An Algorithmic Approach to the Surgical Management of Sternal Dehiscence: A Single-Center Experience

Background Deep sternal wound complications following sternotomy represent a complex challenge. Management can involve debridement, flap reconstruction, and rigid sternal fixation (RSF). We present our 11-year experience in the surgical treatment of deep sternal wound dehiscence using a standardized treatment algorithm.

Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all 134 cardiac patients who required operative debridement after median sternotomy at a single institution between October 2007 and March 2019. Demographics, perioperative covariates, and outcomes were recorded. Univariate and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results One-hundred twelve patients (83.5%) with a deep sternal dehiscence underwent flap closure and 56 (50%) RSF. Of the patients who underwent flap closure, 87.5% received pectoralis advancement flaps. A 30-day mortality following reconstruction was 3.9%. Median length of stay after initial debridement was 8 days (interquartile range: 5–15). Of patients with flaps, 54 (48%) required multiple debridements prior to closure, and 30 (27%) underwent reoperation after flap closure. Patients who needed only a single debridement were significantly less likely to have a complication requiring reoperation (N = 10/58 vs. 20/54, 17 vs. 37%, p = 0.02), undergo a second flap (N = 6/58 vs. 17/54, 10 vs. 32%, p < 0.001), or, if plated, require removal of sternal plates (N = 6/34 vs. 11/22, 18 vs. 50%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion Although sternal dehiscence remains a complex challenge, an aggressive treatment algorithm, including debridement, flap closure, and consideration of RSF, can achieve good long-term outcomes. In low-risk patients, RSF does not appear to increase the likelihood of reoperation. We hypothesize that earlier surgical intervention, before the development of systemic symptoms, may be associated with improved outcomes.

The Paired T-Fastener Technique: A Bolster-Free Gastropexy for Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Purpose: Gastropexy during laparoscopic gastrostomy tube (GT) insertion can be technically challenging. T-fasteners are an effective method of gastropexy. However, the use of external bolsters requires an additional procedure for removal and may cause skin complications due to pressure necrosis. We describe our experience utilizing T-fasteners in a novel way that eliminates external bolsters during laparoscopic GT placement. Methods: Pediatric patients requiring enteral access who underwent gastrostomy at a single institution using the paired T-fastener technique were reviewed. Gastropexy was achieved by passing pairs of T-fasteners, under laparoscopic and/or endoscopic guidance, through single stab incisions into the stomach in a square configuration, allowing the suture from one T-fastener to be tied subcutaneously to its paired suture. This eliminates the need for external bolsters. Operative time and 30-day postoperative complications, including local wound infection, granulation tissue formation, bleeding, and tube replacement, are reported. Results: Thirty patients underwent gastrostomy placement using the paired T-fastener technique. Mean age was 9.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.9) and mean weight 29.9 kg (SD 21.0). Mean tube length was 2.2 cm (SD 0.71). Eight patients underwent an additional procedure at the time of gastrostomy. Mean operative time was 74.4 minutes (SD 39.7). Five patients developed a local wound infection requiring antibiotics. Five developed granulation tissue. Seven patients underwent tube replacement within 30 days for dislodgment or stem upsize. Conclusion: The paired T-fastener technique is a safe and efficient method for primary button gastrostomy placement. This method eliminates the need for additional trocars or external bolsters and may be helpful in patients with thick abdominal walls.