1
|
Peng X, Connolly DJ, Sutton F, Robinson J, Baker-Vogel B, Short EB, Badran BW. Non-invasive suppression of the human nucleus accumbens (NAc) with transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) modulates the reward network: a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1359396. [PMID: 38628972 PMCID: PMC11018963 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1359396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a key node of the brain reward circuit driving reward-related behavior. Dysregulation of NAc has been demonstrated to contribute to pathological markers of addiction in substance use disorder (SUD) making it a potential therapeutic target for brain stimulation. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation approach that can modulate deep brain regions with a high spatial resolution. However, there is currently no evidence showing how the brain activity of NAc and brain functional connectivity within the reward network neuromodulated by tFUS on the NAc. Methods In this pilot study, we carried out a single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the underlying mechanism of tFUS neuromodulating the reward network through NAc in ten healthy adults. Specifically, the experiment consists of a 20-min concurrent tFUS/fMRI scan and two 24-min resting-state fMRI before and after the tFUS session. Results Firstly, our results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of 20-min tFUS on NAc. Additionally, our findings demonstrated that bilateral NAc was inhibited during tFUS on the left NAc compared to sham. Lastly, increased functional connectivity between the NAc and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was observed after tFUS on the left NAc, but no changes for the sham group. Conclusion Delivering tFUS to the NAc can modulate brain activations and functional connectivity within the reward network. These preliminary findings suggest that tFUS could be potentially a promising neuromodulation tool for the direct and non-invasive management of the NAc and shed new light on the treatment for SUD and other brain diseases that involve reward processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolong Peng
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng X, Srivastava S, Sutton F, Zhang Y, Badran BW, Kautz SA. Compensatory increase in ipsilesional supplementary motor area and premotor connectivity is associated with greater gait impairments: a personalized fMRI analysis in chronic stroke. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1340374. [PMID: 38487103 PMCID: PMC10937543 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1340374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Balance and mobility impairments are prevalent post-stroke and a large number of survivors require walking assistance at 6 months post-stroke which diminishes their overall quality of life. Personalized interventions for gait and balance rehabilitation are crucial. Recent evidence indicates that stroke lesions in primary motor pathways, such as corticoreticular pathways (CRP) and corticospinal tract (CST), may lead to reliance on alternate motor pathways as compensation, but the current evidence lacks comprehensive knowledge about the underlying neural mechanisms. Methods In this study, we investigate the functional connectivity (FC) changes within the motor network derived from an individualized cortical parcellation approach in 33 participants with chronic stroke compared to 17 healthy controls. The correlations between altered motor FC and gait deficits (i.e., walking speed and walking balance) were then estimated in the stroke population to understand the compensation mechanism of the motor network in motor function rehabilitation post-stroke. Results Our results demonstrated significant FC increases between ipsilesional medial supplementary motor area (SMA) and premotor in stroke compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, we also revealed a negative correlation between ipsilesional SMA-premotor FC and self-selected walking speed, as well as the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) scores. Conclusion The increased FC between the ipsilesional SMA and premotor regions could be a compensatory mechanism within the motor network following a stroke when the individual can presumably no longer rely on the more precise CST modulation of movements to produce a healthy walking pattern. These findings enhance our understanding of individualized motor network FC changes and their connection to gait and walking balance impairments post-stroke, improving stroke rehabilitation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolong Peng
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Shraddha Srivastava
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Falon Sutton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Yongkuan Zhang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Steven A. Kautz
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McGloon K, Humanitzki E, Brennan J, Summers P, Brennan A, George MS, Badran BW, Cribb AR, Jenkins D, Coker-Bolt P. Pairing taVNS and CIMT is feasible and may improve upper extremity function in infants. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1365767. [PMID: 38415207 PMCID: PMC10896996 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1365767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
In this study we combined non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) with 40 h of constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) in infants. All infants completed the full intervention with no adverse events. Therapists were able to maintain high treatment fidelity and reported high ratings for ease of use and child tolerance. Preliminary results show promising gains on motor outcomes: Mean QUEST increase 19.17 (minimal clinically important difference, MCID 4.89); Mean GMFM increase 13.33 (MCID 1%-3%). Infants also exceeded expectations on Goal Attainment Scores (+1). Early data is promising that taVNS paired with intensive motor CIMT is feasible, reliable, and safe in young infants with hemiplegia, and may help harness activity-dependent plasticity to enhance functional movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly McGloon
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Humanitzki
- Department of Health Science and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Julia Brennan
- Department of Health Science and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Philip Summers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Alyssa Brennan
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mark S. George
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Anne R. Cribb
- College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Dorothea Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Patricia Coker-Bolt
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herr T, Kleger P, Strauss S, Szeska C, Khalil N, Badran BW, Weymar M, Grothe M. Effect of non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on cerebral motor excitability-Study protocol for a randomized, sham controlled trial. Front Neurol 2024; 14:1341898. [PMID: 38283680 PMCID: PMC10811126 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1341898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is becoming increasingly established in the treatment of various neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, only a few studies have focused on the overall influence of taVNS on cortical excitability in general. The planned study will investigate the effect of taVNS on the excitability of the motor cortex in young healthy subjects. The aim of the study is to gain better understand of the physiological mechanism of taVNS to contribute to new fields of application of taVNS in new areas such as the treatment of stroke or multiple sclerosis. This protocol describes a single-center, prospective, double blind, sham-controlled trial that evaluates the effect of taVNS on motor cortex excitability with a planned sample size of 30 participants. The effect of taVNS is investigated by neuronavigation and electromyography (EMG) coupled transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied before and after taVNS stimulation. The following parameters are assessed: resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), recruitment curve (RC), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF). All parameters will be assessed for taVNS on the basis of perception threshold and tolerance threshold. All investigations performed in the study were reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee of the University Medical Center Greifswald (study reference number: BB048/22). Clinical trial registration www.drks.de, number: DRKS00029937.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Herr
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Paula Kleger
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sebastian Strauss
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christoph Szeska
- Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Nura Khalil
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mathias Weymar
- Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Matthias Grothe
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Badran BW, Peng X. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS): a promising noninvasive deep brain stimulation approach for pain. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:351-352. [PMID: 37563280 PMCID: PMC10700642 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01699-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Xiaolong Peng
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aljuhani T, Coker-Bolt P, Katikaneni L, Ramakrishnan V, Brennan A, George MS, Badran BW, Jenkins D. Use of non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: neurodevelopmental and sensory follow-up. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1297325. [PMID: 38021221 PMCID: PMC10666166 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1297325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the impact of non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with oral feeding on long-term neurodevelopmental and sensory outcomes. Method We tested 21 of 35 children who as infants were gastrostomy tube (G-tube) candidates and participated in the novel, open-label trial of taVNS paired with oral feeding. To evaluate possible effects on development at 18-months after infant taVNS, we performed the Bayley-III (n = 10) and Sensory Profile (SP-2, n = 12) assessments before the COVID pandemic, and Cognitive Adaptive Test (CAT), Clinical Linguistics and Auditory Milestone (CLAMS), Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 gross motor tests as possible during and after the pandemic. We compared outcomes for infants who attained full oral feeds during taVNS ('responders') or received G-tubes ('non-responders'). Results At a mean of 19-months, taVNS 'responders' showed significantly better general sensory processing on the SP-2 than 'non-responders'. There were no differences in other test scores, which were similar to published outcomes for infants who required G-tubes. Conclusion This is the first report of neurodevelopmental follow-up in infants who received taVNS-paired feeding. They had similar developmental outcomes as historical control infants failing oral feeds who received G-tubes. Our data suggests that infants who attained full oral feeds had better sensory processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Turki Aljuhani
- Division of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Patricia Coker-Bolt
- Doctorate of Occupational Therapy Program, Hawai’i Pacific University, Honolulu, HI, United States
| | - Lakshmi Katikaneni
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Alyssa Brennan
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mark S. George
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, Unites States
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Dorothea Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jenkins DD, Moss HG, Adams LE, Hunt S, Dancy M, Huffman SM, Cook D, Jensen JH, Summers P, Thompson S, George MS, Badran BW. Higher Dose Noninvasive Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Increases Feeding Volumes and White Matter Microstructural Complexity in Open-Label Study of Infants Slated for Gastrostomy Tube. J Pediatr 2023; 262:113563. [PMID: 37329979 PMCID: PMC11000235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with twice daily bottle feeding increases the volume of oral feeds and white matter neuroplasticity in term-age-equivalent infants failing oral feeds and determined to need a gastrostomy tube. STUDY DESIGN In this prospective, open-label study, 21 infants received taVNS paired with 2 bottle feeds for 2 - 3 weeks (2x). We compared 1) increase oral feeding volumes with 2x taVNS and previously reported once daily taVNS (1x) to determine a dose response, 2) number of infants who attained full oral feeding volumes, and 3) diffusional kurtosis imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy before and after treatment by paired t tests. RESULTS All 2x taVNS treated infants significantly increased their feeding volumes compared with 10 days before treatment. Over 50% of 2x taVNS infants achieved full oral feeds but in a shorter time than 1x cohort (median 7 days [2x], 12.5 days [1x], P < .05). Infants attaining full oral feeds showed greater increase in radial kurtosis in the right corticospinal tract at the cerebellar peduncle and external capsule. Notably, 75% of infants of diabetic mothers failed full oral feeds, and their glutathione concentrations in the basal ganglia, a measure of central nervous system oxidative stress, were significantly associated with feeding outcome. CONCLUSIONS In infants with feeding difficulty, increasing the number of daily taVNS-paired feeding sessions to twice-daily significantly accelerates response time but not the overall response rate of treatment. taVNS was associated with white matter motor tract plasticity in infants able to attain full oral feeds. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04643808).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea D Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
| | - Hunter G Moss
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Lauren E Adams
- College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Sally Hunt
- College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Morgan Dancy
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Sarah M Huffman
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Daniel Cook
- College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Jens H Jensen
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Philipp Summers
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Sean Thompson
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Neuro-X Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Austelle CW, Sege CT, Kahn AT, Gregoski MJ, Taylor DL, McTeague LM, Short EB, Badran BW, George MS. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Early Increases in Heart Rate Associated With the Cold Pressor Test. Neuromodulation 2023:S1094-7159(23)00715-8. [PMID: 37642625 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) may be useful in treating disorders characterized by chronic parasympathetic disinhibition. Acute taVNS decreases resting heart rate in healthy individuals, but little is known regarding the effects of taVNS on the cardiac response to an acute stressor. To investigate effects on the acute stress response, we investigated how taVNS affected heart rate changes during a cold pressor test (CPT), a validated stress induction technique that reliably elicits a sympathetic stress response with marked increases in heart rate, anxiety, stress, and pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited 24 healthy adults (ten women, mean age = 29 years) to participate in this randomized, crossover, exploratory trial. Each subject completed two taVNS treatments (one active, one sham) paired with CPTs in the same session. Order of active versus sham stimulation was randomized. Heart rate, along with ratings of anxiety, stress, and pain, was collected before, during, and after each round of taVNS/sham + CPT. RESULTS In both stimulation conditions, heart rate was elevated from baseline in response to the CPT. Analyses also revealed a difference between active and sham taVNS during the first 40 seconds of the CPT (Δ heart rate [HR] = 12.75 ± 7.85 in the active condition; Δ HR = 16.09 ± 11.43 in the sham condition, p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in subjective ratings between active and sham taVNS. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized, sham-controlled study, taVNS attenuated initial increases in HR in response to the CPT. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of various taVNS doses and parameters on the CPT, in addition to other forms of stress induction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT00113453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher T Sege
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Alex T Kahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mathew J Gregoski
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Danielle L Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Lisa M McTeague
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Edward Baron Short
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lench DH, Turner TH, McLeod C, Boger HA, Lovera L, Heidelberg L, Elm J, Phan A, Badran BW, Hinson VK. Multi-session transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for Parkinson's disease: evaluating feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1210103. [PMID: 37554394 PMCID: PMC10406445 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1210103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In pre-clinical animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can rescue motor deficits and protect susceptible neuronal populations. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to traditional invasive cervical VNS. This is the first report summarizing the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of repeated sessions of taVNS in participants with PD. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and possible efficacy of taVNS for motor and non-motor symptoms in mild to moderate PD. METHODS This is a double-blind, sham controlled RCT (NCT04157621) of taVNS in 30 subjects with mild to moderate PD without cognitive impairment. Participants received 10, 1-h taVNS sessions (25 Hz, 200% of sensory threshold, 500 μs pulse width, 60 s on and 30 s off) over a 2-week period. Primary outcome measures were feasibility and safety of the intervention; secondary outcomes included the MDS-UPDRS, cognitive function and self-reported symptom improvement. RESULTS taVNS treatment was feasible, however, daily in-office visits were reported as being burdensome for participants. While five participants in the taVNS group and three in the sham group self-reported one or more minor adverse events, no major adverse events occurred. There were no group differences on blood pressure and heart rate throughout the intervention. There were no group differences in MDS-UPDRS scores or self-reported measures. Although global cognitive scores remained stable across groups, there was a reduction in verbal fluency within the taVNS group. CONCLUSIONS taVNS was safe, and well-tolerated in PD participants. Future studies of taVNS for PD should explore at-home stimulation devices and optimize stimulation parameters to reduce variability and maximize engagement of neural targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H. Lench
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Travis H. Turner
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Colin McLeod
- Department of Neurology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, United States
| | - Heather A. Boger
- Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Lilia Lovera
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Lisa Heidelberg
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Jordan Elm
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Anh Phan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Vanessa K. Hinson
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peng X, Baker-Vogel B, Sarhan M, Short EB, Zhu W, Liu H, Kautz S, Badran BW. Left or right ear? A neuroimaging study using combined taVNS/fMRI to understand the interaction between ear stimulation target and lesion location in chronic stroke. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1144-1153. [PMID: 37517466 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.07.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) have been primarily administered clinically to the unilateral-left vagus nerve. This left-only convention has proved clinically beneficial in brain disorders. However, in stroke survivors, the presence of a lesion in the brain may complicate VNS-mediated signaling, and it is important to understand the laterality effects of VNS in stroke survivors to optimize the intervention. OBJECTIVE To understand whether taVNS delivered to different ear targets relative to the lesion (ipsilesional vs contralesional vs bilateral vs sham) impacts blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal propagation in stroke survivors. METHODS We enrolled 20 adults with a prior history of stroke. Each participant underwent a single visit, during which taVNS was delivered concurrently during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisition. Each participant received three discrete active stimulation conditions (ipsilesional, contralesional, bilateral) and one sham condition in a randomized order. Stimulation-related BOLD signal changes in the active conditions were compared to sham conditions to understand the interaction taVNS and laterality effects. RESULTS All active taVNS conditions deactivated the contralesional default mode network related regions compared to sham, however only ipsilesional taVNS enhanced the activations in the ipsilesional visuomotor and secondary visual cortex. Furthermore, we reveal an interaction in task activations between taVNS and cortical visuomotor areas, where ipsilesional taVNS significantly increased ipsilesional visuomotor activity and decreased contralesional visuomotor activity compared to sham. CONCLUSION Laterality of taVNS relative to the lesion is a critical factor in optimizing taVNS in a stroke population, with ipsilesional stimulation providing largest direct brain activation and should be explored further when designing taVNS studies in neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolong Peng
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brenna Baker-Vogel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mutaz Sarhan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Edward B Short
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Wenzhen Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hesheng Liu
- Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China
| | - Steven Kautz
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Badran BW, Peng X, Baker-Vogel B, Hutchison S, Finetto P, Rishe K, Fortune A, Kitchens E, O’Leary GH, Short A, Finetto C, Woodbury ML, Kautz S. Motor Activated Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Neuromodulation Approach for Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2023; 37:374-383. [PMID: 37209010 PMCID: PMC10363288 DOI: 10.1177/15459683231173357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), when synchronized with post-stroke motor rehabilitation improves conventional motor rehabilitation training. A non-invasive VNS method known as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerves stimulation (taVNS) has emerged, which may mimic the effects of implanted VNS. OBJECTIVE To determine whether taVNS paired with motor rehabilitation improves post-stroke motor function, and whether synchronization with movement and amount of stimulation is critical to outcomes. METHODS We developed a closed-loop taVNS system for motor rehabilitation called motor activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) and conducted a randomized, double-blind, pilot trial investigating the use of MAAVNS to improve upper limb function in 20 stroke survivors. Participants attended 12 rehabilitation sessions over 4-weeks, and were assigned to a group that received either MAAVNS or active unpaired taVNS concurrently with task-specific training. Motor assessments were conducted at baseline, and weekly during rehabilitation training. Stimulation pulses were counted for both groups. RESULTS A total of 16 individuals completed the trial, and both MAAVNS (n = 9) and unpaired taVNS (n = 7) demonstrated improved Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scores (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 5.00 ± 1.02, unpaired taVNS: 3.14 ± 0.63). MAAVNS demonstrated greater effect size (Cohen's d = 0.63) compared to unpaired taVNS (Cohen's d = 0.30). Furthermore, MAAVNS participants received significantly fewer stimulation pulses (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 36 070 ± 3205) than the fixed 45 000 pulses unpaired taVNS participants received (P < .05). CONCLUSION This trial suggests stimulation timing likely matters, and that pairing taVNS with movements may be superior to an unpaired approach. Additionally, MAAVNS effect size is comparable to that of the implanted VNS approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Xiaolong Peng
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brenna Baker-Vogel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Scott Hutchison
- Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Patricia Finetto
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kelly Rishe
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Andrew Fortune
- Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ellen Kitchens
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Georgia H. O’Leary
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Abigail Short
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Christian Finetto
- Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Michelle L. Woodbury
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Steve Kautz
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Ralph H Johnson VA Health Care System, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McGhee HC, Nichols K, Cribb A, Badran BW, George MS, Brennan A, Bonilha HS, Jenkins D. Early indices of safety related to the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on oropharyngeal swallowing in infants. Brain Stimul 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
|
13
|
Cribb AR, Moss HG, McGhee HC, Nichols K, Bonilha HS, Jensen JH, Brennan A, Badran BW, George MS, Jenkins DD. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation-paired feeding may enhance white matter tract integrity to improve swallow coordination in infants with oromotor dysfunction. Brain Stimul 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
|
14
|
Badran BW, Huffman SM, Dancy M, Austelle CW, Bikson M, Kautz SA, George MS. A pilot randomized controlled trial of supervised, at-home, self-administered transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) to manage long COVID symptoms. Bioelectron Med 2022; 8:13. [PMID: 36002874 PMCID: PMC9402278 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-022-00094-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has now impacted the world for over two years, the persistent secondary neuropsychiatric effects are still not fully understood. These “long COVID” symptoms, also referred to as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), can persist for months after infection without any effective treatments. Long COVID involves a complex heterogenous symptomology and can lead to disability and limit work. Long COVID symptoms may be due to sustained inflammatory responses and prolonged immune response after infection. Interestingly, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may have anti-inflammatory effects, however, until recently, VNS could not be self-administered, at-home, noninvasively. Methods We created a double-blind, noninvasive transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) system that can be self-administered at home with simultaneous remote monitoring of physiological biomarkers and video supervision by study staff. Subsequently, we carried out a pilot (n = 13) randomized, sham-controlled, trial with this system for four weeks to treat nine predefined long covid symptoms (anxiety, depression, vertigo, anosmia, ageusia, headaches, fatigue, irritability, brain fog). No in-person patient contact was needed, with informed consent, trainings, ratings, and all procedures being conducted remotely during the pandemic (2020–2021) and equipment being shipped to individuals’ homes. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier: NCT04638673 registered November 20, 2020. Results Four-weeks of at-home self-administered taVNS (two, one-hour sessions daily, delivered at suprathreshold intensities) was feasible and safe. Although our trial was not powered to determine efficacy as an intervention in a heterogenous population, the trends in the data suggest taVNS may have a mild to moderate effect in reducing mental fatigue symptoms in a subset of individuals. Conclusions This innovative study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of supervised self-administered taVNS under a fully contactless protocol and suggests that future studies can safely investigate this novel form of brain stimulation at-home for a variety of neuropsychiatric and motor recovery applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Neuro-X Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Sarah M Huffman
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Morgan Dancy
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Christopher W Austelle
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven A Kautz
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.,Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Badran BW, Huffman SM, Dancy M, Austelle CW, Bikson M, Kautz SA, George MS. A pilot randomized controlled trial of supervised, at-home, self-administered transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) to manage long COVID symptoms. Res Sq 2022:rs.3.rs-1716096. [PMID: 35765566 PMCID: PMC9238186 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1716096/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Background Although the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has now impacted the world for over two years, the persistent secondary neuropsychiatric effects are still not fully understood. These "long COVID" symptoms, also referred to as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), can persist for months after infection without any effective treatments. Long COVID involves a complex heterogenous symptomology and can lead to disability and limit work. Long COVID symptoms may be due to sustained inflammatory responses and prolonged immune response after infection. Interestingly, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may have anti-inflammatory effects, however, until recently, VNS could not be self-administered, at-home, noninvasively. Methods We created a double-blind, noninvasive transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) system that can be self-administered at home with simultaneous remote monitoring of physiological biomarkers and video supervision by study staff. Subsequently, we carried out a pilot (n = 13) randomized, sham-controlled, trial with this system for four weeks to treat nine predefined long covid symptoms (anxiety, depression, vertigo, anosmia, ageusia, headaches, fatigue, irritability, brain fog). No in-person patient contact was needed, with informed consent, trainings, ratings, and all procedures being conducted remotely during the pandemic (2020-2021) and equipment being shipped to individuals' homes. This trial was registered onClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier: NCT04638673. Results Four-weeks of at-home self-administered taVNS (two, one-hour sessions daily, delivered at suprathreshold intensities) was feasible and safe. Although our trial was not powered to determine efficacy as an intervention in a heterogenous population, the trends in the data suggest taVNS may have a mild to moderate effect in reducing mental fatigue symptoms in a subset of individuals. This innovative study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of supervised self-administered taVNS under a fully contactless protocol and suggests that future studies can safely investigate this novel form of brain stimulation at-home for a variety of neuropsychiatric and motor recovery applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Marom Bikson
- City College of the City University of New York: The City College of New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Austelle CW, O'Leary GH, Thompson S, Gruber E, Kahn A, Manett AJ, Short B, Badran BW. A Comprehensive Review of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:309-315. [PMID: 35396067 PMCID: PMC8898319 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is reemerging as an exciting form of brain stimulation, due in part to the development of its noninvasive counterpart transcutaneous auricular VNS. As the field grows, it is important to understand where VNS emerged from, including its history and the studies that were conducted over the past four decades. Here, we offer a comprehensive review of the history of VNS in the treatment of major depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using PubMed, we reviewed the history of VNS and aggregated the literature into a narrative review of four key VNS epochs: 1) early invention and development of VNS, 2) path to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for depression, 3) refinement of VNS treatment parameters, and 4) neuroimaging of VNS. RESULTS VNS was described in the literature in the early 1900s; however, gained traction in the 1980s as Zabara and colleagues developed an implantable neurocybernetic prosthesis to treat epilepsy. As epilepsy trials proceed in the 1990s, promising mood effects emerged and were studied, ultimately leading to the approval of VNS for depression in 2005. Since then, there have been advances in understanding the mechanism of action. Imaging techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography further aid in understanding direct brain effects of VNS. CONCLUSIONS The mood effects of VNS were discovered from clinical trials investigating the use of VNS for reducing seizures in epileptic patients. Since then, VNS has gone on to be FDA approved for depression. The field of VNS is growing, and as noninvasive VNS quickly advances, it is important to consider a historical perspective to develop future brain stimulation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georgia H O'Leary
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sean Thompson
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elise Gruber
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Alex Kahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Andrew J Manett
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Baron Short
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aljuhani T, Haskin H, Davis S, Reiner A, Moss HG, Badran BW, George MS, Jenkins D, Coker-Bolt P. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) given for poor feeding in at-risk infants also improves their motor abilities. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2022; 15:447-457. [PMID: 36093716 PMCID: PMC9976577 DOI: 10.3233/prm-210090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that may improve oromotor skills when paired with feeding in at-risk infants, but effects on other motor function and how motor function relates to white matter (WM) microstructure are unknown. METHODS In this prospective study, infants failing oral feeds and slated for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement received taVNS paired with bottle feeding daily for 2-3 weeks. The effects of taVNS-paired feeding on general and specific head movements were investigated using the Specific Test of Early infant motor Performance (STEP) and diffusion MRI obtained before and after taVNS treatment. Scores between and within groups (taVNS responders, attained full oral feeds; non-responders, received G-tubes) were compared. RESULTS Performance on head movement items improved significantly in responders but not in non-responders (p < 0.05). Total STEP scores were significantly higher in responders after taVNS treatment than non-responders (p = 0.04). One STEP item, rolling by arm, was associated with significantly greater change in WM tract microstructure (p < 0.05) in the responders. CONCLUSION These results suggest that pairing feeding with taVNS may affect specific head and neck movements to a greater extent in infants who are able to attain full oral feeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Turki Aljuhani
- Division of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hannah Haskin
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shelby Davis
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Amy Reiner
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Hunter G Moss
- Graduate Studies, Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Neuro-X Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Neuro-X Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.,Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Dorothea Jenkins
- College of Medicine, Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Patricia Coker-Bolt
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Badran BW, Austelle CW. The Future Is Noninvasive: A Brief Review of the Evolution and Clinical Utility of Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2022; 20:3-7. [PMID: 35746934 PMCID: PMC9063597 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20210023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a form of neuromodulation that stimulates the vagus nerve. VNS had been suggested as an intervention in the late 1800s and was rediscovered in the late 1980s as a promising treatment for refractory epilepsy. Since then, VNS has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of epilepsy, morbid obesity, and treatment-resistant depression. Unfortunately, VNS is underutilized, as it is costly to implant and often only suggested when all other treatment options have been exhausted. Discovery of a noninvasive method of VNS known as transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS), which activates the vagus through stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, has reignited excitement around VNS. taVNS has immense potential as a safe, at-home, wearable treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders. Major strides are being made in both invasive and noninvasive VNS that aim to make this technology more accessible to patients who would find benefit, including the ongoing RECOVER trial, a randomized controlled trial in up to 1,000 individuals to further evaluate the efficacy of VNS for treatment-resistant depression. In this brief review, we first discuss the early history of VNS; then its clinical utility in FDA-approved indications; and, finally, noninvasive VNS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Badran BW, Gruber EM, O’Leary GH, Austelle CW, Huffman SM, Kahn AT, McTeague LM, Uhde TW, Cortese BM. Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve improves olfaction in healthy individuals: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:761-768. [PMID: 35561963 PMCID: PMC9976566 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both activated by environmental odorants, there is a clear role for the intranasal trigeminal and olfactory nerves in smell function. Unfortunately, our ability to perceive odorants decreases with age or with injury, and limited interventions are available to treat smell loss. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve via trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates odor sensitivity in healthy individuals. METHODS We recruited 20 healthy adults (12 Female, mean age = 27) to participate in this three-visit, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive one of three stimulation modalities (TNS, tDCS, or sham) during each of their visits. Odor detection thresholds were obtained at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 30-min post-intervention. Furthermore, participants were asked to complete a sustained attention task and mood assessments before odor detection testing. RESULTS Findings reveal a timeXcondition interaction for guaiacol (GUA) odorant detection thresholds (F (3.188, 60.57) = 3.833, P = 0.0125), but not phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA) odorant thresholds. At 30-min post-stimulation, both active TNS and active tDCS showed significantly increased sensitivity to GUA compared to sham TNS (Sham TNS = -8.30% vs. Active TNS = 9.11%, mean difference 17.43%, 95% CI 5.674 to 29.18, p = 0.0044; Sham TNS = -8.30% vs. Active tDCS = 13.58%, mean difference 21.89%, 95% CI 10.47 to 33.32, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION TNS is a safe, simple, noninvasive method for boosting olfaction. Future studies should investigate the use of TNS on smell function across different stimulation parameters, odorants, and patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bernadette M. Cortese
- Corresponding author. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, BA 504F, Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, USA. (B.M. Cortese)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Badran BW, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, Brown JC, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, George MS. Neurophysiologic Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) via Electrical Stimulation of the Tragus: A Concurrent taVNS/fMRI Study and Review. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2022; 20:80-89. [PMID: 35746927 PMCID: PMC9063605 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Revised: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
(Appeared originally in Brain Stimulation 2018; 11:492-500) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Collapse
|
21
|
Badran BW, Caulfield KA, Stomberg-Firestein S, Summers PM, Dowdle LT, Savoca M, Li X, Austelle CW, Short EB, Borckardt JJ, Spivak N, Bystritsky A, George MS. Sonication of the Anterior Thalamus With MRI-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound (tFUS) Alters Pain Thresholds in Healthy Adults: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2022; 20:90-99. [PMID: 35746940 PMCID: PMC9063607 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
(Appeared originally in Brain Stimulation 2020; 13:1805-1812) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ehrlich TJ, Bhat J, Horwege AM, Mathalon DH, Glover GH, Roach BJ, Badran BW, Forman SD, George MS, Scott JC, Thase ME, Yesavage JA, Yurgelun-Todd DA, Rosen AC. Ruminative reflection is associated with anticorrelations between the orbitofrontal cortex and the default mode network in depression: implications for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Imaging Behav 2022; 16:1186-1195. [PMID: 34860349 PMCID: PMC9107429 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00596-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Patients with depression who ruminate repeatedly focus on depressive thoughts; however, there are two cognitive subtypes of rumination, reflection and brooding, each associated with different prognoses. Reflection involves problem-solving and is associated with positive outcomes, whereas brooding involves passive, negative, comparison with other people and is associated with poor outcomes. Rumination has also been related to atypical functional hyperconnectivity between the default mode network and subgenual prefrontal cortex. Repetitive pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex has been shown to alter functional connectivity, suggesting that the abnormal connectivity associated with rumination could potentially be altered. This study examined potential repetitive pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation prefrontal cortical targets that could modulate one or both of these rumination subtypes. Forty-three patients who took part in a trial of repetitive pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation completed the Rumination Response Scale questionnaire and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Seed to voxel functional connectivity analyses identified an anticorrelation between the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex (-44, 26, -8; k = 172) with the default mode network-subgenual region in relation to higher levels of reflection. Parallel analyses were not significant for brooding or the RRS total score. These findings extend previous studies of rumination and identify a potential mechanistic model for symptom-based neuromodulation of rumination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobin J Ehrlich
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jyoti Bhat
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Andrea M Horwege
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Daniel H Mathalon
- Mental Health Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gary H Glover
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Brian J Roach
- Mental Health Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Steven D Forman
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - J Cobb Scott
- VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael E Thase
- VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jerome A Yesavage
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd
- Rocky Mountain Network Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Centers (VISN 19), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Allyson C Rosen
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (151Y), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kreisberg E, Esmaeilpour Z, Adair D, Khadka N, Datta A, Badran BW, Bremner JD, Bikson M. High-resolution computational modeling of the current flow in the outer ear during transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS). Brain Stimul 2021; 14:1419-1430. [PMID: 34517143 PMCID: PMC8608747 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) applies low-intensity electrical current to the ear with the intention of activating the auricular branch of the Vagus nerve. The sensitivity and selectivity of stimulation applied to the ear depends on current flow pattern produced by a given electrode montage (size and placement). OBJECTIVE We compare different electrodes designs for taVNS considering both the predicted peak electric fields (sensitivity) and their spatial distribution (selectivity). METHODS Based on optimized high-resolution (0.47 mm) T1 and T2 weighted MRI, we developed an anatomical model of the left ear and the surrounding head tissues including brain, CSF/meninges, skull, muscle, blood vessels, fat, cartilage, and skin. The ear was further segmented into 6 regions of interest (ROI) based on various nerve densities: cavum concha, cymba concha, crus of helix, tragus, antitragus, and earlobe. A range of taVNS electrode montages were reproduced spanning varied electrodes sizes and placements over the tragus, cymba concha, earlobe, cavum concha, and crus of helix. Electric field across the ear (from superficial skin to cartilage) for each montage at 1 mA or 2 mA taVNS, assuming an activation threshold of 6.15 V/m, 12.3 V/m or 24.6 V/m was predicted using a Finite element method (FEM). Finally, considering every ROI, we calculated the sensitivity and selectivity of each montage. RESULTS Current flow patterns through the ear were highly specific to the electrode montage. Electric field was maximal at the ear regions directly under the electrodes, and for a given total current, increases with decreasing electrode size. Depending on the applied current and nerves threshold, activation may also occur in the regions between multiple anterior surface electrodes. Each considered montage was selective for one or two regions of interest. For example, electrodes across the tragus restricted significant electric field to the tragus. Stimulation across the earlobe restricted significant electric field to the earlobe and the antitragus. Because of this relative selectivity, use of control ear montages in experimental studies, support testing of targeting. Relative targeting was robust across assumptions of activation threshold and tissue properties. DISCUSSION Computational models provide additional insight on how details in electrode shape and placement impact sensitivity (how much current is needed) and selectivity (spatial distribution), thereby supporting analysis of existing approaches and optimization of new devices. Our result suggest taVNS current patterns and relative target are robust across individuals, though (variance in) axon morphology was not represented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Kreisberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Devin Adair
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Niranjan Khadka
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Abhishek Datta
- Research and Development, Soterix Medical, New York, USA, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - J Douglas Bremner
- Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, And the Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hunt S, Moss H, Dancy M, Badran BW, George MS, Jenkins D. Predicting response to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with oromotor feeding in neonates: CNS metabolite biomarkers by MR spectroscopy (MRS). Brain Stimul 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
25
|
Thompson SL, O'Leary GH, Austelle CW, Gruber E, Kahn AT, Manett AJ, Short B, Badran BW. A Review of Parameter Settings for Invasive and Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Applied in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:709436. [PMID: 34326720 PMCID: PMC8313807 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.709436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established form of neuromodulation with a long history of promising applications. Earliest reports of VNS in the literature date to the late 1800’s in experiments conducted by Dr. James Corning. Over the past century, both invasive and non-invasive VNS have demonstrated promise in treating a variety of disorders, including epilepsy, depression, and post-stroke motor rehabilitation. As VNS continues to rapidly grow in popularity and application, the field generally lacks a consensus on optimum stimulation parameters. Stimulation parameters have a significant impact on the efficacy of neuromodulation, and here we will describe the longitudinal evolution of VNS parameters in the following categorical progression: (1) animal models, (2) epilepsy, (3) treatment resistant depression, (4) neuroplasticity and rehabilitation, and (5) transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS). We additionally offer a historical perspective of the various applications and summarize the range and most commonly used parameters in over 130 implanted and non-invasive VNS studies over five applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean L Thompson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Georgia H O'Leary
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Christopher W Austelle
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Elise Gruber
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Alex T Kahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Andrew J Manett
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Baron Short
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rosen AC, Bhat JV, Cardenas VA, Ehrlich TJ, Horwege AM, Mathalon DH, Roach BJ, Glover GH, Badran BW, Forman SD, George MS, Thase ME, Yurgelun-Todd D, Sughrue ME, Doyen SP, Nicholas PJ, Scott JC, Tian L, Yesavage JA. Targeting location relates to treatment response in active but not sham rTMS stimulation. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:703-709. [PMID: 33866020 PMCID: PMC8884259 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Precise targeting of brain functional networks is believed critical for treatment efficacy of rTMS (repetitive pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation) in treatment resistant major depression. Objective: To use imaging data from a “failed” clinical trial of rTMS in Veterans to test whether treatment response was associated with rTMS coil location in active but not sham stimulation, and compare fMRI functional connectivity between those stimulation locations. Methods: An imaging substudy of 49 Veterans (mean age, 56 years; range, 27e78 years; 39 male) from a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial of rTMS treatment, grouping participants by clinical response, followed by group comparisons of treatment locations identified by individualized fiducial markers on structural MRI and resting state fMRI derived networks. Results: The average stimulation location for responders versus nonresponders differed in the active but not in the sham condition (P = .02). The average responder location derived from the active condition showed significant negative functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate (P < .001) while the nonresponder location did not (P = .17), a finding replicated in independent cohorts of 84 depressed and 35 neurotypical participants. The responder and nonresponder stimulation locations evoked different seed based networks (FDR corrected clusters, all P < .03), revealing additional brain regions related to rTMS treatment outcome. Conclusion: These results provide evidence from a randomized controlled trial that clinical response to rTMS is related to accuracy in targeting the region within DLPFC that is negatively correlated with subgenual cingulate. These results support the validity of a neuro-functionally informed rTMS therapy target in Veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Rosen
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - J V Bhat
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - V A Cardenas
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - T J Ehrlich
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - A M Horwege
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - D H Mathalon
- Mental Health Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - B J Roach
- Mental Health Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Northern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - G H Glover
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - S D Forman
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M S George
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - M E Thase
- VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - D Yurgelun-Todd
- Rocky Mountain Network Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Centers (VISN 19), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - M E Sughrue
- Omniscient Neurotechnologies, Sydney, Australia; Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - S P Doyen
- Omniscient Neurotechnologies, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - J C Scott
- VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - L Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - J A Yesavage
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Farmer AD, Strzelczyk A, Finisguerra A, Gourine AV, Gharabaghi A, Hasan A, Burger AM, Jaramillo AM, Mertens A, Majid A, Verkuil B, Badran BW, Ventura-Bort C, Gaul C, Beste C, Warren CM, Quintana DS, Hämmerer D, Freri E, Frangos E, Tobaldini E, Kaniusas E, Rosenow F, Capone F, Panetsos F, Ackland GL, Kaithwas G, O'Leary GH, Genheimer H, Jacobs HIL, Van Diest I, Schoenen J, Redgrave J, Fang J, Deuchars J, Széles JC, Thayer JF, More K, Vonck K, Steenbergen L, Vianna LC, McTeague LM, Ludwig M, Veldhuizen MG, De Couck M, Casazza M, Keute M, Bikson M, Andreatta M, D'Agostini M, Weymar M, Betts M, Prigge M, Kaess M, Roden M, Thai M, Schuster NM, Montano N, Hansen N, Kroemer NB, Rong P, Fischer R, Howland RH, Sclocco R, Sellaro R, Garcia RG, Bauer S, Gancheva S, Stavrakis S, Kampusch S, Deuchars SA, Wehner S, Laborde S, Usichenko T, Polak T, Zaehle T, Borges U, Teckentrup V, Jandackova VK, Napadow V, Koenig J. International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020). Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 14:568051. [PMID: 33854421 PMCID: PMC8040977 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Given its non-invasive nature, there is increasing interest in the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) across basic, translational and clinical research. Contemporaneously, tVNS can be achieved by stimulating either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve, referred to as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation(VNS) and transcutaneous cervical VNS, respectively. In order to advance the field in a systematic manner, studies using these technologies need to adequately report sufficient methodological detail to enable comparison of results between studies, replication of studies, as well as enhancing study participant safety. We systematically reviewed the existing tVNS literature to evaluate current reporting practices. Based on this review, and consensus among participating authors, we propose a set of minimal reporting items to guide future tVNS studies. The suggested items address specific technical aspects of the device and stimulation parameters. We also cover general recommendations including inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants, outcome parameters and the detailed reporting of side effects. Furthermore, we review strategies used to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for a given research setting and summarize ongoing developments in animal research with potential implications for the application of tVNS in humans. Finally, we discuss the potential of tVNS in future research as well as the associated challenges across several disciplines in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam D. Farmer
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Strzelczyk
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Alexander V. Gourine
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, Centre for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alireza Gharabaghi
- Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alkomiet Hasan
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas M. Burger
- Laboratory for Biological Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Ann Mertens
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Arshad Majid
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Bart Verkuil
- Clinical Psychology and the Leiden Institute of Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Carlos Ventura-Bort
- Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Charly Gaul
- Migraine and Headache Clinic Koenigstein, Königstein im Taunus, Germany
| | - Christian Beste
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Daniel S. Quintana
- NORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dorothea Hämmerer
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg (CBBS), Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Elena Freri
- Department of Pediatric Neuroscience, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleni Frangos
- Pain and Integrative Neuroscience Branch, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Eleonora Tobaldini
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Eugenijus Kaniusas
- Institute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
- SzeleSTIM GmbH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Felix Rosenow
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fioravante Capone
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Fivos Panetsos
- Faculty of Biology and Faculty of Optics, Complutense University of Madrid and Institute for Health Research, San Carlos Clinical Hospital (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gareth L. Ackland
- Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gaurav Kaithwas
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), Lucknow, India
| | - Georgia H. O'Leary
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Hannah Genheimer
- Department of Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heidi I. L. Jacobs
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ilse Van Diest
- Research Group Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology-Citadelle Hospital, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jessica Redgrave
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Jiliang Fang
- Functional Imaging Lab, Department of Radiology, Guang An Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jim Deuchars
- School of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Biological Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jozsef C. Széles
- Division for Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julian F. Thayer
- Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Kaushik More
- Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Neuromodulatory Networks, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Kristl Vonck
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Neuroscience, 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Laura Steenbergen
- Clinical and Cognitive Psychology and the Leiden Institute of Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Lauro C. Vianna
- NeuroV̇ASQ̇ - Integrative Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Lisa M. McTeague
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mareike Ludwig
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Maria G. Veldhuizen
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marijke De Couck
- Faculty of Health Care, University College Odisee, Aalst, Belgium
- Division of Epileptology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Casazza
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marius Keute
- Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Marta Andreatta
- Department of Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martina D'Agostini
- Research Group Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mathias Weymar
- Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Matthew Betts
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Prigge
- Neuromodulatory Networks, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kaess
- University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Section for Translational Psychobiology in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Roden
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research, Munich, Germany
| | - Michelle Thai
- Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Nathaniel M. Schuster
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health System, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Nicola Montano
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Niels Hansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Laboratory of Systems Neuroscience and Imaging in Psychiatry (SNIPLab), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nils B. Kroemer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peijing Rong
- Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Rico Fischer
- Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Robert H. Howland
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Roberta Sclocco
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, United States
| | - Roberta Sellaro
- Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Ronald G. Garcia
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sebastian Bauer
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sofiya Gancheva
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Heart Rhythm Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Stavros Stavrakis
- Faculty of Biological Science, School of Biomedical Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Kampusch
- Institute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
- SzeleSTIM GmbH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susan A. Deuchars
- School of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Biological Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sven Wehner
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sylvain Laborde
- Department of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Deutsche Sporthochschule, Köln, Germany
| | - Taras Usichenko
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Polak
- Laboratory of Functional Neurovascular Diagnostics, AG Early Diagnosis of Dementia, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Clinic Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tino Zaehle
- Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Uirassu Borges
- Department of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Deutsche Sporthochschule, Köln, Germany
- Department of Social and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Deutsche Sporthochschule, Köln, Germany
| | - Vanessa Teckentrup
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vera K. Jandackova
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
- Department of Human Movement Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
| | - Vitaly Napadow
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, United States
| | - Julian Koenig
- University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Section for Experimental Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jenkins DD, Khodaparast N, O'Leary GH, Washburn SN, Covalin A, Badran BW. Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN): A Novel Adjuvant Treatment in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:648556. [PMID: 33762918 PMCID: PMC7982745 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.648556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal opioid use during pregnancy is a growing national problem and can lead to newborns developing neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) soon after birth. Recent data demonstrates that nearly every 15 min a baby is born in the United States suffering from NOWS. The primary treatment for NOWS is opioid replacement therapy, commonly oral morphine, which has neurotoxic effects on the developing brain. There is an urgent need for non-opioid treatments for NOWS. Transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN), a novel and non-invasive form of electrostimulation, may serve as a promising alternative to morphine. tAN is delivered via a multichannel earpiece electrode worn on and around the left ear, targeting two cranial nerves—the vagus and trigeminal nerves. Prior research suggests that auricular neurostimulation exerts an anxiolytic effect on the body by releasing endogenous opioids and reduces withdrawal symptoms in adults actively withdrawing from opioids. In this first-in-human prospective, open-label trial, we investigated tAN as an adjuvant to morphine therapy in eight infants >33 weeks gestational age suffering from NOWS and receiving oral morphine treatment. Infants received tAN for 30 min 1 h before receiving a morphine dose. tAN was delivered at 0.1 mA below perception intensity at two different nerve targets on the ear: Region 1, the auricular branch of the vagus nerve; and Region 2, the auriculotemporal nerve. tAN was delivered up to four times daily for a maximum of 12 days. The primary outcome measures were safety [heart rate monitoring, Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), and skin irritation] and morphine length of treatment (LOT). tAN was well-tolerated and resulted in no unanticipated adverse events. Comparing to the national average of 23 days, the average oral morphine LOT was 13.3 days (median 9 days) and the average LOT after tAN initiation was 7 days (median 6 days). These preliminary data suggest that tAN is safe and may serve as a promising alternative adjuvant for treating NOWS and reducing the amount of time an infant receives oral morphine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea D Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | | - Georgia H O'Leary
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Brain Stimulation Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | | | | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Brain Stimulation Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
O'Leary GH, Jenkins DD, Coker-Bolt P, George MS, Kautz S, Bikson M, Gillick BT, Badran BW. From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury. Prog Brain Res 2021; 264:287-322. [PMID: 34167660 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Stroke is a major problem worldwide that impacts over 100 million adults and children annually. Rehabilitation therapy is the current standard of care to restore functional impairments post-stroke, however its effects are limited and many patients suffer persisting functional impairments and life-long disability. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) has emerged as a potential rehabilitation treatment option in both adults and children with brain injury. In the last decade, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) have been investigated to improve motor recovery in adults post-stroke. These promising adult findings using NIBS, however, have yet to be widely translated to the area of pediatrics. The limited studies exploring NIBS in children have demonstrated safety, feasibility, and utility of stimulation-augmented rehabilitation. This chapter will describe the mechanism of NIBS therapy (cortical excitability, neuroplasticity) that underlies its use in stroke and motor function and how TMS, tDCS, and taVNS are applied in adult stroke treatment paradigms. We will then discuss the current state of NIBS in early pediatric brain injury and will provide insight regarding practical considerations and future applications of NIBS in pediatrics to make this promising treatment option a viable therapy in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia H O'Leary
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Dorothea D Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Patricia Coker-Bolt
- Division of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Steve Kautz
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bernadette T Gillick
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Baptista AF, Baltar A, Okano AH, Moreira A, Campos ACP, Fernandes AM, Brunoni AR, Badran BW, Tanaka C, de Andrade DC, da Silva Machado DG, Morya E, Trujillo E, Swami JK, Camprodon JA, Monte-Silva K, Sá KN, Nunes I, Goulardins JB, Bikson M, Sudbrack-Oliveira P, de Carvalho P, Duarte-Moreira RJ, Pagano RL, Shinjo SK, Zana Y. Applications of Non-invasive Neuromodulation for the Management of Disorders Related to COVID-19. Front Neurol 2020; 11:573718. [PMID: 33324324 PMCID: PMC7724108 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.573718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) morbidity is not restricted to the respiratory system, but also affects the nervous system. Non-invasive neuromodulation may be useful in the treatment of the disorders associated with COVID-19. Objective: To describe the rationale and empirical basis of the use of non-invasive neuromodulation in the management of patients with COVID-10 and related disorders. Methods: We summarize COVID-19 pathophysiology with emphasis of direct neuroinvasiveness, neuroimmune response and inflammation, autonomic balance and neurological, musculoskeletal and neuropsychiatric sequela. This supports the development of a framework for advancing applications of non-invasive neuromodulation in the management COVID-19 and related disorders. Results: Non-invasive neuromodulation may manage disorders associated with COVID-19 through four pathways: (1) Direct infection mitigation through the stimulation of regions involved in the regulation of systemic anti-inflammatory responses and/or autonomic responses and prevention of neuroinflammation and recovery of respiration; (2) Amelioration of COVID-19 symptoms of musculoskeletal pain and systemic fatigue; (3) Augmenting cognitive and physical rehabilitation following critical illness; and (4) Treating outbreak-related mental distress including neurological and psychiatric disorders exacerbated by surrounding psychosocial stressors related to COVID-19. The selection of the appropriate techniques will depend on the identified target treatment pathway. Conclusion: COVID-19 infection results in a myriad of acute and chronic symptoms, both directly associated with respiratory distress (e.g., rehabilitation) or of yet-to-be-determined etiology (e.g., fatigue). Non-invasive neuromodulation is a toolbox of techniques that based on targeted pathways and empirical evidence (largely in non-COVID-19 patients) can be investigated in the management of patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrahão Fontes Baptista
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Centros de Pesquisa, Investigação e Difusão - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Laboratory of Medical Investigations 54 (LIM-54), São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriana Baltar
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Specialized Neuromodulation Center—Neuromod, Recife, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Hideki Okano
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Centros de Pesquisa, Investigação e Difusão - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Graduate Program in Physical Education, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Moreira
- School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Ana Mércia Fernandes
- Centro de Dor, LIM-62, Departamento de Neurologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - André Russowsky Brunoni
- Serviço Interdisciplinar de Neuromodulação, Laboratório de Neurociências (LIM-27), Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Neuropsiquiatria, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Clarice Tanaka
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Laboratory of Medical Investigations 54 (LIM-54), São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Centro de Dor, LIM-62, Departamento de Neurologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Edgard Morya
- Edmond and Lily Safra International Neuroscience Institute, Santos Dumont Institute, Macaiba, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Trujillo
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
| | - Jaiti K. Swami
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joan A. Camprodon
- Laboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Katia Monte-Silva
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
| | - Katia Nunes Sá
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Isadora Nunes
- Department of Physiotherapy, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Betim, Brazil
| | - Juliana Barbosa Goulardins
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
- Laboratory of Medical Investigations 54 (LIM-54), São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil
- School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Priscila de Carvalho
- Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rafael Jardim Duarte-Moreira
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
- NAPeN Network (Rede de Núcleos de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
| | | | - Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo
- Division of Rheumatology, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Yossi Zana
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pilloni G, Bikson M, Badran BW, George MS, Kautz SA, Okano AH, Baptista AF, Charvet LE. Update on the Use of Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation to Manage Acute and Chronic COVID-19 Symptoms. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:595567. [PMID: 33281589 PMCID: PMC7689057 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.595567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the urgent need to develop and deploy treatment approaches that can minimize mortality and morbidity. As infection, resulting illness, and the often prolonged recovery period continue to be characterized, therapeutic roles for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) have emerged as promising non-pharmacological interventions. tES techniques have established therapeutic potential for managing a range of conditions relevant to COVID-19 illness and recovery, and may further be relevant for the general management of increased mental health problems during this time. Furthermore, these tES techniques can be inexpensive, portable, and allow for trained self-administration. Here, we summarize the rationale for using tES techniques, specifically transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), across the COVID-19 clinical course, and index ongoing efforts to evaluate the inclusion of tES optimal clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppina Pilloni
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mark S. George
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Ralph H Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Steven A. Kautz
- Ralph H Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Alexandre Hideki Okano
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurothechnology 52 (BRAINN/CEPID53 FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Abrahão Fontes Baptista
- Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurothechnology 52 (BRAINN/CEPID53 FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation 54 (LIM-54), São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Leigh E. Charvet
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Badran BW, Caulfield KA, Stomberg-Firestein S, Summers PM, Dowdle LT, Savoca M, Li X, Austelle CW, Short EB, Borckardt JJ, Spivak N, Bystritsky A, George MS. Sonication of the anterior thalamus with MRI-Guided transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) alters pain thresholds in healthy adults: A double-blind, sham-controlled study. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1805-1812. [PMID: 33127579 PMCID: PMC7888561 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation method that may modulate deep brain structures. This study investigates whether sonication of the right anterior thalamus would modulate thermal pain thresholds in healthy individuals. Methods: We enrolled 19 healthy individuals in this three-visit, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial. Participants first underwent a structural MRI scan used solely for tFUS targeting. They then attended two identical experimental tFUS visits (counterbalanced by condition) at least one week apart. Within the MRI scanner, participants received two, 10-min sessions of either active or sham tFUS spread 10 min apart targeting the right anterior thalamus [fundamental frequency: 650 kHz, Pulse repetition frequency: 10 Hz, Pulse Width: 5 ms, Duty Cycle: 5%, Sonication Duration: 30s, Inter-Sonication Interval: 30 s, Number of Sonications: 10, ISPTA.0 995 mW/cm2, ISPTA.3 719 mW/cm2, Peak rarefactional pressure 0.72 MPa]. The primary outcome measure was quantitative sensory thresholding (QST), measuring sensory, pain, and tolerance thresholds to a thermal stimulus applied to the left forearm before and after right anterior thalamic tFUS. Results: The right anterior thalamus was accurately sonicated in 17 of the 19 subjects. Thermal pain sensitivity was significantly attenuated after active tFUS. The pre-post x active-sham interaction was significant (F(1,245.95) = 4.03, p = .046). This interaction indicates that in the sham stimulation condition, thermal pain thresholds decreased 1.08 °C (SE = 0.28) pre-post session, but only decreased .51 °C (SE = 0.30) pre-post session in the active stimulation group. Conclusions: Two 10-min sessions of anterior thalamic tFUS induces antinociceptive effects in healthy individuals. Future studies should optimize the parameter space, dose and duration of this effect which may lead to multi-session tFUS interventions for pain disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sasha Stomberg-Firestein
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Philipp M Summers
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Logan T Dowdle
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Matt Savoca
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Xingbao Li
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Christopher W Austelle
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - E Baron Short
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Borckardt
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Norman Spivak
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Badran BW, Caulfield KA, Cox C, Lopez JW, Borckardt JJ, DeVries WH, Summers P, Kerns S, Hanlon CA, McTeague LM, George MS, Roberts DR. Brain stimulation in zero gravity: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor threshold decreases during zero gravity induced by parabolic flight. NPJ Microgravity 2020; 6:26. [PMID: 33024819 PMCID: PMC7505837 DOI: 10.1038/s41526-020-00116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
We are just beginning to understand how spaceflight may impact brain function. As NASA proceeds with plans to send astronauts to the Moon and commercial space travel interest increases, it is critical to understand how the human brain and peripheral nervous system respond to zero gravity. Here, we developed and refined head-worn transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) systems capable of reliably and quickly determining the amount of electromagnetism each individual needs to detect electromyographic (EMG) threshold levels in the thumb (called the resting motor threshold (rMT)). We then collected rMTs in 10 healthy adult participants in the laboratory at baseline, and subsequently at three time points onboard an airplane: (T1) pre-flight at Earth gravity, (T2) during zero gravity periods induced by parabolic flight and (T3) post-flight at Earth gravity. Overall, the subjects required 12.6% less electromagnetism applied to the brain to cause thumb muscle activation during weightlessness compared to Earth gravity, suggesting neurophysiological changes occur during brief periods of zero gravity. We discuss several candidate explanations for this finding, including upward shift of the brain within the skull, acute increases in cortical excitability, changes in intracranial pressure, and diffuse spinal or neuromuscular system effects. All of these possible explanations warrant further study. In summary, we documented neurophysiological changes during brief episodes of zero gravity and thus highlighting the need for further studies of human brain function in altered gravity conditions to optimally prepare for prolonged microgravity exposure during spaceflight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Claire Cox
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - James W Lopez
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Jeffrey J Borckardt
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA.,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401 USA.,Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - William H DeVries
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Philipp Summers
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Suzanne Kerns
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Colleen A Hanlon
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| | - Lisa M McTeague
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA.,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401 USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA.,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401 USA
| | - Donna R Roberts
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li X, Hartwell KJ, Henderson S, Badran BW, Brady KT, George MS. Two weeks of image-guided left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves smoking cessation: A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1271-1279. [PMID: 32534252 PMCID: PMC7494651 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have found that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) transiently reduces smoking craving, decreases cigarette consumption, and increases abstinence rates. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether 10 daily MRI-guided rTMS sessions over two weeks to the LDLPFC paired with craving cues could reduce cigarette consumption and induce smoking cessation. METHODS We enrolled 42 treatment-seeking nicotine-dependent smokers (≥10 cigarettes per day) in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Participants received 10 daily sessions over 2 weeks of either active or sham MRI-guided rTMS (10Hz, 3000 pulses each session) to the LDLPFC concurrently with video smoking cues. The primary outcome was a reduction in biochemically confirmed cigarette consumption with a secondary outcome of abstinence on the target quit date. We also recorded cue-induced craving and withdrawal symptoms. RESULTS Compared to sham (n = 17), participants receiving active rTMS (n = 21) smoked significantly fewer cigarettes per day during the 2-week treatment (mean [SD], 13.73[9.18] vs. 11.06[9.29], P < .005) and at 1-month follow-up (12.78[9.53] vs. 7.93[7.24], P < .001). Active rTMS participants were also more likely to quit by their target quit rate (23.81%vs. 0%, OR 11.67, 90% CL, 0.96-141.32, x2 = 4.66, P = .031). Furthermore, rTMS significantly reduced mean craving throughout the treatments and at follow-up (29.93[13.12] vs. 25.01[14.45], P < .001). Interestingly across the active treatment sample, more lateral coil location was associated with more success in quitting (-43.43[0.40] vs. -41.79[2.24], P < .013). CONCLUSIONS Daily MRI-guided rTMS to the LDLPFC for 10 days reduces cigarette consumption and cued craving for up to one month and also increases the likelihood of smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02401672.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingbao Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Karen J Hartwell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA
| | - Scott Henderson
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Kathleen T Brady
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
George MS, Caulfield KA, O'Leary K, Badran BW, Short EB, Huffman SM, Li X, Kerns SE, Williams NR. Synchronized cervical VNS with accelerated theta burst TMS for treatment resistant depression. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1449-1450. [PMID: 32777436 PMCID: PMC7970701 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - E Baron Short
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sarah M Huffman
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Xingbao Li
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Suzanne E Kerns
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Nolan R Williams
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Caulfield KA, Badran BW, Li X, Bikson M, George MS. Can transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold estimate individualized tDCS doses over the prefrontal cortex? Evidence from reverse-calculation electric field modeling. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1150-1152. [PMID: 32439562 PMCID: PMC7891110 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Caulfield
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Xingbao Li
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Adair D, Truong D, Esmaeilpour Z, Gebodh N, Borges H, Ho L, Bremner JD, Badran BW, Napadow V, Clark VP, Bikson M. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:717-750. [PMID: 32289703 PMCID: PMC7196013 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The cranial nerves are the pathways through which environmental information (sensation) is directly communicated to the brain, leading to perception, and giving rise to higher cognition. Because cranial nerves determine and modulate brain function, invasive and non-invasive cranial nerve electrical stimulation methods have applications in the clinical, behavioral, and cognitive domains. Among other neuromodulation approaches such as peripheral, transcranial and deep brain stimulation, cranial nerve stimulation is unique in allowing axon pathway-specific engagement of brain circuits, including thalamo-cortical networks. In this review we amalgamate relevant knowledge of 1) cranial nerve anatomy and biophysics; 2) evidence of the modulatory effects of cranial nerves on cognition; 3) clinical and behavioral outcomes of cranial nerve stimulation; and 4) biomarkers of nerve target engagement including physiology, electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and behavioral metrics. Existing non-invasive stimulation methods cannot feasibly activate the axons of only individual cranial nerves. Even with invasive stimulation methods, selective targeting of one nerve fiber type requires nuance since each nerve is composed of functionally distinct axon-types that differentially branch and can anastomose onto other nerves. None-the-less, precisely controlling stimulation parameters can aid in affecting distinct sets of axons, thus supporting specific actions on cognition and behavior. To this end, a rubric for reproducible dose-response stimulation parameters is defined here. Given that afferent cranial nerve axons project directly to the brain, targeting structures (e.g. thalamus, cortex) that are critical nodes in higher order brain networks, potent effects on cognition are plausible. We propose an intervention design framework based on driving cranial nerve pathways in targeted brain circuits, which are in turn linked to specific higher cognitive processes. State-of-the-art current flow models that are used to explain and design cranial-nerve-activating stimulation technology require multi-scale detail that includes: gross anatomy; skull foramina and superficial tissue layers; and precise nerve morphology. Detailed simulations also predict that some non-invasive electrical or magnetic stimulation approaches that do not intend to modulate cranial nerves per se, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), may also modulate activity of specific cranial nerves. Much prior cranial nerve stimulation work was conceptually limited to the production of sensory perception, with individual titration of intensity based on the level of perception and tolerability. However, disregarding sensory emulation allows consideration of temporal stimulation patterns (axon recruitment) that modulate the tone of cortical networks independent of sensory cortices, without necessarily titrating perception. For example, leveraging the role of the thalamus as a gatekeeper for information to the cerebral cortex, preventing or enhancing the passage of specific information depending on the behavioral state. We show that properly parameterized computational models at multiple scales are needed to rationally optimize neuromodulation that target sets of cranial nerves, determining which and how specific brain circuitries are modulated, which can in turn influence cognition in a designed manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin Adair
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis Truong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Nigel Gebodh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen Borges
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Libby Ho
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Douglas Bremner
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Vitaly Napadow
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, MGH, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vincent P Clark
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Dept. Psychology, MSC03-2220, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; The Mind Research Network of the Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, 1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Badran BW, Jenkins DD, Cook D, Thompson S, Dancy M, DeVries WH, Mappin G, Summers P, Bikson M, George MS. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Paired Rehabilitation for Oromotor Feeding Problems in Newborns: An Open-Label Pilot Study. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:77. [PMID: 32256328 PMCID: PMC7093597 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Neonates born premature or who suffer brain injury at birth often have oral feeding dysfunction and do not meet oral intake requirements needed for discharge. Low oral intake volumes result in extended stays in the hospital (>2 months) and can lead to surgical implant and explant of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube). Prior work suggests pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with motor activity accelerates functional improvements after stroke, and transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) has emerged as promising noninvasive form of VNS. Pairing taVNS with bottle-feeding rehabilitation may improve oromotor coordination and lead to improved oral intake volumes, ultimately avoiding the need for G-tube placement. We investigated whether taVNS paired with oromotor rehabilitation is tolerable and safe and facilitates motor learning in infants who have failed oral feeding. We enrolled 14 infants [11 premature and 3 hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)] who were slated for G-tube placement in a prospective, open-label study of taVNS-paired rehabilitation to increase feeding volumes. Once-daily taVNS was delivered to the left tragus during bottle feeding for 2 weeks, with optional extension. The primary outcome was attainment of oral feeding volumes and weight gain adequate for discharge without G-tube while also monitoring discomfort and heart rate (HR) as safety outcomes. We observed no adverse events related to stimulation, and stimulation-induced HR reductions were transient and safe and likely confirmed vagal engagement. Eight of 14 participants (57%) achieved adequate feeding volumes for discharge without G-tube (mean treatment length: 16 ± 6 days). We observed significant increases in feeding volume trajectories in responders compared with pre-stimulation (p < 0.05). taVNS-paired feeding rehabilitation appears safe and may improve oral feeding in infants with oromotor dyscoordination, increasing the rate of discharge without G-tube, warranting larger controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W. Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Dorothea D. Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Daniel Cook
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Sean Thompson
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Morgan Dancy
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - William H. DeVries
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Georgia Mappin
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Philipp Summers
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mark S. George
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cook DN, Thompson S, Stomberg-Firestein S, Bikson M, George MS, Jenkins DD, Badran BW. Design and validation of a closed-loop, motor-activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) system for neurorehabilitation. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:800-803. [PMID: 32289710 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have found that pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with motor activity accelerates cortical reorganization. This synchronous pairing may enhance motor recovery. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a motor-activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) system as a potential neurorehabilitation tool. METHODS We created MAAVNS and validated its function as part of an ongoing clinical trial investigating whether taVNS-paired rehabilitation enhances oromotor learning. We compared 3 different MAAVNS EMG electrode configurations in 3 neonates. The active lead was placed over the buccinator muscle. Reference lead placements were orbital, temporal or frontal. RESULTS The frontal reference lead produced the highest sensitivity (0.87 ± 0.07 (n = 8)) and specificity (0.64 ± 0.13 (n = 8)). Oral sucking reliably triggers MAAVNS stimulation with high confidence. CONCLUSION EMG electrodes placed on target orofacial muscles can effectively trigger taVNS stimuli in infants in a closed loop fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel N Cook
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, USA
| | - Sean Thompson
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, USA
| | - Sasha Stomberg-Firestein
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Badran BW, Caulfield KA, Lopez JW, Cox C, Stomberg-Firestein S, DeVries WH, McTeague LM, George MS, Roberts D. Personalized TMS helmets for quick and reliable TMS administration outside of a laboratory setting. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:551-553. [PMID: 32289675 PMCID: PMC7888559 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - James W Lopez
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Claire Cox
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | | | - William H DeVries
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Lisa M McTeague
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA
| | - Donna Roberts
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding how current reaches the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) underpins efforts to rationalize outcomes and optimize interventions. To this end, computational models of current flow relate applied dose to brain electric field. Conventional tES modeling considers distinct tissues like scalp, skull, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), gray matter and white matter. The properties of highly conductive CSF are especially important. However, modeling the space between skull and brain as entirely CSF is not an accurate representation of anatomy. The space conventionally modeled as CSF is approximately half meninges (dura, arachnoid, and pia) with lower conductivity. However, the resolution required to describe individual meningeal layers is computationally restrictive in an MRI-derived head model. Emulating the effect of meninges through CSF conductivity modification could improve accuracy with minimal cost. APPROACH Models with meningeal layers were developed in a concentric sphere head model. Then, in a model with only CSF between skull and brain, CSF conductivity was optimized to emulate the effect of meningeal layers on cortical electric field for multiple electrode positions. This emulated conductivity was applied to MRI-derived models. MAIN RESULTS Compared to a model with conventional CSF conductivity (1.65 S m-1), emulated CSF conductivity (0.85 S m-1) produced voltage fields better correlated with intracranial recordings from epilepsy patients. SIGNIFICANCE Conventional tES models have been validated using intracranial recording. Residual errors may nonetheless impact model utility. Because CSF is so conductive to current flow, misrepresentation of the skull-brain interface as entirely CSF is not realistic for tES modeling. Updating the conventional model with a CSF conductivity emulating the effect of the meninges enhances modeling accuracy without increasing model complexity. This allows existing modeling pipelines to be leveraged with a simple conductivity change. Using 0.85 S m-1 emulated CSF conductivity is recommended as the new standard in non-invasive brain stimulation modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neural Engineering Laboratory, City College of New York of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States of America. Authors contributed equally
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bikson M, Esmaeilpour Z, Adair D, Kronberg G, Tyler WJ, Antal A, Datta A, Sabel BA, Nitsche MA, Loo C, Edwards D, Ekhtiari H, Knotkova H, Woods AJ, Hampstead BM, Badran BW, Peterchev AV. Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:1349-1366. [PMID: 31358456 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) aims to alter brain function non-invasively by applying current to electrodes on the scalp. Decades of research and technological advancement are associated with a growing diversity of tES methods and the associated nomenclature for describing these methods. Whether intended to produce a specific response so the brain can be studied or lead to a more enduring change in behavior (e.g. for treatment), the motivations for using tES have themselves influenced the evolution of nomenclature, leading to some scientific, clinical, and public confusion. This ambiguity arises from (i) the infinite parameter space available in designing tES methods of application and (ii) varied naming conventions based upon the intended effects and/or methods of application. Here, we compile a cohesive nomenclature for contemporary tES technologies that respects existing and historical norms, while incorporating insight and classifications based on state-of-the-art findings. We consolidate and clarify existing terminology conventions, but do not aim to create new nomenclature. The presented nomenclature aims to balance adopting broad definitions that encourage flexibility and innovation in research approaches, against classification specificity that minimizes ambiguity about protocols but can hinder progress. Constructive research around tES classification, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), should allow some variations in protocol but also distinguish from approaches that bear so little resemblance that their safety and efficacy should not be compared directly. The proposed framework includes terms in contemporary use across peer-reviewed publications, including relatively new nomenclature introduced in the past decade, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), as well as terms with long historical use such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We also define commonly used terms-of-the-trade including electrode, lead, anode, and cathode, whose prior use, in varied contexts, can also be a source of confusion. This comprehensive clarification of nomenclature and associated preliminary proposals for standardized terminology can support the development of consensus on efficacy, safety, and regulatory standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Devin Adair
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Greg Kronberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - William J Tyler
- Arizona State University, School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany; Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-v.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Bernhard A Sabel
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-v.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment ant Human Factors, Dept. Psychology and Neurosciences, Dortmund, Germany; University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Dept. Neurology, Bochum, Germany
| | - Colleen Loo
- School of Psychiatry & Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dylan Edwards
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | | | - Helena Knotkova
- MJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, New York, NY, USA; Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Adam J Woods
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin M Hampstead
- Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Neuropsychology Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Badran BW, Short EB. Abstract #11: tDCS-Enhanced Meditation (E-Meditation) Reduces Mind Wandering and Stress State: An Open-Label Pilot Trial. Brain Stimul 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
44
|
Adair D, Truong DQ, Ho L, Badran BW, Borges H, Bikson M. Abstract #124: How to Modulate Cognition with Cranial Nerve Stimulation? Brain Stimul 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
45
|
Badran BW, Yu AB, Adair D, Mappin G, DeVries WH, Jenkins DD, George MS, Bikson M. Laboratory Administration of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS): Technique, Targeting, and Considerations. J Vis Exp 2019. [PMID: 30663712 DOI: 10.3791/58984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may be administered via a novel, emerging neuromodulatory technique known as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Unlike cervically-implanted VNS, taVNS is an inexpensive and non-surgical method used to modulate the vagus system. taVNS is appealing as it allows for rapid translation of basic VNS research and serves as a safe, inexpensive, and portable neurostimulation system for the future treatment of central and peripheral disease. The background and rationale for taVNS is described, along with electrical and parametric considerations, proper ear targeting and attachment of stimulation electrodes, individual dosing via determination of perception threshold (PT), and safe administration of taVNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York; U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground; Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina;
| | - Alfred B Yu
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground
| | - Devin Adair
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York
| | - Georgia Mappin
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - William H DeVries
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina
| | | | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gibson BC, Sanguinetti JL, Badran BW, Yu AB, Klein EP, Abbott CC, Hansberger JT, Clark VP. Increased Excitability Induced in the Primary Motor Cortex by Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation. Front Neurol 2018; 9:1007. [PMID: 30546342 PMCID: PMC6280333 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (tUS) is an emerging technique that uses ultrasonic waves to noninvasively modulate brain activity. As with other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), tUS may be useful for altering cortical excitability and neuroplasticity for a variety of research and clinical applications. The effects of tUS on cortical excitability are still unclear, and further complications arise from the wide parameter space offered by various types of devices, transducer arrangements, and stimulation protocols. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging devices are safe, commonly available systems that may be useful for tUS. However, the feasibility of modifying brain activity with diagnostic tUS is currently unknown. Objective: We aimed to examine the effects of a commercial diagnostic tUS device using an imaging protocol on cortical excitability. We hypothesized that imaging tUS applied to motor cortex could induce changes in cortical excitability as measured using a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor evoked potential (MEP) paradigm. Methods: Forty-three subjects were assigned to receive either verum (n = 21) or sham (n = 22) diagnostic tUS in a single-blind design. Baseline motor cortex excitability was measured using MEPs elicited by TMS. Diagnostic tUS was subsequently administered to the same cortical area for 2 min, immediately followed by repeated post-stimulation MEPs recorded up to 16 min post-stimulation. Results: Verum tUS increased excitability in the motor cortex (from baseline) by 33.7% immediately following tUS (p = 0.009), and 32.4% (p = 0.047) 6 min later, with excitability no longer significantly different from baseline by 11 min post-stimulation. By contrast, subjects receiving sham tUS showed no significant changes in MEP amplitude. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that tUS delivered via a commercially available diagnostic imaging ultrasound system transiently increases excitability in the motor cortex as measured by MEPs. Diagnostic tUS devices are currently used for internal imaging in many health care settings, and the present results suggest that these same devices may also offer a promising tool for noninvasively modulating activity in the central nervous system. Further studies exploring the use of diagnostic imaging devices for neuromodulation are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin C. Gibson
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Joseph L. Sanguinetti
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States
| | - Bashar W. Badran
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Alfred B. Yu
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States
| | - Evan P. Klein
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Christopher C. Abbott
- Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | | - Vincent P. Clark
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
- Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United States
- The Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Badran BW, Ly M, DeVries WH, Glusman CE, Willis A, Pridmore S, George MS. Are EMG and visual observation comparable in determining resting motor threshold? A reexamination after twenty years. Brain Stimul 2018; 12:364-366. [PMID: 30448078 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA; US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
| | - Martina Ly
- eemagine Medical Imaging Solutions Gmbh, Berlin, Germany
| | - William H DeVries
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Chloe E Glusman
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Saxby Pridmore
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; TMS Department, Saint Helen's Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Badran BW, Jenkins DD, DeVries WH, Dancy M, Summers PM, Mappin GM, Bernstein H, Bikson M, Coker-Bolt P, George MS. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for improving oromotor function in newborns. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:1198-1200. [PMID: 30146041 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA; US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
| | - Dorothea D Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - William H DeVries
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Morgan Dancy
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Philipp M Summers
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Georgia M Mappin
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Henry Bernstein
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia Coker-Bolt
- Division of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Badran BW, Brown JC, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, Yu A, Bikson M, Jenkins DD, George MS. Tragus or cymba conchae? Investigating the anatomical foundation of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Brain Stimul 2018; 11:947-948. [PMID: 29895444 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA; U.S. Army Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
| | - Joshua C Brown
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Logan T Dowdle
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Oliver J Mithoefer
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - James Coatsworth
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - William H DeVries
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Lisa M McTeague
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Alfred Yu
- U.S. Army Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dorothea D Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Brain Stimulation Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Badran BW, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, Brown JC, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, George MS. Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: A concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review. Brain Stimul 2017; 11:492-500. [PMID: 29361441 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Revised: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrical stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) via transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) may influence afferent vagal networks. There have been 5 prior taVNS/fMRI studies, with inconsistent findings due to variability in stimulation targets and parameters. OBJECTIVE We developed a taVNS/fMRI system to enable concurrent electrical stimulation and fMRI acquisition to compare the effects of taVNS in relation to control stimulation. METHODS We enrolled 17 healthy adults in this single-blind, crossover taVNS/fMRI trial. Based on parameters shown to affect heart rate in healthy volunteers, participants received either left tragus (active) or earlobe (control) stimulation at 500 μs 25 HZ for 60 s (repeated 3 times over 6 min). Whole brain fMRI analysis was performed exploring the effect of: active stimulation, control stimulation, and the comparison. Region of interest analysis of the midbrain and brainstem was also conducted. RESULTS Active stimulation produced significant increased BOLD signal in the contralateral postcentral gyrus, bilateral insula, frontal cortex, right operculum, and left cerebellum. Control stimulation produced BOLD signal activation in the contralateral postcentral gyrus. In the active vs. control contrast, tragus stimulation produced significantly greater BOLD increases in the right caudate, bilateral anterior cingulate, cerebellum, left prefrontal cortex, and mid-cingulate. CONCLUSION Stimulation of the tragus activates the cerebral afferents of the vagal pathway and combined with our review of the literature suggest that taVNS is a promising form of VNS. Future taVNS/fMRI studies should systematically explore various parameters and alternative stimulation targets aimed to optimize this novel form of neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar W Badran
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States; US Army Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, United States.
| | - Logan T Dowdle
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | - Oliver J Mithoefer
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | | | - James Coatsworth
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | - Joshua C Brown
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | - William H DeVries
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | - Christopher W Austelle
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | - Lisa M McTeague
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, 29401, United States
| |
Collapse
|