Ustekinumab versus adalimumab for induction and maintenance therapy in biologic-naive patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3b trial

BACKGROUND

Active-comparator trials are important to inform patient and physician choice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with either ustekinumab or adalimumab in biologic-naive patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator, phase 3b trial (SEAVUE) at 121 hospitals or private practices in 18 countries. We included biologic-naive patients aged 18 years or older with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of 220-450, who had not responded to or were intolerant to conventional therapy (or were corticosteroid dependent) and had at least one ulcer of any size at baseline endoscopic evaluation. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; via an interactive web response system) to receive ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg intravenously on day 0, then 90 mg subcutaneously once every 8 weeks) or adalimumab (160 mg on day 0, 80 mg at 2 weeks, then 40 mg once every 2 weeks, subcutaneously) through week 56. Study treatments were administered as monotherapy and without dose modifications. Patients, investigators, and study site personnel were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were in clinical remission (CDAI score <150) at week 52 in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03464136, and EudraCT, 2017-004209-41.

FINDINGS

Between June 28, 2018, and Dec 12, 2019, 633 patients were assessed for eligibility and 386 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab (n=191) or adalimumab (n=195). 29 (15%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group and 46 (24%) of 195 in the adalimumab group discontinued study treatment before week 52. There was no significant difference between the ustekinumab and adalimumab groups in the occurrence of the primary endpoint; at week 52, 124 (65%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group versus 119 (61%) of 195 in the adalimumab group were in clinical remission (between-group difference 4%, 95% CI -6 to 14; p=0·42). Safety for both groups was consistent with previous reports. Serious infections were reported in four (2%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group and five (3%) of 195 in the adalimumab group. No deaths occurred through week 52 of the study.

INTERPRETATION

Both ustekinumab and adalimumab monotherapies were highly effective in this population of biologic-naive patients, with no difference in the primary outcome between the drugs.

FUNDING

Janssen Scientific Affairs.

Incidence of Infusion Reactions and Clinical Effectiveness of Intravenous Golimumab Versus Infliximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Real-World AWARE Study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate tolerability and effectiveness of golimumab-IV versus infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

AWARE, a prospective, real-world, pragmatic, observational, multicenter, phase 4 study, enrolled RA patients when initiating golimumab-IV or infliximab. Treatment decisions were made by the treating rheumatologist. The approved doses for RA are 2 mg/kg at weeks 0, 4, then Q8W for golimumab-IV and 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, then Q8W (dose escalation permitted) for infliximab. A prespecified formal interim analysis was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of infusion reactions (any adverse event that occurred during or within 1 h of infusion) through week 52. Major secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline in CDAI at months 6 and 12 in biologic-naïve patients (non-inferiority margin in the CDAI = 6). Baseline characteristics were adjusted using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW).

RESULTS

In the formal interim analysis (golimumab-IV, n = 479; infliximab, n = 354), the incidence of infusion reactions was significantly lower with golimumab-IV vs. infliximab (3.6 vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001, IPTW-adjusted). Among biologic-naïve patients, mean changes from baseline in CDAI at month 6 (- 9.5 golimumab-IV vs. - 10.1 infliximab) and at month 12 (- 9.4 golimumab-IV vs. - 10.1 infliximab) demonstrated non-inferiority.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with an infusion reaction was significantly lower with golimumab-IV vs. infliximab. Among biologic-naïve patients, mean change from baseline in CDAI at months 6 and 12 was non-inferior for golimumab-IV vs. infliximab. Compared with fixed-dose golimumab-IV, infliximab dose escalation did not provide any greater improvements in CDAI for patients with RA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02728934.

Biodynamic response prediction in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

e12643

Background: Biodynamic signatures (temporal patterns of microscopic motion within a three-dimensional tumor explant) offer a phenomic biomarker that is highly predictive for therapeutic response. The purpose of this study is to evaluate predictive accuracy of a biodynamic drug response classifier in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: Consecutive breast cancer patients from 4 institutions were screened for enrollment in a prospective observational study (NCT03164863). Treatment-naïve needle biopsies were delivered to a central laboratory where biodynamic signatures were measured in living tumor fragments challenged by standard-of-care cytotoxins. Patients received NAC per institutional guidelines and were followed through surgical intervention. A four-point classifier was trained to predict pathologic complete response (CR) then prospectively validated. Results: Among patients completing neoadjuvant treatment and surgical intervention, 33% (24 of 72) achieved CR. The biodynamic classifier predicted CR with 96% sensitivity and 97% negative predictive value. Biodynamically “favored” (scoring ≥ 3) and “strongly favored” (scoring 4) regimens produced CR at rates of 56% (23 of 41) and 73% (19 of 26), respectively. Only 3% of patients (1 of 31) achieved CR from regimens scoring 1 or 2. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 87% (95% CI: 75% to 93%, p < .0001), with similar performance across all subtypes and therapy cohorts (range: 84% to 89%). Performance of the classifier on training and validation patients was statistically equivalent. Conclusions: Biodynamic scoring accurately predicts response in breast cancer patients receiving NAC and holds promise to substantially improve management of these patients. [Table: see text]

Immunomodulation by HDAC inhibition: Results from a phase Ib study with vorinostat and pembrolizumab in metastatic urothelial, renal, and prostate carcinoma patients

2572

Background: Immunosuppressive factors such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) limit the efficacy of immunotherapies. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been shown to have immunomodulatory effects. We have previously reported that HDAC inhibitors have synergistic antitumor effects in combination with PD-1 inhibition in tumor models by inhibiting the function of Tregs and MDSCs. Thus, we conducted a Phase Ib clinical study with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat and the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial, renal and prostate carcinoma. Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination strategy. The phase I portion consisted of two dose levels of vorinostat (100 and 200 mg, PO daily 2 weeks ON and one week OFF) and a fixed, standard dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV every 21 days). Patients were assigned to three cohorts: Cohort A (previously treated, anti-PD1/PD-L1 naïve urothelial and renal cancer pts = 15), Cohort B (previously treated, anti-PD1/PD-L1 resistant urothelial and renal cancer pts = 14), and Cohort C (prostate cancer pts = 14). Results: Dose levels 1 (4 enrolled, 3 evaluable) and 2 (4 enrolled, 3 evaluable) were completed without DLTs and 200 mg was the Phase II recommended dose for vorinostat. The most common resolved grade 3/4 toxicities were acute kidney injury (n = 1), anemia (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1), and hypothyroidism (n = 1) in the dose expansion cohorts. We have enrolled 43 pts (37 evaluable) in the dose expansion cohorts. For Cohort A, B, and C the median PFS were 2.8 months, 5.2 months, and 3.5 months. Two PR were observed including the dose escalation phase. Two PCA pts have achieved undetectable PSA. We have performed several correlative studies including flow cytometry and gene expression analysis on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PDL-1 staining and PSMA PET scans in a subset of pts. Conclusions: The results from this phase Ib suggest that the combination of vorinostat and pembrolizumab is relatively well tolerated and may be active in a subset of immune checkpoint resistant UC/RCC pts and immune checkpoint naïve PCA pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02619253.

Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study of an H4 R-antagonist (JNJ-39758979) in adults with uncontrolled asthma

BACKGROUND

The effects of H₄ R antagonists in preclinical asthma models support the study of antagonists of the H₄ R in the treatment of asthma in humans. JNJ-39758979 is a potent and highly selective oral H₄ R antagonist.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the H₄ R-antagonist JNJ-39758979 in adult patients with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen eligible patients were randomly assigned to JNJ-39758979 300 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks in this phase 2a, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Primary efficacy was assessed via week-12 change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁ ). Secondary efficacy assessments included patient-reported outcome (PRO) asthma assessments (Asthma Daily Diary data [AM and PM peak expiratory flow rate, number of puffs of albuterol/salbutamol, the presence of nocturnal awakenings and asthma symptom score]).

RESULTS

The study did not meet the primary end-point. However, nominally significant improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV₁ were observed with JNJ-39758979 versus placebo at week 12 in pre-specified subgroups with elevated exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils or blood eosinophils at baseline. Nominally significant improvements across PRO assessments were consistently observed in the overall population, as well as in eosinophilic subgroups. Safety, such as adverse event rates, was comparable between JNJ-39758979 and placebo. No serious adverse events were reported. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory values were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings suggest potential benefit of H₄ R antagonists on lung function and asthma control in eosinophilic asthma patients and warrant further evaluation of this mechanism in asthma with eosinophilic inflammation. NCT00946569.

A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate

Objective

Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48.

Results

At week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE.

Conclusions

Treatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment.

Trial registration number

NCT01645280.

Toreforant, A Histamine H4 Receptor Antagonist, in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: Results of 2 Phase II Studies

Objective.

To assess toreforant (selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist) in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods.

In a phase IIa, double-blind, placebo-controlled test, 86 patients were randomized (2:1) to once-daily toreforant 100 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. In phase IIb, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-range–finding evaluations, 272 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to once-daily placebo or toreforant 3/10/30 mg. Primary efficacy endpoints for both studies were Week 12 changes in 28-joint Disease Activity Score–C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP).

Results.

Phase IIa testing was terminated prematurely (patient fatality; secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis). Posthoc analyses indicated toreforant 100 mg/day reduced RA signs/symptoms through Week 12. Phase IIb testing, however, showed no significant Week 12 improvement in DAS28-CRP with toreforant.

Conclusion.

Toreforant was not effective in phase IIb testing.

Results from a Phase IIA Parallel Group Study of JNJ-40346527, an Oral CSF-1R Inhibitor, in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis despite Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy

Objective.

To assess the efficacy and safety of JNJ-40346527, a selective inhibitor of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) receptor kinase that acts to inhibit macrophage survival, proliferation, and differentiation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy.

Methods.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, adults were randomized (2:1) to receive oral JNJ-40346527 100 mg or placebo twice daily through Week 12. Patients with RA had disease activity [≥ 6 swollen/≥ 6 tender joints, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.8 mg/dl] despite DMARD therapy for ≥ 6 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at Week 12 in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score with CRP (DAS28-CRP). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses were also performed, and safety was assessed through Week 16.

Results.

Ninety-five patients were treated (63 JNJ-40346527, 32 placebo); 8 patients discontinued treatment (6 JNJ-40346527, 2 placebo) through Week 12. Mean improvements in DAS28-CRP from baseline to Week 12 were 1.15 for the JNJ-40346527 group and 1.42 for the placebo group (p = 0.30); thus, a statistically significant difference was not observed for the primary endpoint. Pharmacokinetic exposure to JNJ-40346527 and its active metabolites was above the projected concentration needed for pharmacologic activity, and effective target engagement and proof of activity were demonstrated by increased levels of CSF-1 and decreased CD16+ monocytes in JNJ-40346527–treated, but not placebo-treated, patients. Thirty-seven (58.7%) JNJ-40346527–treated and 16 (50.0%) placebo-treated patients reported ≥ 1 adverse event (AE); 1 (1.6%) JNJ-40346527–treated and 3 (9.4%) placebo-treated patients reported ≥ 1 serious AE.

Conclusion.

Although adequate exposure and effective peripheral target engagement were evident, JNJ-40346527 efficacy was not observed in patients with DMARD-refractory active RA. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01597739. EudraCT Number: 2011-004529-28.

Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study of a H4 R-antagonist (JNJ-39758979) in Japanese adults with moderate atopic dermatitis

This trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the H4 R-antagonist JNJ-39758979 in adult Japanese patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to JNJ-39758979 300 mg, 100 mg or placebo once daily for 6 weeks in this phase 2a, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Primary efficacy was assessed via week-6 Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores. Secondary efficacy assessments included Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) pruritus assessments (Pruritus Categorical Response Scale [PCRS], Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales [PNRS], Pruritus Interference Numeric Rating Scale [PINRS] and Subject's Global Impressions of Change in Pruritus [SGICP]). Eighty-eight of 105 planned patients were randomized before the study was stopped and unblinded for safety reasons. The study did not meet the primary end-point. However, numerical improvements (i.e. decreases) in median EASI were observed with JNJ-39758979 100 mg (-3.7) and 300 mg (-3.0) versus placebo (-1.3) at week 6. Nominally significant improvements across PRO PCRS, PNRS and SGICP assessments were consistently observed, particularly with JNJ-39758979 300 mg. Safety, including adverse events (AE), was comparable between JNJ-39758979 and placebo with the exception of two patients (both receiving JNJ-39758979 300 mg) with serious AE of neutropenia, leading to premature study discontinuation. No deaths were reported. Except for neutropenia, no clinically relevant changes in laboratory values were observed. Although not conclusive, findings suggest H4 R-antagonism may be beneficial for AD, particularly in controlling pruritus. JNJ-39758979 appears to be associated with drug-induced agranulocytosis, likely an off-target effect.

Oncology comanagement agreements (CMA) and quality improvement

55

Background: At Indiana University Health, an integrated health care delivery system, an Oncology CMA was implemented in 2013 to provide a framework for engagement between administrators and physicians to improve the value of oncology care. Methods: A collaborative process was used to establish shared goals, measures for performance, and set target goals. For efficiency goals, a system redesign approach was taken. Project teams were organized to develop and implement strategies to achieve goals. Experts in implementation science consulted with individual project teams. Financial incentives were distributed across projects. Final performance measures were assessed across the oncology service line. Results: See Table. Conclusions: Overall, the Oncology CMA positively affected the value of care provided by medical oncologists. The level of physician engagement was variable, although clinical and financial benefits accrued to all members of the practice. Based upon the positive contribution of implementation scientists the CMA in 2014 was modified to create greater support for the design, implementation, and assessment of project goals and plans, It is anticipated that future years will include an institutionalized core of implementation scientists and a steering committee to oversee an ongoing discussion of goals and resource allocation. [Table: see text]

A phase II open-label trial of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma who have undergone an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant and failed to achieve a complete response

BACKGROUND

A majority of multiple myeloma (MM) patients fail to achieve complete response (CR) to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT); effective options following autologous transplantation are needed. Bortezomib (B) is active against MM. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of B following high-dose melphalan therapy and PBSCT. Methods Fifty patients enrolled (48 evaluable) and 49 were treated (safety population).

TREATMENT

4 cycles B 1.3 mg/m(2) Days 1, 4, 8, and 11/21-days; 4 additional cycles were permitted for stable or responding patients. Results Median age was 55 years (range, 38-73), 68% male, 64% ECOG PS = 0, 44% Durie-Salmon Stage IIIA prior to induction, 42% had symptomatic IgG MM; 74% had prior single transplant (26% tandem). Responses post-transplant: 70% PRs, 18% MRs. A median of 4 cycles (range, 2-8) of B were administered. Responses: CR 8%, uCR 2%, PR 23%, uPR 19%, MR 10%, and no change 35%; median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 6.2 months (range, 1.0-19.4). Three deaths occurred (n = 1 sepsis, n = 2 disease progression). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities included: thrombocytopenia, neuropathy (14%, each); asthenia, neutropenia (10%, each); and nausea (4%). Twelve patients (24%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity and 30 patients (60%) completed the study; 20 patients started new treatment (median 5.8 months [range, 1.5-20.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

The study closed early due to widespread availability of B, and the lack of B-naïve patients. Bortezomib monotherapy after melphalan and autologous PBSCT was feasible, safe and well-tolerated (toxicities were manageable), but failed to produce the hypothesized response rates.

Ethnic heterogeneity in glucoregulatory function during treatment with atypical antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Atypical antipsychotics induce weight gain and are linked to increased diabetes risk, but their relative impact on factors that elevate disease risk are unknown.

METHODS

We performed a 6-month, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the effects of risperidone and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. At baseline and weeks 6 and 24, we quantified: (1) total adiposity by DEXA, (2) visceral adiposity by abdominal CT, and (3) insulin sensitivity (SI) and (4) pancreatic function ("disposition index", DI) by intravenous glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

At baseline, groups (risperidone: n=28; olanzapine: n=31) were overweight or obese by body mass index (risperidone: 28.4+/-5.4, olanzapine: 30.6+/-7.0kg/m2). Both drugs induced weight gain (p<0.004). Total adiposity was increased by olanzapine at 6 weeks (p=0.0006) and by both treatments at 24 weeks (p<0.003). Visceral adiposity was increased by olanzapine and risperidone by 24 weeks (p<0.003). S(I) did not deteriorate appreciably, although a downward trend was observed with risperidone. Given known ethnic differences in adiposity and S(I), we performed secondary analysis in African American and Hispanic subjects. In this subset, olanzapine expanded both total and visceral adiposity (p<0.02); no increase was observed with risperidone. There were modest downward trends for SI with both treatments. By week 24, olanzapine-treated subjects exhibited diminished DI (p=0.033), indicating inadequate pancreatic compensation for insulin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective study in psychiatric patients that quantified antipsychotic effects on the multiple metabolic processes that increase diabetes risk. Results indicate that ethnic minorities may have greater susceptibility to antipsychotic-induced glucoregulatory complications.

Incidence and costs of polypharmacy: data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of risperidone and quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

OBJECTIVE

The use of adjunctive psychotropics and the costs of polypharmacy in patients randomized to receive risperidone or quetiapine were compared in a placebo-controlled double-blind study conducted in India, Romania, and the United States.

METHODS

The efficacy and safety of risperidone, quetiapine, and placebo were compared in a 14-day monotherapy phase in patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of symptoms of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. This was followed by a 28-day, additive-therapy phase during which addition of antipsychotics or other psychotropic medications was permitted. Risperidone was received by 153 patients in the monotherapy phase and 133 in the additive therapy phase, quetiapine by 156 and 122, respectively, and placebo by 73 and 53. Rates of polypharmacy were examined using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression methods. Costs of polypharmacy were analyzed by non-parametric Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.

RESULTS

Primary study results have been reported elsewhere (Potkin et al., Schizophr Res 2006;85:254-65). Mean (+/-SD) doses at the additive-therapy baseline were 4.7 +/- 0.9 mg/day of risperidone and 579.0 +/- 128.9 mg/day of quetiapine. Additional psychotropics were received by 36% of the risperidone group, 58% of the quetiapine group (p < 0.01), and by 58% of the placebo group. Antipsychotics accounted for > 95% of the added psychotropics, the most common being olanzapine and haloperidol. The relative risk (quetiapine vs. risperidone) for antipsychotic polypharmacy was 1.90 (p = 0.001; 95% CI 1.29, 2.80). The mean projected cost of additional antipsychotics per randomized patient during the additive-therapy phase was $57.03 in the risperidone group and $101.64 in the quetiapine group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm earlier reports of higher rates of polypharmacy with quetiapine than with risperidone. The findings also reveal substantial between-treatment differences in costs associated with polypharmacy. Limitations of the study include that the study was of short duration and that a high proportion of patients were recruited from countries other than the United States.

The efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of psychosis of Alzheimer's disease and mixed dementia: a meta-analysis of 4 placebo-controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Dementia typically includes behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) as well as cognitive decline. Psychosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a specific component of AD, characterized by delusions, misidentifications, and hallucinations.

METHODS

This study is a meta-analysis of patients with psychosis of AD from four large placebo-controlled clinical trials of risperidone in dementia. Three trials included patients diagnosed with heterogeneous symptoms of BPSD (those with psychosis of AD were included in this analysis), while one trial included only those diagnosed with psychosis of AD. Efficacy was measured using the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) Psychosis subscale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI).

RESULTS

Primary analyses in the psychosis of AD population demonstrated that risperidone significantly improved scores on the BEHAVE-AD Psychosis subscale and CGI scale compared with placebo. Secondary analyses demonstrated that patients with more severe symptoms showed a more pronounced response to treatment with risperidone compared with placebo than those patients with less severe symptoms. Extrapyramidal symptoms and somnolence were more frequent with risperidone than placebo (p=0.04). Cerebrovascular adverse events and all-cause mortality were observed more frequently, although not statistically significantly, with risperidone versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of psychosis of AD showed improvement in psychotic symptoms and general clinical improvement in patients with psychosis of AD treated with risperidone compared with placebo. The benefits of treatment were most significant in patients with severe symptoms. The safety profile of risperidone in this psychosis of AD population was similar to the more general BPSD population.

Treating behavioral and psychological symptoms in patients with psychosis of Alzheimer's disease using risperidone

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of risperidone on specific behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) among patients with psychosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

Post hoc exploratory analysis of data on 479 nursing-home patients with psychosis of AD from three 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Criteria for psychosis of AD were a diagnosis of AD or mixed dementia and a rating of >/= 2 on any delusion or hallucination item of the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) rating scale when entering the trial. Mean changes from baseline to endpoint were examined for items on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and BEHAVE- AD.

RESULTS

On the CMAI, risperidone was significantly more effective than placebo in treating cursing or verbal aggression (p = 0.004), hitting (p < 0.001), performing repetitious mannerisms (p < 0.001), pacing, aimless wandering (p = 0.017), hoarding things (p = 0.02), hiding things (p = 0.02) and repetitive sentences or questions (p = 0.025). On the BEHAVE-AD, risperidone was significantly more effective than placebo in treating physical threats and/or violence (p = 0.001), agitation (other) (p = 0.001) and verbal outbursts (p = 0.026). Although analysis on individual hallucination and delusional items did not demonstrate specific responses, analyses of a composite of delusional items revealed significant drug-placebo differences.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that risperidone is effective in treating a variety of symptoms associated with psychosis of AD.

A model of anticholinergic activity of atypical antipsychotic medications

BACKGROUND

Atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine have significant affinity for the muscarinic receptors in vitro, while aripiprazole, risperidone, and ziprasidone do not. Dissimilarity in binding profiles may contribute to the reported differences in the anticholinergic effects of these antipsychotics. However, it is difficult with the available data to predict the likelihood of anticholinergic effects occurring with various doses of an atypical antipsychotic.

METHODS

We developed a model to assess the potential anticholinergic activity (AA) of atypical antipsychotics at therapeutic doses. A radioreceptor assay was used to measure in vitro AA at 6 clinically relevant concentrations of aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Using published pharmacokinetic data, in combination with the measured in vitro AA, dose-AA curves were generated.

RESULTS

Clozapine, and to a lesser extent olanzapine and quetiapine showed dose-dependent increases in AA. At therapeutic doses, the AA (in pmol/mL of atropine equivalents) was estimated to range from 27-250, 1-15, and 0-5.4 pmol/mL for clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine, respectively. Aripiprazole, risperidone, and ziprasidone did not demonstrate AA at any of the concentrations studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic doses of clozapine, olanzapine, and, to a lesser extent, quetiapine are associated with clinically relevant AA.

Reduction in psychotic symptoms as a predictor of patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: data from a randomized double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction with antipsychotic treatment is important. Limited evidence suggests that satisfaction is associated with symptom improvement and compliance. Predictors of patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication were examined in a study of patients with a recent exacerbation of schizophrenia.

METHODS

Data are from a randomized, double-blind trial comparing risperidone (n = 152), quetiapine (n = 156), and placebo (n = 73). Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) was completed after 14 days of treatment and after 6 weeks at last study visit.

RESULTS

Medication satisfaction at both time points was significantly associated in multiple regression analysis with improvement on 3 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factor scores (positive symptoms p < .01; uncontrolled hostility/excitement, p < .0005; anxiety/depression, p < .04) and treatment with risperidone (p < .03); at day 14, significant association was also found with older age (p = .01). At both time points, predictor variables explained over 30% of the variance in medication satisfaction. Change in Hamilton Depression Scale, prolactin levels, sex, and reported adverse events of extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, and movement disorders were not significant predictors of satisfaction. Lower level of medication satisfaction at day 14 was associated with earlier discontinuation in the trial at week 6 end point. A focused principal components analysis of PANSS factors and MSQ suggested that medication satisfaction relates to 3 groups of factors in descending order of magnitude: lower levels of (a) uncontrolled hostility/excitement, (b) positive symptoms, and (c) negative symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and anxiety/depression.

CONCLUSION

Results give further support that treatment satisfaction is positively associated with symptom improvement, particularly psychotic symptoms, and suggest that satisfaction may also be related to compliance, as those who were more satisfied remained in the trial for a longer period of time.

Risperidone in the treatment of psychosis of Alzheimer disease: results from a prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of low-dose risperidone for treating psychosis of Alzheimer disease (AD).

METHOD

The authors conducted a randomized, eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial involving nursing home residents diagnosed with AD and psychosis. Four hundred seventy-three patients were randomly assigned to placebo (N = 238) or 1.0 to 1.5 mg risperidone per day (N = 235). Coprimary efficacy end points were: changes in scores on the Behavioral pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) Psychosis subscale and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C). Protocol-specified subgroup analyses were performed by demographics and dementia severity.

RESULTS

Efficacy analysis included 416 patients. Both groups improved significantly on the BEHAVE-AD Psychosis subscale and CGI-C with no significant difference between groups. In the subgroups analyses, a statistically significant treatment by Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) interaction on the CGI-C (F([2,381]) = 3.90, p = 0.021) was observed with patients with more severe dementia (MMSE <10) showing significant differences at end point favoring risperidone treatment (chi(2) ([1]) = 5.11, p = 0.024). Mean risperidone dose was 1.03 +/- 0.24 mg per day. All-cause discontinuation rates were 25% for both risperidone and placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 74% risperidone versus 64% placebo patients, with somnolence occurring significantly more frequently with risperidone (16.2% versus 4.6%). Nine (3.8%) risperidone- and six (2.5%) placebo patients died during or within 30 days after treatment.

CONCLUSION

This trial did not confirm earlier findings in this population.

Risperidone treatment in elderly patients with dementia: relative risk of cerebrovascular events versus other antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

The possibility that low-dose antipsychotic treatment is associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) in elderly patients with dementia has been raised. The objective was to determine whether risperidone is associated with an increased risk of CVEs relative to other commonly considered alternative treatments.

METHODS

An analysis of Medicaid data from 1999 to 2002, representing approximately 8 million enrollees from multiple states, was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute inpatient admission for a CVE within 3 months following initiation of treatment with atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or ziprasidone), haloperidol, or benzo-diazepines.

RESULTS

Descriptive analyses found similar rates of incident CVEs across evaluated agents. Multivariate analyses found no differences in comparisons of risperidone with olanzapine or quetiapine. Risperidone and other antipsychotics as a group were also not associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of incident CVE than either haloperidol or benzodiazepines. With risperidone as the reference group: olanzapine, OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.73; quetiapine, OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.23-1.87; haloperidol, OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.02-3.60; benzodiazepines, OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-2.98. With benzodiazepines as the reference group, the OR of incident CVE for all antipsychotics as a class was 0.49, 95%CI 0.35-0.69.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant difference in the incidence of CVEs between patients taking risperidone and those taking other atypical antipsychotics. Risperidone and all atypical antipsychotics were not associated with higher risk than two common treatment alternatives (haloperidol and benzodiazepines). These findings do not support the conclusion that risperidone is associated with a higher risk of CVE than other available treatment alternatives. The data also suggest that patient characteristics other than antipsychotic use are more significant predictors of CVEs. Given the relatively low rates of incident CVEs, a larger sample of patients with groups closely balanced on a wide spectrum of potential risk factors could provide a more precise assessment of risk.

Evaluation of risperidone in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms and sleep disturbances associated with dementia

BACKGROUND

Dementia is associated with progressive cognitive impairment and behavioral and psychological symptoms. Sleep-wake cycle disturbances are common in patients with dementia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and associated sleep-wake cycle disturbances.

METHODS

In this open-label, 12-week, observational, prospective study, the effects of risperidone were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) total and subscale scores. Sleep-wake cycle disturbances were rated by patients/caregivers using a newly developed sleep behavior questionnaire that included assessment of sleep duration, quality, awakenings, and effects on daily activities. Tolerability assessments included the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) subscale for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and the recording of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 338 patients entered the study, with 321 patients completing. Following 12 weeks of risperidone treatment (mean dose 1.49 mg/day at end-point), the mean NPI score was reduced to 10.6 from a baseline score of 28.7. Compared with baseline, patients/caregivers reported significant improvements following 12 weeks of risperidone in total sleep hours at night (5.5 vs. 7.1 hours), hours awake in bed at night (2.3 vs. 1.2 hours), insomnia (40.1% vs. 8.4%), and other sleep-related variables. Six patients reported a total of 10 adverse events, including somnolence (n = 3) and sialorrhea (n = 2). Scores on the UKU subscale of EPS improved significantly (mean 4.0 at baseline vs. 1.7 at week 12).

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of BPSD and associated sleep disturbances.

Risperidone for psychosis of Alzheimer's disease and mixed dementia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose risperidone in treating psychosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mixed dementia (MD) in a subset of nursing-home residents who had dementia and aggression and who were participating in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of risperidone for aggression.

METHOD

This post-hoc analysis included only patients diagnosed with AD or MD with psychosis, defined by a score of >or= 2 on any item of the Behavioral Pathology of Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) psychosis subscale at both screening and baseline. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were changes in scores on BEHAVE-AD psychosis subscale and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C).

RESULTS

Overall, 93 patients (46 risperidone and 47 placebo) fulfilled the psychosis of AD criteria. Mean change at endpoint in BEHAVE-AD psychosis subscale with risperidone was superior to placebo (-5.2 vs -3.3; p = 0.039). Distribution of CGI-C at endpoint also favoured risperidone (p < 0.001). The superior improvement with risperidone compared with placebo occurred as early as the first two weeks and persisted to the end of the treatment period. At endpoint, 59% of risperidone-treated patients were responders (i.e. were 'very much' or 'much' improved) compared with 26% of patients receiving placebo. The mean risperidone dose was 1.03 +/- 0.61 mg/day. Twelve weeks of treatment were completed by 37 patients treated with risperidone (80%) and 35 with placebo (74%). A total of 46 (98%) placebo- and 44 (96%) risperidone-treated patients experienced at least one adverse event, with only somnolence occurring more frequently in the risperidone group.

CONCLUSION

Risperidone effectively reduces psychosis and improves global functioning in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe psychosis of AD and MD.

Effects of switching from olanzapine to risperidone on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in overweight or obese patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: Analysis of a multicenter, rater-blinded, open-label study

BACKGROUND

A major contributor to mortality inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder is cardiovascular disease, an important risk factor for which is the cluster of clinical abnormalities that define the metabolic syndrome (eg, abdominal/visceral obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, impaired glucose tolerance).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to examine the effects of switching from the antipsychotic olanzapine to risperidone on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in high-risk overweight or obese patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis was based on data from a previous 2-phase, 20-week, multicenter (19 US sites), rater-blinded, open-label study. High-risk overweight or obese (body mass index [BMI], >26 kg/m(2)) patients aged 18 to 65 years with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder whose treatment was switched from olanzapine to risperidone were enrolled. Patients who entered the phase 1 switch from olanzapine to risperidone (6 weeks) and the phase 2 extension (14 weeks) were included in the assessment. The primary end point was the difference from baseline in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome at week 20, determined using measurements of weight, BMI, waist circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP).

RESULTS

Baseline assessments for the metabolic syndrome were available from 121 of 123 patients recruited for phase 1 of the study (61 men, 60 women; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [10.2] years; mean [SD] BMI, 33.9 [6.9] kg/m(2)); 71 patients entered phase 2 (29 men, 42 women; mean [SD] age, 40.2 [10.3] years; mean [SD] BMI, 35.1 [7.3] kg/m(2)), of whom 39 (54.9%) ere diagnosed with schizophrenia, and 32 (45.1%) with schizoaffective disorder. The metabolic syndrome was identified in 63 (52.1%) patients at study entry. In the 71 patients with data available from baseline and week 20 (using the last observation carried forward method), the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was reduced from 38 (53.5%) patients at baseline to 26 (36.6%) at study end (McNemar chi(2) = 8.0, P < 0.005). Significant improvements at study end were seen in mean weight (P = 0.031), BMI (P = 0.002), waist circumference (P = 0.003), SBP (P = 0.006), and DBP (P = 0.010). There was no significant difference in the reduction in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome between patients who did or did not receive the behavioral therapy for weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis of switching from the antipsychotic olanzapine to risperidone on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in high-risk overweight or obese patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, the metabolic syndrome was highly prevalent at baseline. Switching from olanza- pine to risperidone was associated with a significant reduction in this prevalence.

Management of agitation, aggression, and psychosis associated with dementia: A pooled analysis including three randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trials in nursing home residents treated with risperidone

This analysis used pooled data from three randomized, placebo-controlled trials that examined the efficacy and safety of risperidone for the treatment of agitation, aggression, and psychosis associated with dementia in elderly nursing home residents to assess the risk-benefit of the use of risperidone in this population. The efficacy data (risperidone n=722, placebo n=428) were obtained from the Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory (CMAI) and behavioral pathology in Alzheimer's disease (BEHAVE-AD) total and subscales. Additionally, clinical global impression (CGI) assessments were performed. Subgroup analyses were performed by type of dementia, severity of dementia, presence or absence of somnolence as an adverse event, and presence or absence of psychosis at baseline. Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment emergent adverse events, Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, ECG and vital signs, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The mean dose of risperidone at end point was 1.0 mg/day (0.02 S.E.). The observed mean change at end point was significantly higher for risperidone than for placebo on CMAI total score (-11.8 versus -6.4, respectively; p<0.001), total aggression score (-5.0 versus -1.8, respectively; p<0.001), BEHAVE-AD total score (-6.1 and -3.6, respectively; p<0.001), and psychotic symptoms score (-2.1 and -1.3, respectively; p=0.003). The main treatment effects of risperidone were similar in all subgroup analyses. Additionally, risperidone-treated patients scored significantly better than placebo-treated patients on the CGI scales at end point. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between risperidone (84.3%) and placebo (83.9%). More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the risperidone-treated group (17.2%) than in the placebo group (11.2%). Differences in adverse event incidences between placebo and risperidone were observed for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), mild somnolence and the less common cerebrovascular adverse events (CAE). Risperidone induced neither orthostatic, nor anticholinergic side effects nor falls nor cognitive decline. Of all atypical antipsychotics, risperidone has the largest database of double-blind controlled trials to support its efficacy and safety in the treatment of agitation, aggression, and psychosis associated with dementia. At the recommended doses, risperidone displayed a favorable risk-benefit profile. Risperidone was well tolerated with respect to EPS, somnolence, and anticholinergic side effects in this elderly population. In view of the risk for CAEs, risperidone, should be targeted towards the treatment of those patients in whom psychotic and behavioral symptoms of dementia are prominent and associated with significant distress, functional impairment or danger to the patient.

In vitro effects of risperidone and 9-hydroxy-risperidone on human platelet function, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic events have been reported with the use of antipsychotic compounds, although the incidence, predisposing factors, and biological mechanisms associated with these events in psychiatric patients are subject to debate.

OBJECTIVE

The in vitro actions of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxy-risperidone (9-OH-risperidone) on human platelet function, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis were examined to explore whether hematologic effects might be a mechanism for thrombotic events with these compounds.

METHODS

Blood was donated by healthy white male subjects who were free of medications (particularly acetylsalicylic acid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory compounds). Platelet shape change and adhesion/aggregation reactions to risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen, epinephrine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) were tested in human platelet-rich plasma. Arachidonic acid metabolism was assessed in human platelets and rat aortic rings. Plasma coagulation was tested in human platelet-poor plasma. Fibrinolysis was measured in human whole blood.

RESULTS

The 12 study subjects ranged in age from 20 to 40 years (median age 30 years). At concentrations of 1 x 10(-5) mol/L (approximately 4180 ng/mL), neither risperidone nor 9-OH-risperidone induced platelet shape change or aggregation, amplified reactions to ADP, or modified platelet adhesion/aggregation induced by collagen or ADP, but they did attenuate epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation (-50% in the case of 9-OH-risperidone; P < 0.05) and 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation (drug concentrations yielding 50% inhibition of 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation, 0.5 and 0.2 ng/mL, respectively). Cyclooxygenase, thromboxane A2 synthase, 12-lipoxygenase, prostacyclin synthase, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis were unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone reduced epinephrine- and 5-HT-induced human platelet aggregation but did not significantly alter other measures of platelet function, plasma coagulation, or fibrinolysis in vitro.

Behavioral and psychological symptoms in patients with dementia as a target for pharmacotherapy with risperidone

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of risperidone on specific behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).

METHOD

We conducted a post hoc exploratory analysis of an integrated database from 3 randomized, controlled trials of risperidone versus placebo in treating 1150 nursing home residents with BPSD. Changes in scores were measured for items on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD).

RESULTS

On the CMAI, risperidone was significantly more effective in treating hitting (p = .000), hurt self or other (p = .005), cursing or verbal aggression (p = .000), repetitive sentences or questions (p = .001), scratching (p = .041), general restlessness (p = .001), grabbing onto people (p = .028), constant request for attention (p = .041), pacing and aimless wandering (p = .013), and performing repetitious mannerisms (p = .045). On the BEHAVE-AD, risperidone was significantly more effective in treating physical threats and/or violence (p = .000), verbal outbursts (p = .000), other anxieties (p = .01), agitation (p = .000), tearfulness (p = .03), and nonparanoid delusions (p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The items from the BEHAVE-AD and CMAI that were improved with risperidone included psychotic, agitated, and aggressive symptoms. These data suggest that risperidone is more effective than placebo in treating a variety of symptoms associated with dementia.

Associations of demographic, functional, and behavioral characteristics with activity-related fear of falling among older adults transitioning to frailty

OBJECTIVES

To determine, in a cohort of older individuals transitioning to frailty (defined by Speechley and Tinetti, 1991) who have previously fallen, whether there are significant associations between demographic, functional, and behavioral characteristics and activity-related fear of falling, using both the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC).

DESIGN

Baseline cross-sectional analysis in a prospective cohort intervention study.

SETTING

Twenty independent senior living facilities in Atlanta.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen male and 270 female subjects (n = 287), age 70 and older (mean +/- standard deviation, 80.9 +/- 6.2), with Mini-Mental State Examination score > or = 24, transitioning to frailty, ambulatory (with or without assistive device), medically stable, and having fallen in the past year.

MEASUREMENTS

Activity-related fear of falling was evaluated with the FES and ABC Scale. Because of the comparable data derived from each scale, associations with functional measures-related analyses were expressed using the latter. Depression was measured by Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Functional measurements included timed 360 degrees turn, functional reach test, timed 10-meter walk test, single limb stands, picking up an object, and three chair stands.

RESULTS

No statistically significant association was found between activity-related fear of falling and age. For the proposed activities, about half (ABC, 48.1%; FES, 50.1%) of the subjects were concerned about falling or showed lack of confidence in controlling their balance. A statistically significant inverse correlation was found between FES and ABC (r = -0.65; P < .001). African-American subjects showed more activity-related fear of falling than did Caucasians (odds ratio (OR): 2.7 for ABC; 2.1 for FES). Fearful individuals were more likely to be depressed and more likely to report the use of a walking aid than were nonfearful individuals. Fear of falling was significantly correlated to all of the functional measurements (P < .05). In a multivariable logistic regression model, depression, using a walking-aid, slow gait speed, and being an African-American were directly related to being more fearful of falling.

CONCLUSIONS

Activity-related fear of falling was present in almost half of this sample of older adults transitioning to frailty. The significant association of activity-related fear of falling with demographic, functional, and behavioral characteristics emphasizes the need for multidimensional intervention strategies to lessen activity-related fear of falling in this population.

Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective

Using matched-pair analysis, we compared two popular methods of stem cell mobilization in 24 advanced-stage breast cancer patients who underwent two consecutive mobilizing procedures as part of a tandem transplant protocol. For the first cycle, 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given and apheresis commenced on day 4 and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). One week after the first cycle of apheresis, 4000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2 etoposide, and 10 microg/kg G-CSF were administered for < or =16 days (cycle 2). Apheresis was initiated when the white blood cell (WBC) count exceeded 5000 cells/microL and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). Mean values of peripheral blood WBC (31,700+/-3200 vs. 30,700+/-3300/microL) were not significantly different between cycles 1 and 2. Mean number of mononuclear cells (MNC) collected per day was slightly greater with G-CSF mobilization than with the combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF (2.5+/-0.21x10(8) vs. 1.8+/-0.19x10(8) cells/kg). Mean daily CD34+ cell yield, however, was nearly six times higher (12.9+/-4.4 vs. 2.2+/-0.5x10(6)/kg; p = 0.01) with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. With G-CSF alone, 13% of aphereses reached the target dose of 5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one collection vs. 57% with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Transfusions of red blood cells or platelets were necessary in 18 of 24 patients in cycle 2. Three patients were hospitalized with fever for a median of 3 days after cycle 2. No patients received transfusions or required hospitalization during mobilization with G-CSF alone. Resource utilization (cost of drugs, aphereses, cryopreservation, transfusions, hospitalization) was calculated comparing the median number of collections to obtain a target CD34+ cell dose of 5x10(6) cells/kg: four using G-CSF vs. one using the combination in this data set. Resources for G-CSF mobilization cost $7326 vs. $8693 for the combination, even though more apheresis procedures were performed using G-CSF mobilization. The cost of chemotherapy administration, more doses of G-CSF, transfusions, and hospitalizations caused cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF to be more expensive than G-CSF alone. A less toxic and less expensive treatment than cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF is needed to be more cost-effective than G-CSF alone for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Bone dysplasia series. Melorheostosis: review and update

Melorheostosis is a rare nongenetic developmental anomaly first described in 1922 by Léri and Joanny. Its etiology is unknown. Patients present at any age, and both sexes are affected equally. Onset is usually insidious, with deformity of the extremity, pain, limb stiffness and limitation of motion in the joints first manifesting in late childhood or early adolescence and progressing into adult life. The characteristic radiographic appearance consists of irregular hyperostotic changes of the cortex, generally on one side of the bone, resembling melted wax dripping down one side of a candle. This appearance gave the anomaly its name, which is taken from the Greek words for member (melos) and flow (rhein). There is usually a distinct demarcation between the affected and normal bone. Dense, sclerotic linear areas are seen mainly in the cortex but also extending into the cancellous bone. Melorheostosis affects mainly the long bones of the upper and lower limbs, but also the short bones of the hand and foot and, rarely, the axial skeleton. It may co-exist with osteopoikilosis and osteopathia striata as well as with tumours or malformations of blood vessels or lymphatics. Soft-tissue ossifications at the site of the joint are common. Bone scintigraphy is positive and shows moderately increased uptake of tracer. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can further characterize the lesion, but rarely contribute to the diagnosis. The forme fruste of melorheostosis may mimic other conditions such as myositis ossificans, osteoma and parosteal osteosarcoma. Treatment of this chronic and sometimes debilitating condition consists of surgical soft-tissue procedures and even, in very severe cases, amputation.

The pathogenesis of osteonecrosis and the relationships to corticosteroids

One of the challenging issues faced by allergists is a risk-benefit analysis on the use of corticosteroids. An uncommon, but serious complication of corticosteroids is the development of avascular necrosis (osteonecrosis). In this review we present the differential diagnosis and pathophysiology of osteonecrosis, with particular emphasis on steroids. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a common disorder that may be either naturally occurring or iatrogenic. With the exception of those cases labeled as idiopathic, the majority are the result of some insult to the vascular integrity of the affected hip. The reason for this disruption is manifold and can range from direct trauma to the more subtle or indirect compromise associated with fatty emboli or often an intravascular event such as that seen in sickle cell anemia. Although they are not totally understood, corticosteroids present a special problem because of susceptibility factors that may make some patients more likely to get osteonecrosis than others. The problem may be more complex, in that the association between corticosteroid use and osteonecrosis may be disease-dependent. In any case, any patient receiving long-term corticosteroids should be warned of this potentially debilitating complication.

Avascular necrosis

There are multiple conditions associated with the development of osteonecrosis including trauma, hemoglobinopathies, Caisson disease, local infiltrative lesions, hypercortisolism, alcohol consumption, chronic renal failure, and autoimmune disease.