Prostate cancer: Alternatively spliced mRNA transcripts in tumor progression and their uses as therapeutic targets

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer deaths among American men. Current therapies show early antitumor responses, but ultimately lead to treatment resistance, relapse and poorer survival in patients. Alternative RNA splicing, a cell mechanism increasing the proteome diversity by producing multiple transcripts from a single gene, has been associated with prostate cancer development/progression. Reports showed that many aberrant mRNA splice variants are upregulated in prostate cancer, promoting malignancy through enhanced proliferation, metastasis, tumor growth, anti-apoptosis, and/or treatment resistance. Here, we discuss the oncogenic properties of aberrant splicing mechanisms underlying prostate cancer pathogenesis, as well as the uses of the splicing variants as potential diagnostics and treatment targets. Finally, we discuss the pharmacologic and molecular approaches for targeting aberrant splicing mechanisms as effective therapies to correct the splicing errors and overcome the drug resistance, ultimately improving the clinical outcome of prostate cancer patients.

Roles of regulator of chromosome condensation 2 in cancer: Beyond its regulatory function in cell cycle

Regulator of chromosome condensation 2 (RCC2) is an essential protein in order for mitosis to proceed properly. It localizes in the centrosome of chromosomes where is involved in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Furthermore, RCC2 associates with integrin networks at the plasma membrane where participates in the control of cell movement. Because of its known role in cell cycle, RCC2 has been linked with cancer progression. Several reports show that RCC2 induces cancer hallmarks, but the mechanisms explaining how RCC2 exerts these roles are widely unknown. Here, we aim to summarize the main findings explaining the roles and mechanisms of RCC2 in cancer promotion. RCC2 is overexpressed in different cancers, including glioblastoma, lung, ovarian, and esophageal which is related to proliferation, migration, invasion promotion in vitro and tumor progression and metastasis in vivo. Besides, RCC2 overexpression induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and causes poorer prognosis in cancer patients. RCC2 overexpression has also been linked with resistance development to chemotherapy and radiotherapy by inhibiting apoptosis and activating cancer-promoting transcription factors. Unfortunately, not RCC2 inhibitors are currently available for further pre-clinical and clinical assays. Therefore, these findings emphasize the potential use of RCC2 as a targetable biomarker in cancer and highlight the importance for designing RCC2 chemical inhibitors to evaluate its efficacy in animal studies and clinical trials.

Estrogen-related receptor alpha directly binds to p53 and cooperatively controls colon cancer growth through the regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and function

BACKGROUND

Of the genes that control mitochondrial biogenesis and function, ERRα emerges as a druggable metabolic target to be exploited for cancer therapy. Of the genes mutated in cancer, TP53 remains the most elusive to target. A clear understanding of how mitochondrial druggable targets can be accessed to exploit the underlying mechanism(s) explaining how p53-deficient tumors promote cell survival remains elusive.

METHODS

We performed protein-protein interaction studies to demonstrate that ERRα binds to p53. Moreover, we used gene silencing and pharmacological approaches in tandem with quantitative proteomics analysis by SWATH-MS to investigate the role of the ERRα/p53 complex in mitochondrial biogenesis and function in colon cancer. Finally, we designed in vitro and in vivo studies to investigate the possibility of targeting colon cancers that exhibit defects in p53.

RESULTS

Here, we are the first to identify a direct protein-protein interaction between the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ERRα and the C-terminal domain (CTD) of p53. ERRα binds to p53 regardless of p53 mutational status. Furthermore, we show that the ERRα and p53 complex cooperatively control mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Targeting ERRα creates mitochondrial metabolic stresses, such as production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial membrane permeabilization (MMP), leading to a greater cytotoxic effect that is dependent on the presence of p53. Pharmacological inhibition of ERRα impairs the growth of p53-deficient cells and of p53 mutant patient-derived colon xenografts (PDX).

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, our data suggest that by using the status of the p53 protein as a selection criterion, the ERRα/p53 transcriptional axis can be exploited as a metabolic vulnerability.

RCC2 Promotes Esophageal Cancer Growth by Regulating Activity and Expression of the Sox2 Transcription Factor

Regulator of chromosome condensation 2 (RCC2) is a protein located in the centrosome, which ensures that cell division proceeds properly. Previous reports show that RCC2 is overexpressed in some cancers and could play a key role in tumor development, but the mechanisms concerning how this occurs are not understood. Furthermore, no evidence exists regarding its role in esophageal cancer. We studied the relevance of RCC2 in esophageal cancer growth and its regulation on Sox2, an important transcription factor promoting esophageal cancer. RCC2 was overexpressed in esophageal tumors compared with normal tissue, and this overexpression was associated with tumorigenicity by increasing cell proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, and migration. These oncogenic effects were accompanied by overexpression of Sox2. RCC2 upregulated and stabilized Sox2 expression and its target genes by inhibiting ubiquitination-mediated proteasome degradation. Likewise, RCC2 increased the transcriptional activity and promoter binding of Sox2. In vivo studies indicated that RCC2 and Sox2 were overexpressed in esophageal tumors compared with normal tissue, and this upregulation occurs in the esophageal basal cell layer for both proteins. In conditional knockout mice, RCC2 deletion decreased the tumor nodule formation and progression in the esophagus compared with wild-type mice. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression, a cell proliferation marker, was also downregulated in RCC2 knockout mice. Overall, our data show for the first time that RCC2 is an important protein for the stabilization and transcriptional activation of Sox2 and further promotion of malignancy in esophageal cancer. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that RCC2 controls Sox2 expression and transcriptional activity to mediate esophageal cancer formation.

Anticancer response to disulfiram may be enhanced by co-treatment with MEK inhibitor or oxaliplatin: modulation by tetrathiomolybdate, KRAS/BRAF mutations and c-MYC/p53 status

Ammonium tetrathiomolybdate (TTM) and disulfiram (DSF) are copper (Cu) chelators in cancer clinical trials partly because Cu chelation: a) restricts the activity of Cu-binding MEK1/2 enzymes which drive tumourigenesis by KRAS or BRAF oncogenic mutations and b) enhances uptake of oxaliplatin (OxPt), clinically used in advanced KRAS-mutant colorectal carcinomas (CRC). Whereas TTM decreases intracellular Cu trafficking, DSF can reach other Cu-dependent intracellular proteins. Since the use of individual or combined Cu chelation may help or interfere with anti-cancer therapy, this study investigated whether TTM modifies the response to DSF supplemented with: 1) UO126, a known MEK1/2 inhibitor; 2) other Cu chelators like neocuproine (NC) or 1, 10-o-phenanthroline (OPT) in wt p53 melanoma cells differing in BRAF or KRAS mutations; 3) OxPt in mutant p53 CRC cells devoid of KRAS and BRAF mutations or harbouring either KRAS or BRAF mutations. TTM was not toxic against ^{V600E-mut-BRAF} A375 and ^{G12D-mut-KRAS/high c-myc} C8161 melanoma cells. Moreover, TTM protected both melanoma types from toxicity induced by DSF, NC and co-treatment with sub-lethal levels of DSF and the MEK inhibitor, UO126. Toxicity by co-treatment with DSF+OPT was poorly reversed by TTM in C8161 melanoma cells. In contrast to the greater toxicity of 0.1 μM DSF against mutant p53 CRC cells irrespective of their KRAS mutation, TTM did not protect ^{G12V-mut-KRAS/high c-myc} SW620 CRC from DSF+OxPt compared to ^{KRAS-WT/BRAF-WT} Caco-2 CRC. Our results show that DSF co-treatment with: a) MEK inhibitors may enhance tumour suppression; b) OxPt in CRC may counteract impaired response to cetuximab by KRAS/BRAF mutations and c) as a single treatment, TTM may be less effective than DSF and decreases the efficacy of the latter.