Novel therapeutic strategies in pancreatic cancer: moving beyond cytotoxic chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Prognosis of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remains disappointing with a 5-year overall survival of only 3-5%. Compared to other cancers, the evolution in standard therapeutic options has been stagnant and polychemotherapy regimens (with well-known toxicity profile and resistance pattern) remain standard of care. Only for patients (5%-7%) with a breast cancer gene (BRCA) pathogenic germline variant, prognosis has improved by the use of olaparib (poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor).

AREAS COVERED

This review covers emerging treatment strategies in the management of mPDAC. One of the main topics is the rigid and immunological cold tumor microenvironment (TME) of PDAC and the search for agents that impact this TME and/or engage the immune system. In addition, the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has elicited for some patients new targeted therapies directed at alterations in the RTK/RAS/MAPK pathway and the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage repair pathway. Other evolving treatment strategies are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The search for new, often combination, treatment strategies for mPDAC should be encouraged and implemented in early treatment lines given the significant decline of performance status of patients in later lines. NGS analysis should be used where available, although cost-effectiveness could be debatable.

New Developments in Treating RAS-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

One of the great challenges in digestive oncology is choosing the optimal therapy for RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Even though the RAS genes and accompanying pathway were identified decades ago and extensive knowledge exists on their role in carcinogenesis, it has proven challenging to translate these insights into new therapies and clinical benefit for patients. However, recently, new drugs targeting this pathway (for example, KRAS^G12C inhibitors) have shown promising results in clinical trials, as monotherapy or in combination regimens. Although resistance remains an important issue, more knowledge on adaptive resistance and feedback loops in the RAS-pathway has led to strategical combination regimens to overcome this problem. In the past year, many encouraging results have been published or presented at conferences. Even though some of the data is still preliminary, these studies may bring practice-changing results and can lead to a clinical benefit for patients over the coming years. Because of these recent developments, the treatment of RAS-mutated mCRC has become a topic of great interest. Therefore, in this review, we will summarize the standard of care and discuss the most important emerging therapies for this patient population.

First-line anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF therapy, tumour sidedness, and survival: Results from the South Australian (SA) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Registry

42

Background: The anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (bev) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in mCRC in combination with first-line chemotherapy. Clinical and molecular characteristics, such as primary tumour sidedness, RAS, BRAF and MMR status are prognostic and predictive biomarkers for response to treatment. Our aim was to compare the survival and tumour characteristics of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy and antibody combinations using the SA mCRC Registry. Methods: This real-world registry has collected data from all patients diagnosed with mCRC in SA prospectively since 2006. We identified patients who had received first-line Pmab, Cmab or bev. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare outcomes based on primary tumour location. Results: Of the 5537 patients currently entered onto the registry, 1313 with RAS results available had received first-line anti-EGFR/VEGF antibodies and had colon tumour side recorded. The table summarises median overall survival (mOS) and patient characteristics. Survival was significantly shorter for those with right colon cancers (P < 0.001). There were more high-grade (P < 0.001), KRAS mutant (P = 0.004) and BRAF mutant (P = 0.036) tumours in those with right colon cancers, and a trend towards fewer curative liver resections (P = 0.059). There was no significant difference in mOS seen between Pmab, Cmab or bev for both left (P = 0.14) and right-sided (P = 0.88) primary tumours. Conclusions: There were more high-grade, BRAF and KRAS mutant patients with right colon tumours, and lower rates of liver resection, which may explain the significantly shorter mOS. The survival seen for Pmab and Cmab was almost identical for both right and left primary tumours. When comparing Pmab, Cmab and bev as first-line therapy, there was no significant difference in mOS for both left- and right-sided CRC. [Table: see text]

Patterns of care and survival of first line anti-EGFR therapy; results from South Australian (SA) metastatic colorectal (mCRC) registry

e15577

Background: Treatment of mCRC has changed dramatically over the last decade with therapy guided by clinical and molecular features which include side of primary, RAS, BRAF and MMR status. For left sided RAS WT mCRC survival is optimized by using first line anti-EGFR anti-bodies combined with chemotherapy. This is reflected in modern guidelines. Methods: We aim to assess the uptake of first line anti-EGFR/chemotherapy combinations in patients with mCRC and assess for difference between cetuximab (C) and panitumumab (P) use from the SAmCRCR. The real word registry has collected data from all patients diagnosed with mCRC in SA prospectively since 2/2006. We compared RAS WT patients treated with chemo/bevacizumab (CB). Survival was analysed using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: Of the 5537 patients currently entered onto the registry, only 97 had RAS status recorded and had received first line anti-EGFR/chemotherapy (FaEC). 102 patients were RAS WT and received CB. Table summarises patient characteristics and median OS for FaEC (C or P) and CB. There was no statistical difference in survival for C v P (p = 0.055). Conclusions: When comparing C & P choice in first line therapy, C was more often combined with irinotecan/chemo. C patients had higher rate of left sided primary. There were lower rates of liver resection in patients treated with C which may explain the numerically lower median overall survival. An updated cohort analysis will be included to assess changes in practice over time.[Table: see text]

A rare case of hemodialysis-related portosystemic encephalopathy and review of the literature

Hemodialysis-related portosystemic encephalopathy (HRPSE) is a clinical phenomenon where portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) develops without liver dysfunction, usually caused by changes in the portosystemic blood flow related to hemodialysis. We describe the case of a 22-year old patient with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) who developed HRPSE several months after initiation of hemodialysis. Despite initial therapy with laxatives and neomycin symptoms recurred. It was only after relocation of the hemodialysis catheter from the superior caval vein to the femoral vein that symptoms completely resolved.