Effectiveness and Toxicity of Five Fraction Prone Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast conserving therapy (BCT) is increasingly used to treat women with early stage breast cancer. Our institution was an early adopter of 5-fraction ABPI and delivers APBI primarily to patients in the prone position. This study reports long term oncologic and cosmetic outcome in a large cohort of women treated with 5-fraction external beam APBI.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We included patients receiving APBI 600 cGy × 5 fx delivered every other day or every day between 2010 and 2022. Late toxicities and clinician and patient rated cosmesis were evaluated for patients with > 6 month follow up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and dosimetric factors associated with development of acute and late toxicities, clinician and patient rated cosmesis. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the null hypothesis was rejected for p<0.05. Kaplan Meier methodology was used to calculate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LR-RFS).

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-two patients received APBI either daily (56%) or every other day (44%). Most of the patients (92%) were treated in the prone position. Average mean heart dose was 23 cGy for left-sided and 11 cGy for right-sided breast cancers. Ipsilateral lung V30% ≤ 30%. At a median follow up of 48 months (range: 5.96 - 155 months), 12 (2.7%) patients developed a local recurrence, 14 (3.2%) patients developed a contralateral breast primary, 10 patients (2.3%) developed a distant metastasis and one patient (0.2%) developed a local recurrence followed by a distant metastasis 1 month later. Out of 258 patients with > 6 month follow up, rates of late grade 1-2 telangiectasia, fibrosis, edema, atrophy and hyperpigmentation were 4%, 18%, 1%, 19% and 7% respectively. There was only one late grade 3 event in a patient who developed significant breast atrophy. The rate of good-excellent physician and patient rated cosmesis was 95% and 89% respectively (N = 256 at median follow up of 80 months). On multivariate logistic regression, patients who did not receive any adjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy were at increased risk of developing a local recurrence. Patients with PR negative disease were at increased risk of distant metastasis. Patient who experienced any grade of acute dermatitis during treatment were at increased risk of any high grade (grade ≥ 2) late adverse event and worse physician rated cosmesis. Daily or every other day treatment did not correlate with worse toxicity or clinical outcomes. Plastic surgery involvement, LVI, EIC, lobular histology, and ER negativity did not correlate with an increased risk of recurrence. Five-year LR-RFS, DFS and OS were 98%, 92.5% and 98.6% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Five- fraction APBI delivered primarily in the prone position either daily or every other day was effective with low rates of local recurrence, minimal toxicity and excellent cosmetic scores at long term follow up.

A Phase II, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Caffeine-Based Antifibrosis Cream in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation induced fibrosis (RIF) is a common long term adverse event in patients undergoing post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) which can cause capsular contracture, implant loss, and reconstruction complications in women with implant-based breast reconstruction. At a molecular level, adenosine is a driver of RIF. Preclinical data have shown that pharmacologic blockade of the adenosine A2A Receptor (A2AR) in mice as well as an A2AR knockout mouse model prevented skin fibrosis associated with radiation injury. Caffeine is an A2AR antagonist which has been shown to block the development of hepatic fibrosis in liver disease patients. We present a phase II placebo controlled clinical trial to evaluate whether a caffeine-based cream can prevent RIF and thus reduce the rates of reconstructive complications in patients with tissue expander-based reconstruction requiring PMRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Women ≥ 18 years old with breast carcinoma stage 0-III status post mastectomy with tissue expander-based reconstruction who require PMRT to the chest wall +/- the regional nodes are being enrolled. The target accrual is 60 patients. Boost field to the chest wall, scar and/or nodal region is allowed. Patients with inflammatory breast cancer or those requiring skin bolus are excluded. Prior to starting radiation, patients will be randomized to placebo vs. caffeine cream and they will be instructed to apply the cream twice a day starting on the first day of radiation treatment and continuing daily for the duration of radiation until the removal of tissue expanders. The primary study endpoint is reconstructive complications requiring rehospitalization or reoperation by 2 years post radiation including reconstructive failure with or without reconstruction. A safety endpoint of grade ≥ 2 acute radiation dermatitis will also serve as a co-primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints are wound infection/cellulitis, hematoma, seroma, threatened exposure, wound dehiscence, implant leakage, rupture, and or deflation, and capsular contracture that do not meet criteria for the primary endpoint. Clinician rated cosmesis, local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis and survival up to 4 years are additional secondary endpoints. Exploratory endpoint includes the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) as a potential tool to quantitatively measure post irradiation fibrosis. Correlative aims include assessing epidermal thickness and fat layer thickness from tissue obtained at time of implant exchange for association with the development of fibrosis. The primary efficacy endpoint will be estimated using Kaplan Meier methods from date of randomization. Treatment comparisons will be based on a 2-sided log rank chi-square test and the hazard ratio will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals. The study started accruing in 12/2019 and is estimated to end by 04/2024. As of January 2023, 67% (40/60 patients) of the planned patients have been enrolled.

RESULTS

To be determined.

CONCLUSION

To be determined.

Prospective Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Invisible Ink Tattoos for the Delivery of External Beam Radiation Therapy: The PREFER Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Invisible ink tattoos allow for setup accuracy while avoiding the cosmetic permanence of visible ink tattoos. The goal of this trial was to evaluate patient-reported preference for the use of invisible ink tattoos in a radiation oncology clinic.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In an IRB-approved, prospective, feasibility trial, patients at a single institution receiving pencil beam scanning proton therapy to the thorax, abdomen, or pelvis underwent invisible ink tattoo-based treatment setup. Patient preference surveys comparing visible and invisible ink tattoos were completed prior to simulation (17 questions), immediately following simulation (5 questions), and at the end of treatment (18 questions), with preference scored on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and cosmesis scored on a 4-point Likert scale of excellent-good-fair-poor. Differences in distributions were examined using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Fisher's exact tests, or chi-square tests, where statistical significance was considered at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients screened, 102 were enrolled and 94 completed all surveys. Mean age was 55.0 years, and 58.5% were female. Most patients were white (79.1%) and non-Hispanic (92.6%). Patients most commonly had breast (34.0%), prostate (16.0%), and lung (9.6%) cancer. An average of 5 (range 3-8) invisible ink tattoos were placed per patient. Overall, 75.5% of patients reported that they would prefer to receive invisible tattoos vs. visible tattoos, and 88.3% rated the overall cosmetic outcome of invisible ink tattoo marks as excellent or good. Compared to males, females were more willing to travel farther from their home in order to avoid receiving visible tattoos (45.4% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.035) and would pay additional money to avoid receiving visible tattoos (34.5% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.002). Patients who had previously received any tattoo (cosmetic or visible RT tattoos) were more satisfied with the appearance of their invisible ink tattoos compared to those who had never previously received tattoos (82.9% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.022). Patients receiving definitive intent RT were more satisfied with the appearance of the tattoos compared to those receiving palliative intent RT (67.1% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.011). Patients with at least a college education were less satisfied with the appearance of tattoos compared to those without a college education (67.0% vs. 95.0% p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate stronger avoidance of visible tattoos and patient preference for invisible tattoos. The standard incorporation of invisible ink tattoos for patient setup should be strongly considered.