Leibovitz Z, Haratz KK, Malinger G, Shapiro I, Pressman C. Fetal posterior fossa dimensions: normal and anomalous development assessed in mid-sagittal cranial plane by three-dimensional multiplanar sonography.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;
43:147-153. [PMID:
23671019 DOI:
10.1002/uog.12508]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2013] [Revised: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 05/01/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To construct nomograms of the dimensions of the fetal posterior fossa (PF), assessed in the mid-sagittal plane in the second and third trimesters, and to assess how measurements from fetuses with PF abnormalities deviate from our normal ranges.
METHODS
This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 378 healthy fetuses in low-risk singleton pregnancies between 15 and 35 weeks. PF size was evaluated in the mid-sagittal plane of the fetal head using three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (3D-MPR). The borders of the PF were defined from the clivus to the tentorium (clivotentorial distance, CTD) and from the occipital bone to the level of the upper mesencephalic edge (tecto-occipital distance, TOD), and the posterior fossa area (PFA) and perimeter (PFP) were assessed. Growth charts were produced. Thirty-nine fetuses diagnosed with PF malformations were analyzed by calculating the z-scores of PFA, PFP, TOD and CTD, relative to the developed nomograms.
RESULTS
Of the 378 healthy fetuses initially included, there were 281 with adequate visualization of the PF borders; i.e. PF mid-sagittal plane morphometry was feasible in 74.3% of cases. There was a linear relationship between each of PFA, PFP, TOD and CTD, and gestational age, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.97, 0.97, 0.96 and 0.95, respectively (P < 0.001 for each). Chiari II malformation (CM-II) and Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM) were associated with the greatest difference in PF size compared with normal; PFA z-scores exceeded 2.6 in all five DWM cases and were below -2.66 in all 11 CM-II cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Sonographic evaluation of fetal PF size in the mid-sagittal plane is feasible. Our constructed nomograms provide reference data that may be helpful when evaluating PF congenital malformations.
Collapse