Risk of borderline ovarian tumors after fertility treatment - Results from a Danish cohort of infertile women

OBJECTIVE

Results from previous studies examining the association between fertility treatment and borderline ovarian tumors are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between fertility treatment and borderline ovarian tumors in a cohort of infertile women.

METHODS

This cohort study was based on the Danish Infertility Cohort and included all infertile women aged 20-45 years living in Denmark between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2017 (n = 146,891). Information on use of fertility drugs, borderline ovarian tumors and cancer diagnoses, covariates, emigration, and vital status was obtained by linkage to national registers. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for potential confounders for overall borderline ovarian tumors and for serous- and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors separately.

RESULTS

During a median 11.3 years of follow-up, 144 women developed a borderline ovarian tumor. No marked associations between ever use of clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor modulators, human chorionic gonadotropin or progesterone and borderline ovarian tumors were observed, neither overall nor for serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors analysed separately. Further, no clear associations with borderline ovarian tumors were found according to cumulative dose, time since first use or parity status for any fertility drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

No marked associations between use of fertility drugs and borderline ovarian tumors were observed. However, the cohort's relatively young age at end of follow-up emphasizes the importance of extending the follow-up period for women who have used fertility drugs.

Risk of epithelial ovarian tumors among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A nationwide population-based cohort study

An association between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and epithelial ovarian tumors is biologically plausible as conditions inherent to PCOS such as excessive androgenic hormones, reproductive factors and obesity are also risk factors for these hormone-sensitive tumors. However, previous studies have showed conflicting results and have various methodological limitations. This population-based cohort study investigates the association between PCOS and epithelial ovarian tumors and includes all women born in Denmark between January 1, 1940 and December 31, 1993 (n = 1 719 304). PCOS diagnoses, ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumor diagnoses, covariates, migration and vital status were obtained from the Danish national registers. Adjusted cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for epithelial ovarian cancer and for borderline ovarian tumors overall as well as for histological subtypes separately. During median 26 years of follow-up we identified 6490 women with ovarian cancer and 2990 women with borderline ovarian tumors. Overall, we observed no marked associations between a diagnosis of PCOS and overall epithelial ovarian cancer or overall epithelial borderline ovarian tumors, irrespective of time since diagnosis. However, we found an increased risk of ovarian cancer among postmenopausal women with PCOS (HR 2.28 95% CI 1.02-5.09) and an increased risk of serous borderline ovarian tumors (HR 2.34 95% CI 1.21-4.53) in women with PCOS compared with women without PCOS. Importantly, low statistical precision is a crucial limitation of our study and in previous studies and larger studies with longer follow-up are therefore warranted.

Patient attitudes towards and satisfaction with subcutaneous injection of progesterone versus vaginal administration in assisted reproductive technology treatment

The hormones used in fertility treatment come in various forms. Progesterone used for luteal phase support is often administered vaginally as either suppositories, tablets or gel. However, in Denmark the administration of progesterone as a subcutaneous injection has newly been introduced. The aim of the study was to explore patient attitudes towards and satisfaction with subcutaneous injection of progesterone versus vaginal administration of progesterone in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatments.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A qualitative study with online and face to face interviews with a total of 19 women undergoing an ART treatment. Only women with at least one previous blastocyst transfer using vaginal progesterone or subcutaneous progesterone could be recruited. All participants were included from either the Fertility Clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte or from the Fertility Unit at Aalborg University Hospital.

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in four themes: (1) medication, (2) everyday life, (3) bodily experiences and (4) infertility or hope. Most informants highlighted the administration of subcutaneous progesterone only once a day and avoidance of the vaginal discharge as clear advantages. Reasons for preferring the vaginal administration were inconvenience of bringing the subcutaneous medication along and resistance to inject oneself.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that the satisfaction with the subcutaneous progesterone is generally positive. However, valuable thoughts have given insights into possible areas, which could be improved. Further, that some women prefer vaginal progesterone. The results show that the women are interested in being included in the decision-making when choosing the administration form of progesterone.

Risk of colorectal cancer after use of fertility drugs-results from a large Danish population-based cohort of women with infertility

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between use of fertility drugs and colorectal cancer among women with infertility.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

The study cohort was obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and consisted of all women with infertility aged 20-45 years living in Denmark during 1995-2017.

INTERVENTION(S)

Information on the use of specific types of fertility drugs, colorectal cancer diagnoses, covariates, and vital status were obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and Danish national registers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for colorectal cancer overall and rectal and colon cancer separately.

RESULTS(S)

Among 148,036 women in the final study cohort, 205 women were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Ever use of clomiphene citrate (CC) was associated with a lower rate of colorectal cancer (unadjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89; adjusted HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93). However, the lower rate was only seen among women who first used CC >8 years ago (unadjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.76; adjusted HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75). No marked associations were found between the use of any of other types of fertility drugs and colorectal cancer. The results for colon and rectal cancer analyzed separately were similar, except for a suggestion of a decreased risk of rectal cancer associated with the use of gonadotropins (adjusted HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.20-1.08).

CONCLUSION(S)

Among women with infertility, the use of most types of fertility drugs was not associated with colorectal cancer. However, CC may decrease the risk of colorectal cancer and gonadotropins might decrease the risk of rectal cancer, but we cannot rule out that these findings may be more related to the underlying conditions in these women or are chance findings. Consequently, the results from this study should be investigated further in large epidemiological studies.

O-083 Tumors of the central nervous system among women treated with fertility drugs: a population-based cohort study

Study question

Is the use of fertility drugs among infertile women associated with tumors of the central nervous system (CNS)?

Summary answer

The use of most specific types of fertility drugs is not associated with an increased risk of CNS tumors overall.

What is known already

Few previous studies have investigated the association between fertility drugs and CNS tumors. Studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the risk of CNS tumors associated with assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization (IVF). No studies have reported the risk associated with various specific fertility drugs.

Study design, size, duration

Retrospective population-based cohort study of all women included in the Danish Infertility Cohort. The study cohort consisted of 148 016 infertile women after exclusion of women who emigrated, died, were diagnosed with cancer before infertility diagnosis, and women for whom information on level of education was missing. The cohort was linked to various national health- and civil registers to study all 20- to 45-year old infertile women in Denmark during 1995-2017.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

The study cohort was linked to various national health and population registers to obtain information on fertility drugs (clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor modulators and progesterone), CNS tumors, relevant covariates and vital and emigration status. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for CNS tumors overall and for gliomas, meningiomas and diverse benign tumors of the brain and other parts of the CNS.

Main results and the role of chance

During a median 11.3 years of follow-up, 328 women were diagnosed with a CNS tumor. No marked associations were observed between use of most types of fertility drugs (clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor modulators and progesterone) and CNS tumors. However, ever use of human chorionic gonadotropin was associated with an increased rate of gliomas (HR 2.13 95% CI 0.90-5.01) but a decreased rate of meningiomas (HR 0.49 95% CI 0.28-0.87). No clear associations with CNS tumors were observed according to time since first use or cumulative dose for any specific fertility drugs. Additional studies with longer follow-up are necessary to support these findings.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The median age at end of follow-up (43.5 years) was lower than the median age for CNS tumors diagnosis (60 years). Information on estrogen use, treatment regimens and number of cycles is only partly available in the registers and these were not included in this study.

Wider implications of the findings

This study presents reassuring results regarding the risk of tumors of the CNS among women treated with fertility drugs. Our study is only generalizable to premenopausal women, and the risk for postmenopausal women remains to be assessed.

Trial registration number

not applicable

P-783 Fertility treatment and risk of ovarian cancer in a large nationwide cohort of 151,821 infertile Danish women

Study question

Do use of fertility drugs increase the risk of ovarian cancer among infertile women

Summary answer

Use certain types of fertility drugs may modify the risk of ovarian cancer among infertile women, primarily for serous ovarian tumors and among parous women.

What is known already

Even though most previous studies on the association between fertility treatment and ovarian cancer have not been able to show a convincing association, some studies have found an increased risk of this malignancy among women undergoing fertility treatment. However, many of the previous studies have had methodological limitations including selection bias and potential confounding due to missing information of important factors, such as parity status and hormonal contraceptive use, small sample size as well as short- and incomplete follow-up time. Furthermore, only few studies have assessed the association between fertility treatment and ovarian cancer according to histological type.

Study design, size, duration

This retrospective register-based cohort study included virtually all 20-45 year old infertile women in Denmark between 1971 and 2017 as identified in the Danish Infertility Cohort. All women were followed from entry in the cohort (i.e. the date of first infertility diagnosis) to occurrence of ovarian cancer, any other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), death, emigration, bilateral oophorectomy or end of follow-up (December 31, 2017), whichever occurred first. The median follow-up length was 10.3 years

Participants/materials, setting, methods

In total, 332 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer during the follow-up period. Information on the use of specific fertility drugs (clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, hCGs, GnRH receptor modulators and progesterone), ovarian cancer, covariates and vital status was obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and various Danish national registers. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for ovarian cancer overall and for serous ovarian tumors.

Main results and the role of chance

After adjustment for attained age (as the underlying time scale), calendar year of study entry, highest obtained level of education, maternal age at first childbirth, number of childbirths, hormonal contraceptive use as well as mutual adjustment for treatment with any other specific fertility drugs, ever use of hCG (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) and GnRH receptor modulators (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-1.00) were associated with a decreased risk of overall ovarian cancer. In contrast, ever use of gonadotropins (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.91-2.24) and especially progesterone (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.18-2.78) increased the risk of overall ovarian cancer. No marked association was observed for clomiphene citrate (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.80-1.44)). The rates for serous ovarian cancer generally resembled those observed for overall ovarian cancer; however only the association for progesterone reached statistical significance (HR 2.89; 95% CI 1.67-4.99). The observed associations existed mainly among parous women and did not vary with time since first use of the fertility drug in question and no statistically significant associations were observed with cumulative dose of the specific fertility drugs.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The median age at the end of follow-up was only 42.5 years, which is markedly lower than the usual peak age for ovarian cancer in Denmark (mid 60s). Hence, we were not able to capture the true, potential long-term association between use of fertility drugs and ovarian cancer.

Wider implications of the findings

Use of certain specific types of fertility drugs in fertility treatment may modify the risk of ovarian cancer among subgroups of women. However, although this study is by far the largest to date, additional large epidemiological studies with longer follow-up time are needed to further clarify the observed associations.

Trial registration number

Not applicable.

Surgical treatment of Asherman syndrome and reproductive outcome

INTRODUCTION

Asherman syndrome may be challenging to treat. This study presented the results after hysteroscopic treatment of Asherman syndrome in our clinic focusing on the reproductive outcome.

METHODS

A total of 43 women were operated in the course of a five-year period. The women were post-operatively treated with hyaluronic acid gel, intrauterine device (IUD) and hormonal supplementation. A second-look minihysteroscopy and removal of the IUD were conducted seven weeks later. Data concerning the results after one or more operations were obtained from a phone interview and from the medical records.

RESULTS

The pregnancy rate among the 38 women who wished to conceive was 82%, and the live birth rate was 63%. Among the 31 women who became pregnant, 42% achieved spontaneous pregnancy, whereas 58% became pregnant after fertility treatments. An increased risk of obstetric complications was recorded, especially related to abnormal placentation and impaired placenta function.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic treatment of Asherman syndrome seems to be a safe procedure, but a risk possibly exists of obstetrical complications in the subsequent pregnancies. Pregnancies following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis should be considered high-risk pregnancies.

FUNDING

none.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

Fertility drugs and incidence of thyroid cancer in a Danish nationwide cohort of 146 024 infertile women

STUDY QUESTION

Do fertility drugs increase the risk of thyroid cancer among infertile women?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The use of most types of fertility drugs was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The incidence of thyroid cancer is higher for women than men, especially during reproductive years, indicating that reproductive hormones may be involved in the development of thyroid cancer. Only a few previous studies have examined the association between the use of fertility drugs and incidence of thyroid cancer and the results are inconclusive.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective, population-based cohort study including all 146 024 infertile women aged 20-45 years and living in Denmark in the period 1995-2017. The women were followed from the date of entry in the cohort (i.e. date of first infertility diagnosis) until the occurrence of thyroid cancer or any other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), death, emigration, total thyroidectomy or the end of follow-up (31 December 2018), whichever occurred first. The median length of follow-up was 11.3 years.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

In total, 167 women were diagnosed with thyroid cancer during the follow-up period. Information on the use of specific fertility drugs (clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, hCGs, GnRH receptor modulators and progesterone), thyroid cancer, covariates and vital status was obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and various Danish national registers. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for thyroid cancer overall and for papillary thyroid cancer.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

After adjustment for the calendar year of infertility diagnosis, the highest obtained level of education, parity status, obesity or thyroid disease and mutual adjustment for other registered fertility drugs, no marked associations were observed between the use of clomiphene citrate, hCG, gonadotropins or GnRH receptor modulators and risk of overall or papillary thyroid cancer. However, ever use of progesterone was associated with an increased rate of both overall (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.07-2.48) and papillary (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.04-2.65) thyroid cancer after mutual adjustment for other specific fertility drugs. For most specific fertility drugs, we observed a tendency toward higher associations with thyroid cancer within the first 5 years after the start of drug use than after 5 years from the start of use. No marked associations were detected according to the cumulative dose for any of the specific fertility drugs.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Despite a large study population, the statistical precision in some subgroup analyses may be affected due to the low number of thyroid cancer cases. Although we were able to adjust for a number of potential confounders, residual and unmeasured confounding may potentially have affected the observed associations, as we could not adjust for some factors that may influence the association between fertility drugs and thyroid cancer, including age at menarche and BMI.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Although this study, which is the largest to date, provides reassuring evidence that there is no strong link between the use of fertility drugs and thyroid cancer incidence, we observed a modest increased thyroid cancer incidence after the use of progesterone. However, we cannot rule out that this is a chance finding and the potential association between the use of progesterone and thyroid cancer should therefore be investigated further in large epidemiological studies. The results of the present study provide valuable knowledge for clinicians and other health care personnel involved in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was supported by research grants from the Jascha Foundation and the Aase and Ejner Danielsens Foundation. B.N. received honoraria and/or non-financial support by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, IBSA Nordic APS and Merck KGAA. The remaining authors have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

[Reproductive surgery for female infertility]

Although assisted reproductive technology has reduced the need for surgery for women with infertility, there is evidence to support, that targeted reproductive surgery can improve fertility and pregnancy outcomes. In the last decades, increased access to minimal invasive surgery has brought a new era to reproductive surgery. An integration of reproductive surgery in the fertility treatment is therefore recommended. The patient should be offered detailed information regarding the pros and cons before the surgical treatment, as the evidence in the field is sparse, which is discussed in this review.

Immediate versus postponed single blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (mNC-FET): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Today, it is widespread practice to postpone frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a modified natural cycle (mNC) for at least one menstrual cycle after oocyte retrieval and failed fresh embryo transfer or freeze-all. The rationale behind this practice is the concern that suboptimal ovarian, endometrial or endocrinological conditions following ovarian stimulation may have a negative impact on endometrial receptivity and implantation. However, two recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on retrospective data did not support this practice. As unnecessary delay in time to transfer and pregnancy should be avoided, the aim of this study is to investigate if immediate single blastocyst transfer in mNC-FET is non-inferior to standard postponed single blastocyst transfer in mNC-FET in terms of live birth rate.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded trial including 464 normo-ovulatory women aged 18-40 years undergoing single blastocyst mNC-FET after a failed fresh or freeze-all cycle. Participants are randomised 1:1 to either FET in the first menstrual cycle following the stimulated cycle (immediate FET) or FET in the second or subsequent cycle following the stimulated cycle (postponed FET). The study is designed as a non-inferiority trial and primary analyses will be performed as intention to treat and per protocol.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (J-nr.: H-19086300). Data will be handled according to Danish law on personal data protection in accordance with the general data protection regulation. Participants will complete written consent forms regarding participation in the study and storage of blood samples in a biobank for future research. The study will be monitored by a Good Clinical Practice (GCP)-trained study nurse not otherwise involved in the study. The results of this study will be disseminated by publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04748874; Pre-results.

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in cases with nonmale factor infertility. The lack of robust evidence on an advantage of using ICSI over conventional IVF in these patients is problematic since ICSI is more invasive, complex and requires additional resources, time and effort. Therefore, the primary objective of the IVF versus ICSI (INVICSI) study is to determine whether ICSI is superior to standard IVF in patients without severe male factor infertility. The primary outcome measure is first live birth from fresh and frozen-thawed transfers after one stimulated cycle. Secondary outcomes include fertilisation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, birth weight and congenital anomalies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a two-armed, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. In total, 824 couples/women with infertility without severe male factor will be recruited and allocated randomly into two groups (IVF or ICSI) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomised in variable block sizes and stratified by trial site and age. The main inclusion criteria are (1) no prior IVF/ICSI treatment, (2) male partner sperm with an expected count of minimum 2 million progressive motile spermatozoa following density gradient purification on the day of oocyte pick up and (3) age of the woman between 18 and 42 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Helsinki Declaration. The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark. Study findings will be presented, irrespectively of results at international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04128904. Pre-results.

Endometrial cancer risk after fertility treatment: a population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Using data from a large population-based cohort of women with fertility problems in Denmark, we examined the association between use of fertility drugs and endometrial cancer incidence.

METHODS

Women aged 20-45 years living in Denmark during 1 January 1995-31 December 2017 and diagnosed with fertility problems (i.e., subfertile women) were identified from the Danish Infertility Cohort. Information on use of fertility drugs, endometrial cancer, covariates and vital status was obtained from various Danish national registers. Cox proportional hazard models were used adjusted for calendar year of study entry, highest level of education, parity status, hormonal contraceptive use, obesity and diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Of the 146,104 subfertile women, 129,478 (88.6%) were treated with fertility drugs. During a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 119 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Use of any fertility drugs was not associated with an increased rate of overall (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.50-1.34) or type I endometrial cancer (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.60-1.95). No associations between use of specific types of fertility drugs and endometrial cancer were observed. No marked associations were observed according to cumulative dose of specific fertility drugs, parity status, or with increasing follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

No marked associations between use of fertility drugs and risk of endometrial cancer were observed. The relatively young age of the cohort at end of follow-up, however, highlights the need for longer follow-up of women after fertility drug use.

Ovarian reserve markers and endocrine profile during oral contraception: Is there a link between the degree of ovarian suppression and AMH?

The ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) are suppressed in varying degree during the use of combined oral contraceptives (COC). Further, long-term use of COC can mask a condition of premature ovarian insufficiency. A desirable clinical tool that could distinguish true low ovarian reserve markers from COC-induced low levels during use of COC is warranted. The aim of this multicenter study including 235 COC users was to assess whether low age-adjusted AMH levels during COC use were linked to concomitant low levels of LH, FSH, estradiol and androgens - as a potential future tool to differentiate between 'false', COC-induced low AMH levels vs. true low AMH. Study population and methods: In total, 235 COC users from the general population aged 19-40 years were included. AMH, AFC and a reproductive hormonal profile were measured during COC intake. Age-adjusted AMH levels (Z-scores) were calculated from a comparison group of 983 non-users of COC. Differences in hormonal profile were tested between women with low versus high age-adjusted AMH-quartiles based on non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The outcomes of interest were levels of gonadotropins, estradiol and androgens according to the four the age-adjusted AMH quartiles to find out if women with low age-adjusted AMH levels had a stronger gonadotropin suppression compared with women with higher age-adjusted AMH levels. Mean age of COC users was 30.2 years (SD 3.8), median AMH 14 pmol/l (inter-quartile range (IQR) 8.7-23)), median AFC 16 (IQR 11-25). We found no significant differences across the age-adjusted AMH quartiles in either the levels of gonadotropins, estrogens or androgens, respectively. Thus, the degree of suppression of FSH, LH, androgens and estradiol are unlikely to be a useful tool to differentiate between false low and true low ovarian reserve markers during COC use. Presently, there seems to be no alternative to withdrawal of the COC and to re-test the ovarian reserve after 2-3 months. Trial registration Trial no. NCT02785809 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Treatment with the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab in women with asthma undergoing fertility treatment: a proof-of-concept study-The PRO-ART study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is associated with prolonged time to pregnancy and a higher need for fertility treatment. However, the mechanism underlying this association remains incompletely understood. Previous research points to asthma-driven systemic inflammation also affecting the reproductive organs and thereby fertility. The aim of this study was to determine if treatment with omalizumab prior to fertility treatment will increase pregnancy rate among women with asthma by decreasing the systemic asthma-related inflammation and, by that, to provide insight into the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an ongoing prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial planned to enrol 180 women with asthma recruited from fertility clinics in Denmark. The patients are randomised 1:1 to either omalizumab or placebo. The primary endpoint is the difference in pregnancy rate confirmed with ultrasound at gestational week 7 of pregnancy. The secondary endpoints are change in sputum and blood eosinophil cell count, change in biomarkers, change in microbiota, together with rate of pregnancy loss, frequency of malformations, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, birth weight, small for gestational age and perinatal death between groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The methods used in this study are of low risk, but if successful, our findings will have a large impact on a large group of patients as infertility and asthma are the most common chronic diseases among the young population. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee-Danish national research ethics committee (H-18016605) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT no: 2018-001137-41) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal number: VD-2018486 and I-Suite number 6745). The test results will be published regardless of whether they are positive, negative or inconclusive. Publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals is planned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03727971.

Therapeutic endometrial scratching and implantation after in vitro fertilization: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To study whether endometrial scratching in the luteal phase before ovarian stimulation increases clinical pregnancy rates in women with one or more previous implantation failures.

DESIGN

A nonblinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Fertility clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Three hundred four eligible patients scheduled for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection were randomized. The intervention group (n = 151) underwent endometrial scratching in the luteal phase before controlled ovarian stimulation, while no intervention was performed in the control group (n = 153).

INTERVENTION(S)

Endometrial scratching with a Pipelle de Cornier catheter in the luteal phase before ovarian stimulation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rate and prenatal and birth data.

RESULT(S)

There was no overall significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rates between the control and intervention groups (38.5% vs. 44.4%; relative risk = 1.15; confidence interval [0.86-1.55]). However, subgroup analyses revealed that women with three or more previous implantation failures had a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate (31.1% vs. 53.6%; relative risk = 1.72; confidence interval [1.05-2.83]) after scratching. No difference was seen as regards prenatal and birth data between the two groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Endometrial scratching in the luteal phase before ovarian stimulation significantly enhances the clinical pregnancy rate in women with three or more prior implantation failures. This result seems to corroborate previous reports, which found that particularly women with repeated implantation failure seem to gain a positive effect from endometrial scratching. Importantly, there were no significant differences in prenatal data and birth data between the groups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01963819.

Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess whether the ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were lower among women using the progestin-only pill (POP) or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and similar to the decrease observed in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill users.Methods: This retrospective study comprised 565 hormonal contraceptive users (COC, POP, LNG-IUS or contraceptive vaginal ring) and 983 non-hormonal contraceptive users, who were seen in two Danish fertility assessment and counselling clinics between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted multiple regression analysis was used to examine the differences in AMH and AFC between hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive users.Results: Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AMH was 31.1% lower among COC users [95% confidence interval (CI) -39.6%, -25.9%; p < 0.001], 35.6% lower among POP users (95% CI -49.0%, -18.6%; p < 0.001) and 17.1% lower among LNG-IUS users (95% CI -31.4%, 0.002%; p = 0.052); no significant differences were seen among vaginal ring users. Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AFC was 31.3% lower among COC users (95% CI -35.0%, -25.3%; p < 0.001) and 29.7% lower among POP users (-39.1%, -17.9%; p < 0.001); no significant differences were seen among LNG-IUS or vaginal ring users. Ovarian volume was more than 50% reduced among COC and vaginal ring users (p < 0.001) but was unchanged among POP and LNG-IUS users.Conclusion: Assessment of ovarian reserve markers among users of all types of hormonal contraception should be interpreted cautiously and the type of contraceptive method considered.

Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and other potential risk factors, and subsequent preterm delivery (<37 weeks), using data from a large cohort study of Danish women.

METHODS

The Danish prospective cohort study was initiated in 1991, with the original aim of investigating the role of human papillomavirus in the natural history of cervical neoplasia. The study included 11,088 women aged 20-29. The cohort was invited for 2 follow-up examinations in 1993-1995 and 1999-2000, respectively. At all 3 examinations, the women answered questions about a number of different lifestyle variables. We assessed the relationship between preterm delivery and potential risk factors, such as previous LEEP treatments, smoking during pregnancy, age, parity and previous preterm delivery. The cohort was followed until 2004, through linkages with the nationwide Pathology Data Bank and the Medical Birth Registry.

RESULTS

Of the 14,982 deliveries in the cohort during follow up, 542 were preterm (21-37 weeks). Among deliveries with no previous LEEP, 3.5% ended as a preterm delivery, whereas this applied to 6.6% among deliveries following a LEEP, yielding a significantly increased risk of preterm birth after LEEP (OR=1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). The strongest risk factor for preterm delivery was a previous preterm delivery (OR=2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.7). Other significant risk factors were smoking during pregnancy and low educational status.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of preterm delivery after LEEP treatment. Thus, women in their reproductive age should be informed about the increased risk of preterm delivery, if treated with LEEP.