Effects of Levetiracetam and Lacosamide on survival and seizure control in IDH-wild type glioblastoma during temozolomide plus radiation adjuvant therapy

Introduction

There are no clear indications for the best choice of anti-seizure medications to control brain tumor related epilepsy. In vitro studies have shown an antitumoral effect of Levetiracetam and Lacosamide on glioblastoma IDH-wild type.

Research question

This study investigates whether the use of levetiracetam and/or lacosamide impacts survival rates. The secondary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of both ASMs in controlling seizures.

Materials and methods

In this observational retrospective single-cohort study, patients underwent chemoradiation protocol after GBM surgery. They were grouped as follows: (1) use of levetiracetam, (2) use of lacosamide, (3) simultaneous use of levetiracetam and lacosamide, (4) no ASM usage. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method coupled with a log-rank test for difference assesments. To evaluate the pharmacological efficacy of post-operative seizure control, a negative binomial regression was conducted.

Results

The study included 272 patients, 174 of which underwent adjuvant chemoradiation treatment. Patients without ASM therapy had a non-significant longer median OS (compared to the other groups (log-rank = 0.37). The IRR of seizure relapse was 2.57 (p = 0.007) times higher in lacosamide users, and MGMT promoter methylation demonstrated a protective effect against postoperative seizure onset (p = 0.05), regardless of the aforementioned confounding factors.

Discussion and conclusions

In patients diagnosed with GBM IDH-WT undergoing chemoradiation therapy, the use of levetiracetam or lacosamide for controlling BTRE does not seem to modify survival. Lacosamide users exhibited a higher IRR of postoperative seizures compared to levetiracetam users, and MGMT promoter methylation appears to be a protective factor.

Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma

The G105G SNP (rs11554137) in the IDH1 gene is observed in about 10–15% of patients with a diffuse glioma. Data regarding its impact on gliomas are poor and partially conflicting, possibly due to the evolving classification of CNS tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the G105G SNP prognostic significance in a homogenous cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, in agreement with the 2021 WHO classification. The study analyzed 211 patients by collecting several clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics, including the age, lesion localization, number of involved lobes, type of surgical treatment, disease outcome and MGMT promoter methylation status. PFS and DSS curves were plotted according to the Kaplan–Meier method and statistical analyses were performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. A total of 32 patients out of 211 (15.2%) were found to be G105G SNP carriers. No significant impact of the IDH1 G105G SNP on patients’ outcomes was observed in terms of PFS and DSS, while MGMT promoter methylation and gross total resection resulted as key prognostic factors in our cohort as expected. No prognostic impact of the IDH1 G105G SNP was detected in this strict cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Analysis of larger cohorts is warranted to address the sample size limitations.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of a hypertonic seawater solution enriched with manganese and copper salts

Background: Nasal irrigation is commonly recommended as an adjuvant treatment for blocked nose. In the present study, the safety and efficacy profile of Stérimar Blocked Nose (SBN), a hypertonic seawater solution enriched with manganese and copper salts, has been evaluated on nasal epithelium, in vitro. Methodology: 3D reconstituted human nasal epithelium tissue model, MucilAir™, has been used to investigate the safety of SBN on nasal epithelium by measuring trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER), cytotoxicity (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release) and phlogosis-related effects (interleukin-8 secretion). Efficacy assessment was measured by ciliary beat frequency (CBF), mucociliary clearance (MCC) and antimicrobial activities (against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Results: Four-day SBN treatment did not compromise the nasal epithelium integrity as TEER values were over the tissue integrity limit. SBN treatment did not exert cytotoxic (LDH release) or pro-inflammatory effects (IL-8 secretion). SBN treatment significantly increased the CBF and MCC rates compared to untreated cells. SBN treatment exerted a bactericidal effect on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa cultures, whereas seawater not enriched in copper and manganese had only a bacteriostatic effect. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that SBN is a safe formula for use on human nasal epithelium. The results also suggest a better potential therapeutic role for SBN in comparison to not-enriched seawater when used to control nasal congestion and inhibit bacterial growth which may cause nasal congestion.