The association between skeletal muscle measures and chemotherapy-induced toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced toxicities frequently occur in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) has been associated with a higher incidence of toxicities for several types of cancers and cytostatics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between skeletal muscle measures and chemotherapy-induced toxicity in a large cohort of NSCLC patients.

METHODS

A multicentre prospective follow-up study (PGxLUNG, NTR number NL5373610015) in NSCLC patients was conducted. Included were patients diagnosed with NSCLC (stage II-IV) treated with first-line platinum-based (cisplatin or carboplatin) chemotherapy of whom pretreatment imaging was available. Skeletal muscle area (SMA) segmentation was performed on abdominal imaging at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). SMA at the level of L3 was corrected for squared height (m2 ) to yield the lumbar skeletal muscle mass index (LSMI). Skeletal muscle density (SMD) was calculated as the mean Hounsfield Unit (HU) of the segmented SMA. SMM and SMD were categorized as low, intermediate, and high, based on LSMI and mean HU tertiles, respectively. Chemotherapy-induced toxicity was scored using CTCAE v4.03 and categorized into haematological (anaemia, leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia), non-haematological (nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and esophagitis), and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (treatment switch, delay, de-escalation, discontinuation, or hospitalization). The relationship between SMM, SMD, and toxicities was assessed with logistic regression modelling taking into account potential confounders like gender and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

In total, 297 patients (male n = 167, median age 64 years) were included. Haematological toxicity grade 3/4 was experienced in 36.6% (n = 108) of the patients, 24.6% (n = 73) experienced any non-haematological toxicity grade ≥2, and 55.6% (n = 165) any DLT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low SMM (ORadj 2.41, 95% CI 1.31-4.45, P = 0.005) and age at diagnosis >65 years (ORadj 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.90, P = 0.025) were statistically significantly associated with overall haematological toxicity grade 3/4. No statistically significant associations were found between low SMM or low SMD and non-haematological toxicities. Low SMM (ORadj 2.23, 95% CI 1.23-4.04, P = 0.008) and high SMD (ORadj 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.74, P = 0.003) were statistically significantly associated with a higher respectively lower risk of DLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-small cell lung cancer patients with pretreatment low SMM are at significant higher risk for haematological toxicities grade 3/4 and DLT. NSCLC patients with high SMD are at significant lower risk for DLT. Further studies should be aimed to investigate whether platinum dosing based on skeletal muscle measurements and/or improvement of pretreatment SMM/SMD could reduce the risk of toxicity without compromising efficacy.

The overall survival impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

•

PCI for LS-SCLC patients has become more controversial.

•

Literature search on PCI impact on overall survival in LS-SCLC yielded 28 studies.

•

Meta-analysis of adjusted HRs revealed pooled HR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57–0.69).

•

Findings support PCI in current practice while awaiting prospective trial results.

Background

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients has become more controversial. Since the publication of the systematic review by Aupérin et al. in 1999, no randomized controlled trials regarding PCI in LS-SCLC have been completed. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the effect of PCI on overall survival (OS) in patients with LS-SCLC.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in the databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane library. Only studies that reported an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), indicating the effect of PCI versus no PCI on OS (adjusted for confounders) in patients with LS-SCLC were included for critical appraisal and meta-analysis. A pooled aHR estimate was calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

Pooling of 28 retrospective studies including a total of 18,575 patients demonstrated a significant beneficial effect of PCI versus no PCI on OS with a pooled aHR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57–0.69). Substantial heterogeneity of reported aHRs among studies was observed (I² = 65.9%). Subgroup analyses revealed that this heterogeneity could partly be explained by study sample size. The pooled aHR among 7 versus 21 studies with a sample size of > 300 versus ≤ 300 patients was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.64–0.97) versus 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46–0.69; p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant beneficial effect of PCI on OS in patients with LS-SCLC. Larger studies reported a milder beneficial effect, possibly due to a decreased risk of model overfitting. Serious risk of selection and confounding bias were of concern due to the lack of prospective trials. These results support the role of PCI in standard clinical practice in patients with LS-SCLC while awaiting results of prospective trials on alternative strategies.

Multicenter Comparison of Molecular Tumor Boards in The Netherlands: Definition, Composition, Methods, and Targeted Therapy Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) provide rational, genomics-driven, patient-tailored treatment recommendations. Worldwide, MTBs differ in terms of scope, composition, methods, and recommendations. This study aimed to assess differences in methods and agreement in treatment recommendations among MTBs from tertiary cancer referral centers in The Netherlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MTBs from all tertiary cancer referral centers in The Netherlands were invited to participate. A survey assessing scope, value, logistics, composition, decision-making method, reporting, and registration of the MTBs was completed through on-site interviews with members from each MTB. Targeted therapy recommendations were compared using 10 anonymized cases. Participating MTBs were asked to provide a treatment recommendation in accordance with their own methods. Agreement was based on which molecular alteration(s) was considered actionable with the next line of targeted therapy.

RESULTS

Interviews with 24 members of eight MTBs revealed that all participating MTBs focused on rare or complex mutational cancer profiles, operated independently of cancer type-specific multidisciplinary teams, and consisted of at least (thoracic and/or medical) oncologists, pathologists, and clinical scientists in molecular pathology. Differences were the types of cancer discussed and the methods used to achieve a recommendation. Nevertheless, agreement among MTB recommendations, based on identified actionable molecular alteration(s), was high for the 10 evaluated cases (86%).

CONCLUSION

MTBs associated with tertiary cancer referral centers in The Netherlands are similar in setup and reach a high agreement in recommendations for rare or complex mutational cancer profiles. We propose a "Dutch MTB model" for an optimal, collaborative, and nationally aligned MTB workflow.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Interpretation of genomic analyses for optimal choice of target therapy for patients with cancer is becoming increasingly complex. A molecular tumor board (MTB) supports oncologists in rationalizing therapy options. However, there is no consensus on the most optimal setup for an MTB, which can affect the quality of recommendations. This study reveals that the eight MTBs associated with tertiary cancer referral centers in The Netherlands are similar in setup and reach a high agreement in recommendations for rare or complex mutational profiles. The Dutch MTB model is based on a collaborative and nationally aligned workflow with interinstitutional collaboration and data sharing.