1
|
Giger-Pabst U, Bucur P, Roger S, Falkenstein TA, Tabchouri N, Le Pape A, Lerondel S, Demtröder C, Salamé E, Ouaissi M. Comparison of Tissue and Blood Concentrations of Oxaliplatin Administrated by Different Modalities of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:4445-4451. [PMID: 31399820 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new technology for delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy. It is generally assumed that with PIPAC, the ratio of peritoneal to systemic drug concentration is superior to liquid hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). To date, no direct comparative data are available supporting such an assumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve 65-day-old pigs were randomly separated into three groups of four pigs each, all of which received intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the following administration methods: PIPAC with oxaliplatin 92 mg in 150 ml dextrose 5% (Group 1); PIPAC with electrostatic aerosol precipitation (ePIPAC; Group 2); or laparoscopic HIPEC (L-HIPEC) with oxaliplatin 400 mg in 4 L dextrose 5% at 42 °C (Group 3). Serial blood and peritoneal tissue concentrations of oxaliplatin were determined by spectrometry. RESULTS In all three groups, the maximum concentration of oxaliplatin in blood was detected 50-60 min after onset of the chemotherapy experiments, with no significant differences among the three groups (p = 0.7994). Blood oxaliplatin concentrations (0-30 min) were significantly higher in the L-HIPEC group compared with the ePIPAC group (p < 0.05). No difference was found for the overall systemic oxaliplatin absorption (area under the curve). Overall concentrations in the peritoneum were not different among the three groups (p = 0.4725), but were significantly higher in the visceral peritoneum in the PIPAC group (p = 0.0242). CONCLUSIONS Blood and tissue concentrations were comparable between all groups; however, depending on the intraperitoneal area examined and the time points of drug delivery, the concentrations differed significantly between the three groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urs Giger-Pabst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.,Department of General Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Petru Bucur
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Sébastien Roger
- EA4245 Transplantation Immunologie Inflammation, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | | | - Nicolas Tabchouri
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | | | | | - Cédric Demtröder
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.,Department of General Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray Les Tours, France. .,EA4245 Transplantation Immunologie Inflammation, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giger-Pabst U, Demtröder C, Falkenstein TA, Ouaissi M, Götze TO, Rezniczek GA, Tempfer CB. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:442. [PMID: 29669524 PMCID: PMC5907219 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4363-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with recurrent malignant epithelioid mesothelioma (MM) after surgery and standard chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed have limited treatment options. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with recurrent MM undergoing Pressurized IntraPeritoneal/Thoracal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC/PITAC) with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2. Data were retrospectively collected in a prospective registry of patients undergoing PIPAC/PITAC. Study outcomes were microscopic tumor regression grade (TRG), survival and adverse events (v4.0 CTCAE). Results A total of 29 patients (m/f = 17/12) with MM with a mean age of 62.4 (range: 42 to 84) years were analyzed. A total of 74 PIPAC and 5 PITAC procedures were performed. The mean number of PIPAC applications was 2.5 (range: 0 to 10) per patient. Twenty patients (69%) had > 2 PIPAC procedure and were eligible for TRG analysis. TRG 1 to 4 was observed in 75% (15/20) of patients. Major regression (TRG 3) or complete regression (TRG 4) was observed in 20% and 10%, respectively. PIPAC induced significant tumor regression in 51.7% (15/29) of patients with a cumulative effect after repetitive PIPACs (PIPAC #1 vs. PIPAC #2: p = 0.001; PIPAC #1 vs. PIPAC #3: p = 0.001; PIPAC #1 vs. PIPAC #4: p = 0.001). Postoperative CTCAE grade 4 complications were observed in two patients (6.9%) who had cytoreductive surgery (CC2) and intraoperative PIPAC. One patient (3.4%) died due to postoperative kidney insufficiency. After a follow up of 14.4 (95% CI: 8.1 to 20.7) months after the last PIPAC/PITAC application, median overall survival was 26.6 (95% CI: 9.5 to 43.7) months (from the first application). Conclusion After prior abdominal surgery and systemic chemotherapy, repetitive PIPAC applications are feasible and safe for patients with end-stage MM. Furthermore, PIPAC induces significant histological regression of malignant mesothelioma in the majority of patients. PITAC is feasible, but its safety and efficacy to control malignant pleural effusion remain unclear. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4363-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urs Giger-Pabst
- Basic Research Laboratories of the Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany. .,Department of General Surgery & Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany.
| | - Cédric Demtröder
- Department of General Surgery & Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Thomas A Falkenstein
- Basic Research Laboratories of the Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Thorsten O Götze
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, UCT-University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Hospital Northwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Günther A Rezniczek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Clemens B Tempfer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falkenstein TA, Götze TO, Ouaissi M, Tempfer CB, Giger-Pabst U, Demtröder C. First Clinical Data of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) as Salvage Therapy for Peritoneal Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer. Anticancer Res 2018; 38:373-378. [PMID: 29277797 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients suffering from peritoneal metastasis of biliary tract cancer were treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a study carried out at a single institution, tertiary referral center certified for therapy of peritoneal disease. Retrospective data analysis was performed of prospective data for PIPAC with intra-peritoneal low-dose doxorubicin (1.5 mg/m2) and cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2) delivered at intervals of 6 weeks. The outcome criteria were microscopic pathological response, survival, and adverse events [Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (v4.0)]. RESULTS A total of 13 patients (male/female=8/5) with a mean age of 58 (range=37-75) years underwent 17 PIPAC procedures without intraoperative complications. The mean number of PIPAC applications was 1.3 (range=0-3). Due to non-accessibility of the abdominal cavity in two patients (15.4%) and rapid clinical deterioration in six patients (46%), five patients underwent two or more PIPAC applications and were, therefore, eligible for histological analysis to assess carcinoma regression. Overall tumor regression of any degree was determined in 4/5 patients. An overall median survival of 85 days (95% confidence interval(CI)=59.2-110.4 days) after the first PIPAC application was observed. No complications greater than Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (v4.0) level 2 occurred. CONCLUSION PIPAC can induce objective regression of systemic chemotherapy-resistant peritoneal metastasis of biliary tract cancer. However, due to a rapid clinical deterioration of the patients, almost two-thirds of the patients cannot undergo repetitive PIPAC courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Falkenstein
- Basic Research Laboratories of the Department of Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Thorsten O Götze
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, UCT-University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Hospital Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Department of Digestive, Oncology, Endocrine and Liver Transplantation, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Trousseau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Clemens B Tempfer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.,General Surgery and Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, St. Mary's Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Urs Giger-Pabst
- Basic Research Laboratories of the Department of Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany .,General Surgery and Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, St. Mary's Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Cédric Demtröder
- General Surgery and Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, St. Mary's Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Demtröder C, Solass W, Zieren J, Strumberg D, Giger-Pabst U, Reymond MA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:364-71. [PMID: 26400556 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an experimental drug delivery method that applies chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. We present the first results obtained with PIPAC in colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CPM). METHOD This is a retrospective analysis. PIPAC was applied in 17 consecutive patients with pretreated CPM. All patients had previously undergone surgery, and 16 had undergone previous lines of systemic chemotherapy (median, two lines). The mean peritoneal metastasis index (peritoneal cancer index) was 16 ± 10. Forty-eight applications of PIPAC with oxaliplatin (92 mg/m2 ) were given every 6 weeks at 37 °C and 12 mmHg for 30 min. The outcome criteria were microscopic pathological response, survival and adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. RESULTS Forty-eight PIPAC administrations were performed with no intra-operative complications. The mean number of PIPAC administrations per patient was 2.8 (minimum one, maximum six). Postoperative adverse events (CTCAE level 3) were observed in four patients (23%), no CTCAE level-4 adverse events were reported. The hospital mortality was zero. Objective tumour responses were observed in 12/17 patients (71%), and the overall responses were as follows: complete pathological response (seven patients), major response (four patients), partial response (one patient), no response (two patients) and not eligible (three patients). The mean survival after first PIPAC was 15.7 months. CONCLUSION Repeated PIPAC with oxaliplatin can induce the regression of pretreated CPM. The toxicity appears to be low. These preliminary results are encouraging and justify prospective clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Demtröder
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - W Solass
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hanover, Hannover, Germany
| | - J Zieren
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - D Strumberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology and Haematology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - U Giger-Pabst
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - M-A Reymond
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.,Department of Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Odendahl K, Solass W, Demtröder C, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Tempfer C, Reymond MA. Quality of life of patients with end-stage peritoneal metastasis treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:1379-85. [PMID: 26138283 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Revised: 05/28/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of Life (QoL) plays an important role in patients with peritoneal metastasis and is deteriorating continuously until death. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative palliative treatment of peritoneal metastasis. We present the first QoL results under PIPAC therapy. METHODS Retrospective analysis of QLQ30 questionnaire results during repeated courses of PIPAC applications in palliative patients with pretreated peritoneal metastasis. RESULTS 91 patients (M:F = 40:51, median age 64 (34-77) years) with 158 PIPAC applications were analyzed. 86% patients had previously received systemic chemotherapy. Peritoneal metastasis was advanced (Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index I = 16 ± 10). At admission, only moderate impairment of functioning (62-83%) and symptom scores (17-47%) was observed. 48 patients received at least 2 PIPAC every 6 weeks. After PIPAC # 1, the global physical score deteriorated slightly (from 82% to 75%), but improved after PIPAC # 2 (up to 89%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhoea, anorexia) remained stable under PIPAC therapy. CONCLUSIONS Quality of life was relatively high in this group of patients with advanced, pretreated peritoneal metastasis, explaining their wish for further therapy. Functioning scores and disease-related symptoms were not altered for at least 3 months in the patients able to receive repeated PIPAC. Except for a transient moderate increase of pain scores, PIPAC did not cause therapy-related QoL deterioration, especially no gastrointestinal symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Odendahl
- Dept. of Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Germany
| | - W Solass
- Dept. of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - C Demtröder
- Dept. of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - U Giger-Pabst
- Dept. of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - J Zieren
- Dept. of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - C Tempfer
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - M A Reymond
- Dept. of Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Germany; Dept. of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|