Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Depressed Episodes in Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder before and after Treatment

Depression is one of the current dilemmas in both developed and developing societies. Studies show that the severity of psychiatric symptoms is directly related to the degree of inflammation caused by cytokines secreted by the immune system. Hence, evaluating serum cytokine levels in patients with depression can help to understand the pathogenesis of the disease and make the best therapeutic decisions. The present study investigated the levels of inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with major depression or bipolar disorder during depressive episodes (BDDE) before and after a 6-month pharmaceutical intervention. Patients referring to 3 clinics were recruited for the study. The diagnosis of major depression or bipolar disorder in a depressive phase was made according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -5(DSM-5) criteria. There was a significant difference in depression levels between the pre-intervention and 6-month follow-up in both groups. After 6 months, IL-1 and IL-6 levels in the bipolar disorder group had decreased while TNF-α levels had increased. There was also a significant difference between pre-intervention and follow-up levels of IL-1.  Serum levels of IL-1 and IL-6 decreased significantly in both groups after the 6-month follow-up, and symptom improvement was observed. TNF-α levels, on the other hand, decreased in the major depression group but increased in the bipolar disorder group. Considering that inflammation is a major outcome of depression, treatment strategies to reduce inflammation could be a practical approach to improving psychiatric symptoms.

Baricitinib: From Rheumatoid Arthritis to COVID-19

Baricitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that was first approved for treating moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but that later showed considerable efficacy in the control of exaggerated inflammatory responses that occur in a wide range of diseases. There is a growing body of evidence, obtained from clinical trials and case reports, demonstrating clinical and paraclinical improvement in patients following administration of baricitinib including RA, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, interferon‐mediated autoinflammatory diseases, graft‐versus‐host disease, diabetic kidney disease, and, recently, coronavirus disease‐19. However, despite overall encouraging results, many adverse effects have been observed in baricitinib‐treated patients, ranging from simple infections to increased risk of malignancies, particularly in long‐term use. The significant efficacy of baricitinib, versus the probable adverse effects, urge further investigation before establishing it as a part of standard therapeutic protocols. Here, we have provided a review of the studies that have used baricitinib for treating various inflammatory disorders and summarized the advantages and disadvantages of its administration.

Comparing IRF-4 Gene Expression Between Acute T cell- Mediated Rejection and Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Renal transplant rejection is one of the clinical challenges, which usually requires administration of immunosuppressive drugs causing serious side effects. Therefore, invention of effective and specific therapeutics is necessary to control undesired immune responses particularly T-cell reactions to allograft. Interferon Regulatory Factor-4 (IRF-4) due to its implication on T cells differentiation and function might be targeted to treat T cell-mediated cellular rejection (TCMR). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between IRF-4 gene expression and acute TCMR, as well as to examine the correlation between IRF-4 gene expression and cellular expression of Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and Helios molecules.

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 30 patients with biopsy proven acute TCMR and 30 stable recipients. IRF-4 gene expression was quantified using RT-PCR, and cellular expression of PD-1 and Helios were evaluated with flowcytometry.

RESULTS

IRF-4 gene expression was significantly increased in acute TCMR patients compared with stable recipients (P < .05). Helios protein expression was slightly decreased in TCMR group but this was not statistically significant. There was a negative correlation between IRF-4 gene expression and PD-1 as well as Helios frequency in the whole studied population.

CONCLUSION

IRF-4 expression increases in acute TCMR which might also lead to a diminished expression of downstream immunoregulatory molecules such as PD-1 and Helios. Therefore, specific inhibition of IRF-4 may be helpful in managing acute TCMR.