Gilteritinib in combination with venetoclax, low-dose cytarabine and actinomycin D for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia

We have conducted a retrospective, single-centre analysis of 20 patients with relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (FLT3m AML) who received a salvage quadruplet regimen consisting of gilteritinib, venetoclax, low-dose cytarabine and actinomycin D (G-ACTIVE). G-ACTIVE resulted in a 95% (19/20) overall response rate and 75% (15/20) complete remission and complete remission with an incomplete platelet recovery (CR + CRp) rate. Out of 13 transplant-eligible patients, 11 (86%) proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The median overall survival and relapse-free survival after G-ACTIVE were 32 and 12.9 months respectively. The Day 60 mortality rate was 15%.

Glasdegib in combination with low-dose Cytarabine for the outpatient treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in unfit patients

We retrospectively collected clinical data on 31 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) patients who were treated with outpatient glasdegib and low-dose Cytarabine (LDAraC) at our institution. The median age was 67 years (45–86). The median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 2 (1–3). The patients had previously received a median number of 2 (1–4) treatment lines, 61% (19/31) had been treated with intensive chemotherapy, 29% (9/31) had relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and 45% (14/31) had had venetoclax exposure. Adverse cytogenetics were identified in 45% (14/31) of the cases. The CR + CRp rate was 21% (6/29) among evaluable patients. The median overall survival was 3.9 months for all patients. Different median overall survival times were observed in responders, patients achieving stable disease and those diagnosed with progressive disease: not reached vs 3.9 months vs 0.8 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were pneumonia (29%, 9/31), sepsis (23%, 7/31), and febrile neutropenia (16%, 5/31). Glasdegib + LDAraC is a fairly safe, non-intensive, outpatient regimen inducing complete remission and resulting in prolonged survival in some R/R AML patients.

Mitigating arrhythmia risk in Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin treated COVID-19 patients using arrhythmia risk management plan

Aims

To assess cardiac safety in COVID-19 patients treated with the combination of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin using arrhythmia risk management plan.

Methods and results

We retrospectively examined arrhythmia safety of treatment with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the setting of pre-defined arrhythmia risk management plan. The data was analyzed using R statistical package version 4.0.0. A two-tailed p-value<0.05 was considered significant. 81 patients were included from March 23rd to May 10th 2020. The median age was 59 years, 58.0% were female. The majority of the study population (82.7%) had comorbidities, 98.8% had radiological signs of pneumonia. Fourteen patients (17.3%) experienced QTc ≥ 480 ms and 16 patients (19.8%) had an increase of QTc ≥ 60 ms. Seven patients (8.6%) had QTc prolongation of ≥ 500 ms. The treatment was discontinued in 4 patients (4.9%). None of the patients developed ventricular tachycardia. The risk factors significantly associated with QTc ≥ 500 ms were hypokalemia (p = 0.032) and use of diuretics during the treatment (p = 0.020). Three patients (3.7%) died, the cause of death was bacterial superinfection with septic shock in two patients, and disseminated intravascular coagulation with multiple organ failure in one patient. None of these deaths were associated with cardiac arrhythmias.

Conclusion

We recorded a low incidence of QTc prolongation ≥ 500 ms and no ventricular tachycardia events in COVID-19 patients treated with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin using cardiac arrhythmia risk management plan.

Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients failing venetoclax-based salvage therapies

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the outcomes of 28 heavily pretreated (median 3 (2-6) treatment lines, sixteen (57%) allotransplanted) relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients who had failed salvage venetoclax-based therapies.

RESULTS

The median age was 59 years (20-80), 20 patients (71%) had ECOG 2-4 status, and 18 patients (64%) were stratified to European Leukemia Network 2017 adverse risk group. The most common mutations were ASXL1 (21%), RUNX1 (18%), FLT3 ITD/TKD (18%), PTPN11 (15%), NRAS/KRAS (15%), and WT1 (15%). Twenty-two patients (79%) received different post-venetoclax salvage therapies with the overall response rate of 23% (complete remission + morphological leukemia-free state). Three of six (50%) patients achieved complete remissions after therapy with venetoclax + actinomycin D ± low-dose cytarabine. The remaining 6 patients did not receive any further salvage treatment mainly due to poor general condition. The median overall survival was 3.9 months for all patients (4.3 for those receiving post-venetoclax salvage vs 1.3 months receiving palliative care alone, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Though the remission rate and survival of patients failing venetoclax are poor, a small proportion of these R/R AML patients may still respond to cautious intensification of chemotherapy with venetoclax.

Etoposide + Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Optional Plerixafor in Patients Who Failed Chemomobilization with or without Plerixafor

We conducted a retrospective study of 62 patients undergoing etoposide (2 g/m²) + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 10 patients also received additional plerixafor) as a salvage stem cell mobilization regimen after previous unsuccessful chemomobilization with or without plerixafor. The median peak CD34⁺ values after etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor was 54.07 CD34⁺/μL compared with 9.6 CD34⁺/μL after previous mobilization attempts (P < .001). The median yield was 6.33 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg per 2 apheresis. Etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor mobilization regimen resulted in 91.53% successful mobilizations and 89.83% of patients proceeding to autologous stem cell transplantation. All 7 patients who had previously failed plerixafor-based mobilization attempts were successfully mobilized with etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor and proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation. The most common grades 3 to 4 adverse events of etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor were febrile neutropenia (69.35%), mucositis (51.62%), and bacteremia (20.97%). No fatal outcomes were observed. Rates of 12-month overall survival and progression-free survival were 88.71% and 70.97%, respectively. Etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor is an effective regimen for salvage stem cell mobilization also in patients who failed plerixafor, with most patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. The adverse event rate may warrant a decrease in the dose of etoposide.