1
|
Mata DA, Lee JK, Shanmugam V, Marcus CB, Schrock AB, Williams EA, Ritterhouse LL, Hickman RA, Janovitz T, Patel NR, Kroger BR, Ross JS, Mirza KM, Oxnard GR, Vergilio JA, Elvin JA, Benhamida JK, Decker B, Xu ML. Liquid biopsy-based circulating tumour (ct)DNA analysis of a spectrum of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies yields clinically actionable results. Histopathology 2024; 84:1224-1237. [PMID: 38422618 DOI: 10.1111/his.15168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Liquid biopsy (LBx)-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can facilitate molecular profiling of haematopoietic neoplasms (HNs), particularly when tissue-based NGS is infeasible. METHODS AND RESULTS We studied HN LBx samples tested with FoundationOne Liquid CDx, FoundationOne Liquid, or FoundationACT between July 2016 and March 2022. We identified 271 samples: 89 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), 43 plasma-cell neoplasm (PCN), 41 histiocytoses, 27 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 25 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 22 myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), 14 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and 10 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Among 73.4% with detectable pathogenic alterations, median maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) was 16.6%, with AML (36.2%), MDS (19.7%), and MPN (44.5%) having higher MSAFs than DLBCL (3.9%), NHL (8.4%), HL (1.5%), PCN (2.8%), and histiocytoses (1.8%) (P = 0.001). LBx detected characteristic alterations across HNs, including in TP53, KRAS, MYD88, and BTK in NHLs; TP53, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in PCNs; IGH in DLBCL; TP53, ATM, and PDCD1LG2 in HL; BRAF and MAP2K1 in histiocytoses; TP53, SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 in MDS; JAK2 in MPNs; and FLT3, IDH2, and NPM1 in AML. Among 24 samples, the positive percent agreement by LBx was 75.7% for variants present in paired buffy coat, marrow, or tissues. Also, 75.0% of pairs exhibited alterations only present on LBx. These were predominantly subclonal (clonal fraction of 3.8%), reflecting the analytical sensitivity of LBx. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate that LBx can detect relevant genomic alterations across HNs, including at low clonal fractions, suggesting a potential clinical utility for identifying residual or emerging therapy-resistant clones that may be undetectable in site-specific tissue biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vignesh Shanmugam
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Erik A Williams
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin R Kroger
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
- Departments of Pathology, Urology, and Medicine (Oncology), State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Kamran M Mirza
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jamal K Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mina L Xu
- Department of Pathology, Yale New-Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Damrauer JS, Phelps SN, Amuchastegui K, Lupo R, Mabe NW, Walens A, Kroger BR, Alvarez JV. Foxo-dependent Par-4 Upregulation Prevents Long-term Survival of Residual Cells Following PI3K-Akt Inhibition. Mol Cancer Res 2018; 16:599-609. [PMID: 29330285 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-17-0492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Tumor recurrence is a leading cause of death and is thought to arise from a population of residual cells that survive treatment. These residual cancer cells can persist, locally or at distant sites, for years or decades. Therefore, understanding the pathways that regulate residual cancer cell survival may suggest opportunities for targeting these cells to prevent recurrence. Previously, it was observed that the proapoptotic protein (PAWR/Par-4) negatively regulates residual cell survival and recurrence in mice and humans. However, the mechanistic underpinnings on how Par-4 expression is regulated are unclear. Here, it is demonstrated that Par-4 is transcriptionally upregulated following treatment with multiple drugs targeting the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway, and identify the Forkhead family of transcription factors as mediators of this upregulation. Mechanistically, Foxo3a directly binds to the Par-4 promoter and activates its transcription following inhibition of the PI3K-Akt pathway. This Foxo-dependent Par-4 upregulation limits the long-term survival of residual cells following treatment with therapeutics that target the PI3K-Akt pathway. Taken together, these results indicate that residual breast cancer tumor cell survival and recurrence requires circumventing Foxo-driven Par-4 upregulation and suggest that approaches to enforce Par-4 expression may prevent residual cell survival and recurrence. Mol Cancer Res; 16(4); 599-609. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Damrauer
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie N Phelps
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Katie Amuchastegui
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ryan Lupo
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nathaniel W Mabe
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrea Walens
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Benjamin R Kroger
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James V Alvarez
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|