1
|
Devillier P, Gallet C, Salvator H, Julien C, Naline E, Roisse D, Levert C, Breton E, Galtat A, Decourtray S, Prevel L, Grassin-Delyle S, Grandjean D. Biomedical detection dogs for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 Infections from axillary sweat and breath samples. J Breath Res 2022; 16. [PMID: 35287115 DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ac5d8c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
A PCR test of a nasal swab is still the "gold standard" for detecting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, PCR testing could be usefully complemented by non-invasive, fast, reliable, cheap methods for detecting infected individuals in busy areas (e.g. airports and railway stations) or remote areas. Detection of the volatile, semivolatile and non-volatile compound signature of SARS-CoV-2 infection by trained sniffer dogs might meet these requirements. Previous studies have shown that well-trained dogs can detect SARS-CoV-2 in sweat, saliva and urine samples. The objective of the present study was to assess the performance of dogs trained to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in axillary-sweat-stained gauzes and on expired breath trapped in surgical masks. The samples were provided by individuals suffering from mild-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), asymptomatic individuals, and individuals vaccinated against COVID-19. Results: Seven trained dogs tested on 886 presentations of sweat samples from 241 subjects and detected SARS-CoV-2 with a diagnostic sensitivity (relative to the PCR test result) of 89.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.4-92.2%) and a specificity of 83.9% (95% CI: 80.3-87.0%) - even when people with a low viral load were included in the analysis. When considering the 207 presentations of sweat samples from vaccinated individuals, the sensitivity and specificity were respectively 85.7% (95% CI: 68.5-94.3) and 86.0% (95% CI: 80.2-90.3%). The likelihood of a false-positive result was greater in the two weeks immediately after COVID-19 vaccination. Four of the seven dogs also tested on 262 presentations of mask samples from 98 subjects; the diagnostic sensitivity was 83.1% (95% CI: 73.2-89.9) and the specificity was 88.6% (95% CI: 83.3-92.4%). There was no difference (McNemar's test P=0.999) in the dogs' abilities to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in paired samples of sweat-stained gauzes vs. surgical masks worn for only 10 minutes. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the promise of SARS-CoV-2 screening by detection dogs and broaden the method's scope to vaccinated individuals and easy-to-obtain face masks, and suggest that a "dogs + confirmatory rapid antigen detection tests" screening strategy might be worth investigating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Devillier
- Exhalomics, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, 11 rue Guillaume Lenoir, Suresnes, 92150, FRANCE
| | - Capucine Gallet
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine) , University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Maisons-Alfort, Creteil, Île-de-France, 94010, FRANCE
| | - Hélène Salvator
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Suresnes, Île-de-France, 92151, FRANCE
| | - Clothilde Julien
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine) , University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Maisons-Alfort, Creteil, Île-de-France, 94010, FRANCE
| | - Emmanuel Naline
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Suresnes, Île-de-France, 92151, FRANCE
| | - Didier Roisse
- Service Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 60 (Oise County Fire and Rescue Service), SDIS60, Tillé, Tillé, 60639, FRANCE
| | - Clément Levert
- Service Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 78 (Yvelines County Fire and Rescue Service), SDIS78, Versailles, Versailles, 78000, FRANCE
| | - Erwan Breton
- Service Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 78 (Yvelines County Fire and Rescue Service), SDIS78, Versailles, Versailles, 78000, FRANCE
| | - Arnaud Galtat
- Service Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 78 (Yvelines County Fire and Rescue Service), SDIS78, Versailles, Versailles, 78000, FRANCE
| | - Sandra Decourtray
- Service d'accueil des Urgences, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Suresnes, Île-de-France, 92151, FRANCE
| | - Laura Prevel
- Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Suresnes, Île-de-France, 92151, FRANCE
| | - Stanislas Grassin-Delyle
- Exhalomics, service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Suresnes, Île-de-France, 92151, FRANCE
| | - Dominique Grandjean
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine) , University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Maisons-Alfort, Creteil, Île-de-France, 94010, FRANCE
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grandjean D, Gallet C, Julien C, Sarkis R, Muzzin Q, Roger V, Roisse D, Dirn N, Levert C, Breton E, Galtat A, Forget A, Charreaudeau S, Gasmi F, Jean-Baptiste C, Petitjean S, Hamon K, Duquesne JM, Coudert C, Tourtier JP, Billy C, Wurtz JM, Chauvin A, Eyer X, Ziani S, Prevel L, Cherubini I, Khelili-Houas E, Hausfater P, Devillier P, Desquilbet L. Identifying SARS-COV-2 infected patients through canine olfactive detection on axillary sweat samples; study of observed sensitivities and specificities within a group of trained dogs. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262631. [PMID: 35157716 PMCID: PMC8843128 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing need for rapid, reliable, non-invasive, and inexpensive mass testing methods as the global COVID-19 pandemic continues. Detection dogs could be a possible solution to identify individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. Previous studies have shown that dogs can detect SARS-CoV-2 on sweat samples. This study aims to establish the dogs’ sensitivity (true positive rate) which measures the proportion of people with COVID-19 that are correctly identified, and specificity (true negative rate) which measures the proportion of people without COVID-19 that are correctly identified. Seven search and rescue dogs were tested using a total of 218 axillary sweat samples (62 positive and 156 negative) in olfaction cones following a randomised and double-blind protocol. Sensitivity ranged from 87% to 94%, and specificity ranged from 78% to 92%, with four dogs over 90%. These results were used to calculate the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each dog for different infection probabilities (how likely it is for an individual to be SARS-CoV-2 positive), ranging from 10–50%. These results were compared with a reference diagnostic tool which has 95% specificity and sensitivity. Negative predictive values for six dogs ranged from ≥98% at 10% infection probability to ≥88% at 50% infection probability compared with the reference tool which ranged from 99% to 95%. Positive predictive values ranged from ≥40% at 10% infection probability to ≥80% at 50% infection probability compared with the reference tool which ranged from 68% to 95%. This study confirms previous results, suggesting that dogs could play an important role in mass-testing situations. Future challenges include optimal training methods and standardisation for large numbers of detection dogs and infrastructure supporting their deployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Grandjean
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Capucine Gallet
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Clothilde Julien
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Riad Sarkis
- Université Franco-Libanaise St Joseph (Saint Joseph University of Beirut), Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Quentin Muzzin
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Vinciane Roger
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Didier Roisse
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours de l’Oise (Fire and Rescue Service), Tillé, France
| | - Nicolas Dirn
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours de l’Oise (Fire and Rescue Service), Tillé, France
| | - Clement Levert
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Erwan Breton
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Arnaud Galtat
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Alexandre Forget
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Sebastien Charreaudeau
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Fabien Gasmi
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Caroline Jean-Baptiste
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (Alfort School of Veterinary Medicine), University Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Sebastien Petitjean
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Katia Hamon
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Jean-Michel Duquesne
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Chantal Coudert
- Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours des Yvelines (Fire and Rescue Service), Versailles, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Tourtier
- Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées Begin (Begin Military Hospital), Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Christophe Billy
- Centre Hospitalier François Quesnay (François Quesnay Hospital Centre), GHT Yvelines, Mantes-la-Jolie, France
| | - Jean-Marc Wurtz
- Site d’Altkirch GHRMSA (Groupement Hospitalier Mulhouse Sud Alsace), Altkirch, France
| | - Anthony Chauvin
- Hôpital Lariboisière APHP (Lariboisière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France
| | - Xavier Eyer
- Hôpital Lariboisière APHP (Lariboisière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France
| | - Sabrina Ziani
- Hôpitaux de Saint-Maurice (Saint-Maurice Hospital), Saint-Maurice, France
| | | | - Ilaria Cherubini
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France
| | - Enfel Khelili-Houas
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France
| | - Pierre Hausfater
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Great Paris Hospitals), Paris, France
| | | | - Loic Desquilbet
- Ecole nationale vétérinaire d’Alfort, Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Maisons-Alfort, France
| |
Collapse
|