1
|
Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Agostinetto E, Hamy AS, Kim HJ, Di Meglio A, Bernstein Molho R, Hilbers F, Pogoda K, Carrasco E, Punie K, Bajpai J, Ignatiadis M, Moore HCF, Phillips KA, Toss A, Rousset-Jablonski C, Peccatori FA, Renaud T, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Fruscio R, Cui W, Wong SM, Vernieri C, Ruddy KJ, Dieci MV, Matikas A, Rozenblit M, Villarreal-Garza C, De Marchis L, Del Mastro L, Puglisi F, Del Pilar Estevez-Diz M, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Mrinakova B, Meister S, Livraghi L, Clatot F, Yerushalmi R, De Angelis C, Sánchez-Bayona R, Meattini I, Cichowska-Cwalińska N, Berlière M, Salama M, De Giorgi U, Sonnenblick A, Chiodi C, Lee YJ, Maria C, Azim HA, Boni L, Partridge AH. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Young BRCA Carriers: An International Hospital-Based Cohort Study. JAMA 2024; 331:49-59. [PMID: 38059899 PMCID: PMC10704340 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.25463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Importance Young women with breast cancer who have germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 face unique challenges regarding fertility. Previous studies demonstrating the feasibility and safety of pregnancy in breast cancer survivors included limited data regarding BRCA carriers. Objective To investigate cumulative incidence of pregnancy and disease-free survival in young women who are BRCA carriers. Design, Setting, and Participants International, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study conducted at 78 participating centers worldwide. The study included female participants diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020 carrying germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. Last delivery was October 7, 2022; last follow-up was February 20, 2023. Exposure Pregnancy after breast cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end points were cumulative incidence of pregnancy after breast cancer and disease-free survival. Secondary end points were breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, pregnancy, and fetal and obstetric outcomes. Results Of 4732 BRCA carriers included, 659 had at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer and 4073 did not. Median age at diagnosis in the overall cohort was 35 years (IQR, 31-38 years). Cumulative incidence of pregnancy at 10 years was 22% (95% CI, 21%-24%), with a median time from breast cancer diagnosis to conception of 3.5 years (IQR, 2.2-5.3 years). Among the 659 patients who had a pregnancy, 45 (6.9%) and 63 (9.7%) had an induced abortion or a miscarriage, respectively. Of the 517 patients (79.7%) with a completed pregnancy, 406 (91.0%) delivered at term (≥37 weeks) and 54 (10.4%) had twins. Among the 470 infants born with known information on pregnancy complications, 4 (0.9%) had documented congenital anomalies. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (IQR, 4.5-12.6 years). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed between patients with or without a pregnancy after breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.20). Patients who had a pregnancy had significantly better breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance In this global study, 1 in 5 young BRCA carriers conceived within 10 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Pregnancy following breast cancer in BRCA carriers was not associated with decreased disease-free survival. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03673306.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U. O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- U. O. Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Elisa Agostinetto
- Breast Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cité, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Cancer Survivorship Program–Molecular Predicitors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rinat Bernstein Molho
- Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center Affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Florentine Hilbers
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Breast Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Halle C. F. Moore
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Fedro A. Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Unit and General Surgery 3–Senology, Surgical Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Robert Fruscio
- UO Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan–Bicocca, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie M. Wong
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, and McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- IFOM ETS, AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Kathryn J. Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche, e Gastroenterologiche, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
- Oncologia 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alexios Matikas
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institute, and Breast Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mariya Rozenblit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion–TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Laura De Marchis
- Department of Radiological, Oncological, and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Division of Oncology, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Dermatology, Umberto 1 University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U. O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Avano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bela Mrinakova
- First Department of Oncology, Comenius University and St Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Sarah Meister
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Luca Livraghi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Rinat Yerushalmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences M. Serio, University of Florence, and Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Florence University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Natalia Cichowska-Cwalińska
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Centre, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Martine Berlière
- Department of Medical Oncology and Breast Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Oncofertility Consortium and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Camila Chiodi
- Cancer Survivorship Program–Molecular Predicitors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Young-Jin Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Camille Maria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cité, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hatem A. Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion–TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
- Cairo Oncology Center, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Luca Boni
- U. O. Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mrinakova B, Vertakova-Krakovska B, Hancinova M, Tarbaj L. P080 Fertility Preservation and Pregnancy in Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice, Slovak Republic Survey. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00197-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
|
3
|
Tankova T, Senkus E, Beloyartseva M, Borštnar S, Catrinoiu D, Frolova M, Hegmane A, Janež A, Krnić M, Lengyel Z, Marcou Y, Mazilu L, Mrinakova B, Percik R, Petrakova K, Rubovszky G, Tokar M, Vrdoljak E. Management Strategies for Hyperglycemia Associated with the α-Selective PI3K Inhibitor Alpelisib for the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1598. [PMID: 35406370 PMCID: PMC8997133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Alpelisib is an α-selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor used for treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA-mutated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer following disease progression on or after endocrine therapy. Hyperglycemia is an on-target effect of alpelisib affecting approximately 60% of treated patients, and sometimes necessitating dose reductions, treatment interruptions, or discontinuation of alpelisib. Early detection of hyperglycemia and timely intervention have a key role in achieving optimal glycemic control and maintaining alpelisib dose intensity to optimize the benefit of this drug. A glycemic support program implemented by an endocrinology-oncology collaborative team may be very useful in this regard. Lifestyle modifications, mainly comprising a reduced-carbohydrate diet, and a designated stepwise, personalized antihyperglycemic regimen, based on metformin, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, and pioglitazone, are the main tools required to address the insulin-resistant hyperglycemia induced by alpelisib. In this report, based on the consensus of 14 oncologists and seven endocrinologists, we provide guidance for hyperglycemia management strategies before, during, and after alpelisib therapy for HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer, with a focus on a proactive, multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsvetalina Tankova
- Department of Endocrinology, Medical University of Sofia, 2, Zdrave Str., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Elżbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Maria Beloyartseva
- Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoye Avenue, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (M.B.); (M.F.)
| | - Simona Borštnar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Doina Catrinoiu
- Department of Diabetology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Constanta, Romania, Tomis Bvd. No. 145, 900591 Constanta, Romania; (D.C.); (L.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, University Alley No. 1, 900470 Constanta, Romania
| | - Mona Frolova
- Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoye Avenue, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (M.B.); (M.F.)
| | - Alinta Hegmane
- Out-Patient Department of Medical Oncology, Riga East University Hospital, Oncology Center of Latvia, 4, Hipokrata Str., LV1079 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Andrej Janež
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disease, University Medical Center, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Mladen Krnić
- Department of Endocrinology, Clinical Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000 Split, Croatia;
| | - Zoltan Lengyel
- Szent János Hospital, Diós árok 1-3, 1125 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Yiola Marcou
- Medical Oncology Department, The Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, 32 Acropoleos Avenue, Strovolos, Nicosia 2006, Cyprus;
| | - Laura Mazilu
- Department of Diabetology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Constanta, Romania, Tomis Bvd. No. 145, 900591 Constanta, Romania; (D.C.); (L.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, University Alley No. 1, 900470 Constanta, Romania
| | - Bela Mrinakova
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Heydukova 10, 812 50 Bratislava, Slovakia;
- Slovak Republic Department of Medical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Heydukova 10, 812 50 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Ruth Percik
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel;
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Katarina Petrakova
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý kopec 543/7, Brno-Střed-Staré, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Gábor Rubovszky
- National Institute of Oncology, Rath Gy. Str. 7-9, 1122 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Margarita Tokar
- The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center and Dr. Larry Norton Institute, SorokaMedical Center, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, Be’er Sheva, Israel;
| | - Eduard Vrdoljak
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mrinakova B, Trebaticky B, Kajo K, Ondrusova M, Lehotska V, Waczulikova I, Ondrus D. Bilateral testicular germ cell tumors - 50 years experience. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 122:449-453. [PMID: 34161111 DOI: 10.4149/bll_2021_074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study analysed the characteristics and outcome of the patients with bilateral germ testicular cell cancer (TC), especially synchronous. METHODS Among 2.124 TC patients diagnosed between 1970 and 2020, 96 (4. 5%) developed the 2nd TC. Nine occurred synchronously and 87 were metachronous. Patients were analysed according to the age and histological type of bilateral TC in comparison with unilateral TC. RESULTS The mean follow-up of all 2,124 patients was 14.9 years. Unilateral TC occurred in 2.028 patients (the mean age of 32.4 years), 707 of them had seminoma, 1.310 nonseminomatous (NS) TC and 11 spermatocytic tumours. The 1st tumour of metachronous bilateral disease was diagnosed at a significantly younger age (27.1 years) compared to the unilateral disease (32.4 years). The mean interval between the 1st and the 2nd TC was 8.2 years. Patients with NSTC had a longer mean interval (9.2 years) between the 1st and the 2nd TC in comparison with seminoma patients (6.7 years). The mean age at diagnosis for seminoma was significantly higher (31.3 years) compared to the NSTC (24.1 years). Bilateral seminoma occurred in 5 synchronous bilateral TC patients, four patients had discordant histology, none presented with bilateral NSTC. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral TC is a rare and requires individualized management of patients (Tab. 5, Fig. 4, Ref. 32).
Collapse
|
5
|
Mrinakova B, Kajo K, Lehotska V, Ondrusova M, Balogova S, Pinakova Z, Novotna V, Usakova V, Fedorkova L, Waczulikova I, Kausitz J, Ondrus D. Stage I testicular seminoma risk-adapted therapeutic management. Neoplasma 2021; 68:613-620. [PMID: 33502887 DOI: 10.4149/neo_2021_200630n677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Following orchiectomy, patients with clinical stage I (CSI) testicular seminoma may be managed by active surveillance (S) or adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy or chemotherapy). In view of the published data on long-term toxicity, especially second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is currently no longer recommended as an adjuvant therapy option for these patients. The purpose of our recent study was to compare the impact of two selected treatment approaches - S versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on the survival of patients with CSI testicular seminoma. This cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 139 patients collected at a single center between 10/2011-5/2020, with CSI testicular seminoma, stratified into two groups according to risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. In the S group (low-risk - without rete testis invasion - RTI, primary tumor size <4 cm), consisting of 77 patients, who underwent S, relapse occurred in 10 (13.0%) patients after a mean follow-up of 14.3 months. In the ACT group (high-risk - RTI and/or primary tumor size >4 cm), consisting of 62 patients, who were treated with ACT, relapse occurred in 5 (8.1%) patients after a mean follow-up of 11.6 months. Overall survival of patients in both groups was 100% with a mean follow-up of 43.9 months. A statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups was not found. Based on our findings, ACT seems to be an adequate treatment for patients with a high risk of relapse, as well as S for those with a low risk of relapse. Despite its excellent prognosis, optimal management of CSI testicular seminoma remains controversial, with variations in expert opinion and international guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bela Mrinakova
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Department of Medical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Karol Kajo
- Department of Pathology, Slovak Medical University, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Viera Lehotska
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Sona Balogova
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Zuzana Pinakova
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Slovak Medical University and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Vera Novotna
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Department of Medical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Vanda Usakova
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Lucia Fedorkova
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Department of Medical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Iveta Waczulikova
- Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics, Division of Biomedical Physics, Comenius University, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Juraj Kausitz
- Department of Radioimmunodiagnostics, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Dalibor Ondrus
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine and St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Signorelli GR, Lehocki F, Mora Fernández M, O'Neill G, O'Connor D, Brennan L, Monteiro-Guerra F, Rivero-Rodriguez A, Hors-Fraile S, Munoz-Penas J, Bonjorn Dalmau M, Mota J, Oliveira RB, Mrinakova B, Putekova S, Muro N, Zambrana F, Garcia-Gomez JM. A Research Roadmap: Connected Health as an Enabler of Cancer Patient Support. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14360. [PMID: 31663861 PMCID: PMC6914240 DOI: 10.2196/14360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence that quality of life is a positive variable for the survival of cancer patients has prompted the interest of the health and pharmaceutical industry in considering that variable as a final clinical outcome. Sustained improvements in cancer care in recent years have resulted in increased numbers of people living with and beyond cancer, with increased attention being placed on improving quality of life for those individuals. Connected Health provides the foundations for the transformation of cancer care into a patient-centric model, focused on providing fully connected, personalized support and therapy for the unique needs of each patient.
Connected Health creates an opportunity to overcome barriers to health care support among patients diagnosed with chronic conditions. This paper provides an overview of important areas for the foundations of the creation of a new Connected Health paradigm in cancer care. Here we discuss the capabilities of mobile and wearable technologies; we also discuss pervasive and persuasive strategies and device systems to provide multidisciplinary and inclusive approaches for cancer patients for mental well-being, physical activity promotion, and rehabilitation.
Several examples already show that there is enthusiasm in strengthening the possibilities offered by Connected Health in persuasive and pervasive technology in cancer care. Developments harnessing the Internet of Things, personalization, patient-centered design, and artificial intelligence help to monitor and assess the health status of cancer patients. Furthermore, this paper analyses the data infrastructure ecosystem for Connected Health and its semantic interoperability with the Connected Health economy ecosystem and its associated barriers. Interoperability is essential when developing Connected Health solutions that integrate with health systems and electronic health records.
Given the exponential business growth of the Connected Health economy, there is an urgent need to develop mHealth (mobile health) exponentially, making it both an attractive and challenging market. In conclusion, there is a need for user-centered and multidisciplinary standards of practice to the design, development, evaluation, and implementation of Connected Health interventions in cancer care to ensure their acceptability, practicality, feasibility, effectiveness, affordability, safety, and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Ruiz Signorelli
- Oncoavanze, Seville, Spain.,Sport & Society Research Group, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.,Insight Centre for Data Analytics, O'Brien Centre for Science, University College Dublin, Belfield Campus, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fedor Lehocki
- Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.,National Centre of Telemedicine Services, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Matilde Mora Fernández
- Sport & Society Research Group, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Gillian O'Neill
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, O'Brien Centre for Science, University College Dublin, Belfield Campus, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dominic O'Connor
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, O'Brien Centre for Science, University College Dublin, Belfield Campus, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Louise Brennan
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, O'Brien Centre for Science, University College Dublin, Belfield Campus, Dublin, Ireland.,Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Francisco Monteiro-Guerra
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, O'Brien Centre for Science, University College Dublin, Belfield Campus, Dublin, Ireland.,Salumedia Tecnologías, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Santiago Hors-Fraile
- Salumedia Tecnologías, Seville, Spain.,Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Architecture and Computer Technology Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | | | - Jorge Mota
- Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ricardo B Oliveira
- Laboratory of Active Living, Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Rio de Janeiro State, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Bela Mrinakova
- First Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Silvia Putekova
- Faculty of Health Care and Social Work, University of Trnava, Trnava, Slovakia
| | - Naiara Muro
- Laboratoire d'informatique médicale et d'ingénierie des connaissances en e-Santé, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France.,eHealth and Biomedical Applications, Vicomtech, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.,Biodonostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Francisco Zambrana
- Department of Oncology, Infanta Sofia University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan M Garcia-Gomez
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, The Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mrinakova B, Ondrusova M, Lehotska V, Ondrus D. Extremely rare synchronous primary neoplasms in testicular cancer patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 120:641-645. [PMID: 31475546 DOI: 10.4149/bll_2019_106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study analyzes the incidence of multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPN) in patients with testicular cancer (TC), the results are compared with literature findings and assess the rarest subgroup of patients with MPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data of 1870 patients with TC treated or followed up in a single center in the period of 5/1970-12/2018 were collected and analyzed retrospectively in focus of the occurrence of MPN. RESULTS The overall incidence of MPN was 150 (8.02 %). There were 89 cases of bilateral TC (59.3 %), of these 8 cases were synchronous (diagnosed within three months period from the primary diagnosis) and 81 metachronous (9 % and 91 % respectively). Non-testicular other primary malignancies (OPM) occurred in 61 cases (40.7 %), of which 59 cases were metachronous (96.7 %) and two cases were synchronous (3.3 %). Metachronous malignancies included mainly prostate cancer (n = 17 patients), kidney cancer (n = 13 patients) and colorectal cancer (n = 12 patients). Synchronous OPM was found in two patients. CONCLUSION In our study we registered two cases of synchronous OPM, both histologically clear cell renal cancer. We have analyzed clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment strategies of synchronous OPM, in order to improve its diagnosis and therapy (Fig. 3, Ref. 22).
Collapse
|
8
|
Mrinakova B, Ondrušová M, Švantnerová M, Ondruš D. Malignant Tumors of the Penis - Dia-gnostics and Therapy. Klin Onkol 2019; 32:31-39. [PMID: 30764627 DOI: 10.14735/amko201931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer belongs to group of relatively rare malignancies. It represents, on average, 0.5-1% of all tumours in males globally and occurs predominantly in older individuals (> 65 years). The geographical distribution of malignant cancer of the penis is reported. A higher incidence is observed in less developed parts of the world, particularly in South America, Southeast Asia, and some areas of Africa (> 2.0/100,000). In Slovakia, there has been a recent increase in incidence (1.1/100,000 in 2011). Mortality has stabilized at 0.3/100,000 in recent years. Significant risk factors for malignant cancers include social and cultural habits and hygienic and religious practices. Important risk factors are inadequate hygiene of the foreskin sac, phimosis, human papillomavirus infection, sexual promiscuity, smoking, genital infections, and a low socio-economic and educational status. PURPOSE The present paper provides an overview of pathology, symptomatology, diagnostic approaches, and classification of the extent of the disease. Treatment of the primary tumour depends on the extent of the disease and includes topical treatment, photodynamic treatment, cryoablation, laser photocoagulation, conservative surgical treatment, especially circumcision, and even radical treatment - penile amputation with perineal urethrostomy. An important part of the management of this malignancy is surgical treatment of metastases in inguinal lymph nodes. The article devotes more attention to non-surgical treatment modalities, in particular radiotherapy (external and brachytherapy) and systemic therapy (chemotherapy and biologic therapy), offering an overview of the indications and regimens in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and palliative approaches, with and without concomitant chemoradiotherapy, and describes possible adverse effects of the treatments. Conclusion: Patients with penile cancer should be concentrated in centres that have abundant experience in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Key words penile cancer - surgical treatment - radiotherapy - chemotherapy - biologic therapy The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 12. 11. 2018 Accepted: 12. 12. 2018.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ondrusova M, Balogova S, Lehotska V, Kajo K, Mrinakova B, Ondrus D. Controversies in the management of clinical stage I testicular seminoma. Cent European J Urol 2016; 69:35-9. [PMID: 27123323 PMCID: PMC4846723 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2016.699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Revised: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Following orchiectomy patients with clinical stage I (CSI) testicular seminoma may be managed by active surveillance (AS) or adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy or chemotherapy). In view of the published data on long-term toxicity, mainly second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is currently no longer recommended as adjuvant therapy for these patients. The purpose of our recent study was to compare the impact of two selected treatment approaches – AS versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on survival in patients with CSI testicular seminoma. Material and methods The cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 106 patients collected at a single centre between 4/2008–8/2015, with CSI testicular seminoma, stratified into two groups according to risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. Results In group A (low-risk), consisting of 84 patients, who underwent AS, relapse occurred in 10 (11.9%) patients after a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. In group B (high-risk), consisting of 22 patients, who were treated with ACT, relapse occurred in two (9.1%) patients after a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. Overall survival of patients in both groups was 100% with a mean follow-up of 25.3 months. The statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups was not found. Conclusions ACT seems to be adequate treatment for patients with high-risk of relapse, as well as AS for those with low-risk of relapse. Despite its excellent prognosis, optimal management of CSI testicular seminoma remains controversial, with variations in expert opinion and international guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Ondrusova
- St. Elisabeth University of Health and Social Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic; Pharm-In, Ltd., Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Sona Balogova
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Viera Lehotska
- 2 Department of Radiology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Karol Kajo
- Department of Pathology, Slovak Medical University & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Bela Mrinakova
- Department of Medical Oncology & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Dalibor Ondrus
- 1 Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mrinakova B, Kajo K, Ondrusova M, Simo J, Ondrus D. Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis Testis. A Clinicopathologic Analysis of Two Cases with a Review of the Literature. Klin Onkol 2016; 29:369-374. [PMID: 27739317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Paratesticular malignant mesothelioma is an extremely rare type of mesothelioma with only a limited number of reported cases. Its clinical differentiation is challenging, and its diagnosis is almost exclusively accidental. The major risk factor is exposure to asbestos, typically with a long latency between exposure and diagnosis. The current study presents the clinical data of two patients diagnosed with paratesticular malignant mesothelioma. We evaluated a large spectrum of risk factors in the patients histories. The histomorphological and immunohistochemical characteristics were analysed and put into the perspective of a broad differential diagnosis. Both cases of malignant epithelial mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis clinically presented as unilateral hydroceles. Patients underwent surgery with the perioperative finding of a tumour. Radical inguinal orchiectomy was the treatment of choice for both patients. After comprehensive staging, the second patient underwent a second step of inguinal and pelvic lymph node dis- section. Follow-up visits revealed recurrence of the disease in the first patient. Resection of the tumour was performed. The histology confirmed the relapse of a tumour with identical features to those of the first tumour. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not indicated. Both patients are currently in complete remission. In conclusion, surgical treatment had a determinative role in the prognosis of these patients. Radical orchiectomy is the treatment of choice for localized disease. Lymph node dissection can be considered in the case of lymph node enlargement. There is a lack of evidence-based data for adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Patients should be referred to experienced multidisciplinary cancer centres for a second opinion on histology, treatment, and a follow-up plan.Key words: mesothelioma - tunica vaginalis testis - hydrocele - asbestos exposure.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ondrusova M, Mrozova L, Ondrus D, Mrinakova B. Trends and estimates in prostate cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the Slovak Republic, 1968-2012. Neoplasma 2013; 60:446-51. [PMID: 23581418 DOI: 10.4149/neo_2013_058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the third most-common non-skin cancer and also the third leading cause of cancer death in the Slovak Republic in recent years. However, analysis of incidence and mortality long-term time-trends, on the basis of which the prevalence estimates could have been calculated, were not available. This paper analyses national trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality from 1968 to 2007 by using the join-point regression to propose potential changes in health care. The authors noted a statistically significant increase in the values of incidence after 1999 and improvement in mortality after 1998. Using a mathematical modelation authors predicted the overall prostate cancer prevalence in the Slovak Republic to provide actual data for health management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ondrusova
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mrinakova B, Ondrus D, Kajo K, Kunderlik M, Tkacova M, Ondrusova M. Paratesticular mesothelioma in young age. Case report. Klin Onkol 2012; 25:290-293. [PMID: 22920171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant mesothelioma is a neoplasm arising in serosal membranes in the body cavities. Usual presentation of the tumor is in the pleura, peritoneum and less frequently pericardium. Paratesticular mesothelioma is the rarest known form of malignant mesothelioma with only a limited number of reported cases. CASE A case of malignant epithelial mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis was reported with presentation of hydrocele and multinodular intrascrotal masses in a 20-year old male. The patient underwent surgery for post-traumatic long-term hydrocele with perioperative discovery of multiple small exophytic structures. After histological findings of the malignant mesothelioma of tunica vaginalis testis, he underwent left-side orchiectomy, followed by inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissection. Clinical staging did not reveal distant metastases. Regular follow-up visits based on physical examinations and imaging studies are to date negative for recurrence. CONCLUSION Literature data were reviewed, and possible risk factors for the development of the neoplasm were analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Mrinakova
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|