Pain, Analgesic Use, and Patient Satisfaction With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) trial found similar ambulation and survival at 60 days with spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Trial outcomes evaluating pain, prescription analgesic use, and patient satisfaction have not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction after hip fracture surgery with spinal versus general anesthesia.

DESIGN

Preplanned secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02507505).

SETTING

46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 50 years or older undergoing hip fracture surgery.

INTERVENTION

Spinal or general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain on postoperative days 1 through 3; 60-, 180-, and 365-day pain and prescription analgesic use; and satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

A total of 1600 patients were enrolled. The average age was 78 years, and 77% were women. A total of 73.5% (1050 of 1428) of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Worst pain over the first 24 hours after surgery was greater with spinal anesthesia (rated from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]; mean difference, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68]). Pain did not differ across groups at other time points. Prescription analgesic use at 60 days occurred in 25% (141 of 563) and 18.8% (108 of 574) of patients assigned to spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (relative risk, 1.33 [CI, 1.06 to 1.65]). Satisfaction was similar across groups.

LIMITATION

Missing outcome data and multiple outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

Severe pain is common after hip fracture. Spinal anesthesia was associated with more pain in the first 24 hours after surgery and more prescription analgesic use at 60 days compared with general anesthesia.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Structure, processes, and initial outcomes of The Ottawa Hospital Multi-Specialist Limb-Preservation Clinic and Programme: A unique-in-Canada quality improvement initiative

In 2017, The Ottawa Hospital initiated a unique-in-Canada quality improvement initiative by opening a novel, multi-specialist limb-preservation clinic. We sought to describe the structure, processes, and initial outcomes of the clinic and evaluate whether it is achieving its mandate of providing high-quality wound clinical care, education, and research. We conducted a descriptive prospective cohort study alongside a nested study of 162 clinic patients requiring serial assessments. There have been 1623 visits, mostly (72.2%) from outpatients. During 17.8% of visits, patients were evaluated by >1 specialist. Therapies provided most often included negative-pressure wound therapy (32.7%), biological wound dressings (21.6%), and total contact casting (18.5%). Furthermore, 1.2% underwent toe/ray amputations or skin grafting in clinic and 22.8% were initiated on antimicrobials. Mixed-effects models suggested that mean wound volumes for those requiring serial assessments decreased by 1.6 (95% confidence interval = -0.86 to -2.27) cm³ between visits. The clinic provided seven rotations to vascular surgery, infectious diseases, dermatology, and palliative care physicians; three nursing preceptorships; and two educational workshops. It also initiated provincial and national vascular health and wound care research initiatives. This study may be used to guide development of other limb-preservation clinics and programmes. Findings support that our programme is achieving its mandate.

Accessory anterolateral talar facet: analysis of the morphologic features on MRI

PURPOSE

To analyze the morphologic features of accessory anterolateral talar facet (AALTF) on MRI that can assist in detecting this entity, identify any associated structural changes and also define its MRI prevalence.

METHODS

Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated 140 ankle MRI scans for the presence of AALTF, complimentary anterior calcaneal extension facet and angle of Gissane measurement. One observer evaluated the scans for other structural details including AALTF length, cartilage thickness, bone marrow edema, hind foot coalition and talar beaking.

RESULTS

There was a good inter-observer agreement for the detection of AALTF on MRI (Kappa = 0.64). AALTF was present in 33 out of 140 (23.6%) scans. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of AALTF between male and female subjects (P = 0.71). No significant difference in age between those with and those without AALTF (P = 0.96). Angle of Gissane was significantly smaller in ankles with AALTF (P = 0.0367, observer 1 and 0.0003, observer 2). AALTF had a mean length of 7 mm and was covered with cartilage in 25/33 (75.8%) with mean cartilage thickness of 1.4 mm. Complimentary cartilage covered anterior calcaneal facet was demonstrated in 10/33 (30.3%) and had a mean cartilage thickness of 2.5 mm. Talar beaking was more prevalent in ankles with AALTF showing an anterior calcaneal extension facet than those without the latter feature (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

AALTF is a frequently observed feature on ankle MRI, with good inter-observer reliability for its detection. When present, it is often opposed by a cartilage covered anterior calcaneal extension facet, which can be associated with talar beaking.