PrEP Stigma and logistical barriers remain significant challenges in curtailing HIV transmission among Black and Hispanic/Latinx cisgender sexual minority men and transgender women in the US

Despite advancements in HIV prevention, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), there remain inequities in accessing PrEP among Black and Hispanic/Latinx cisgender sexual minority men and transgender women (SMMTW). Researchers have documented multiple barriers to PrEP uptake, yet the relative impacts of PrEP internalized stigma and logistical barriers (e.g., Cost; time) to PrEP use are understudied. It may be meaningful to investigate potential interactions between internalized stigma and logistical barriers to PrEP use. We utilized data from 827 Black and Hispanic/Latinx SMMTW (Mage = 25.09) in the US and found that greater PrEP-related internalized stigma and greater PrEP logistical barriers were independently significantly associated with lower likelihood of current PrEP use, but PrEP-related internalized stigma became a non-significant predictor when included in a multivariable model. We found a significant interaction between PrEP-related internalized stigma and logistical barriers to PrEP use, such that the association between internalized stigma and likelihood of current PrEP use was only significant at lower levels of logistical barriers to PrEP use. Findings highlight the need to reduce logistical barriers to PrEP use, and for clinicians to acknowledge the role of stigma for individuals who otherwise do not report logistical barriers.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, anticipated PrEP stigma, and bisexual identity among a Black and Hispanic/Latino sexual and gender diverse sample

Black and Hispanic/Latino sexual minority men and gender diverse (SMMGD) individuals are disproportionately impacted by the HIV epidemic. Uptake and adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is suboptimal among SMMGD Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals, but most research has approached this population as homogenous (e.g., a group operationalized as men who have sex with men). Bisexual men are less likely to disclose their sexual identity and report more mental health problems than their gay counterparts, but there is less attention to the impact of different sexual identities on PrEP use over time. We utilized data from three waves of a national longitudinal study (2020-2021) to characterize Black and Hispanic/Latino SMMGD participants' PrEP use including: 1) PrEP uptake during the study; 2) consistent PrEP use across the study; and 3) discontinuation of PrEP use since study baseline. We found bisexual men were significantly less likely than gay men to be consistent PrEP users and were more likely to discontinue PrEP use over the course of the study. Of the sample who reported PrEP use across surveys, 10% initiated PrEP during the study period, 0% of whom were bisexual. Additionally, bisexual participants reported statistically significantly higher anticipated PrEP stigma relative to gay participants. These findings have implications for HIV prevention interventions. Given the differences in PrEP experiences as a function of sexual identity, researchers and clinicians should consider the disruptive role of stigma (both biphobia and anticipated PrEP stigma) in PrEP care and adherence.

LGBTQ state policies: A lever for reducing SGM youth substance use and bullying

PURPOSE

Sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) are more likely than their cisgender and heterosexual peers to use substances and to be bullied, yet it is unknown whether the absence/presence of youth- and LGBTQ-specific equity laws drive these disparities. The purpose of this study was to extend previous research focused on adult- and LGBTQ-specific structural factors (e.g., same-sex marriage laws) to determine whether the youths' structural environment (i.e., state-level LGBTQ youth-focused equity laws) was associated with bullying and recent alcohol use, binge drinking, and cigarette use among SGMY.

PROCEDURES

We utilized data from the LGBTQ National Teen Survey, collected in 2017 (N = 8,841 sexual and gender minority youth). Linear regression analyses examined the association between bullying and substance use and between state-level LGBTQ youth-focused equity laws (individually and as a composite variable) and bullying and substance use.

FINDINGS

SGMY living in states with LGBTQ equity laws were less likely to experience bullying. Findings regarding the relation between LGBTQ equity laws and substance use were mixed, such that LGBTQ equity laws were associated with a higher likelihood of binge drinking and alcohol use, and a lower likelihood of cigarette use.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight the role of state-level equity laws in reducing bullying and substance use disparities for SGMY. Yet, given the finding that equity laws were associated with a higher likelihood of binge drinking, it is important to continue to explore how the structural environment shapes SGMY health.

[Socioeconomic determinants and utilization of emergency hospital services]

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic level is a key determinant for health status. It may also influence on the utilization of hospital emergency services, although the factor responsible for that is not known. The main objective of the present report is to assess whether patients using frequently hospital emergency services have one or more variables related to low socioeconomic level.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was applied to 800 patients randomly selected from those attending the emergency services of a provincial reference hospital. It was gathered information on: income, education level, employment, loneliness, domestic violence, occupational accidents, and life style. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to ascertain the independent predictors for attending for than once to the emergency services.

RESULTS

In crude analysis, low income and low educational level were significantly related to the use of emergency services (both chi 2 for a trend < 0.05). Alcoholism (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.2-4.7) and domestic violence (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 0.9-8.1) were also related. Stepwise logistic regression analysis selected income (OR for intermediate level = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0-2.7, and OR for low level = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.4-3.7) and alcoholism (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.3-6.4) as independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low income and/or alcoholism use emergency hospital services more frequently.