Patient-Reported Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients Treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within the MOMENTUM Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

With the 1.5 MR-Linac, planning target volume (PTV) margins for the treatment of rectal cancer can be reduced by 1/3 compared to conventional radiotherapy techniques. This allows better sparing of surrounding tissues, potentially resulting in less toxicity and greater patient comfort. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after rectal cancer treatment on a 1.5T MR-Linac have not yet been reported. Through international collaboration, the 'Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM)' registry provides the unique opportunity to study these outcomes in a relatively large patient cohort. The aim of this study is to assess PROs of rectal cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within MOMENTUM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

An international, prospective, observational cohort study was performed, including all patients with rectal cancer who were treated with 25 Gy in five fractions on an MR-Linac in three institutions located in the Netherlands (2019-2022). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the general EORTC QLQ-C30 and colorectal cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Scores were calculated according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. A high score for a functional scale represents a high functioning level, while a high score for a symptom scale represents a high symptomatology level. Outcomes were measured at regular time points (i.e., at baseline and after three, 6 and 12 months follow-up). Patients who underwent tumor resection were censored at the date of surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 152patients were included, with a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-27) months. Of these, six patients (4%) had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I disease, 11 patients (7%) stage II, 85 patients (56%) stage III, and 12 patients (8%) stage IV. A total of 87 patients (57%) reached three months follow-up without surgery, 60 patients (39%) six months, and 40 patients (26%) twelve months. At six months follow-up, 25/132 patients (19%) had received additional chemotherapy. The median global health score was 83 (interquartile range [IQR] 67-83) at baseline, 75 (IQR 58-83) at three months, 75 (IQR 58-83) at six months and 83 (IQR 83-100) at twelve months. In most QLQ-C30 domains, functional and symptom scores deteriorated during the first six months after treatment, but returned to or exceeded baseline scores at 12 months. Overall, treatment resulted in improved QLQ-CR29 scores after 12 months follow-up. Most frequently reported symptoms were blood and mucus in stool, urinary frequency, stool frequency and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

This study presents patient-reported outcomes in the currently largest cohort of patients with rectal cancer who received treatment on a 1.5T MR-Linac. Overall, treatment resulted in improved symptom management, and stabilized or improved quality of life outcomes after twelve months of follow-up.

Validated Pretreatment Prediction Models for Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Pretreatment response prediction is crucial to select those patients with rectal cancer who will benefit from organ preservation strategies following (intensified) neoadjuvant therapy and to avoid unnecessary toxicity in those who will not. The combination of individual predictors in multivariable prediction models might improve predictive accuracy. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise validated pretreatment prediction models (other than radiomics-based models or image-based deep learning models) for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer and provide evidence-based recommendations for future research. MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase.com, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies published up to November 2022. A total of 5006 studies were screened and 16 were included for data extraction and risk of bias assessment using Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). All selected models were unique and grouped into five predictor categories: clinical, combined, genetics, metabolites, and pathology. Studies generally included patients with intermediate or advanced tumor stages who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Evaluated outcomes were pathological complete response and pathological tumor response. All studies were considered to have a high risk of bias and none of the models were externally validated in an independent study. Discriminative performances, estimated with the area under the curve (AUC), ranged per predictor category from 0.60 to 0.70 (clinical), 0.78 to 0.81 (combined), 0.66 to 0.91 (genetics), 0.54 to 0.80 (metabolites), and 0.71 to 0.91 (pathology). Model calibration outcomes were reported in five studies. Two collagen feature-based models showed the best predictive performance (AUCs 0.83-0.91 and good calibration). In conclusion, some pretreatment models for response prediction in rectal cancer show encouraging predictive potential but, given the high risk of bias in these studies, their value should be evaluated in future, well-designed studies.

New Opportunities for Minimizing Toxicity in Rectal Cancer Management

Advances in multimodal management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), consisting of preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, have improved local disease control and patient survival but are associated with significant risk for acute and long-term morbidity. Recently published trials, evaluating treatment dose intensification via the addition of preoperative induction or consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT]), have demonstrated improved tumor response rates while maintaining acceptable toxicity. In addition, TNT has led to an increased number of patients achieving a clinical complete response and thus eligible to pursue a nonoperative, organ-preserving, watch and wait approach, thereby avoiding toxicities associated with surgery, such as bowel dysfunction and stoma-related complications. Ongoing trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mismatch repair-deficient tumors suggest that this subgroup of patients with LARC could potentially be treated with immunotherapy alone, sparing them the toxicity associated with preoperative treatment and surgery. However, the majority of rectal cancers are mismatch repair-proficient and less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors and require multimodal management. The synergy noted in preclinical studies between immunotherapy and radiotherapy on immunogenic tumor cell death has led to the design of ongoing clinical trials that explore the benefit of combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy (mainly of immune checkpoint inhibitors) and aim to increase the number of patients eligible for organ preservation.

Impact of dose-escalated chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: two year follow-up of the randomized RECTAL-BOOST trial

BACKGROUND

Dose-escalated chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not result in higher complete response rates, but initiated more tumor regression in the randomized XXXXX trial (Clinicaltrials.gov XXXXX). This study compared patient reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who received dose-escalated CRT (5 × 3Gy boost + CRT) or standard CRT for two years following randomization.

METHODS

Patients with LARC, participating in the XXXXX trial, filled out EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following start of treatment. Between-group differences in functional QoL domains were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model and expressed as effect size (ES). Symptom scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Patients treated with dose-escalated CRT (boost group, n=51) experienced a significantly stronger decline in global health at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,4 and ES -0,4), physical functioning at 6 months (ES -1,1), role functioning at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,8 and ES -0,6) and social functioning at 6 months (ES -0,6) compared to patients treated with standard CRT (control group, n=64). The boost group reported significantly more fatigue at 3 and 6 months (83% vs. 66% resp. 89% vs. 76%), pain at 3 and 6 months (67% vs. 36% resp. 80% vs. 44%) and diarrhea at 3 months (45% vs. 29%) compared to the control group. From 12 months onwards, QoL and symptoms were similar between groups, apart from more blood/mucus in stool in the boost group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LARC, dose-escalated CRT resulted in a transient deterioration in global health, physical, role, and social functioning and more pain, fatigue and diarrhea at 3 and 6 months following start of treatment compared to standard CRT. From 12 months onwards, the impact of dose-escalated CRT on QoL largely resolved.

Patient-Reported Work Ability During the First Two Years After Rectal Cancer Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer treatment is associated with substantial short- and longer-term morbidity that may affect patients' ability to work.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated patient-reported work ability during the first 2 years after rectal cancer diagnosis, relative to the Dutch general population. Also, we assessed the association between clinical factors and work ability.

DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the Radiation-Oncology Department of a tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Patients with rectal cancer, <67 years of age, and treated with curative intent were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Work ability was assessed with the Work Ability Index before the start of treatment (baseline) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after. The Work Ability Index scores of patients with paid employment were compared with the scores of matched population controls. Mixed models were used to estimate the impact of clinical factors on work ability.

RESULTS

Of the 230 eligible patients, 172 (75%) had paid employment. Work ability decreased at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline. At 12 months, work ability recovered to baseline level but remained significantly lower than in population controls up to 24 months. Fifty-four percent reported 100 to 365 days of sick leave during the first 12 months of treatment versus 2% in the general population. At 24 months, 32% needed substantial adaptations in work activities, worked reduced hours, or were unable to work due to the disease versus 6% in the general population. Female sex, multiple comorbidities, oligometastatic disease, chemoradiation, and abdominoperineal resection were associated with lower work ability.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by a decrease in questionnaire response rate from 83% to 64% over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported work ability deteriorates during rectal cancer treatment. Within 24 months after diagnosis, work ability returns to pretreatment level but remains lower than that of the general population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B175. CAPACIDAD DE TRABAJO REPORTADO POR PACIENTES DURANTE LOS PRIMEROS DOS AÑOS DESPUÉS DEL DIAGNÓSTICO DE CÁNCER RECTAL: El tratamiento del cáncer rectal se asocia con una morbilidad significante a corto y largo plazo que puede afectar la capacidad de trabajo de pacientes.Evaluamos la capacidad de trabajo reportado por pacientes durante los primeros dos años después del diagnóstico de cáncer rectal, en relación con la población general holandesa. Además, evaluamos la asociación entre los factores clínicos y capacidad para trabajar.Estudio de cohorte prospectivo.Este estudio se realizó en el Departamento de Radiación Oncológica de en un centro de referencia de tercer nivel.Se seleccionaron pacientes con cáncer rectal, <67 años de edad, y tratados con intención curativa.La capacidad de trabajo se evaluó con el índice de capacidad de trabajo antes del inicio del tratamiento (línea de base) y a los 3, 6, 12, 18 y 24 meses después. Los puntajes de capacidad laboral de los pacientes con empleo remunerado se compararon con los puntajes de los controles de población pareados. Se utilizaron modelos mixtos para estimar el impacto de los factores clínicos en la capacidad laboral.De los 230 pacientes elegibles, 172 (75%) tenían empleo remunerado. La capacidad de trabajo disminuyó a los 3 y 6 meses en comparación con la línea de base. A los 12 meses, la capacidad de trabajo se recuperó al nivel de referencia, pero se mantuvo significativamente más baja que en los controles de la población hasta 24 meses. Durante los primeros 12 meses, el 54% reportó 100-365 días de baja por enfermedad versus el 2% en la población general. A los 24 meses, el 32% necesitaba adaptaciones sustanciales en las actividades laborales, trabajó horas reducidas o no pudo trabajar debido a la enfermedad frente al 6% en la población general. El sexo femenino, las comorbilidades múltiples, la enfermedad oligometastásica, la quimiorradiación y la resección abdominoperineal se asociaron con una menor capacidad de trabajo.El estudio estuvo limitado por una disminución en la tasa de respuesta al cuestionario del 83% al 64% a lo largo plazo.La capacidad laboral informada por el paciente se deteriora durante el tratamiento del cáncer rectal. Dentro de los 24 meses posteriores al diagnóstico, la capacidad laboral vuelve al nivel de pretratamiento, pero sigue siendo inferior a la de la población general. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B175. (Traducción-Dr. Adrian Ortega).

The trials within cohorts design facilitated efficient patient enrollment and generalizability in oncology setting

OBJECTIVES

The trials within cohorts (TwiCs) design aims to improve recruitment efficiency. We conducted the first TwiCs in radiation oncology and described efficiency of the design and generalizability of the results.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

In two radiotherapy centers, patients with rectal cancer were asked to participate in a prospective cohort study and to provide broad consent for randomization and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Consenting patients who met the trial criteria were randomized directly after cohort enrollment. The intervention arm was offered a radiotherapy boost. We evaluated acceptance rate, its impact on sample size, and compared clinical characteristics between trial participants and patients of the Dutch national cancer registry.

RESULTS

128 of the 200 eligible patients (64%) were randomized. Sixty-two patients did not consent (in time) to cohort participation, to broad randomization, or to PROs. Of the 64 patients in the intervention arm, 52 (81%) accepted the intervention. During the trial, the acceptance rate dropped temporarily, after which sample size was adapted. Trial patients were comparable in age, comorbidity, and disease stage to the national rectal cancer population.

CONCLUSIONS

The TwiCs design is feasible, allows enrollment of a high proportion of randomizable patients, with positive impact on trial efficiency and generalizability of results in a clinical oncology setting.

Population-based study of morbidity risk associated with pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer may induce a pathological complete response (pCR) but increase surgical morbidity due to radiation-induced fibrosis. In this study the association between pCR and postoperative surgical morbidity was investigated.

Methods

Patients in the Netherlands with rectal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2009 and 2017 were included. Data were stratified into patients who underwent resection with creation of a primary anastomosis and those who had a permanent stoma procedure. The association between pCR and postoperative morbidity was investigated in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

pCR was observed in 976 (12·2 per cent) of 8003 patients. In 3472 patients who had a primary anastomosis, the presence of pCR was significantly associated with surgical complications (122 of 443 (27·5 per cent) versus 598 of 3029 (19·7 per cent) in those without pCR) and anastomotic leak (35 of 443 (7·9 per cent) versus 173 of 3029 (5·7 per cent) respectively). Multivariable analysis also showed associations between pCR and surgical complications (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·53, 95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 1·92) and pCR and anastomotic leak (adjusted OR 1·41, 1·03 to 2·05). Of 4531 patients with a permanent stoma, surgical complications were observed in 120 (22·5 per cent) of 533 patients with a pCR, compared with 798 (20·0 per cent) of 3998 patients with no pCR (adjusted OR 1·17, 0·94 to 1·46).

Conclusion

Patients with a pCR in whom an anastomosis was created were at increased risk of developing an anastomotic leak.

The effect of time interval from chemoradiation to surgery on postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A prolonged time interval between chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision (TME) may render more rectal cancer patients eligible for organ-sparing approaches but may also cause more pelvic fibrosis and surgical morbidity. We estimated the effect of time interval on postoperative complications and other surgical outcomes in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

This is a population-based cohort study using data of the Dutch Colorectal Audit. Rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiation followed by TME after an interval of 3-20 weeks were selected (n = 6,268). Time interval from completion of chemoradiation to TME was categorized into 3-6, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12 and 13-20 weeks. Outcomes included postoperative complication (any, and stratified by medical and surgical complications), reintervention, intraoperative complication, incomplete resection, positive circumferential margin (CRM) and pathological complete response (pCR). The interval of 7-8 weeks was the reference group.

RESULTS

Prolonged time intervals were not associated with a higher risk of a postoperative complication (any, surgical or medical), reintervention, and incomplete resection. Intraoperative complications were however more common after 11-12 weeks than after 7-8 weeks (odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20-2.69). The interval of 9-10 weeks was associated with less CRM positive resections, and 9-10 and 13-20 weeks with more pCR (relative to 7-8 weeks, OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.56-0.98; OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.04-1.58; and OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.04-1.71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 7-8 weeks, longer time intervals up to 13-20 weeks between chemoradiation and TME are not associated with more postoperative complications or more positive resection margins. Accordingly, prolonging the interval aiming for organ-sparing treatment is safe.

Health-related quality of life in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation with delayed surgery versus short-course radiotherapy with immediate surgery: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with delayed surgery (CRT-DS) and short-course radiotherapy with immediate surgery (SCRT-IS) are two commonly used treatment strategies for rectal cancer. However, the optimal treatment strategy for patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer remains a discussion. This study compares quality of life (QOL) between SCRT-IS and CRT-DS from diagnosis until 24 months after treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective colorectal cancer cohort, rectal cancer patients with clinical stage T2-3N0-2M0 undergoing SCRT-IS or CRT-DS between 2013 and 2017 were identified. QOL was assessed using EORTC-C30 and EORTC-CR29 questionnaires before the start of neoadjuvant treatment (baseline) and at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after. Patients were 1:1 matched using propensity sore matching. Between- and within-group differences in QOL domains were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Symptoms and sexual interest at 12 and 24 months were compared using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

156 of 225 patients (69%) remained after matching. The CRT-DS group reported poorer emotional functioning at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (mean difference with SCRT-IS: -9.4, -12.1, -7.3, -8.0 and -7.9 respectively), and poorer global health, physical-, role-, social- and cognitive functioning at 6 months (mean difference with SCRT-IS: -9.1, -9.8, -14.0, -9.2 and -12.6, respectively). Besides emotional functioning, all QOL domains were comparable at 12, 18 and 24 months. Within-group changes showed a significant improvement of emotional functioning after baseline in the SCRT-IS group, whereas only a minor improvement was observed in the CRT-DS group. Symptoms and sexual interest in male patients at 12 and 24 months were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In rectal cancer patients, CRT-DS may induce a stronger decline in short-term QOL than SCRT-IS. From 12 months onwards, QOL domains, symptoms and sexual interest in male patients were comparable between the groups. However, emotional functioning remained higher after SCRT-IS than after CRT-DS.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Rectal Surgery on Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Cancer During the First 2 Years After Diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Rectal cancer surgery with neoadjuvant therapy is associated with substantial morbidity. The present study describes the course of quality of life (QOL) in rectal cancer patients in the first 2 years after the start of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study within a colorectal cancer cohort including rectal cancer patients who were referred for neoadjuvant chemoradiation or short-course radiotherapy and underwent rectal surgery. QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and colorectal cancer questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR29) before treatment and after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The outcomes were compared with the QOL scores from the Dutch general population and stratified by low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection. Postoperative bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection was measured using the low anterior resection syndrome score.

RESULTS

Of the 324 patients, 272 (84%) responded to at least 2 questionnaires and were included in the present study. Compared with pretreatment levels, the strongest decline was observed in physical, role, and social functioning at 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. Global health and cognitive functioning declined to a lesser extend, and emotional functioning gradually improved over the time. Within 24 months, the QOL scores had recovered toward the pretreatment levels in most patients. Compared with the general population, physical, role, social, and cognitive functioning and symptoms of fatigue and insomnia remained significantly worse in patients on longer-term. After low anterior resection, major bowel dysfunction was reported by 44% to 60% of the patients. Increasing urinary incontinence and severe complaints of impotence were observed in patients who had undergone abdominoperineal resection.

CONCLUSION

Rectal cancer treatment is associated with a significant decline in QOL during the first 6 months after the diagnosis. Within 2 years, most patients return toward pretreatment functioning but could still experience poorer functioning and treatment-related symptoms compared with the general population. These findings support shared decision-making and emphasize the need for postoperative supportive care and novel treatment approaches.

The impact of postoperative complications on health-related quality of life in older patients with rectal cancer; a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

As result of the aging population and increasing rectal cancer incidence, more older patients undergo treatment for rectal cancer. This study compares treatment course, postoperative complications, and quality of life (QOL) between older and younger patients with rectal cancer and evaluates the impact of postoperative complications on QOL in the elderly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer participating in a prospective colorectal cancer cohort and referred for radiotherapy between 2013 and 2016 were included. QOL was assessed with the cancer questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) before treatment and at three, six, and twelve months. Outcomes were compared between older patients (≥70years) and younger patients (<70years) and stratified by presence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 115 (33%) older patients and 230 (67%) younger patients were included. Compared to younger patients, older patients underwent significantly more often short-course radiation with delayed surgery (6.1% and 19.1% respectively) and less often chemoradiation (62.6% and 39.1% respectively), and were more likely to undergo a Hartmann procedure with permanent stoma (3.5% and 13.0% respectively) instead of sphincter-sparing surgery (43.9% and 29.6% respectively). Postoperative complication rates were similar (38.5% in older patients versus 34.7% in younger patients). Older patients had worse physical functioning at six and twelve months after diagnosis compared to younger patients. Presence of postoperative complications had a significant stronger impact on physical- and role functioning in older patients.

CONCLUSION

Older patients undergo more often a tailored treatment approach for rectal cancer than younger patients. With this tailored approach, similar postoperative complication rates and QOL are achieved. However, postoperative complications have a larger negative impact on physical- and role functioning in older patients which indicates a need for better prediction of postoperative complications in the elderly.

Abstract 1827: The prospective Dutch colorectal cancer cohort: A prospective nation-wide observational cohort study

The increasingly complex subclassification of tumors based on clinical and molecular characteristics, as well as the large sample sizes needed for clinical trials, pose new challenges to the recruitment of patients for studies. Currently, less than 10% of all cancer patients are enrolled in clinical trials, limiting their external validity, but also leaving room for improvement in the recruitment of patients. Clinical trials are often complicated by low inclusion rates, inadequate data collection, high non-completion rates and costs, and often provide insufficient data for post-hoc subgroup analyses. We believe that a prospective observational cohort study can provide standardized and validated collection of clinical data, tissue and blood samples and patient-reported outcome measures, and can improve patient recruitment for clinical trials. The Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort is a prospective multidisciplinary nation-wide observational cohort study in the Netherlands, a country with a yearly colorectal cancer incidence of 15,000 patients. The goal of the study is to facilitate future basic, translational and clinical research in the field of colorectal cancer for both national and international research groups with short or absent inclusion periods, even for studies with stringent inclusion criteria.

All patients &gt; 18 years with histologically proven colorectal cancer are asked to participate. Four essential features characterize the study: 1) a patient-centered informed-consent approach; 2) a framework to systematically collect long-term clinical follow-up and patient-reported outcomes; 3) an infrastructure for the standardized collection and storage of tissue and blood samples and 4) efficient recruitment for clinical trials which is facilitated by the innovative cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) design. The cmRCT design allows patients to participate in multiple non-conflicting clinical trials. We believe that the key to the development of a sustainable cohort study is the collaboration with existing organizations using their expertise, and preventing duplicate data entry and unnecessary costs. To these ends, close collaborations with other national initiatives, like the national cancer registry (hosted by IKNL), the national pathology registry PALGA, and the national biobanking infrastructure BBMRI-NL have been established. An effective governance structure to secure the privacy of patients and hospitals, and to facilitate research is needed.

This study will provide long-term clinical data, tissue and blood samples, and patient-reported outcome measures collected under a broad informed consent, of a large cohort of patients with colorectal cancer. The available data and tissue will facilitate basic, translational and clinical research. Furthermore, the design of this cohort study can be used as an example for other tumor types.

Citation Format: Robert R.J. Coebergh van den Braak, Geraldine R. Vink, Martijn G.H. van Oijen, Mirre E. de Noo, Sophie A. Kurk, Maarten J.P. Burbach, Alice M. Couwenberg, Anne M. May, Helena M. Verkooijen, Gerrit A. Meijer, Miriam Koopman. The prospective Dutch colorectal cancer cohort: A prospective nation-wide observational cohort study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1827.

The impact of retractor SPONGE-assisted laparoscopic surgery on duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer (SPONGE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To achieve an adequate visual working field during laparoscopic colorectal surgery without disturbance of the small intestine, patients are positioned in the Trendelenburg position. This position results in hemodynamic changes that may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay. Recently, an intraoperative retractor sponge was introduced as an alternative to the Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic surgery. The objective of this trial is to study the impact of the use of an intraoperative retractor sponge on the duration of the hospital stay and risk of perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS/DESIGN

The SPONGE trial is a monocenter study and follows the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) design. It will be conducted within a multicenter prospective observational cohort of colorectal cancer patients of all stages, for whom longitudinal clinical data and patient-reported outcomes are collected. Patients within the cohort, who will undergo laparoscopic surgery for distal colon or rectal cancer, are eligible for inclusion and form a subcohort. From this subcohort, a 1:1 random sample will be offered to undergo surgery with the use of the retractor sponge. Patients from the subcohort who are not selected will undergo standard treatment, that is, surgery in the Trendelenburg position. The primary endpoint is the duration of the postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes are duration of surgery; intraoperative blood loss and fluid balance; and postoperative body temperature, oxygenation and complications. Both arms require 94 patients.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of sponge-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery in comparison with standard Trendelenburg position on hospital stay and peri- and postoperative complications. Results of this study will also be relevant for other surgical procedures in the pelvic region. The present study is the second randomized controlled trial according to the cmRCT design, which is embedded within our colorectal cancer cohort.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02574013 . Registered 27 September 2015.