1
|
John M, Post A, Burkland DA, Greet BD, Chaisson J, Heberton GA, Saeed M, Rasekh A, Razavi M. Confirming pericardial access by using impedance measurements from a micropuncture needle. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2020; 43:593-601. [PMID: 32333406 DOI: 10.1111/pace.13927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pericardial access is complicated by two difficulties: confirming when the needle tip is in the pericardial space, and avoiding complications during access, such as inadvertently puncturing other organs. Conventional imaging tools are inadequate for addressing these difficulties, as they lack soft-tissue markers that could be used as guidance during access. A system that can both confirm access and avoid inadvertent organ injury is needed. METHODS A 21G micropuncture needle was modified to include two small electrodes at the needle tip. With continuous bioimpedance monitoring from the electrodes, the needle was used to access the pericardium in porcine models (n = 4). The needle was also visualized in vivo by using an electroanatomical map (n = 2). Bioimpedance data from different tissues were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS Bioimpedance data collected from the subcutaneous space (992.8 ± 13.1 Ω), anterior mediastinum (972.2 ± 14.2 Ω), pericardial space (323.2 ± 17.1 Ω), mid-myocardium (349.7 ± 87.6 Ω), right ventricular cavity (235.0 ± 9.7 Ω), lung (1142.0 ± 172.0 Ω), liver (575.0 ± 52.6 Ω), and blood (177.5 ± 1.9 Ω) differed significantly by tissue type (P < .01). Phase data in the frequency domain correlated well with the needle being in the pericardial space. A simple threshold analysis effectively separated lung (threshold = 1120.0 Ω) and blood (threshold = 305.9 Ω) tissues from the other tissue types. CONCLUSIONS Continuous bioimpedance monitoring from a modified micropuncture needle during pericardial access can be used to clearly differentiate tissues. Combined with traditional imaging modalities, this system allows for confirming access to the pericardial space while avoiding inadvertent puncture of other organs, creating a safer and more efficient needle-access procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathews John
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Allison Post
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - David A Burkland
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian D Greet
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jordan Chaisson
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - George A Heberton
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohammad Saeed
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdi Rasekh
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mehdi Razavi
- Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hale ZD, Greet BD, Burkland DA, Greenberg S, Razavi M, Rasekh A, Molina Razavi JE, Saeed M. Slow-pathway visualization by using voltage-time relationship: A novel technique for identification and fluoroless ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:1430-1435. [PMID: 32270564 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is treatable by catheter ablation. Advances in mapping-system technology permit fluoroless workflow during ablations. As national practice trends toward fluoroless approaches, easily obtained, reproducible methods of slow-pathway identification, and ablation become increasingly important. We present a novel method of slow-pathway identification and initial ablation results from this method. METHODS AND RESULTS We examined AVNRT ablations performed at our institution over a 12-month period. In these cases, the site of the slow pathway was predicted by latest activation in the inferior triangle of Koch during sinus rhythm. Ablation was performed in this region. Proximity of the predicted site to the successful ablation location, complication rates, and patient outcomes were recorded. Junctional rhythm was seen in 40/41 ablations (98%) at the predicted site (mean, 1.3 lesions and median, 1 lesion per case). One lesion was defined as 5 mm of ablation. The initial ablation was successful in 39/41 cases (95%); in two cases, greater or equal to 2 echo beats were detected after the initial ablation, necessitating further lesion expansion. In 8/41 cases (20%), greater than one lesion was placed during initial ablation before attempted reinduction. Complications included one transient heart block and one transient PR prolongation. During follow-up (median, day 51), one patient had lower-extremity deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus, and one had a lower-extremity superficial venous thrombosis. There was one tachycardia recurrence, which prompted a redo ablation. CONCLUSIONS Mapping-system detection of late-activation, low-amplitude voltage during sinus rhythm provides an objective, and fluoroless means of identifying the slow pathway in typical AVNRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary D Hale
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian D Greet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiology, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - David A Burkland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.,Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott Greenberg
- Department of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, The Woodlands, Texas
| | - Mehdi Razavi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdi Rasekh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Joanna E Molina Razavi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohammad Saeed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Electrophysiology Clinical Research and Innovations, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pujara D, Cheema FH, Greet BD, Nair A, Simpson L, Civitello A, Rojas-Delgado F, Cheng J, Morgan JA, Mathuria N. Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmia Resolution after Continuous Flow-Left Ventricular Assist Device (CF-LVAD) Implantation. J Card Fail 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.07.286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
4
|
Greet BD, Pujara D, Burkland D, Pollet M, Sudhakar D, Rojas F, Costello B, Postalian A, Hale Z, Jenny B, Lai C, Igbalode K, Wadhera D, Nair A, Ono M, Morgan J, Simpson L, Civitello A, Cheng J, Mathuria N. Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018; 4:257-264. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Burkland DA, Ganapathy AV, John M, Greet BD, Saeed M, Rasekh A, Razavi M. Near-field impedance accurately distinguishes among pericardial, intracavitary, and anterior mediastinal position. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2017; 28:1492-1499. [PMID: 28833720 DOI: 10.1111/jce.13325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epicardial catheter ablation is increasingly used to treat arrhythmias with an epicardial component. Nevertheless, percutaneous epicardial access remains associated with a significant risk of major complications. Developing a technology capable of confirming proper placement within the pericardial space could decrease complication rates. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in bioimpedance among the pericardial space, anterior mediastinum, and right ventricle. METHODS An ovine model (n = 3) was used in this proof-of-concept study. A decapolar catheter was used to collect bipolar impedance readings; data were collected between each of five electrode pairs of varying distances. Data were collected from three test regions: the pericardial space, anterior mediastinum, and right ventricle. A control region in the inferior vena cava was used to normalize the data from the test regions. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences among regions. RESULTS A total of 10 impedance values were collected in each animal between each of the five electrode pairs in the three test regions (n = 340) and the control region (n = 145). The average normalized impedance values were significantly different among the pericardial space (1.760 ± 0.370), anterior mediastinum (3.209 ± 0.227), and right ventricle (1.024 ± 0.207; P < 0.0001). In post hoc testing, the differences between each pair of regions were significant, as well (P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION Impedance values are significantly different among these three anatomical compartments. Therefore, impedance can be potentially used as a means to guide percutaneous epicardial access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Burkland
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anand V Ganapathy
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mathews John
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian D Greet
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohammad Saeed
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdi Rasekh
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehdi Razavi
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|