Determinants of medication adherence in people with epilepsy: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

Poor medication adherence in people with epilepsy (PwE) increases mortality, hospitalization, and poor quality of life, representing a critical challenge for clinicians. Several demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological factors were singularly found associated with medication adherence in several studies, but the literature lacks a comprehensive study simultaneously assessing all these variables.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter and cross-sectional study using online questionnaires with the following clinical scales: Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory 31 (QoLIE-31), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and 14-item Resilience scale (RES14) in a population of 200 PwE. We used the ANOVA test and Spearman's correlation to evaluate the relationship between medication adherence and demographic, clinical (seizure frequency, number of anti-seizure medications), and neuropsychological characteristics. We trained separate machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine) to classify patients with medium-high adherence (MMAS-8 ≥ 6) and poor adherence (MMAS-8 < 6) and to identify the main features that influence adherence.

RESULTS

Women were more adherent to medication (p-value = 0.035). Morisky Medication Adherence Scale -8 showed a direct correlation with RES14 (p-value = 0.001) and age (p-value = 0.001), while was inversely correlated with BDI-II (p-value = 0.001) and GAD-7 (p-value = 0.001). In our model, the variables mostly predicting treatment adherence were QoLIE-31 subitems, followed by age, resilience, anxiety, years of school, and disease duration.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that gender, age, and neuropsychological traits are relevant factors in predicting medication adherence to PwE. Furthermore, our data provided the first evidence that machine learning on multidimensional self-report questionnaires could help to develop a decisional support system in outpatient epilepsy clinics.

Multicentric EORTC retrospective study shows efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in patients who have mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome with variable CD30 positivity

BACKGROUND

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) was approved as a therapy for mycosis fungoides (MF) based on the ALCANZA trial. Little real-world data, however, are available.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BV in patients with MF/Sézary Syndrome (SS) with variable CD30 positivity in a real-world cohort and to explore potential predictors of response.

METHODS

Data from 72 patients with MF/SS across nine EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) centres were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients with: overall response (ORR), ORR lasting over 4 months (ORR4), time to response (TTR), response duration (RD), progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Secondary aims included a safety evaluation and the association of clinicopathological features with ORR, RD and TTNT.

RESULTS

All 72 patients had received at least one systemic treatment. ORR was achieved in 45 of 67; ORR4 in 28 of 67 with a median TTR of 8 weeks [interquartile range (IQR) 5·5-14] and with a median RD of 9 months (IQR 3·4-14). Median PFS was 7 months (IQR 2-12) and median TTNT was 30 days (6-157·5). Patient response, RD, PFS and TTNT were not associated with any clinicopathological characteristics. In the MF group, patients with stage IIB/III vs. IV achieved longer PFS and had a higher percentage of ORR4. There was a statistically significant association between large-cell transformation and skin ORR (P = 0·03). ORR4 was more frequently achieved in patients without lymph node involvement (P = 0·04).

CONCLUSIONS

BV is an effective option for patients with MF/SS, including those with variable CD30 positivity, large-cell transformation, SS, longer disease duration and who have been treated previously with several therapies.

Socioeconomic disparities in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is now a wide consensus at recognizing social and economic circumstances as main determinants of an individual's health status. Nevertheless, characteristics relating to socioeconomic status (SES) are poorly described in research reports. The aim of the present review was to verify whether the SES of participants is adequately reported in interventional studies targeting Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to explore the impact of SES proxy measures on the efficacy of the considered medications.

METHODS

A systematic review of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the currently marketed drugs for AD (i.e. cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) was conducted by performing a structured search on PubMed and the Cochrane databases. The following indicators of SES were considered in the retained studies: (i) educational level, (ii) lifetime job category, (iii) income and (iv) wealth. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A total of 48 articles were finally selected. Overall, only eight RCTs reported data concerning the four considered SES indicators. Indeed, only information pertaining to the educational level of participants was provided. Only one RCT (n = 60) performed ad hoc, secondary analyses accounting for the SES of participating subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The research and clinical relevance of SES has mistakenly been overlooked by the vast majority of RCTs on AD. A greater effort should be made to collect and report data on those SES indicators that may significantly affect the clinical manifestations and trajectories of patients with cognitive disturbances.

Results of a prospective randomized trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB, bulky, squamous carcinoma of the cervix

A prospective randomized trial was carried out in patients with squamous carcinoma of the cervix uteri, stage Ib bulky. The protocol considers two arms: the control group (75 patients) and the neoadjuvant one (76 patients). All the patients were classified according to the FIGO staging system and in order to determine the tumor size objectively, an ultrasound scanning was done. After this a Wertheim-Meigs operation followed by adjuvant whole-pelvis irradiation was performed. In the neoadjuvant group the same procedures were carried out but three courses of chemotherapy with the "quick" VBP scheme were given before the treatment. The new therapeutic strategy proved to be very useful in bulky tumors in which the clinical examination showed a cervix increased in size and the ultrasound scanning a volume larger than 60 c.c. (> 4 x 4 x 4 cm). In those cases statistically significant differences were found between both groups when free disease interval and survival were considered. These were due to the fact that operability has been improved and the parametrial extension has been decreased as well as other risk factors such as vascular embolism, lymph node involvement, tumor-cervix quotient, and tumor volume. The use of this new strategy is not justified in small tumors (< 3-4 cm in diameter) because in those cases, survival is not improved with neoadjuvant therapy.