1
|
Opsahl JA, Vaudel M, Guldbrandsen A, Aasebø E, Van Pesch V, Franciotta D, Myhr KM, Barsnes H, Berle M, Torkildsen Ø, Kroksveen AC, Berven FS. Label-free analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid addressing various normalization strategies and revealing protein groups affected by multiple sclerosis. Proteomics 2016; 16:1154-65. [PMID: 26841090 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2015] [Revised: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The aims of the study were to: (i) identify differentially regulated proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) between multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and non-MS controls; (ii) examine the effect of matching the CSF samples on either total protein amount or volume, and compare four protein normalization strategies for CSF protein quantification. CSF from MS patients (n = 37) and controls (n = 64), consisting of other noninflammatory neurological diseases (n = 50) and non neurological spinal anesthetic subjects (n = 14), were analyzed using label-free proteomics, quantifying almost 800 proteins. In total, 122 proteins were significantly regulated (p < 0.05), where 77 proteins had p-value <0.01 or AUC value >0.75. Hierarchical clustering indicated that there were two main groups of MS patients, those with increased levels of inflammatory response proteins and decreased levels of proteins involved in neuronal tissue development (n = 30), and those with normal protein levels for both of these protein groups (n = 7). The main subgroup of controls clustering with the MS patients showing increased inflammation and decreased neuronal tissue development were patients suffering from chronic fatigue. Our data indicate that the preferable way to quantify proteins in CSF is to first match the samples on total protein amount and then normalize the data based on the median intensities, preferably from the CNS-enriched proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill A Opsahl
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marc Vaudel
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Astrid Guldbrandsen
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Elise Aasebø
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Vincent Van Pesch
- Neurology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Diego Franciotta
- Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, IRCCS, "C. Mondino" National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy
| | - Kjell-Morten Myhr
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Harald Barsnes
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Magnus Berle
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Surgical Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Øivind Torkildsen
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ann C Kroksveen
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Frode S Berven
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kroksveen AC, Jaffe JD, Aasebø E, Barsnes H, Bjørlykke Y, Franciotta D, Keshishian H, Myhr KM, Opsahl JA, van Pesch V, Teunissen CE, Torkildsen Ø, Ulvik RJ, Vethe H, Carr SA, Berven FS. Quantitative proteomics suggests decrease in the secretogranin-1 cerebrospinal fluid levels during the disease course of multiple sclerosis. Proteomics 2015; 15:3361-9. [DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann C. Kroksveen
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research; Department of Clinical Medicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Jacob D. Jaffe
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; 7 Cambridge Center; Cambridge MA USA
| | - Elise Aasebø
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Harald Barsnes
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Computational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Yngvild Bjørlykke
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Department of Clinical Science; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Diego Franciotta
- Laboratory of Neuroimmunology; “C. Mondino” National Neurological Institute; Pavia Italy
| | - Hasmik Keshishian
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; 7 Cambridge Center; Cambridge MA USA
| | - Kjell-Morten Myhr
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research; Department of Clinical Medicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre; Department of Neurology; Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway
| | - Jill A. Opsahl
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research; Department of Clinical Medicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Vincent van Pesch
- Neurochemistry Unit; Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain; Brussels Belgium
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank; Department of Clinical Chemistry; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Øivind Torkildsen
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research; Department of Clinical Medicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre; Department of Neurology; Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway
| | - Rune J. Ulvik
- Department of Clinical Medicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry; Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway
| | - Heidrun Vethe
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Department of Clinical Science; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Steven A. Carr
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; 7 Cambridge Center; Cambridge MA USA
| | - Frode S. Berven
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research; Department of Clinical Medicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE); Department of Biomedicine; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
- The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre; Department of Neurology; Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kroksveen AC, Opsahl JA, Guldbrandsen A, Myhr KM, Oveland E, Torkildsen Ø, Berven FS. Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics in multiple sclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014; 1854:746-56. [PMID: 25526888 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2014] [Revised: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune mediated chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system usually initiated during young adulthood, affecting approximately 2.5 million people worldwide. There is currently no cure for MS, but disease modifying treatment has become increasingly more effective, especially when started in the first phase of the disease. The disease course and prognosis are often unpredictable and it can be challenging to determine an early diagnosis. The detection of novel biomarkers to understand more of the disease mechanism, facilitate early diagnosis, predict disease progression, and find treatment targets would be very attractive. Over the last decade there has been an increasing effort toward finding such biomarker candidates. One promising strategy has been to use state-of-the-art quantitative proteomics approaches to compare the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteome between MS and control patients or between different subgroups of MS. In this review we summarize and discuss the status of CSF proteomics in MS, including the latest findings with a focus on the last five years. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Neuroproteomics: Applications in Neuroscience and Neurology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann C Kroksveen
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5009 Bergen, Norway; The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Jill A Opsahl
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5009 Bergen, Norway; The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Astrid Guldbrandsen
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5009 Bergen, Norway
| | - Kjell-Morten Myhr
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Postbox 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway; The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Postbox 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Eystein Oveland
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5009 Bergen, Norway; The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Øivind Torkildsen
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Postbox 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway; The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Postbox 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Frode S Berven
- Proteomics Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5009 Bergen, Norway; The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Postbox 1400, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teunissen C, Menge T, Altintas A, Álvarez-Cermeño JC, Bertolotto A, Berven FS, Brundin L, Comabella M, Degn M, Deisenhammer F, Fazekas F, Franciotta D, Frederiksen JL, Galimberti D, Gnanapavan S, Hegen H, Hemmer B, Hintzen R, Hughes S, Iacobaeus E, Kroksveen AC, Kuhle J, Richert J, Tumani H, Villar LM, Drulovic J, Dujmovic I, Khalil M, Bartos A. Consensus definitions and application guidelines for control groups in cerebrospinal fluid biomarker studies in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013; 19:1802-9. [DOI: 10.1177/1352458513488232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The choice of appropriate control group(s) is critical in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker research in multiple sclerosis (MS). There is a lack of definitions and nomenclature of different control groups and a rationalized application of different control groups. We here propose consensus definitions and nomenclature for the following groups: healthy controls (HCs), spinal anesthesia subjects (SASs), inflammatory neurological disease controls (INDCs), peripheral inflammatory neurological disease controls (PINDCs), non-inflammatory neurological controls (NINDCs), symptomatic controls (SCs). Furthermore, we discuss the application of these control groups in specific study designs, such as for diagnostic biomarker studies, prognostic biomarker studies and therapeutic response studies. Application of these uniform definitions will lead to better comparability of biomarker studies and optimal use of available resources. This will lead to improved quality of CSF biomarker research in MS and related disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Teunissen
- Neurological Laboratory, Innogentecis and Roche, VU University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Til Menge
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine-University, Germany
| | - Ayse Altintas
- Neurology Department, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul University, Turkey
| | | | | | - Frode S Berven
- Department of Biomedicine, Proteomics Unit (PROBE), University of Bergen, Norway
- The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
| | - Lou Brundin
- Neurology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Manuel Comabella
- Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Spain
| | - Matilde Degn
- Department of Neurology, Glostrup University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Franz Fazekas
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Diego Franciotta
- Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, IRCCS - C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Italy
| | - Jette L Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Glostrup University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniela Galimberti
- Neurology Unit, Dept. of Pathophysiology and Trasplantation, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Italy
| | | | - Harald Hegen
- Innsbruck Medical University, Department of Neurology, Austria
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München/ Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich/German Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Ellen Iacobaeus
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
| | - Ann C Kroksveen
- The KG Jebsen Centre for MS-research, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Jens Kuhle
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - John Richert
- Global Medical Affairs Department, Biogen Idec Inc., USA
| | | | - Luisa M Villar
- Department of Immunology, MS Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCYS, REEM, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael Khalil
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Ales Bartos
- Prague Psychiatric Center, Czech Republic
- Charles University in Prague, Third Faculty of Medicine, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berle M, Kroksveen AC, Haaland OA, Aye TT, Opsahl JA, Oveland E, Wester K, Ulvik RJ, Helland CA, Berven FS. Protein profiling reveals inter-individual protein homogeneity of arachnoid cyst fluid and high qualitative similarity to cerebrospinal fluid. Fluids Barriers CNS 2011; 8:19. [PMID: 21599959 PMCID: PMC3120722 DOI: 10.1186/2045-8118-8-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2011] [Accepted: 05/20/2011] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mechanisms behind formation and filling of intracranial arachnoid cysts (AC) are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate AC fluid by proteomics to gain further knowledge about ACs. Two goals were set: 1) Comparison of AC fluid from individual patients to determine whether or not temporal AC is a homogenous condition; and 2) Evaluate the protein content of a pool of AC fluid from several patients and qualitatively compare this with published protein lists of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. METHODS AC fluid from 15 patients with temporal AC was included in this study. In the AC protein comparison experiment, AC fluid from 14 patients was digested, analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a semi-quantitative label-free approach and the data were compared by principal component analysis (PCA) to gain knowledge of protein homogeneity of AC. In the AC proteome evaluation experiment, AC fluid from 11 patients was pooled, digested, and fractionated by SCX chromatography prior to analysis by LC-MS/MS. Proteins identified were compared to published databases of proteins identified from CSF and plasma. AC fluid proteins not found in these two databases were experimentally searched for in lumbar CSF taken from neurologically-normal patients, by a targeted protein identification approach called MIDAS (Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) initiated detection and sequence analysis). RESULTS We did not identify systematic trends or grouping of data in the AC protein comparison experiment, implying low variability between individual proteomic profiles of AC.In the AC proteome evaluation experiment, we identified 199 proteins. When compared to previously published lists of proteins identified from CSF and plasma, 15 of the AC proteins had not been reported in either of these datasets. By a targeted protein identification approach, we identified 11 of these 15 proteins in pooled CSF from neurologically-normal patients, demonstrating that the majority of abundant proteins in AC fluid also can be found in CSF. Compared to plasma, as many as 104 proteins in AC were not found in the list of 3017 plasma proteins. CONCLUSIONS Based on the protein content of AC fluid, our data indicate that temporal AC is a homogenous condition, pointing towards a similar AC filling mechanism for the 14 patients examined. Most of the proteins identified in AC fluid have been identified in CSF, indicating high similarity in the qualitative protein content of AC to CSF, whereas this was not the case between AC and plasma. This indicates that AC is filled with a liquid similar to CSF. As far as we know, this is the first proteomics study that explores the AC fluid proteome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Berle
- Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berle M, Wester KG, Ulvik RJ, Kroksveen AC, Haaland OA, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Berven FS, Helland CA. Arachnoid cysts do not contain cerebrospinal fluid: A comparative chemical analysis of arachnoid cyst fluid and cerebrospinal fluid in adults. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010; 7:8. [PMID: 20537169 PMCID: PMC2898803 DOI: 10.1186/1743-8454-7-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2010] [Accepted: 06/10/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Arachnoid cyst (AC) fluid has not previously been compared with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the same patient. ACs are commonly referred to as containing "CSF-like fluid". The objective of this study was to characterize AC fluid by clinical chemistry and to compare AC fluid to CSF drawn from the same patient. Such comparative analysis can shed further light on the mechanisms for filling and sustaining of ACs. Methods Cyst fluid from 15 adult patients with unilateral temporal AC (9 female, 6 male, age 22-77y) was compared with CSF from the same patients by clinical chemical analysis. Results AC fluid and CSF had the same osmolarity. There were no significant differences in the concentrations of sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium or glucose. We found significant elevated concentration of phosphate in AC fluid (0.39 versus 0.35 mmol/L in CSF; p = 0.02), and significantly reduced concentrations of total protein (0.30 versus 0.41 g/L; p = 0.004), of ferritin (7.8 versus 25.5 ug/L; p = 0.001) and of lactate dehydrogenase (17.9 versus 35.6 U/L; p = 0.002) in AC fluid relative to CSF. Conclusions AC fluid is not identical to CSF. The differential composition of AC fluid relative to CSF supports secretion or active transport as the mechanism underlying cyst filling. Oncotic pressure gradients or slit-valves as mechanisms for generating fluid in temporal ACs are not supported by these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Berle
- Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rajalahti T, Kroksveen AC, Arneberg R, Berven FS, Vedeler CA, Myhr KM, Kvalheim OM. A Multivariate Approach To Reveal Biomarker Signatures for Disease Classification: Application to Mass Spectral Profiles of Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:3608-20. [DOI: 10.1021/pr100142m] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tarja Rajalahti
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| | - Ann C. Kroksveen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| | - Reidar Arneberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| | - Frode S. Berven
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| | - Christian A. Vedeler
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| | - Kjell-Morten Myhr
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| | - Olav M. Kvalheim
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Proteomic Unit (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis National Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rajalahti T, Arneberg R, Kroksveen AC, Berle M, Myhr KM, Kvalheim OM. Discriminating Variable Test and Selectivity Ratio Plot: Quantitative Tools for Interpretation and Variable (Biomarker) Selection in Complex Spectral or Chromatographic Profiles. Anal Chem 2009; 81:2581-90. [DOI: 10.1021/ac802514y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tarja Rajalahti
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The National Competence Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Reidar Arneberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The National Competence Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ann C. Kroksveen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The National Competence Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Magnus Berle
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The National Competence Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kjell-Morten Myhr
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The National Competence Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Olav M. Kvalheim
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Pattern Recognition Systems AS, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, The National Competence Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Arneberg R, Rajalahti T, Flikka K, Berven FS, Kroksveen AC, Berle M, Myhr KM, Vedeler CA, Ulvik RJ, Kvalheim OM. Pretreatment of Mass Spectral Profiles: Application to Proteomic Data. Anal Chem 2007; 79:7014-26. [PMID: 17711295 DOI: 10.1021/ac070946s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Mass spectral profiles are influenced by several factors that have no relation to compositional differences between samples: baseline effects, shifts in mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) (synchronization/alignment problem), structured noise (heteroscedasticity), and, differences in signal intensities (normalization problem). Different procedures for pretreatment of whole mass spectral profiles described by almost 50,000 m/z values are investigated in order to find optimal approaches with respect to revealing the information content in the data. In order to quantitatively assess the impact of different procedures for pretreatment of mass spectral profiles, we use factorial designs with the ratio between intergroup and intragroup (replicate) variance as response. We have examined the influence of smoothing, binning, alignment/synchronization, noise pattern, and normalization on data interpretation. Our analysis shows that the spectral profiles have to be corrected for heteroscedastic noise prior to normalization. An nth root transform, where n is a small, positive integer, is used to create a homoscedastic noise structure without destroying the linear correlation structures describing individual components when using whole mass spectral profiles. The choice of n is decided by a simple graphic procedure using replicate information. Log transform is shown to change the heteroscedastic noise structure from being dominant in high-intensity regions, to produce the largest noise in the low-intensity regions. In addition, log transform has a negative effect on the collinearity in the profiles. Factorial designs reveal strong interactions between several of the pretreatment steps, e.g., noise structure and normalization. This underlines the limited usability of looking at the different pretreatment steps in isolation. Binning turns out to be able to substitute smoothing of spectra by, for example, moving average or Savitsky-Golay, while, at the same time, reducing the data point description of the profiles by 1 order of magnitude. Thus, if the sampling density is high, binning seems to be an attractive option for data reduction without the risk of losing information accompanying the integration of profiles into peaks. In the absence of smoothing, binning should be executed prior to alignment. If binning is not performed, the order of pretreatment should be smoothing, alignment, nth root transform, and normalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reidar Arneberg
- Center for Integrated Petroleum Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Proteomics Unit (PROBE), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berven FS, Kroksveen AC, Berle M, Rajalahti T, Flikka K, Arneberg R, Myhr KM, Vedeler C, Kvalheim OM, Ulvik RJ. Pre-analytical influence on the low molecular weight cerebrospinal fluid proteome. Proteomics Clin Appl 2007; 1:699-711. [DOI: 10.1002/prca.200700126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|