Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Small Bowel Anastomoses in Patients With Secondary Mesenteric Ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Although stapled anastomoses have been widely evaluated in the context of the elective surgery, few reports compared manual with stapled anastomoses in patients undergoing emergency surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of hand-sewn end-to-end anastomoses with stapled side-to-side and stapled end-to-side anastomoses in patients undergoing small bowel resection for acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to intestinal obstruction.

METHODS

From January 2015 to June 2021 all the hemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency surgery with small bowel resection for intestinal obstruction were enrolled in this study. According to surgical technique in performing anastomosis, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1: hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis, group 2: stapled end-to-side anastomosis, and group 3: stapled side-to-side anastomosis.

RESULTS

Although the anastomosis failure rate was higher in group 3, it was not significantly different between the three groups (P = 0.78: chi-square test). Likewise, no significant differences in the median hospital stay were found between the patients' groups (P = 0.87: Kruskal-Wallis test). The median operating time was similar in patients undergoing stapled anastomoses and was significantly higher in patients undergoing hand-sewn anastomoses (P = 0.0009: Kruskal-Wallis test).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing emergency small bowel resection for complicated intestinal obstruction, a similar outcome in terms of dehiscence rate and hospital stay can be achieved performing stapled or hand-sewn anastomoses, even if restoring the intestinal continuity with stapled technique is associated with lower operating time.

Treatment of acute diverticulitis with open abdomen technique

AIM

The aim of this study is to highlight our experience about the use of open Abdomen's technique as strategy for the management of complicated colon diverticulitis with a delayed anastomosis or colostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients, with III and IV Hinchey stage, have been undertaken to a surgical procedure with Open Abdomen technique and application of Ab-thera device. A second surgical look was made after 48-72 hours in order to evaluate the possibility to do an anastomosis or colostomy.

RESULTS

No deaths in patients with anastomosis were reported, but one case of leakage at the 8th day and one case of micro pulmonary embolism had been displayed. Elderly patients were discharged between the 15TH /18th day. One patient affected by lymphoma was sent in haematology department for other treatment.

DISCUSSION

Today trend is to treat the diverticular disease with colic and paracolic abscess by a medical therapy and percutaneous drainage under CT scan or ultrasound view. With III and IV of Hinchey scale we perform the resection with anastomosis or colostomy. The open abdomen technique allows the surgeons to make the decision of colostomy or anastomosis in the second surgical look at 48-72 hours after the first treatment with irrigation and aspiration during AB-Thera.

CONCLUSION

The Open Abdomen technique is a valid therapeutic alternative approach for patients with acute diverticulitis disease in III and IV Hinchey grade. This therapeutic approach gives important advantages in patients with delayed colostomy.

KEY WORDS

Diverticulitis, Damage Control Surgery, Open Abdomen.

Advantages of Damage Control Strategy With Abdominal Negative Pressure and Instillation in Patients With Diffuse Peritonitis From Perforated Diverticular Disease

Purpose. To evaluate the results of Damage Control Strategy (DCS) in the treatment of generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticular disease in patients with preoperative severe systemic diseases. Methods. All the patients with diffuse peritonitis (Hinchey 3 and 4) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 were included and underwent DCS consisting of a 2-step procedure. The first was peritoneal lavage, perforated colon-stapled resection, and temporary abdominal closure with negative pressure wound therapy combined with instillation. The second step, 48 hours later, included the possibility of restoring intestinal continuity basing on local and general patients' conditions. Results. Thirty patients (18 [60%] women and 12 [40%] men, median age 68.5 [range = 35-84] years) were included (18 [60%] ASA III, 11 [36.7%] ASA IV, and 1 [0.03%] ASA V). Seven patients (23.3%) showed sepsis and 1 (3.33%) septic shock. At second surgery, 24 patients (80%) received a colorectal anastomosis and 6 patients (20%) underwent a Hartmann's procedure. Median hospital stay was 18 days (range = 12-62). Postoperative morbidity rate was 23.3% (7/30) and included 1 anastomotic leak treated with Hartmann's procedure. Consequently, at discharge from hospital, 23 patients (76.6%) were free of stoma. Primary fascial closure was possible in all patients. Conclusions. DCS with temporary abdominal closure by negative pressure wound therapy combined with instillation in patients with diffuse peritonitis from complicated diverticulitis could represent a feasible surgical option both in hemodynamically stable and no stable patients, showing encouraging results including a low stoma rate and an acceptable morbidity rate.

Unexpected histopathologic result of a wide surgical excision of a bleeding lesion of the skin: a case of Merkel cell carcinoma of the leg

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell Carcinoma is a very rare primary cutaneous tumor that often looks like an innocuous and asymptomatic nodule or plaque of the skin, but with a very fast growing. It is also called neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin or trabecular cancer. The main treatment is based on a local excision followed by radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The most common site of presentation of this lesion is head and neck (40-60%.) and it often occur in older men with immunological system dysfunction like HIV patients, cancer, severe infections and immunosuppression for transplantation.

METHODS

The authors report a case of a bleeding Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the right leg in a 83 years old man with HCV infection, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus type 2 that required local excision.

RESULTS

Lesion was entirely removed and then patient was sent to oncologists. After two months from surgical excision, healing process is regular and without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This type of tumor can be misdiagnosed and, if bleeding, it can represent a serious surgical emergency.

Totally Implantable Central Venous Access: 15 years' experience in a single unit

The use of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Systems (T.I.C.V.A.S.) has become an essential aid for those patients requiring extended intravenous infusion treatments or complete parenteral nutrition, and for whom the peripheral venous system may be or may become inadequate for infusions. This paper describes fifteen years of experience in the use of totally implantable systems. It examines the application methods as well as the different systems, complications, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and cost/benefit ratio. We examined 261 patients observed during a period of approximately 15 years. A surgical team carried out the operations for these patients in an operating room under the strictest asepsis conditions. The Port-a-Cath central venous access systems were used in 221 cases (84.6%) and the Pas-Port peripheral venous access systems were used in 40 cases (15.3%). We observed no particular differences between the different types of systems implanted. The total rate of complications was 11.7%, 0.7% of which were positioning complications, 4.2% stability complications, and 6.1% management complications. There were 2 cases (0.76%) of defective performance of the implanted system. We found patient satisfaction with the method average in 19.85% of the cases, good in 70.23% and excellent in 11.9%. Quality of life improved because of reduced total hospitalization time and more convenient treatment management. Regarding the cost/benefit ratio we also found that the benefits outnumbered costs. In connection with the cost of the system the possibility of home management leads to a marked decrease in hospitalization expenditure. Today these systems should be considered as being essential in the correct management of the patient requiring medium-to-long-term infusion treatment. On the whole these treatments are well accepted by the patient and the possibility of home or day hospital management allows a marked reduction in hospitalization, which affects both social life and costs. The incidence of complications was found to be relatively low considering that most of them are the result of poor management of the system by the paramedical personnel or by the relatives of the patients. In this sense, better education in the management of the system would further optimize results. (The Journal of Vascular Access 2001; 2: 161-167).

[Hemorrhoidectomy with stapler vs. traditional hemorrhoidectomy: comparative outcome of 2 groups of patients]

Authors compare the results of two groups of patients, with III and IV degree haemorrhoids. The first group (48 patients) were treated with traditional surgery, open or closed. The second group (42 patients) treated with stapling haemorrhoidectomy. The groups were compared in order to determine if a true advantage exists regarding post-operative pain and functional recovery. Authors conclude that stapler haemorrhoidectomy, is somehow better in reducing the pain and offers a quick functional recovery. But the technique must be adopted in selected patients with mucosal prolapse, when the haemorrhoidal plexus is below the dentate line. In those cases, with inveterate mucosal prolapse, and thickened external fibrous tissue, or an irreducible prolapse of the external haemorrhoidal plexus, the choice must be carefully evaluated.

[Laparoscopic appendectomy and laparotomy appendectomy: comparison of methods]

The study compares the real advantages of laparoscopic appendicectomy using only a transumbilical trocar, with laparotomic appendicectomy in the management of acute and/or chronic pain in the lower right abdominal quadrant. From May 1997 to April 2000, 88 patients were treated: 27 (group I) with the laparoscopic approach, and 61 (group II) with laparotomy. We compared operating times, incidence of complications, hospital stay and cosmetic result. We also reviewed the literature on this subject over the past ten years. Average operating time was 45 minutes in group I and 30 minutes in group II; complications consisted in 2 cases of omphalitis in the laparoscopic group and 3 infections of the wound and 2 cases of lipolysis of the abdominal wall in the laparotomic group. The average hospital stay was 3.2 days in the laparoscopic group against 4.7 days in the laparotomic group. Resumption of work and sport occurred after 10 to 20 days and 15 to 45 days in groups I and II, respectively. The total cost was lower in the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic approach appears to be an effective technique for the management of acute and chronic appendicitis, as it allows both treatment of the pathology and diagnosis and treatment of other unknown pathologies, with exploration of the abdominal cavity. In addition, it guarantees a good cosmetic result, a short hospital stay with a low incidence of complications and an advantageous cost/benefit ratio.