Dying at "home" - a qualitative study of end-of-life care in rural Northern Norway from the perspective of health care professionals

BACKGROUND

'Most patients want to die at home' is a familiar statement in palliative care. The rate of home deaths is therefore often used as a success criterion. However, providing palliative care and enabling patients to die at home in rural and remote areas may be challenging due to limited health care resources and geographical factors. In this study we explored health care professionals' experiences and reflections on providing palliative care to patients at the end of life in rural Northern Norway.

METHODS

This is a qualitative focus group and interview study in rural Northern Norway including 52 health care professionals. Five uni-professional focus group discussions were followed by five interprofessional focus group discussions and six individual interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Health care professionals did their utmost to fulfil patients' wishes to die at home. They described pros and cons of providing palliative care in rural communities, especially their dual roles as health care professionals and neighbours, friends or even relatives of patients. Continuity and carers' important contributions were underlined. When home death was considered difficult or impossible, nurses expressed a pragmatic attitude, and the concept of home was extended to include 'home place' in the form of local health care facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing palliative care in patients' homes is professionally and ethically challenging, and health care professionals' dual roles in rural areas may lead to additional pressure. These factors need to be considered and addressed in discussions of the organization of care. Nurses' pragmatic attitude when transfer to a local health care facility was necessary underlines the importance of building on local knowledge and collaboration. Systematic use of advance care planning may be one way of facilitating discussions between patients, family carers and health care professionals with the aim of achieving mutual understanding of what is feasible in a rural context.

Talking together in rural palliative care: a qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in Norway

Background

Caring for people with palliative care needs in their homes requires close collaboration within and between primary and hospital care. However, such close collaboration is often lacking. Transitions of care are potentially unsafe and distressing points in a patient trajectory. Few studies have explored the experiences of healthcare professionals in the community who receive patients from hospital care and provide them with palliative care at home.

Objective

To explore how rural health professionals experience local and regional collaboration on patients in need of palliative care.

Methods

This was a qualitative focus group and interview study in rural Northern Norway involving 52 primary care health professionals including district nurses, general practitioners, oncology nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists. Five uni-professional focus group discussions were followed by five interprofessional discussions and six individual interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results

“Talking together” was perceived as the optimal form of collaboration, both within primary care and with specialists. Nurses and GPs had similar perceptions of their worst-case scenario in primary palliative care: the sudden arrival after working hours of a sick patient about whom they lacked information. These situations could be the result of a short notice transfer from secondary care or an emergency presentation after a crisis in patient management locally, the latter often resulting in a hospital admission. Participants missed timely and detailed discharge letters and in complex cases a telephone call or conference. Locally, co-location was perceived as advantageous for crucial communication, mutual support, and knowledge about each other’s competencies and work schedule. Because local health professionals belonged to different units within the primary health care organisation, in some places they had limited knowledge about each other’s roles and skill sets.

Conclusions

Lack of communication, both locally and between specialist and primary care, was a key factor in the worst-case patient scenarios for GPs and nurses working in primary palliative care in rural Northern Norway. Co-location of primary care professionals promoted local collaboration and should be encouraged. Hospital discharge planning should involve the receiving primary care professionals.

Evaluating a centralised cancer support centre in the remote region of Northern Norway

INTRODUCTION

Being diagnosed with cancer and undergoing treatment is a life-changing experience, and many cancer patients find the physical, emotional and social effects of the disease to be stressful. This study explores the experiences of cancer patients and their relatives from all parts of Northern Norway visiting the centralised cancer support centre.

METHODS

In a comprehensive prospective survey, 286 visitors were invited to participate and 181 of these accepted. The characteristics of the participants, their expectations for visiting the centre, whether they wanted to meet peers or volunteers rather than clinicians and how they viewed the centre in the context of cancer care were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most satisfied were visitors aged less than 50 years, women and those reporting a 'strong social network'. The majority of the visitors wanted to have better access to peers (with a similar cancer diagnosis) (89%), cancer nurses (75%) or oncologists (71%). About a third of the participants (29.8%) lived in communities with fewer than 5000 inhabitants and 59.4% in municipalities with fewer than 15 inhabitants/km2. There were no significant differences in the characteristics of the participants, or in their evaluation of the support centre, when stratified by number of inhabitants or population density in their home community.

CONCLUSION

The cancer support centre was highly valued by patients and their relatives for meeting peers. The centre was most frequently visited by and most popular among women and those self-reporting strong social networks. Access to oncology doctors and nurses in this setting could be valuable. Participants living in remote areas had similar characteristics and evaluated the support centre similarly to those living in more urban areas.

Bridging the distance: a prospective tele-oncology study in Northern Norway

PURPOSE

The University Hospital of North Norway (UNN) is a tertiary-level hospital and has the main responsibility of providing specialized cancer health care in the remote area of Northern Norway. Weekly videoconferences (VCs) have been established to enable clinicians at a local hospital and primary cancer health care providers in five different communities to discuss cases with specialist cancer care services at UNN. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of these VCs.

METHODS

This is a prospective registration study. Descriptive data were collected at UNN, and for each patient discussed at the VC, a survey was completed by the local health care provider responsible for the patient.

RESULTS

During an 18-month period, 167 cases were discussed (101 patients). A median of 7 health care providers participated in each VC. According to the local physicians and nurses, the VCs contributed in 96% of cases to give "quite a bit" or "very much" confidence in adequate patient care. They reported that patient care in 85% of cases would be improved "quite a bit" or "very much" due to the VC. The mean number of days waiting for VC were 2.0 days (range, 0-7; SD, 2.0) and was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) than the estimated time waiting if alternative consultations were to be used (mean, 10.2 days (range, 0-30; SD, 5.8)).

CONCLUSION

VC may be a useful supplemental tool to support primary health care providers at local hospitals and remote communities in their effort to offer efficient and high-quality cancer care.

[Nausea, vomiting and constipation in palliative care]

Nausea/vomiting and constipation are frequent symptoms among patients with advanced disease and short survival expectancy. The aim of this paper is to present the aetiology, diagnostic work-up, prophylaxis and treatment of these symptoms in palliative patients, based on a literature review and clinical experience. Nausea/vomiting is not a diagnosis, but symptoms with multiple causes. There is no universally applicable treatment approach. General guidelines for good treatment are: 1) impeccable assessment and work-up, 2) choice of treatment according to underlying causes and involved mechanisms, 3) pharmacological treatment applied jointly with non-pharmacological measures, 4) thorough follow-up and readjustment of treatment. During work-up, or if underlying causes can not be identified, metoclopramide, alternatively haloperidol, is the first drug of choice. Oral administration should be avoided until vomiting is controlled. Adequate hydration is important. The same general guidelines are applicable to handle constipation. However, prophylactic measures are also essential, focusing on risk factors (fluid intake, activity and toilet accommodations). Stool softening laxatives should be administered, (polyethylene glycol or lactulose), and if needed, combined with a bowel stimulant (bisacodyl or sodium picosulphate). Opioid use is among the most common causes of constipation and prescription of opioids should always be accompanied by prescription of laxatives. Exceptions are diarrhoea, ileostomy and dying patients.