed better survival in females (P=0.027) and a similar probability of cardiac transplantation (P=0.288). After PSM, females showed higher needs for intraoperative fresh frozen plasma (P=0.044) and platelets (P=0.001) but comparable postoperative outcomes. No sex-related differences were noticed regarding two-year outcomes, long-term survival and adverse events. LVAD-related infections remained the most common complication with males experiencing more pump infections than women (P=0.050).

Conclusions

Patients receiving less-invasive LVAD implantation do not show significant sex-related differences in short and long-term outcomes and survival. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the role of less-invasive techniques in reducing sex-based disparities after LVAD implantation.

18F-FDG PET/CT in Left-Ventricular Assist Device Infection: Initial Results Supporting the Usefulness of Image-Guided Therapy

Accurate definition of the extent and severity of left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) infection may facilitate therapeutic decision making and targeted surgical intervention. Here, we explore the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for guidance of patient management. Methods: Fifty-seven LVAD-carrying patients received 85 whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans for the work-up of device infection. Clinical follow-up was obtained for up to 2 y. Results: PET/CT showed various patterns of infectious involvement of the 4 LVAD components: driveline entry point (77% of patients), subcutaneous driveline path (87%), pump pocket (49%), and outflow tract (58%). Driveline smears revealed Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas strains as the underlying pathogen in most cases (48 and 34%, respectively). At receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, an ¹⁸F-FDG SUV of more than 2.5 was most accurate to identify smear-positive driveline infection. Infection of 3 or all 4 LVAD components showed a trend toward lower survival than did infection of 2 or fewer components (P = 0.089), whereas involvement of thoracic lymph nodes was significantly associated with an adverse outcome (P = 0.001 for nodal SUV above vs. below median). Finally, patients who underwent early surgical revision within 3 mo after PET/CT (n = 21) required significantly less inpatient hospital care during follow-up than did those receiving delayed surgical revision (n = 11; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT identifies the extent of LVAD infection and predicts adverse outcome. Initial experience suggests that early image-guided surgical intervention may facilitate a less complicated subsequent course.