1
|
Kaur M, Utidjian L, Abend NS, Dickinson K, Roebling R, McDonald J, Maltenfort MG, Foskett N, Elmoufti S, Guerriero RM, Jain BG, Pajor NM, Rao S, Shellhaas RA, Slaughter L, Forrest CB. Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on Safety and Electroencephalographic Response to Lacosamide for Neonatal Seizures. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 155:18-25. [PMID: 38579433 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in older children. However, minimal data are available for neonates. We aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with lacosamide use and explore the electroencephalographic seizure response to lacosamide in neonates. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven pediatric hospitals from January 2009 to February 2020. For safety outcomes, neonates were followed for ≤30 days from index date. Electroencephalographic response of lacosamide was evaluated based on electroencephalographic reports for ≤3 days. RESULTS Among 47 neonates, 98% received the first lacosamide dose in the intensive care units. During the median follow-up of 12 days, 19% of neonates died, and the crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-days (95% confidence interval) of the adverse events by diagnostic categories ranged from 2.8 (0.3, 10.2) for blood or lymphatic system disorders and nervous system disorders to 10.5 (4.2, 21.6) for cardiac disorders. Electroencephalographic seizures were observed in 31 of 34 patients with available electroencephalographic data on the index date. There was seizure improvement in 29% of neonates on day 1 and also in 29% of neonates on day 2. On day 3, there was no change in 50% of neonates and unknown change in 50% of neonates. CONCLUSIONS The results are reassuring regarding the safety of lacosamide in neonates. Although some neonates had fewer seizures after lacosamide administration, the lack of a comparator arm and reliance on qualitative statements in electroencephalographic reports limit the preliminary efficacy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moninder Kaur
- RWE Neurology, UCB Pharma Ltd, Slough, UK; Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Levon Utidjian
- The Applied Clinical Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas S Abend
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kimberley Dickinson
- The Applied Clinical Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Roebling
- Epilepsy and Rare Syndrome Organisation, UCB Pharma, Monheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Jill McDonald
- The Applied Clinical Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mitchell G Maltenfort
- The Applied Clinical Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Sami Elmoufti
- Biometric & Quantitative Services-Launch Statistics, UCB Pharma, Morrisville, North Carolina
| | - Rejean M Guerriero
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Badal G Jain
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Nathan M Pajor
- Divisions of Pulmonary Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Suchitra Rao
- Department of Pediatrics (Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Hospital Medicine), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Renée A Shellhaas
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Laurel Slaughter
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Christopher B Forrest
- The Applied Clinical Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sabeti S, Ball KL, Bhattacharya SK, Bitrian E, Blieden LS, Brandt JD, Burkhart C, Chugani HT, Falchek SJ, Jain BG, Juhasz C, Loeb JA, Luat A, Pinto A, Segal E, Salvin J, Kelly KM. Consensus Statement for the Management and Treatment of Sturge-Weber Syndrome: Neurology, Neuroimaging, and Ophthalmology Recommendations. Pediatr Neurol 2021; 121:59-66. [PMID: 34153815 PMCID: PMC9107097 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a sporadic, neurocutaneous syndrome involving the skin, brain, and eyes. Because of the variability of the clinical manifestations and the lack of prospective studies, consensus recommendations for management and treatment of SWS have not been published. OBJECTIVE This article consolidates the current literature with expert opinion to make recommendations to guide the neuroimaging evaluation and the management of the neurological and ophthalmologic features of SWS. METHODS Thirteen national peer-recognized experts in neurology, radiology, and ophthalmology with experience treating patients with SWS were assembled. Key topics and questions were formulated for each group and included (1) risk stratification, (2) indications for referral, and (3) optimum treatment strategies. An extensive PubMed search was performed of English language articles published in 2008 to 2018, as well as recent studies identified by the expert panel. The panel made clinical practice recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Children with a high-risk facial port-wine birthmark (PWB) should be referred to a pediatric neurologist and a pediatric ophthalmologist for baseline evaluation and periodic follow-up. In newborns and infants with a high-risk PWB and no history of seizures or neurological symptoms, routine screening for brain involvement is not recommended, but brain imaging can be performed in select cases. Routine follow-up neuroimaging is not recommended in children with SWS and stable neurocognitive symptoms. The treatment of ophthalmologic complications, such as glaucoma, differs based on the age and clinical presentation of the patient. These recommendations will help facilitate coordinated care for patients with SWS and may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Sabeti
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California
| | | | | | - Elena Bitrian
- Department of Ophthalmology & Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami
| | - Lauren S. Blieden
- Department of Ophthalmology & Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - James D. Brandt
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Craig Burkhart
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Harry T. Chugani
- Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Stephen J. Falchek
- Department of Neurology, Nemours duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Badal G. Jain
- Department of Neurology, Nemours duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Csaba Juhasz
- Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey A. Loeb
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aimee Luat
- Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan,Department of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University, College of Medicine, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
| | - Anna Pinto
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric Segal
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine and Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Jonathan Salvin
- Previous affiliation Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Nemours duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Kristen M. Kelly
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California
| |
Collapse
|