Blomberg BA, Thomassen A, de Jong PA, Simonsen JA, Lam MGEH, Nielsen AL, Mickley H, Mali WPTM, Alavi A, Høilund-Carlsen PF. Impact of Personal Characteristics and Technical Factors on Quantification of Sodium 18F-Fluoride Uptake in Human Arteries: Prospective Evaluation of Healthy Subjects.
J Nucl Med 2015. [PMID:
26205304 DOI:
10.2967/jnumed.115.159798]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED
Sodium 18F-fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT imaging is a promising imaging technique for the assessment of atherosclerosis but is hampered by a lack of validated quantification protocols. Both personal characteristics and technical factors can affect quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake. This study investigated whether blood activity, renal function, injected dose, circulating time, and PET/CT system affect quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake.
METHODS
Eighty-nine healthy subjects were prospectively examined by 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging. Arterial 18F-NaF uptake was quantified at the level of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, and coronary arteries by calculating the maximum 18F-NaF activity (NaFmax), the maximum/mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmax/mean), and the maximum blood-subtracted 18F-NaF activity (bsNaFmax). Multivariable linear regression assessed the effect of personal characteristics and technical factors on quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake.
RESULTS
NaFmax and TBRmax/mean were dependent on blood activity (β=0.34 to 0.44, P<0.001, and β=-0.68 to -0.58, P<0.001, respectively) and PET/CT system (β=-0.80 to -0.53, P<0.001, and β=-0.80 to -0.23, P<0.031, respectively). bsNaFmax depended on PET/CT system (β=-0.91 to -0.57, P<0.001) but not blood activity. This finding was observed at the level of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, and the coronary arteries. In addition to blood activity and PET/CT system, injected dose affected quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake, whereas renal function and circulating time did not.
CONCLUSION
The prospective evaluation of 89 healthy subjects demonstrated that quantification of arterial 18F-NaF uptake is affected by blood activity, injected dose, and PET/CT system. Therefore, blood activity, injected dose, and PET/CT system should be considered to generate accurate estimates of arterial 18F-NaF uptake.
Collapse