Three-dimensional evaluation of condylar position after mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap—comparison of different surgical techniques

Three-dimensional positional changes of the temporomandibular joint after mandible reconstruction using microvascular fibula flaps were investigated in 58 patients. The results of preoperative virtually planned surgery, intraoperative resection- and cutting-guided surgery, and non-guided surgery were compared. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography data of each patient were processed and superimposed digitally. The condyle deviations and rotations along the axes and planes of the skull, as well as Euclidean distances, were determined. Reliability analyses, descriptive statistics, and non-parametric tests were performed with the alpha level set at P = 0.05. Reliability proved to be excellent for all variables. The median Euclidean distance was 2.07 mm for the left condyle and 2.11 mm for the right condyle. Deviations of ≥ 10 mm occurred in nine (16%) cases. The maximum deviation occurred in the horizontal plane and the least deviation in the sagittal plane. Median rotation was ≤ 1.4° around all axes. The condylar displacements did not differ significantly between the different surgical techniques investigated. The three-dimensional measurement method applied is highly reliable for evaluating the three-dimensional condylar position after mandibular reconstruction.

Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction

Introduction

Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction.

Material & Methods

A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Results

A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap.

Discussion

The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases.

Conclusion

The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.

Sandwich flaps as a feasible solution for the management of huge mandibular composite tissue defects

In the current therapy of head and neck defects, surgical reconstruction with the aid of pedicle or free flaps is common practice. Suitable single flaps are available to solve most reconstructive challenges. However, reconstruction can become a problem in extensive mandibular defects, as they are often caused by large primary tumors or osteoradionecrosis. These composite defects often lead to large intraoral or extraoral fistulas due to the involvement of mucosa, skin, mandible and soft tissue. These issues call for a double flap approach in order to achieve adequate reconstruction. Therefore, we developed a surgical sandwich technique as presented in this study. The procedure features the acquisition and use of two vascular flaps which can be freely combined according to their desired features (for example being of high tissue volume or osteomyocutaneous). In our study we included 11 patients (ten male, one female) with a mean age of 57 years. Seven of the patients had defects due to osteoradionecrosis and four due to tumor resection. A sandwich technique was performed in a single operation in eight patients, whereas for three patients several operations were necessary. The flaps used included: fibula free flap (FFF); anterolateral thigh (ALT); radial forearm flap (RFF); deltopectoral flap (DPF) and tensor fascia lata (TFL). The following combinations were used: FFF and ALT (three cases), FFF and RFF (two), FFF and DPF (three), ALT and TFL (two), and two ALT flaps (one). The sandwich technique proved suitable for complex reconstructions and led to desirable esthetic and functional results. The flexibility in combining different free or pedicle flaps made it possible to address various defect situations and consequently offer satisfactory surgical reconstruction for complex cases.