4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Dosing Strategies: A Retrospective Evaluation

ObjectivesDetermine indication specific 4-Factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) dosing strategies within a hospital system and subsequent effectiveness. Background: 4FPCC is FDA approved for reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for acute major bleeding or need for urgent surgery/invasive procedure. Since its approval, off label use has expanded to include direct oral anticoagulant reversal and perioperative hemostasis. Optimal dosing strategies remain controversial, and recent studies have evaluated fixed-dose regimens with lower doses than those recommended in product labeling. Methods/Materials: Retrospective cohort with manual chart review for patients who received 4FPCC spanning 2 years. Primary outcome was to characterize dosing. Secondary outcomes were INR normalization, hemostatic efficacy, in-hospital mortality, and renal function change. Results: Of the 300 patients evaluated, 80% received 4FPCC for anticoagulant reversal, with 66% of those for VKA and 34% for DOAC. The remaining 20% received 4FPCC for a non-reversal indication. Of the patients requiring anticoagulation reversal, 25% received doses lower than recommended and 6% received higher. 71% of patients received 4FPCC for life-threatening bleed, and 45% of them had intracranial hemorrhage. Higher mortality with higher than recommended doses was the only statistically significant secondary outcome (P = .018). Conclusion: We found that lower doses than recommended were used in a significant number of patients. The higher than recommended doses group constituted a small proportion of patients and the higher mortality was attributed to patient acuity on presentation. Additional studies evaluating dosing approach are required to determine lowest effective dosing for various indications.

Subcutaneous Insulin Versus Traditional Intravenous Insulin Infusion in Treatment of Mild to Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) insulin infusions are the current standard of care for treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Subcutaneous (SQ) insulin, however, may also be a safe and effective alternative.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare patient-centered outcomes related to the treatment of mild to moderate DKA using two different protocols: an SQ insulin protocol and an IV insulin infusion protocol with an initial bolus (IVB) or without a bolus (IVNB).

METHODS

We retrospectively conducted a multicenter cohort study evaluating SQ vs. IV insulin for the treatment of mild to moderate DKA. The primary outcome was time to DKA resolution. Secondary outcomes included time to glucose correction, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, hypoglycemia events, readmission rates, and IV insulin use.

RESULTS

Within the study time frame, 257 patients were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. There was no significant difference in the time to DKA resolution between the IVB (p = 0.603) or IVNB (p = 0.269) groups compared with the population who received SQ insulin only. Hospital LOS was significantly longer when comparing the SQ group with the IVNB group (p < 0.001), but not when comparing it with the IVB group (p = 0.259). The IV protocols had significantly more hypoglycemic events compared with the SQ protocol (IVB vs. SQ, p < 0.001; IVNB vs. SQ, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SQ insulin may be an effective alternative option for treating mild to moderate DKA with fewer hypoglycemic effects.