The impact of microfluidics sperm processing on blastocyst euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation: a sibling oocyte double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the euploidy rates among blastocysts created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation.

DESIGN

Sibling oocyte randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single university-affiliated infertility practice.

PATIENTS

A total of 106 patients aged 18-42 years undergoing fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles with preimplantation genetic testing between January 2021 and April 2022 contributed 1,442 mature oocytes, which were injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation.

INTERVENTION(S)

The sperm sample is divided and processed using a microfluidics device and density gradient centrifugation for injection into sibling oocytes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization, high-quality blastulation, and ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

The blastocyst euploidy rate per mature oocyte was not significantly different in the study group compared with the control group (22.9% vs. 20.5%). The blastocyst euploidy rate per biopsied embryo was also similar between the 2 groups (53.0% vs. 45.7%). However, the fertilization rate per mature oocyte injected was found to be significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group (76.0% vs. 69.9%). The high-quality blastulation rate per mature oocyte injected was similar between the 2 groups, as was the total number of embryos frozen. There were no differences in the number of participants with no blastocysts for biopsy or the number of participants with no euploid embryos between the 2 groups. Among the male factor infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss subgroups, there were no differences in euploidy rates, fertilization rates, blastulation rates, or total numbers of blastocysts frozen, although the study was underpowered to detect these differences. Seventy-seven patients underwent frozen embryo transfer; there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Microfluidics processing did not improve embryo euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation in this sibling oocyte study, although fertilization rates were significantly higher.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04744025.

Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Does trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increase the risk of obstetric or perinatal complications in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Trophectoderm biopsy may increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in pregnancies following FET cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Trophectoderm biopsy has replaced blastomere biopsy as the standard of care to procure cells for PGT analysis. Recently, there has been concern that trophectoderm biopsy may adversely impact obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Previous studies examining this question are limited by use of inappropriate control groups, small sample size or reporting on data that no longer reflects current IVF practice.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single university-affiliated fertility center. A total of 756 patients who underwent FET with transfer of previously vitrified blastocysts that had either trophectoderm biopsy or were unbiopsied and resulted in a singleton live birth between 2013 and 2019 were included.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes for patients aged 20-44 years who underwent FET with transfer of previously vitrified blastocysts that were either biopsied (n = 241) or unbiopsied (n = 515) were analyzed. Primary outcome was odds of placentation disorders including HDP and rate of fetal growth restriction (FGR). Binary logistic regression was performed to control for potential covariates.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The biopsy group was significantly older, had fewer anovulatory patients, was more often nulliparous and had fewer embryos transferred compared to the unbiopsied group. After controlling for potential covariates, the probability of developing HDP was significantly higher in the biopsy group compared with unbiopsied group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.943, 95% CI 1.072-3.521; P = 0.029).There was no significant difference between groups in the probability of placenta previa or placenta accreta. There was also no significant difference in the rate of FGR (aOR 1.397; 95% CI, 0.815-2.395; P = 0.224) or the proportion of low (aOR 0.603; 95% CI, 0.336-1.084; P = 0.091) or very low (aOR 2.948; 95% CI, 0.613-14.177; P = 0.177) birthweight infants comparing biopsied to unbiopsied groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION

This was a retrospective study performed at a single fertility center, which may limit the generalizability of our findings.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Trophectoderm biopsy may increase the risk of HDP in FET cycles, however, a prospective multicenter randomized trial should be performed to confirm these findings.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No specific funding was obtained for this study. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.

The dual trigger study: Rationale and study design of a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing pregnancy rates after co-administration of low dose hCG at the time of GnRH agonist trigger or 35 h later for the prevention of OHSS

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic complication of controlled ovarian stimulation. The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for the trigger of oocyte maturation is effective in the prevention of OHSS although it may result in a lower pregnancy rate. The use of adjuvant low dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at the time of trigger or at the time of oocyte retrieval may improve pregnancy rates. The goal of this dual trigger study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the use of low dose hCG administered at the time of GnRH agonist trigger or 35 h later as well as the potential impact on pregnancy rates. The population will consist of 82 women undergoing IVF treatment who are at risk of developing OHSS. This study will be a single center prospective randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. The randomization schedule will be administered by the Investigational Drug Services of the University. After controlled ovarian stimulation, induction of oocyte maturation will be achieved using a GnRH agonist and patients will be randomized to receive either low dose hCG 1000 IU at the time of trigger and placebo at oocyte retrieval (Study group) or placebo at the time of trigger and hCG 1500 IU at the time of oocyte retrieval (Control group). The main outcomes will be live birth rates and incidence of OHSS. Two ancillary studies will include a quality of life survey and serum assessment of independent corpus luteum function.

The effect of luteal phase vaginal estradiol supplementation on the success of in vitro fertilization treatment: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of luteal phase vaginal E(2) supplementation improves clinical pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University-based tertiary fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred sixty-six patients undergoing their first cycle of IVF treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients underwent three different protocols for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF treatment with long GnRH agonist suppression, use of GnRH antagonist, or a microdose GnRH agonist protocol. Luteal phase support was in the form of IM P. Patients randomized into the study group (n = 84) received E(2) supplementation in the form of vaginal estrace 2 mg twice a day starting on the day of ET. Patients randomized to the control group (n = 82) received no E(2) supplementation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

There were no significant differences in the implantation (56/210 [26.7%] vs. 64/203 [31.5%]), clinical pregnancy (42/84 [50%] vs. 52/82 [63.4%]), and ongoing pregnancy rates (40/84 [47.6%] vs. 46/82 [56.1%]) between the study and control groups, respectively. In the subgroup of patients who used the long GnRH agonist suppression protocol, there was a lower clinical pregnancy rate in the study group compared with the control group (27/55 [49.1%] vs. 42/59 [71.2%]). There were, however, no differences in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups in patients who used either the GnRH antagonist or microdose GnRH agonist protocols.

CONCLUSION(S)

The addition of vaginal E(2) supplementation to routine P supplementation for luteal support does not improve the probability of conception after IVF treatment.

Meiotic arrest in human oocytes is maintained by a Gs signaling pathway

In mammalian oocytes, the maintenance of meiotic prophase I arrest prior to the surge of LH that stimulates meiotic maturation depends on a high level of cAMP within the oocyte. In mouse and rat, the cAMP is generated in the oocyte, and this requires the activity of a constitutively active, Gs-linked receptor, GPR3 or GPR12, respectively. To examine if human oocyte meiotic arrest depends on a similar pathway, we used RT-PCR and Western blotting to look at whether human oocytes express the same components for maintaining arrest as rodent oocytes. RNA encoding GPR3, but not GPR12, was expressed. RNA encoding adenylate cyclase type 3, which is the major adenylate cyclase required for maintaining meiotic arrest in the mouse oocyte, was also expressed, as was Galphas protein. To determine if this pathway is functional in the human oocyte, we examined the effect of injecting a function-blocking antibody against Galphas on meiotic resumption. This antibody stimulated meiotic resumption of human oocytes that were maintained at the prophase I stage using a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. These results demonstrate that human oocytes maintain meiotic arrest prior to the LH surge using a signaling pathway similar to that of rodent oocytes.

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there are any differences in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and implantation rates in high-risk patients undergoing IVF using a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression protocol.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University-based tertiary fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Sixty-six patients under 40 years of age with polycystic ovarian syndrome, polycystic ovarian morphology, or previous high response undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomized to an ovarian stimulation protocol consisting of either GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist (study group) or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression with a GnRH agonist (control group). Both groups received luteal phase and early pregnancy supplementation with IM progesterone (P), and patients in the study group also received E(2) patches and their doses were adjusted according to the serum levels.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Incidence of OHSS and implantation rate.

RESULT(S)

None of the patients in the study group developed any form of OHSS compared with 31% (10/32) of the patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the implantation (22/61 [36.0%] vs. 20/64 [31.0%]), clinical pregnancy (17/30 [56.7%] vs. 15/29 [51.7%]), and ongoing pregnancy rates (16/30 [53.3%] vs. 14/29 [48.3%]) between the study and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

The use of a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after GnRH antagonist cotreatment combined with adequate luteal phase and early pregnancy E(2) and P supplementation reduces the risk of OHSS in high-risk patients undergoing IVF without affecting implantation rate.