1
|
Carlson J, Foos V, Kasle A, Mugwagwa T, Draica F, Lee Wiemken T, Nguyen JL, Cha-Silva A, Migliaccio-Walle K, Dzingina M. Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Patients at High Risk for Progression to Severe COVID-19 in the United States. Value Health 2024; 27:164-172. [PMID: 38043712 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) is an orally administered antiviral indicated for the outpatient treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for disease progression to severe illness. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of NMV/r versus best supportive care for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for progression to severe illness from a US health sector perspective. METHODS A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a short-term decision-tree (1 year) followed by a lifetime 2-state Markov model (alive and dead). The short-term decision-tree captured costs and outcomes associated with the primary infection and healthcare utilization; survivors of the short-term decision-tree were followed until death assuming US quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), adjusted in the short-term for survivors of mechanical ventilation. Baseline rate of hospitalization and NMV/r effectiveness were taken from an Omicron-era US real-world study. Remaining inputs were informed by previous COVID-19 studies and publicly available US sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all model inputs to test the robustness of model results. RESULTS NMV/r was found to decrease COVID-19 related hospitalizations (-0.027 per infected case) increase QALYs (+0.030), decrease hospitalization costs (-$1110), and increase total treatment cost (+$271), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $8931/QALY. Results were most sensitive to baseline risk of hospitalization and NMV/r treatment effectiveness parameters. The probabilistic analysis indicated that NMV/r has a >99% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS NMV/r is cost-effective vs best supportive care for patients at high risk for severe COVID-19 from a US health sector perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Carlson
- Curta, Inc, Seattle, Washington, USA; The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Volker Foos
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Ltd, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pierre V, Draica F, Di Fusco M, Yang J, Nunez-Gonzalez S, Kamar J, Lopez S, Moran MM, Nguyen J, Alvarez P, Cha-Silva A, Gavaghan M, Yehoshua A, Stapleton N, Burnett H. The impact of vaccination and outpatient treatment on the economic burden of Covid-19 in the United States omicron era: a systematic literature review. J Med Econ 2023; 26:1519-1531. [PMID: 37964554 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2281882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To identify and synthesize evidence regarding how coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) interventions, including vaccines and outpatient treatments, have impacted healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs in the United States (US) during the Omicron era. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify articles published between 1 January 2021 and 10 March 2023 that assessed the impact of vaccination and outpatient treatment on costs and HCRU outcomes associated with COVID-19. Screening was performed by two independent researchers using predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. RESULTS Fifty-eight unique studies were included in the SLR, of which all reported HCRU outcomes, and one reported costs. Overall, there was a significant reduction in the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization for patients who received an original monovalent primary series vaccine plus booster dose vs. no vaccination. Moreover, receipt of a booster vaccine was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization vs. primary series vaccination. Evidence also indicated a significantly reduced risk of hospitalizations among recipients of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r), remdesivir, sotrovimab, and molnupiravir compared to non-recipients. Treated and/or vaccinated patients also experienced reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, and emergency department (ED)/urgent care clinic encounters. LIMITATIONS The identified studies may not represent unique patient populations as many utilized the same regional/national data sources. Synthesis of the evidence was also limited by differences in populations, outcome definitions, and varying duration of follow-up across studies. Additionally, significant gaps, including HCRU associated with long COVID and various high-risk populations and cost data, were observed. CONCLUSIONS Despite evidence gaps, findings from the SLR highlight the significant positive impact that vaccination and outpatient treatment have had on HCRU in the US, including periods of Omicron predominance. Continued research is needed to inform clinical and policy decision-making in the US as COVID-19 continues to evolve as an endemic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Pierre
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Florin Draica
- Vaccine Clinical Research, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jingyan Yang
- Vaccine Clinical Research, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Joanna Kamar
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Santiago Lopez
- Vaccine Clinical Research, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary M Moran
- Vaccine Clinical Research, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Piedad Alvarez
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Alon Yehoshua
- Vaccine Clinical Research, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | - Naomi Stapleton
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heather Burnett
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|