1
|
Puente J, Algaba Arrea F, Buisán Rueda Ó, Castellano Gauna D, Durán I, Fernández Ávila JJ, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Parada Blázquez MJ, Pérez Fentes D, Sancho Pardo G, Vallejo Casas JA, Gratal P, Pardo MT, Guillem Porta V. Criteria and indicators to evaluate quality of care in genitourinary tumour boards. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03381-z. [PMID: 38341809 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03381-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genitourinary (GU) multidisciplinary tumour boards (GUMTBs) are key components of patient care, as they might lead to changes in treatment plan, improved survival, and increased adherence to guidelines. However, there are no guidelines on how GUMTBs should operate or how to assess their quality of performance. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify criteria and indicators to evaluate quality in GUMTBs. A scientific committee-comprising 12 GU cancer specialists from seven disciplines-proposed a list of criteria and developed indicators, evaluated in two rounds of Delphi method. Appropriateness and utility of indicators were scored using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds of Delphi respondents selecting a score sub-category that encompassed the median score of the group. RESULTS Forty-five criteria were selected to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs covering five dimensions: organisation, personnel, protocol and documentation, resources, and interaction with patients. Then, 33 indicators were developed and evaluated in the first round of Delphi, leading to a selection of 26 indicators in two dimensions: function, governance and resources, and GUMTB sessions. In the second round, consensus was reached on the appropriateness of all 26 indicators and on the utility of 24 of them. Index cards for criteria and indicators were developed to be used in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS Criteria and indicators were developed to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs, aiming to serve as a guide to improve quality of care and health outcomes in patients with GU cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Puente
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
- Fundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad de La Oncología), Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Óscar Buisán Rueda
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Castellano Gauna
- Fundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad de La Oncología), Madrid, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Durán
- Fundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad de La Oncología), Madrid, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Juan José Fernández Ávila
- Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biobizkaia, Vizcaya, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Pérez Fentes
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Gemma Sancho Pardo
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paula Gratal
- Fundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad de La Oncología), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Guillem Porta
- Fundación ECO (Excelencia y Calidad de La Oncología), Madrid, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Vithas 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duque-Santana V, Diaz-Gavela A, Recio M, Guerrero LL, Peña M, Sanchez S, López-Campos F, Thuissard IJ, Andreu C, Sanz-Rosa D, Achard V, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Molina Y, Del Cerro Peñalver E, Couñago F. Jorge clinical study: 10-year outcomes of risk-adapted radiotherapy defined by multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer. World J Urol 2023; 41:3829-3838. [PMID: 37966505 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04682-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with localized prostate adenocarcinoma treated with radiotherapy (RT) ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), according to the risk groups based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) instead of digital rectal exam (DRE). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 140 consecutive patients diagnosed with localized prostate adenocarcinoma, stratified into different risk groups-low (LR), intermediate (IR), and high (HR) by mpMRI results. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 104 months, in LR group (n = 15), 10-year BRFS was 86.7%, 10-year LRFS was 86.7%, 10-year MFS was 93.3%, and 10-year OS was 100%. In IR group (n = 80), 10-year BRFS was 80.5%, 10-year LRFS was 86.1%, 10-year MFS was 92.6%, and 10-year OS was 76%. In HR group (n = 45), 10-year BRFS was 72.8%, 10-year LRFS was 78.7%, 10-year MFS was 82.1%, and 10-year OS was 77% (2 deaths from prostate cancer). According to mpMRI results, 36 (25.7%) patients change the risk group and 125 (89.28%) patients change the TNM stage. There was a trend for higher metastatic relapse in patients who switched from IR to HR (due to mpMRI) versus the patients who remained in the IR (20%, vs. 1.81% p = 0.059). Multivariate analysis showed that locoregional relapse was strongly associated with distant relapse (OR = 9.28; 95%CI: 2.60-33.31). There were no cases of acute grade 3 toxicity. Late grade 3 genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual toxicity were 2.8%, 0.7%, and 1.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION This is the first study with a 10-year median follow-up of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy according to the risk groups established by mpMRI. Our findings show that mpMRI is a key tool to diagnose and establish risk groups in these patients, to optimize their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Duque-Santana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid y Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Diaz-Gavela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid y Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Recio
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Leonardo Guerrero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid y Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Peña
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid y Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofia Sanchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid y Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando López-Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Israel J Thuissard
- Department of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Andreu
- Department of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Sanz-Rosa
- Department of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Yolanda Molina
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elia Del Cerro Peñalver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid y Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital San Francisco de Asís y La Milagrosa, Clinical Director, National Chair of Research and Clinical Trials, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borque-Fernando A, Calleja-Hernández MA, Cózar-Olmo JM, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Pérez-Fentes DA, Puente-Vázquez J, Rodrigo-Aliaga M, Unda M, Álvarez-Ossorio JL. Abiraterone in low-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Authors' reply. Actas Urol Esp 2023:S2173-5786(23)00058-6. [PMID: 37301369 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Borque-Fernando
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, IIS-Aragón, Aragón, Spain.
| | | | - J M Cózar-Olmo
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Insitute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - D A Pérez-Fentes
- Servicio de Urología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J Puente-Vázquez
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Rodrigo-Aliaga
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - M Unda
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - J L Álvarez-Ossorio
- Servicio de Urología Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Asociación Española de Urología, Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borque-Fernando A, Calleja-Hernández MA, Cózar-Olmo JM, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Pérez-Fentes DA, Puente-Vázquez J, Rodrigo-Aliaga M, Unda M, Álvarez-Ossorio JL. A multidisciplinary consensus statement on the optimal pharmacological treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Actas Urol Esp 2023; 47:111-126. [PMID: 36720305 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The addition of docetaxel or new hormone therapies (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide) improves overall survival and is currently the standard of care. However, the decision on the specific regimen to accompany ADT should be discussed with the patient, considering factors such as possible associated toxicities, duration of treatment, comorbidities, patient preferences, as there is no sufficient evidence to recommend one regimen over the other in most cases. This paper summarizes the evidence on the management of mHSPC and provides consensus recommendations on the optimal treatment in combination with ADT in mHSPC patients, with special attention to the patient's clinical profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Borque-Fernando
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain, IIS-Aragón, Spain.
| | | | - J M Cózar-Olmo
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Insitute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - D A Pérez-Fentes
- Servicio de Urología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J Puente-Vázquez
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Rodrigo-Aliaga
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón. Spain
| | - M Unda
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - J L Álvarez-Ossorio
- Servicio de Urología Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar., Presidente de la Asociación Española de Urología, Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lara PC, Rodríguez-Melcón JI, Palacios-Eito A, Lozano A, Hervás-Morón A, Villafranca E, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Sancho G, Maldonado X. Phase II Study of ENZAlutamide Combined With Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (ENZART) for Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:891886. [PMID: 35912190 PMCID: PMC9329530 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.891886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is usually treated by a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and a short course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT is associated with multiple side effects, including weight gain, loss of libido, and hot flashes. In contrast, anti-androgen monotherapy is generally better tolerated in spite of higher rates of gynecomastia.ObjectiveThis study assessed the effectiveness of enzalutamide monotherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT (Hypo-EBRT) for treating intermediate risk prostate cancer.MethodThis trial was a multicenter, open-label phase II study of 6 months of enzalutamide monotherapy combined with Hypo-EBRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Hypo-EBRT was initiated 8–12 weeks after initiating enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was PSA decline >80% measured at the 25th week of enzalutamide administration. Secondary end-points included assessment of toxicity, changes in anthropomorphic body measurements, sexual hormones, and metabolic changes.ResultsSixty-two patients were included in the study from January 2018 to February 2020. A PSA decline of >80% was observed in all evaluable patients at the end of enzalutamide treatment and 92% achieved PSA values under 0.1 ngr/ml. All patients remain in PSA response (<80% reduction of the initial values) 6 months after the end of enzalutamide treatment. The most frequent adverse events were hypertension, asthenia, and gynecomastia. There were no significant changes in bone density, body mass index (BMI), or patient-reported outcomes (PROs).ConclusionEnzalutamide monotherapy is very effective along with hEBRT in reducing PSA levels for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the potential use of this combination in future randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital, Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, Las Palmas, Spain
- *Correspondence: Pedro C. Lara,
| | | | - Amalia Palacios-Eito
- Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Antonio Lozano
- Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Arriexaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Gemma Sancho
- Radiation Oncology, San Creu I San Pau University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Maldonado
- Radiation Oncology, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cacicedo J, Casquero F, Navarro A, Martinez-Indart L, del Hoyo O, Frías A, de Zarate RO, Büchser D, Gómez-Iturriaga A, San Miguel I, Suarez F, Barcena A, López-Guerra JL. Prospective multicentre analysis of the therapeutic approach and prognostic factors determining overall survival in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated with curative intent. BJR Open 2022; 4:20210058. [PMID: 36105426 PMCID: PMC9459856 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyse patterns of treatment with curative intent commonly used in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and predictive factors of overall survival in routine clinical practice. Methods This multicentre prospective study included consecutive patients aged ≥65 years old diagnosed with NSCLC between February 2014 and January 2018. Inclusion criteria: age ≥65 years, stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC. Treatment decisions were taken by a multidisciplinary committee. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to identify which clinical/treatment-associated variables, or pre-treatment quality of life (QOL) considering EORTC QLQ-C30 (and LC13 module) were predictive of overall survival. Results A total of 139 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 9.9 months (1.18-57.36 months) with a median survival of 14 months (range 11-17 months). In the group>75-year-old patients, the committee recommended chemotherapy and sequential radiotherapy (55.6%) or radiotherapy alone (22.2%), rather than surgery (3.7%) or concomitant radiochemotherapy (16.5%). However, in 65- to 75-year-old patients, surgery and concomitant radiochemotherapy were recommended in half of cases (p=0.003). Regarding multivariate analysis, the risk of death was higher in patients with pre-existing heart disease (p=0.002), low score for physical functioning (p=0.0001), symptoms of dysphagia (p=0,01), chest pain (p=0.001), and those not undergoing surgical treatment (p=0.024). Conclusions Patients >75 years received more conservative treatments. Surgery improved survival and should be carefully considered, regardless of patient age. Comorbidities and poor baseline QOL are predictive of shorter survival. Advances in knowledge Measuring these parameters before treatment may help us to define a population of frail patients with a poorer prognosis to facilitate decision making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francisco Casquero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Catalan de Oncología, Avinguda de la Gran vía de l'Hospitalet, 199-203, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorea Martinez-Indart
- Department of Bioinformatics and Statistics, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Olga del Hoyo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Andere Frías
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Roberto Ortiz de Zarate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - David Büchser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | | | - Iñigo San Miguel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Fernan Suarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Adrian Barcena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Jose Luis López-Guerra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Virgen Del Rocío, Av Manuel Siurot, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lopez Campos F, Lorente D, Llacer C, érez P, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Henriquez-López I, Peleteiro P, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Navarro-Castellón J, Lozano R, Romero N, Gajate P, Ana C, Gómez J, Álvarez S, Molina-Cerrillo J, Pelari L, Hernández-Corrales A, Morillo V, García R, Ferrer-Albiach C, Castro E, Olmos D. PD-0908 PSA Progression and survival in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07187-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
8
|
Cañón V, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Casquero F, Rades D, Navarro A, del Hoyo O, Morillo V, Willisch P, López-Guerra J, Illescas-Vacas A, Ciervide R, Martinez-Indart L, Cacicedo J. PD-0885 Quality of Life improvement in patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07164-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Lopez Campos F, Lorente D, Llacer-Pérez C, Henríquez I, Peleteiro P, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Álvarez S, Alonso-Gordoa T, Molina-Cerrillo J, Vallejo C, Hervás A, Navarro-Castellón J, Gómez J, Morillo V, Lozano R, Romero-Laorden N, García R, Hernández-Corrales A, Pelari L, Ferrer-Albiach C, Sancho S, Castro E, Olmos D. PD-0913 Local treatment to the primary tumor and PSA changes as prognostic factors in mCRPC. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07192-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
10
|
Segundo CGS, Couñago F, Gómez-Iturriaga A. Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients: Time to move on. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:351-356. [PMID: 34049780 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In the management of prostate cancer , few treatments have caused as much controversy as adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after radical prostatectomy in high-risk patients In the present article, we assess the exclusion and inclusion criteria of the 6 randomised trials and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival and overall survival rates in order to identify the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from ART. We also evaluate treatment-related toxicity and the indications for androgen deprivation therapy . The main aim of this analysis was to determine whether the available evidence, which previously appeared to support ART, now favours early salvage radiotherapy. If so, perhaps we can finally resolve the controversy surrounding the optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid (UEM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Henriquez I, Spratt D, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Abuchaibe O, Couñago F. Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Novel agents to treat a lethal disease. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:6-12. [PMID: 33552935 PMCID: PMC7829629 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i1.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) - defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 2 ng/mL, testosterone castration levels < 1.7 nm/L, and the absence of metastatic lesions on conventional imaging (computed tomography or bone scan) - has been defined as a lethal disease by the Prostate Cancer Work Group. One-third of patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen deprivation therapy for biochemical recurrence after local treatment will develop CRPC, with death occurring an average of 2.5 years after diagnosis of castration resistance. Most patients diagnosed with nmCRPC are asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic at diagnosis due to local treatment. In patients with short PSA doubling times (< 10 mo) and high baseline PSA levels, there is a high risk of bone metastases followed by prostate cancer-related mortality. These patients also present significant morbidity that negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Recently, the results of three randomized trials (PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS) were published. Those trials evaluated the efficacy of three different androgen receptor inhibitors - enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide - in patients with nmCRPC. In all three trials, the study drugs improved both metastasis-free survival and overall survival compared to placebo, plus on-going androgen deprivation therapy without a negative impact on QoL. In patients with nmCRPC, the most important clinical objective is early detection and treatment to maintain a low tumor burden and to prolong the symptom-free interval. For patients with nmCRPC, these novel drugs offer new hope for better QoL and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Henriquez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan, Instituto Investigación Pere i Virgili, Reus 43204, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Daniel Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, Michigan, MI 48109, United States
| | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo 48903, Bizcaia, Spain
| | - Oscar Abuchaibe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgilio Galvis Ramirez Cancer Centre, Bucaramanga s/n, Santander, Colombia
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Hospital La Luz, Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine, Universidad Europea, Madrid 28223, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cacicedo J, Ciria JP, Morillo V, Martinez-Indart L, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Del Hoyo O, Büchser D, Frias A, San Miguel I, Suarez F, Casquero F. Pain response and quality of life assessment in patients with moderate/severe neuropathic pain due to bone metastasis undergoing treatment with palliative radiotherapy and tapentadol: A prospective multicentre pilot study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:859-865. [PMID: 32729219 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess pain response rate (RR) and quality of life (QoL), in patients with moderate/severe neuropathic pain (NP) due to bone metastasis (BM) undergoing palliative 3D radiotherapy plus tapentadol. METHODS We conducted a prospective multicentre pilot study. Patients were assessed before radiotherapy using the validated questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions). Response to radiotherapy (8 Gy-30 Gy/1-10fr) at one and two months was assessed according the International Bone Metastases Consensus criteria. INCLUSION CRITERIA radiological evidence of BM, NP according to DN4 (cut-off score ≥ 4), no spinal cord compression, worst pain score ≥ 5/10. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test compared changes in QoL among response groups. RESULTS Seventeen patients (13 men, 4 woman), median age 67 years (42-81), were included. Pre-treatment median pain severity was 7.5 (5-10). Median dose of tapentadol administered before radiotherapy was 100 mg/24 h (100-300 mg). Overall RR 1 month after radiotherapy was 10/16 = 62.5%: 3/16 (18.8%) achieving a complete response (CR) and 7/16 (43.8%) a partial response (PR). Overall RR 2 months after RT was 5/10 (50%): 10% a CR and 40% a PR. ITT RR for this study at 1 and 2 months was 10/17 = 59% and 5/17 = 29%, respectively. Patients responding to radiotherapy had significant improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning (EF) (p = 0.025) and fatigue symptom scale scores (p = 0.035) one month after radiotherapy. Painful site symptom QLQ-BM22 scores improved 2 months after radiotherapy (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS Palliative radiotherapy plus tapentadol shows an acceptable pain response and QoL improvement especially regarding EF, fatigue and painful site symptom scales in patients with moderate/severe NP due to BM. Therefore, it could be an alternative to manage NP in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Cacicedo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Insitute/Department of Surgery, Radiology and Physical Medicine, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Juan Pablo Ciria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Virginia Morillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital de Castellón, Castelló, Spain
| | - Lorea Martinez-Indart
- Bioinformatics and Statistics Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Heatlh Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Insitute/Department of Surgery, Radiology and Physical Medicine, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Olga Del Hoyo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain
| | - David Büchser
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain
| | - Andere Frias
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain
| | - Iñigo San Miguel
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain
| | - Fernan Suarez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain
| | - Francisco Casquero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Vizcaya (Basque Country), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Couñago F, López-Campos F, Díaz-Gavela AA, Almagro E, Fenández-Pascual E, Henríquez I, Lozano R, Linares Espinós E, Gómez-Iturriaga A, de Velasco G, Quintana Franco LM, Rodríguez-Melcón I, López-Torrecilla J, Spratt DE, Guerrero LL, Martínez-Salamanca JI, del Cerro E. Clinical Applications of Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1550. [PMID: 32545454 PMCID: PMC7352850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is clinically relevant molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer (PCa), but this biological diversity has had only a minimal impact on clinical practice. Treatment outcomes in patients with localised PCa are often highly variable, even among patients stratified to the same risk group or disease state based on standard clinical and pathological parameters. In recent years, the development of gene panels has provided valuable data on the differential expression of genes in patients with PCa. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to identify and validate prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be applied across clinical scenarios, ranging from localised disease to metastatic castration-resistant PCa. The availability of such tools would allow for precision medicine to finally reach PCa patients. In this review, we evaluate current data on molecular biomarkers for PCa, with an emphasis on the biomarkers and gene panels with the most robust evidence to support their application in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Couñago
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Almagro
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esaú Fenández-Pascual
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.F.-P.); (E.L.E.)
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Iván Henríquez
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain;
| | - Rebeca Lozano
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Genitourinary Cancer Traslational Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research, 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Estefanía Linares Espinós
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.F.-P.); (E.L.E.)
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | | | | | | | - Ignacio Rodríguez-Melcón
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;
| | - José López-Torrecilla
- Radiation Oncology-ERESA, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Luis Leonardo Guerrero
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca
- Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.F.-P.); (E.L.E.)
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Madrid, Spain
| | - Elia del Cerro
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (A.A.D.-G.); (L.L.G.); (E.d.C.)
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Department, Faculty of Biomedicine. Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
González-San Segundo C, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Couñago F. Are all prostate cancer patients "fit" for salvage radiotherapy? World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:1-10. [PMID: 31976305 PMCID: PMC6935690 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The indication for salvage radiotherapy (RT) (SRT) in patients with biochemically-recurrent prostate cancer after surgery is based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at the time of biochemical recurrence. Although there are clear criteria (pT3-pT4 disease and/or positive margins) for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, no specific clinical or tumour-related criteria have yet been defined for SRT. In retrospective series, 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (PFS) ranges from 35%-85%, depending on the PSA level at the start of RT. Two phase 3 trials have compared SRT with and without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), finding that combined treatment (SRT+ADT) improves both PFS and overall survival. Similar to adjuvant RT, the indication for ADT is based on tumour-related factors such as PSA levels, tumour stage, and surgical margins. The number of patients referred to radiation oncology departments for SRT continues to rise. In the present article, we define the clinical, therapeutic, and tumour-related factors that we believe should be evaluated before prescribing SRT. In addition, we propose a decision algorithm to determine whether the patient is fit for SRT. This algorithm will help to identify patients in whom radiotherapy is likely to improve survival without significantly worsening quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid 28003, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
López Campos F, Moreno I, Conde-Moreno A, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Ruiz Vico M, Romero Laorden N, Henríquez López I, Peleteiro Higuero P, Lozano Mejorada R, Piquer T, Couselo M, Gómez Ramos J, Navarro J, Barrionuevo Castillo P, García R, Villatoro R, Montesa A, Saez M, Herrera B, Castro Marcos E. Prognostic associations of early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy284.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Couñago F, Artigas C, Sancho G, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Maldonado A, Caballero B, López-Campos F, Recio M, Del Cerro E, Henríquez I. Importance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in hospital practice. View of the radiation oncologist. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018; 37:302-314. [PMID: 30139594 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a treatment with curative intent, both in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and in patients presenting with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Moreover, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy as a metastasis directed therapy in patients with oligometastatic PCa has significantly increased in the recent years. Conventional imaging techniques, including transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), morphologic magnetic resonance and bone scintigraphy have traditionally played a minor role in all those clinical scenarios due to its low diagnostic accuracy. The recent development of the positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer 68Ga-PSMA binding to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in PCa cells, has shown promising results. Detection rates for PCa lesions are higher than CT and higher than the best technique available, the PET/CT with choline. Its superiority has been demonstrated even at very low PSA levels (<1 ng/ml). This increase in diagnostic accuracy represents a potential impact on patient management, especially in radiotherapy. Even if this imaging technique is already available for routine clinical practice in some European countries, in Spain, unfortunately, there is very limited access. In this review, we analyze the main studies that investigate the usefulness of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with PCa and its potential impact on radiotherapy treatments. In addition, we compared the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, with the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and the PET/CT with choline, in the different clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Couñago
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | - C Artigas
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear y Terapias Metabólicas, Jules Bordet Institute, Bruselas, Bélgica
| | - G Sancho
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, España
| | - A Gómez-Caamaño
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, España
| | - A Maldonado
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, España
| | - B Caballero
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, España
| | - F López-Campos
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
| | - M Recio
- Departamento de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, España
| | - E Del Cerro
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - I Henríquez
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Sant Joan, Institute d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Reus, España
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Couñago F, Sancho G, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Henríquez I. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer: a national survey of patterns of practice among radiation oncologists in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1484-1491. [PMID: 29992463 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1919-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate patterns of practice among Spanish radiation oncologists in the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). We evaluated (1) access to mpMRI, (2) current clinical practices, and (3) physician expectations of mpMRI. METHODS Cross-sectional survey of 118 radiation oncologists at 75 Radiation Oncology (RO) departments in Spain. RESULTS A total of 55 radiation oncologists from 52 RO departments (52/75; 69%) completed the survey. Prostate mpMRI is performed at 94.5% of the centres that provided data. The most common indications for mpMRI in routine clinical practice were: (1) detection/localization of the tumour prior to second biopsy (82.7%), (2) cancer staging (80.8%), and (3) detection of recurrence after definitive treatment (80.8%). Most respondents (72.7%) reported modifying the primary radiotherapy treatment when mpMRI findings indicate a more advanced T stage with a resultant change in the risk group. Most respondents (90.5%) treat macroscopic local recurrence after prostatectomy with high doses, ranging from 71 to 83 Gy; in 37.7% of cases, the full dose is delivered to the entire prostate bed. In pelvic nodal recurrence, more than half (59.3%) of the respondents reported performing elective pelvic radiotherapy, including the prostate bed, with a boost to the involved nodes. CONCLUSIONS This survey shows that prostate mpMRI is routinely used by radiation oncologists in Spain in a wide range of clinical scenarios. The findings reported here underscore the need to standardize treatment protocols for definitive and salvage radiotherapy in patients evaluated with mpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Calle Diego de Velázquez, 2, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223, Madrid, Spain.
| | - G Sancho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - I Henríquez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Sant Joan, Institute d'Investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), Reus, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cacicedo J, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Navarro A, Morillo V, Willisch P, Lopez-Guerra JL, Illescas A, Casquero F, Del Hoyo O, Ciervide R, Martinez-Indart L, Bilbao P, Rades D. Analysis of predictors of pain response in patients with bone metastasis undergoing palliative radiotherapy: Does age matter? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 62:578-584. [PMID: 29797486 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate whether age is a predictor of pain response after radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis (BM). METHODS Between June 2010 and June 2014, 204 patients with BM undergoing palliative radiotherapy participated in a multicentre prospective study. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) to rate the intensity pain (from 0 to 10) at baseline and 4 weeks after radiotherapy. To determine which variables predicted pain response and particularly whether age is a predictor, logistic regression analysis was used. Baseline variables considered were: age (≤65/66-75/>75 years), sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1/≥2), pretreatment pain score (≤4/5-7/≥8), radiotherapy (single/multiple fraction), primary tumour location, visceral metastases (yes/no), concomitant systemic chemotherapy and bisphosphonate use (yes/no). RESULTS Pain response was assessed in the 128 patients who completed BPI pretreatment and at 4 weeks after radiotherapy. According to univariate analysis, pain response was better in over 75-year-olds than younger patients: (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1; P = 0.031). Response was better in patients receiving multiple fractions rather than a single fraction of 8 Gy (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1; P = 0.01), and in patients with a pretreatment pain score ≥8 vs ≤7 (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.0; P = 0.017). No other variables were significant. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment schedule (OR, 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-7.9; P = 0.004) and pre-radiotherapy pain score (OR, 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-6.3; P = 0.009) were the only independent predictors of pain response. CONCLUSION All patients with painful bone metastasis should be referred for palliative radiotherapy to relieve the pain regardless of age. Therefore, an older age should not be a reason to withhold palliative radiation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Cacicedo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Morillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital de Castellón, Castelló, Spain
| | | | | | - Ana Illescas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Francisco Casquero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Olga Del Hoyo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciervide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital San Chinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorea Martinez-Indart
- Bioinformatics and Statistics Department, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Heatlh Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Pedro Bilbao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hervás A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Casaña M, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Pastor J, Jove J, Mengual JL, Gónzalez-San Segundo C, Muñoz J. Adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer: multi-institutional retrospective analysis of the Spanish RECAP database. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 20:193-200. [PMID: 28667448 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1709-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The primary aim was to comparatively assess 2- and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS). A secondary aim was to identify predictors of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were acquired from the RECAP database, a population-based prostate cancer registry in Spain. Inclusion criteria included RP (with or without lymphadenectomy) followed by ART or SRT. A total of 702 patients were analyzed. Pre-RT PSA values (>0.5 vs. ≤0.5 ng/ml), pathological stage (T1-2 vs. T3-4), post-surgical Gleason score (≤7 vs. 8-10), margin status (positive vs. negative), hormonal treatment (yes vs. no), and RT dose (≤66 Gy vs. >66 Gy) were evaluated to assess their impact on BRFS. RESULTS The mean patient age in the ART and SRT groups, respectively, was 64 years (range 42-82) and 64.8 years (range 42-82). Median follow-up after RT in the whole sample was 34 months (range 3-141). A total of 702 patients were included: 223 (31.8%) received ART and 479 (68.2%) SRT. BRFS rates (95% CI) in the ART and SRT groups at months 24 and 60 were, respectively: 98.1% (95.9-100.0%) vs. 91.2% (88.2-94.2%) and 84.5% (76.4-92.6%) vs. 74.0% (67.4-80.7%) (p = 0.004). No significant differences in OS were observed (p = 0.053). The following variables were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence in the SRT group: (1) positive surgical margin status (p = 0.049); (2) no hormonotherapy (p = 0.03); (3) total prostate dose ≤66 Gy (p = 0.004); and pre-RT PSA ≥0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS This is the first nationwide study in Spain to evaluate a large cohort of PCa patients treated with RP followed by postoperative RT. ART yielded better 2- and 5-year BRFS rates, although OS was equivalent. These findings are consistent with most other published studies and support ART in patients with adverse prognostic characteristics after radical prostatectomy. Prospective trials are needed to compare immediate ART to early SRT to better determine their relative benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hervás
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Ramón Y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
| | - A Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - M Casaña
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - J Pastor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Jove
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J L Mengual
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - J Muñoz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cacicedo J, Perez JF, Ortiz de Zarate R, del Hoyo O, Casquero F, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Lasso A, Boveda E, Bilbao P. A prospective analysis of inter- and intrafractional errors to calculate CTV to PTV margins in head and neck patients. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 17:113-20. [PMID: 25037850 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1200-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2014] [Accepted: 06/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate an institute-specific CTV-PTV margin for head and neck (HN) patients according to a 3-mm action level protocol. METHODS/PATIENTS Twenty-three HN patients were prospectively analysed. Patients were immobilized with a thermoplastic mask. Inter- and intrafractional set-up errors (in the three dimensions) were assessed from portal images (PI) registration. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were compared with two orthogonal PI by matching bone anatomy landmarks. The isocenter was verified during the first five consecutive days of treatment: if the mean error detected was greater than 2 mm the isocenter position was corrected for the rest of the treatment. Isocenter was checked weekly thereafter. Set-up images were obtained before and after treatment administration on 10, 20 and 30 fractions to quantify the intrafractional displacement. For the set-up errors, systematic (Σ), random (σ), overall standard deviations, and the overall mean displacement (M), were determined. CTV to PTV margin was calculated considering both inter- and intrafractional errors. RESULTS A total of 396 portal images was analysed in 23 patients. Systematic interfractional (Σ(inter)) set-up errors ranged between 0.77 and 1.42 mm in the three directions, whereas the random (σ (inter)) errors were around 1-1.31 mm. Systematic intrafractional (Σ(intra)) errors ranged between 0.65 and 1.11 mm, whereas the random (σ (intra)) errors were around 1.13-1.16 mm. CONCLUSIONS A verification protocol (3-mm action level) provided by EPIDs improves the set-up accuracy. Intrafractional error is not negligible and contributes to create a larger CTV-PTV margin. The appropriate CTV-PTV margin for our institute is between 3 and 4.5 mm considering both inter- and intrafractional errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cacicedo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital, c/Plaza de Cruces s/n, 48903, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hortelano E, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Ortiz-de-Zárate R, Zaballa M, Barturen Á, Casquero F, San-Miguel Í, Carvajal C, Cacicedo J, Del-Hoyo O, Lupiani J, Pérez F, Bilbao P. Is argon plasma coagulation an effective and safe treatment option for patients with chronic radiation proctitis after high doses of radiotherapy? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2014; 106:165-170. [PMID: 25007015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In severe cases refractory to medical treatment, APC appears to be the preferred alternative to control persistent rectal bleeding of patients with chronic radiation proctitis. Although successful outcomes have been demonstrated in patients previously treated with moderate doses of radiotherapy, there is reluctance towards its indication due to the concern of severe adverse events in patients treated with high doses of radiation. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of APC in the management of bleeding radiationinduced proctitis in patients treated with high doses of radiation for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data from 30 patients were treated with APC due to chronic radiation proctitis, were reviewed retrospectively. All cases had prostate cancer and 9 of them (30 %) underwent previous radical prostatectomy. The median dose of conformal 3D External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) delivered was 74 Gy (range 46-76). Median rectal D1cc and D2cc was 72.5 and 72.4 Gy respectively. Median rectal V70, V60 and V40 was 12, 39.5 and 80 %. Cardiovascular and digestive disease, diabetes, smoking behaviour, lowest haemoglobin and transfusion requirements were recorded. Indications for treatment with APC were anemia and persistent bleeding despite medical treatment. Argon gas flow was set at 1.8 l/min with an electrical power setting of 50 W. RESULTS Median age of all patients was 69.6 years. The median lowest haemoglobin level was 9.6 g/dL. Median time between completion of radiotherapy and first session of APC was 13 months. Ninety-four therapeutic sessions were performed (median 3 sessions). Median time follow-up was 14.5 months (range 2-61). Complete response with resolved rectal bleeding was achieved in 23 patients (77 %), partial response in 5 (16 %) and no control in 2 (6 %). No patients required transfusion following therapy. Two patients developed long-term (> 6 weeks) grade 2 rectal ulceration and grade 2 rectal incontinence, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The argon plasma coagulation is an effective and safe management option in patients with medically refractory rectal bleeding after high doses of radiation for prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
22
|
Martínez-Monge R, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Cambeiro M, Garrán C, Montesdeoca N, Aristu JJ, Alcalde J. Phase I–II trial of perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer. Brachytherapy 2009; 8:26-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2008] [Revised: 06/30/2008] [Accepted: 10/06/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
23
|
Gómez-Iturriaga A, Moreno Jiménez M, Martínez-Monge R. [Radiotherapy in breast cancer: standards and new directions, accelerated partial breast irradiation]. Rev Med Univ Navarra 2008; 52:25-36. [PMID: 18578194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy as a part of the breast cancer treatment has evolved in the last decades. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy produces a substantial reduction in the risk of local recurrence as well as a moderate, but definitive reduction in long-term breast cancer mortality in women at high risk of locoregional failure. Whole-breast irradiation, as part of breast-conservation therapy, has well-established results with good cosmesis, and low toxicity. Results from the BCT trials suggest that the risk for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence resides within close proximity to the original tumor site. This has led investigators to consider the role of an accelerated and more tumor bed-focused course of radiotherapy. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) is a collection of radiotherapy techniques that deliver higher daily doses of radiation to the surgical cavity with margin over a shorter time than whole breast irradiation (from 6-6.5 weeks to 1 week). Early results of this approach have demonstrated excellent local control, minimal acute toxicity, and are more convenient for the patient. Phase III randomized clinical trials are currently underway to assess local control, acute and chronic toxicities. APBI extend the choise of breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Clínica Universitaria, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Martínez-Monge R, Gómez-Iturriaga A. High-dose-rate brachytherapy in lower eyelid cancer. Brachytherapy 2007; 6:227-9. [PMID: 17681245 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2007] [Revised: 03/13/2007] [Accepted: 03/20/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in eyelid tumors. No previous reports on HDR brachytherapy for eyelid cancer are found in the literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS An individual case is reported. A detailed description of the implantation technique, dose prescription, and treatment delivery is provided. RESULTS The implantation and the treatment course were uneventful. Short-term tolerance was within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS HDR brachytherapy can be used in patients with eyelid cancer. The larger diameter of HDR applicators compared to LDR wires do not preclude the use of HDR brachytherapy in this structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Martínez-Monge
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarre, Avenida Pio XII s/n, E-31080 Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|