1
|
Moroianu ŞL, Bhattacharya I, Seetharaman A, Shao W, Kunder CA, Sharma A, Ghanouni P, Fan RE, Sonn GA, Rusu M. Computational Detection of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI Using Deep Learning. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2821. [PMID: 35740487 PMCID: PMC9220816 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The localization of extraprostatic extension (EPE), i.e., local spread of prostate cancer beyond the prostate capsular boundary, is important for risk stratification and surgical planning. However, the sensitivity of EPE detection by radiologists on MRI is low (57% on average). In this paper, we propose a method for computational detection of EPE on multiparametric MRI using deep learning. Ground truth labels of cancers and EPE were obtained in 123 patients (38 with EPE) by registering pre-surgical MRI with whole-mount digital histopathology images from radical prostatectomy. Our approach has two stages. First, we trained deep learning models using the MRI as input to generate cancer probability maps both inside and outside the prostate. Second, we built an image post-processing pipeline that generates predictions for EPE location based on the cancer probability maps and clinical knowledge. We used five-fold cross-validation to train our approach using data from 74 patients and tested it using data from an independent set of 49 patients. We compared two deep learning models for cancer detection: (i) UNet and (ii) the Correlated Signature Network for Indolent and Aggressive prostate cancer detection (CorrSigNIA). The best end-to-end model for EPE detection, which we call EPENet, was based on the CorrSigNIA cancer detection model. EPENet was successful at detecting cancers with extraprostatic extension, achieving a mean area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.72 at the patient-level. On the test set, EPENet had 80.0% sensitivity and 28.2% specificity at the patient-level compared to 50.0% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity for the radiologists. To account for spatial location of predictions during evaluation, we also computed results at the sextant-level, where the prostate was divided into sextants according to standard systematic 12-core biopsy procedure. At the sextant-level, EPENet achieved mean sensitivity 61.1% and mean specificity 58.3%. Our approach has the potential to provide the location of extraprostatic extension using MRI alone, thus serving as an independent diagnostic aid to radiologists and facilitating treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Indrani Bhattacharya
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (I.B.); (W.S.); (A.S.); (P.G.); (G.A.S.)
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Arun Seetharaman
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Wei Shao
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (I.B.); (W.S.); (A.S.); (P.G.); (G.A.S.)
| | - Christian A. Kunder
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Avishkar Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (I.B.); (W.S.); (A.S.); (P.G.); (G.A.S.)
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (I.B.); (W.S.); (A.S.); (P.G.); (G.A.S.)
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Richard E. Fan
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Geoffrey A. Sonn
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (I.B.); (W.S.); (A.S.); (P.G.); (G.A.S.)
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Mirabela Rusu
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (I.B.); (W.S.); (A.S.); (P.G.); (G.A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhattacharya I, Lim DS, Aung HL, Liu X, Seetharaman A, Kunder CA, Shao W, Soerensen SJC, Fan RE, Ghanouni P, To'o KJ, Brooks JD, Sonn GA, Rusu M. Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning. Med Phys 2022; 49:5160-5181. [PMID: 35633505 PMCID: PMC9543295 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer remains the second deadliest cancer for American men despite clinical advancements. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the most sensitive non‐invasive imaging modality that enables visualization, detection, and localization of prostate cancer, and is increasingly used to guide targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, its utility remains limited due to high rates of false positives and false negatives as well as low inter‐reader agreements. Purpose Machine learning methods to detect and localize cancer on prostate MRI can help standardize radiologist interpretations. However, existing machine learning methods vary not only in model architecture, but also in the ground truth labeling strategies used for model training. We compare different labeling strategies and the effects they have on the performance of different machine learning models for prostate cancer detection on MRI. Methods Four different deep learning models (SPCNet, U‐Net, branched U‐Net, and DeepLabv3+) were trained to detect prostate cancer on MRI using 75 patients with radical prostatectomy, and evaluated using 40 patients with radical prostatectomy and 275 patients with targeted biopsy. Each deep learning model was trained with four different label types: pathology‐confirmed radiologist labels, pathologist labels on whole‐mount histopathology images, and lesion‐level and pixel‐level digital pathologist labels (previously validated deep learning algorithm on histopathology images to predict pixel‐level Gleason patterns) on whole‐mount histopathology images. The pathologist and digital pathologist labels (collectively referred to as pathology labels) were mapped onto pre‐operative MRI using an automated MRI‐histopathology registration platform. Results Radiologist labels missed cancers (ROC‐AUC: 0.75‐0.84), had lower lesion volumes (~68% of pathology lesions), and lower Dice overlaps (0.24‐0.28) when compared with pathology labels. Consequently, machine learning models trained with radiologist labels also showed inferior performance compared to models trained with pathology labels. Digital pathologist labels showed high concordance with pathologist labels of cancer (lesion ROC‐AUC: 0.97‐1, lesion Dice: 0.75‐0.93). Machine learning models trained with digital pathologist labels had the highest lesion detection rates in the radical prostatectomy cohort (aggressive lesion ROC‐AUC: 0.91‐0.94), and had generalizable and comparable performance to pathologist label‐trained‐models in the targeted biopsy cohort (aggressive lesion ROC‐AUC: 0.87‐0.88), irrespective of the deep learning architecture. Moreover, machine learning models trained with pixel‐level digital pathologist labels were able to selectively identify aggressive and indolent cancer components in mixed lesions on MRI, which is not possible with any human‐annotated label type. Conclusions Machine learning models for prostate MRI interpretation that are trained with digital pathologist labels showed higher or comparable performance with pathologist label‐trained models in both radical prostatectomy and targeted biopsy cohort. Digital pathologist labels can reduce challenges associated with human annotations, including labor, time, inter‐ and intra‐reader variability, and can help bridge the gap between prostate radiology and pathology by enabling the training of reliable machine learning models to detect and localize prostate cancer on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indrani Bhattacharya
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.,Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - David S Lim
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Han Lin Aung
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Xingchen Liu
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Arun Seetharaman
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Christian A Kunder
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Wei Shao
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Simon J C Soerensen
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.,Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Richard E Fan
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.,Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Katherine J To'o
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.,Department of Radiology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.,Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Mirabela Rusu
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seetharaman A, Bhattacharya I, Chen LC, Kunder CA, Shao W, Soerensen SJC, Wang JB, Teslovich NC, Fan RE, Ghanouni P, Brooks JD, Too KJ, Sonn GA, Rusu M. Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 2021; 48:2960-2972. [PMID: 33760269 PMCID: PMC8360053 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows great promise in assisting with prostate cancer diagnosis and localization, subtle differences in appearance between cancer and normal tissue lead to many false positive and false negative interpretations by radiologists. We sought to automatically detect aggressive cancer (Gleason pattern ≥ 4) and indolent cancer (Gleason pattern 3) on a per-pixel basis on MRI to facilitate the targeting of aggressive cancer during biopsy. METHODS We created the Stanford Prostate Cancer Network (SPCNet), a convolutional neural network model, trained to distinguish between aggressive cancer, indolent cancer, and normal tissue on MRI. Ground truth cancer labels were obtained by registering MRI with whole-mount digital histopathology images from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Before registration, these histopathology images were automatically annotated to show Gleason patterns on a per-pixel basis. The model was trained on data from 78 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and 24 patients without prostate cancer. The model was evaluated on a pixel and lesion level in 322 patients, including six patients with normal MRI and no cancer, 23 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, and 293 patients who underwent biopsy. Moreover, we assessed the ability of our model to detect clinically significant cancer (lesions with an aggressive component) and compared it to the performance of radiologists. RESULTS Our model detected clinically significant lesions with an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.75 for radical prostatectomy patients and 0.80 for biopsy patients. Moreover, the model detected up to 18% of lesions missed by radiologists, and overall had a sensitivity and specificity that approached that of radiologists in detecting clinically significant cancer. CONCLUSIONS Our SPCNet model accurately detected aggressive prostate cancer. Its performance approached that of radiologists, and it helped identify lesions otherwise missed by radiologists. Our model has the potential to assist physicians in specifically targeting the aggressive component of prostate cancers during biopsy or focal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Seetharaman
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Indrani Bhattacharya
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.,Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Leo C Chen
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Christian A Kunder
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Wei Shao
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Simon J C Soerensen
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.,Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jeffrey B Wang
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Nikola C Teslovich
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Richard E Fan
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Katherine J Too
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.,Department of Radiology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.,Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Mirabela Rusu
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porkodi V, Patwa N, Seetharaman A, Niranjan I, Jadhav V, Saravanan A. Impact of knowledge sharing on virtual team projects. IJKMS 2019. [DOI: 10.1504/ijkms.2019.10025001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
5
|
|
6
|
Aserkar R, Seetharaman A, Chu JAM, Jadhav V, Inamdar S. Impact of personal data protection (PDP) regulations on operations workflow. HSM 2017. [DOI: 10.3233/hsm-161631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Aserkar
- Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, SP Jain School of Global Management, Singapore
| | | | - Joy Ann Macaso Chu
- Department of Accounting, Logistics and Manufacturing, SP Jain School of Global Management, Singapore
| | - Veena Jadhav
- Department of HRM, SP Jain School of Global Management, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moorthy MK, Seetharaman A, Jaffar N, Foong YP. Employee Perceptions of Workplace Theft Behavior: A Study Among Supermarket Retail Employees in Malaysia. Ethics & Behavior 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2014.917416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
8
|
Gupta P, Seetharaman A, Raj JR. The usage and adoption of cloud computing by small and medium businesses. International Journal of Information Management 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 335] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
<h2 style="page-break-after: auto; text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; mso-themecolor: text1;">This paper presents a comparison of the traditional management accounting with the new approach of management accounting with the use of latest information technology and manufacturing technologies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The information and data of the research were gathered from various sources of secondary data. Many online articles and journals were available through these search engines such as Google, Infoseek, Lycos, Excites and Altavista. These articles were downloaded from Internet Websites including IFAC library, CPA online newsletters, Institute of Management Accountants, CIMA (Chartered Institute of Management Accountants), Technical Bulletin and Institute of Commercial and Financial Accountants.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The modern techniques used in Management Accounting are discussed. TQM (Total Quality Management), ABC (Activity Based Costing) and BSC (Balanced score card) are some of the tools that are introduced in management accounting to keep up with the latest technology.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This research highlights the emergence of new, more proactive management accounting that increasingly becomes part of the management team with the business process. The future roles and expectations of these accountants in the competitive global economy are discussed.</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;"> </span></span></h2>
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The existing literatures highlights that the security is the primary factor which determines the adoption of Internet banking technology. The secondary information on Internet banking development in Malaysia shows a very slow growth rate. Hence, this study aims to study the banking customers perception towards security concern and Internet banking adoption through the information collected from 150 sample respondents. The data analysis reveals that the customers have much concern about security and privacy issue in adoption of Internet banking, whether the customers are adopted Internet banking or not. Hence, it infers that to popularize Internet banking system there is a need for improvement in security and privacy issue among the banking customers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raju Sudha
- Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya 63100, Malaysia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Seetharaman A, Khatibi AA, Swee Ting W. Vendor development and control:its linkage with demand chain. Int Jnl Phys Dist & Log Manage 2004. [DOI: 10.1108/09600030410533583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|