Comparing the effects of 5-minute premature infant oral motor intervention with 15-minute Fucile treatment in term infants with feeding difficulties: A multi-arm randomised clinical trial

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether term infants with feeding difficulties who received either a 5-minute premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) or a 15-minute Fucile treatment had different outcomes, compared to term infants in a nontreatment group.

METHOD

Stable term infants (N = 51) born between 37-41 weeks of gestational age with feeding difficulties were randomly assigned into one of two intervention groups and a control group. One intervention group received PIOMI and the other group received Fucile treatment once a day for seven consecutive days; the control group received usual care only. The volume of milk intake, the amount of weight gain, and the length of hospital stay were compared across all groups.

RESULT

Findings indicated that the volume of milk intake and weight gain showed significant improvement in all three groups. However, pairwise comparison revealed that infants in the Fucile group had significantly higher volume of milk intake and weight gain compared to infants in both the control and PIOMI groups. Length of hospital stay was not significantly different amongst all groups.

CONCLUSION

The effects of Fucile treatment were more considerable than for usual care or PIOMI. This finding raises the possibility that prolonged exercise may facilitate improvement in feeding skills for term infants with feeding difficulties.

Effect of premature infant oral motor intervention [PIOMI] combined with music therapy on feeding progression of preterm infants: a randomized control trial

Prematurity may produce long-term complications in the physical and cognitive development of infants. There is a need for interventions that can improve feeding and reduce the length of NICU stay and separation time between the infant and mother. This study aimed to explore the clinical effect of premature infant oral motor intervention [PIOMI] combined with music therapy [MT] on feeding progression in premature infants.Premature infants with gestational ages between 26 and 30 weeks were included in the study. Fifty-two participants were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. All infants received PIOMI, and the intervention group received additional MT. The participants of the two groups were compared based on weight gain, feeding progression, Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Scale [POFRAS], milk volume, and length of hospitalization. The data were analyzed using independent sample t-tests, covariance tests, and repeated measure ANOVA used to compare three group means.The intervention group reached independent oral feeding 8 days earlier [P = .018] than the control group. Length of hospitalization was 6 days shorter [P = .224] for the intervention group, and the mean volume of milk on the 10th day was 215.38 ± 56.4 in the intervention group and 155.69 ± 68.9 in the control group, respectively [P = .001]. The mean score of the POFRAS scale on the 10th day was 28.65 ± 3.0 in the intervention groups and 20.96 ± 3.3 in the control groups, retrospectively [P = .001]. There was no difference in weight gain between the two groups [P = .522].Conclusion: PIOMI combined with MT was effective for the feeding progression of premature infants, and infants who received both these interventions were discharged sooner than control infants. Thus, MT should be considered part of feeding interventions for preterm infants with gestational ages between 26 and 30 weeks.Trial registration: Clinical trial registration number: IRCT20210502051155N1 on 18/9/2021 What is Known -- What is New: • There is numerous study about the eff ect of music therapy or oral motor interventi on. However, premature Infants havenot been yet studied to determine whether music therapy and oral motor interventi ons may synergize to aid their feedingprogression.

Mothers' involvement in assessing feeding skills of premature infants

OBJECTIVE

Among the problems faced by premature infants after birth are weakness in oral-motor skills and an inability to achieve oral feeding independence. The Early Feeding Skills (EFS) Assessment is a tool for identifying infant's feeding ability level and determining the levels at which an infant requires support for safe and efficient feeding. Given the effective role of mothers and their involvement in taking care of premature infants and the importance of examining the psychometric properties of tools used for assessing infant's feeding, this study aimed at evaluating inter-rater reliability (between mother and rater) using the EFS Instrument.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. Participants in this study included 30 mothers with premature infants admitted to the NICU ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz, Iran. To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the "Early Feeding Skills (EFS) Assessment Instrument", feeding skills of the infants were evaluated by the mother and a rater. Statistical analysis was carried out using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) in SPSS software (Ver. 22).

RESULTS

The inter-rater reliability of the total score for each section of the EFS Instrument was good (ICC >0.75). ICC values for inter-rater agreement in assessing Oral Feeding Readiness, Ability to Maintain Engagement in Feeding, Ability to Organize Oral-Motor Functioning, Ability to Coordinate Swallowing, Ability to Maintain Physiologic Stability, and Oral Feeding Recovery were 0.87, 0.94, 0.91, 0.85, 0.95 and, 0.80, respectively.

CONCLUSION

If mothers are appropriately trained on the EFS assessment, they can actively participate with the health care professionals providing care to their children. Furthermore, remote participation is possible. The findings of this study revealed significant inter-rater reliability.

Parent-Administered Oral Stimulation in Preterm Infants: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

 The study aimed to assess whether there was any difference in the transition time to full oral feedings between parent-administered and professional-administered premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI). The study also evaluated parental satisfaction with performing the intervention through an open-ended questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN

 A single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study was carried on between March 2017 and May 2019. A total of 39 infants born ≤32 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to either parent-performed or professionally performed oral stimulation. The oral stimulation was performed once a day for seven consecutive days between 31 and 32 weeks' postmenstrual age.

RESULTS

 There was no statistically significant difference in transition time, weight gain, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. No adverse events were observed. Parents' satisfaction was high, and their active involvement enhanced their perception of adequacy to care for their infant.

CONCLUSION

 Following adequate training, a parent-administered PIOMI may be considered in preterm infants to reduce the transition time to full oral feeding and enhance the direct involvement of parents in neonatal care.

KEY POINTS

· No difference in transition time between parent-performed and professional-performed PIOMI.. · PIOMI may be delivered by parents following appropriate training.. · Active involvement of parents may improve the parent-infant bonding..

The effects of premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on oral feeding of preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Given the increase in the birth and survival rate of the premature infants, a need for supportive health care services becomes more evident. The goal of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) in the feeding progression and early intervention. This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

This clinical trial included premature infants in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of two hospitals in Tehran, who were randomly assigned into intervention and control group, each containing 15 infants. The PIOMI was administered to the intervention group in the course of 10 days. The infants in the control group received routine nursing services. Repeated measures ANOVA (RMA) were analyzed. The postmenstrual age and weight of the participants were examined at the time points of accomplishing one, four, and eight oral feedings a day and at the time of hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The intervention group reached the first oral feeding (with a mean of 7.2 days) and eight oral feeding (with a mean of 13.47 days) earlier than the control group. The length of hospital stay in intervention group was significantly shorter (P = 0.03). RMA wasn't statistically significant between groups for weight (F: 0.76, P: 0.39, ŋ: 0.03); but within-subjects test showed that change of the weight over time and for interaction of time and group was significant (F: 74.437, P < 0.001, ŋ: 0.727). The effect size of infants' age in the measurement times was 91%.

CONCLUSION

the results revealed that PIOMI is a fruitful method for premature infants. We suggest that PIOMI can be integrated in feeding rehabilitation programs of the premature infants born with gestational age of as young as 26-29 weeks, and applied at 29 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA).

THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT20180410039260N1.