1
|
Pietrasanta C, Pugni L, Ronchi A, Schena F, Davanzo R, Gargantini G, Ferrazzi E, Mosca F. Management of the mother-infant dyad with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a highly epidemic context. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2020; 13:307-311. [PMID: 32444569 PMCID: PMC7592681 DOI: 10.3233/npm-200478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
In the context of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the hospital management of mother-infant pairs poses to obstetricians and neonatologists previously unmet challenges. In Lombardy, Northern Italy, 59 maternity wards networked to organise the medical assistance of mothers and neonates with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Six “COVID-19 maternity centres” were identified, the architecture and activity of obstetric and neonatal wards of each centre was reorganised, and common assistance protocols for the management of suspected and proven cases were formulated. Here, we present the key features of this reorganization effort, and our current management of the mother-infant dyad before and after birth, including our approach to rooming-in practice, breastfeeding and neonatal follow-up, based on the currently available scientific evidence. Considered the rapid diffusion of COVID-19 all over the world, we believe that preparedness is fundamental to assist mother-infant dyads, minimising the risk of propagation of the infection through maternity and neonatal wards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pietrasanta
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Milan, Italy
| | - L Pugni
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - A Ronchi
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - F Schena
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - R Davanzo
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.,Technical Panel on Breastfeeding, Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - G Gargantini
- Direzione Generale Welfare, Regione Lombardia, Milan, Italy
| | - E Ferrazzi
- University of Milan, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Milan, Italy.,Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Obstetrical Unit - Mangiagalli Center. Via della Commenda, Milan, Italy (EU)
| | - F Mosca
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiappini E, Petrolini C, Caffarelli C, Calvani M, Cardinale F, Duse M, Licari A, Manti S, Martelli A, Minasi D, Miraglia Del Giudice M, Pajno GB, Pietrasanta C, Pugni L, Tosca MA, Mosca F, Marseglia GL. Hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants: an update by Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology jointly with the Italian Society of Neonatology. Ital J Pediatr 2019; 45:145. [PMID: 31744514 PMCID: PMC6862761 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-019-0742-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Hexavalent vaccines, protecting against six diseases (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis [DTaP], poliovirus, hepatitis B virus [HBV], and Haemophilus influenzae type b [Hib], are routinely the standard of care in Europe. The use of combined vaccines allows the reduction of number of injections and side effects, the reduction of costs, and the increase in adherence of the family to the vaccination schedule both in terms of the number of doses and timing. The safety profile, efficacy and effectiveness of hexavalent vaccines have been extensively documented in infants and children born at term, and data are accumulating in preterm infants. Hexavalent vaccines are particularly important for preterm infants, who are at increased risk for severe forms of vaccine preventable diseases. However, immunization delay has been commonly reported in this age group. All the three hexavalent vaccines currently marketed in Italy can be used in preterm infants, and recent data confirm that hexavalent vaccines have a similar or lower incidence of adverse events in preterm compared to full-term infants; this is likely due to a weaker immune system response and reduced ability to induce an inflammatory response in preterm infants. Apnoea episodes are the adverse events that can occur in the most severe preterm infants and / or with history of respiratory distress. The risk of apnoea after vaccination seems to be related to a lower gestational age and a lower birth weight, supporting the hypothesis that it represents an unspecific response of the preterm infant to different procedures. High seroprotection rates have been reported in preterm infants vaccinated with hexavalent vaccine. However, a lower gestational age seems to be associated with lower antibody titres against some vaccine antigens (e.g. HBV, Hib, poliovirus serotype 1, and pertussis), regardless of the type of hexavalent vaccine used. Waiting for large effectiveness studies, hexavalent vaccines should be administered in preterm infants according to the same schedule recommended for infants born at term, considering their chronological age and providing an adequate monitoring for cardio-respiratory events in the 48–72 h after vaccination, especially for infants at risk of recurrence of apnoea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Chiappini
- SODc Malattie Infettive AOU Meyer, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
| | - C Petrolini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
| | - C Caffarelli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - M Calvani
- Dipartimento di Pediatria, Ospedale S. Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy
| | - F Cardinale
- UOC Pediatria, Servizio di Allergologia e Pneumologia Pediatrica, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria "Consorziale-Policlinico", Ospedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italy
| | - M Duse
- Dipartimento di Pediatria, Policlinico Umberto I, Università Sapienza di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - A Licari
- Clinica Pediatrica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico "S. Matteo", Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - S Manti
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Unità di Broncopneumologia Pediatrica, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - A Martelli
- UOC Pediatria, Azienda Ospedaliera G. Salvini, Ospedali di Garbagnate Milanese e Bollate, Milano, Italy
| | - D Minasi
- Unità Pediatria, Ospedale di Polistena, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - M Miraglia Del Giudice
- Dipartimento della Donna, del Bambino e di Chirurgia Generale e Specialistica, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy
| | - G B Pajno
- Dipartimento di Pediatria, Unità di Allergologia, Università di Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - C Pietrasanta
- Terapia intensiva neonatale, Fondazione IRCCS "Ca' Granda", Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - L Pugni
- Terapia intensiva neonatale, Fondazione IRCCS "Ca' Granda", Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - M A Tosca
- Allergologia Pediatrica, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - F Mosca
- Terapia intensiva neonatale, Fondazione IRCCS "Ca' Granda", Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - G L Marseglia
- Clinica Pediatrica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico "S. Matteo", Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ciuffini F, Pietrasanta C, Lavizzari A, Musumeci S, Gualdi C, Sortino S, Colnaghi M, Mosca F. Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: preliminary data. Pediatr Med Chir 2014; 36:88. [PMID: 25573704 DOI: 10.4081/pmc.2014.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite of improved survival of premature infants, the incidence of long term pulmonary complications, mostly associated with ventilation-induced lung injury, remains high. Non invasive ventilation (NIV) is able to reduce the adverse effects of mechanical ventilation. Although nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is an effective mode of NIV, traumatic nasal complications and intolerance of the nasal interface are common. Recently high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is emerging as a better tolerated form of NIV, allowing better access to the baby's face, which may improve nursing, feeding and bonding. HFNC may be effective in the treatment of some neonatal respiratory conditions while being more user-friendly for care-givers than conventional NCPAP. Limited evidence is available to support the specific role, efficacy and safety of HFNC in newborns and to demonstrate efficacy compared with NCPAP; some studies suggest a potential role for HFNC in respiratory care of the neonate as a distinct non invasive ventilatory support. We present the preliminary data of a randomized clinical trial; the aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of HFNC compared to NCPAP in preterm newborns with mild to moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ciuffini
- NICU, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pietrasanta C, Ghirardi B, Manca MF, Uccella S, Gualdi C, Tota E, Pugni L, Mosca F. Herpesviruses and breast milk. Pediatr Med Chir 2014; 36:5. [PMID: 25573640 DOI: 10.4081/pmc.2014.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast milk has always been the best source of nourishment for newborns. However, breast milk can carry a risk of infection, as it can be contaminated with bacterial or viral pathogens. This paper reviews the risk of acquisition of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpesviruses frequently detected in breastfeeding mothers, via breast milk, focusing on the clinical consequences of this transmission and the possible strategies for preventing it. Maternal VZV infections are conditions during which breastfeeding may be temporarily contraindicated, but expressed breast milk should always be given to the infant. CMV infection acquired through breast milk rarely causes disease in healthy term newborns; an increased risk of CMV disease has been documented in preterm infants. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) does not regard maternal CMV seropositivity as a contraindication to breastfeeding; according to the AAP, in newborns weighing less than 1500 g, the decision should be taken after weighing the benefits of breast milk against the risk of transmission of infection. The real efficacy of the different methods of inactivating CMV in breast milk should be compared in controlled clinical trials, rigorously examining the negative consequences that each of these methods can have on the immunological and nutritional properties of the milk itself, with a view to establish the best risk-benefit ratio of these strategies before they are recommended for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pietrasanta
- NICU, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università di Milano, Milano.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghirardi B, Pietrasanta C, Ciuffini F, Manca MF, Uccella S, Lavizzari A, Pugni L, Mosca F. [Management of outbreaks of nosocomial pathogens in neonatal intensive care unit]. Pediatr Med Chir 2014; 35:263-8. [PMID: 24620553 DOI: 10.4081/pmc.2013.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Outbreaks of nosocomial pathogens are one of the most relevant problems in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Many factors contribute to the onset of an epidemic, including virulence of the pathogen and vulnerability of the infants hospitalized in NICU. Outbreaks are often caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). MDROs are defined as microorganisms, predominantly bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents. MDROs, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and certain gram-negative bacilli (GNB), have important infection control implications. Once MDROs are introduced into a healthcare setting, transmission and persistence of the resistant strain is determined by the availability of vulnerable patients, selective pressure exerted by antimicrobial use, increased potential for transmission from larger numbers of infected or colonized patients ("colonization pressure"), and the impact of adherence to prevention efforts. Often, routine infection control measures are not enough to contain outbreaks, and additional control measures are needed, including implementation of hand hygiene, cohorting of infected/colonized infants, neonatal surveillance cultures, screening of healthcare workers and decolonization of neonates and/or healthcare workers in selected cases. In this review, we report the practices we developed in our NICU to contain an epidemic. These recommendations reflect the experience of the group, as well as the findings of the current literature.
Collapse
|