Association between Tumor Volume Change on MRI with Surgical Margin Status, Pathological Response, and Local Control Following Pre-Operative Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The clinical significance of radiographic progression during pre-operative radiation therapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate associations between radiographic change on T1 post-contrast (T1c) and T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with percent pathological response (PR%), positive surgical margins (+SM), and local control (LC).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with STS undergoing neoadjuvant RT who had both pre- and post-RT MRI prior to surgical resection. Gross tumor volumes were contoured on pre- and post-RT T1c and T2 MRI sequences and relative change in volume from baseline was calculated. Radiographic classification was defined as response (>30% reduction), progression (>30% increase), or stable (≤30% reduction or ≤30% increase). Chi squared, Fishers Exact, and Kruskal Wallis (KW) tests were used to assess differences between groups. Linear and binary logistic regression models used to assess associations between MRI response and PR% and +SM, respectively. LC was modeled with Kaplan Meier methods and log rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 68 STS patients were identified, with a median follow up of 49 months (range 7-229). With a median age of 60.5 years (25-88) and tumor size of 10.8cm (2.7-25.7), the most common histologies were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS; 32.4%) and myxoid liposarcoma (ML; 16.2%), and were primarily grade 2-3 disease (89.7%). With a median RT dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (44-60Gy), the median radiographic volume change was 2% (-86.4 to 953.6%) and -2.1% (-89.6 to 962.5%) for T1c and T2, respectively. Radiographic classification of response/stable/progression was 25.4%/49.2%/25.4% and 27.9%/52.5%/19.7% for T1c and T2, respectively. Histology (ML vs. UPS) and grade (1 vs. 3) were predictors for radiographic response on both T1c (72.7% vs 18.8%, p = 0.03 and 71.4% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.03) and T2 (71.5% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.02 and 71.4% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.002), respectively. With 6 +SM (8.8%), the rate of +SM for response/stable/progression was 20%/10.3%/0% in T1c (p = 0.2) and 5.9%/12.5%/0% in T2 (p = 0.5). As a continuous variable, neither relative change on T1c (p = 0.2) or T2 (p = 0.4) were associated with +SM. With an overall median PR% of 64% (0-100%), the median PR% was significantly different for response/stable/progression for both T1c (95%/42%/73%, p = 0.02) and T2 (95%/50%/87.5%, p = 0.04). Radiographic change on neither T1c (p = 0.4) or T2 (p = 0.5) were associated with PR% on a continuous basis. With a total of 4 local recurrences, there was no significant difference in LC by radiographic classification on either T1c (p = 0.65) or T2 (p = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

While radiographic response may be correlated with pathological response, radiographic progression on either T1c or T2 following neoadjuvant RT was not associated with a detriment in surgical margins or local control. These findings suggest that STS radiographic "pseudoprogression" is not associated with worse outcome.

Outcomes of Cytoreductive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Patients with Oligometastatic or Oligoprogressive Dominant Lung Metastases from Colorectal Primary

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Oxaliplatin based systemic therapy regimens have improved the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and with this, there has been increased interest in the integration of local therapies to oligometastatic and oligoprogressive sites. There is a vast body of literature exploring the benefits of cytoreduction with surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) approaches. We report our rates of local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) for patients with oligometastatic/progressive CRC with lung metastases treated with SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Single institution retrospective review of patients diagnosed with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive CRC with dominant metastases to the lungs who were treated with SBRT between September 2009 and December 2022. Oligometastatic disease was defined as newly diagnosed, untreated CRC with up to 5 metastases, up to 3 in one organ. Oligoprogressive disease was defined as CRC with 1 - 2 distant sites that continued to progress on active treatment while the primary site was controlled. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Association between local control and patient factors was analyzed using log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive CRC were treated with SBRT to 124 lung lesions. Colon cancer was the primary site for 54 patients with a median age at time of SBRT of 66 years (IQR 57 - 73) and a median tumor diameter of 1.20 cm (IQR 0.93 - 1.90). Rectal cancer was the primary site for 30 patients, median age was 60 years (IQR 49 - 70) and median tumor diameter was 1.10 cm (IQR 0.80 - 1.48). Median dose for the entire cohort was 6000 cGy (range 5000 - 6000) with median number of fractions 5 (range 3 - 5). Median follow-up after SBRT was 24 months. Overall, there were 9 local failures at last follow-up. Almost half (n = 42) of the patients experienced distant recurrence. Median local control (LC) for the entire cohort was not reached, 2-yr LC and 5-yr LC were 94.6% and 85.7% respectively. There were no differences in LC between colon and rectal cancer (p = 0.29). Actuarial median overall survival was 71 months (95% CI 44.3 - 97.7) and 5-yr OS was 50.2%. Due to the small number of events, we were unable to identify patient factors associated with local failure on univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive SBRT is an effective treatment option for patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive CRC with dominant lung metastases offering excellent rates of LC. Most patients failed distantly highlighting the importance of additional systemic therapies.

Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-Painting (HARD) vs. Standard Radiotherapy for Unresected Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) offers modest local control (LC) for unresected soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Although STS has a low α/β (∼2 - 6) that may benefit from a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen, it is often limited due to the toxicity risk to surrounding organs. A simultaneous integrated boost to gross disease (2.5 - 3 Gy/fraction), with lower doses to the intermediate and low risk target volume, may offer a safe isotoxic dose escalation approach. We hypothesize that this hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy dose-painting (HARD) will improve local control compared to CFRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We performed a single institution retrospective analysis of patients who received external beam radiotherapy with definitive intent (≥50 Gy) for unresected STS. CFRT was defined as 1.8 - 2 Gy/fraction (Gy/fx). HARD regimens consisted of 60 - 66 Gy at 3 Gy/fx or 70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fx to gross disease, with 1.8 - 2.4 Gy/fx to intermediate and low risk regions. All anatomical sites and histologies were included. Local control (LC) was defined from date of current diagnosis, estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods via log-rank tests or Cox regression for univariate analysis (UVA), when appropriate. Cox regression multivariate analysis (MVA) included regimen, biological effective dose (α/β 6; BED6), lesion size, age, and grade.

RESULTS

We identified 77 patients with primary and metastatic STS treated with HARD (n = 40) or CFRT (n = 37) between 1990 and 2022, with a median follow up of 24 months in surviving patients. The mean dose for CFRT and HARD are 56.8 Gy (50 - 77.4 Gy) and 64.9 Gy (60 - 70 Gy), respectively. HARD was comprised of 65% for 3 Gy/fx and 35% for 2.5 Gy/fx regimens. At the time of RT, grade 3 (69%) and extremity (39%) tumors were the most common. Tumor histology was very heterogenous across both cohorts, with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma being the most common for HARD (33%) and CFRT (19%). HARD was more often utilized in stage IV patients (55% vs. 19%, p = 0.001) and had a higher mean BED6 (96 vs. 74.2 Gy, p < 0.001) than CFRT, but without differences in age (67 vs. 59 years), tumor size (8 vs. 10 cm), concurrent chemotherapy (35% vs. 30%), Karnofsky performance status (86 vs. 85), follow-up (19 vs. 28 months), and grade (all p > 0.1). On UVA, there was a LC benefit associated with higher BED6 (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.9 - 0.98, p = 0.002) and the HARD regimen (2-year LC 95% vs. 62%, p < 0.001). On MVA, only HARD (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.006 - 0.729, p = 0.027) was independently associated with LC.

CONCLUSION

Although the HARD regimen and higher BED6 were both associated with significant improvement in LC, only the HARD regimen independently associated with a local control benefit for unresected STS. These results suggest biologic dose-intensification exploiting the low α/β of STS with an isotoxic hypofractionated regimen may be a favorable strategy for unresectable STS. Future prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Abstract OT2-04-05: Phase II trial of pre-operative stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in early-stage breast cancer

Background:

Post-operative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has demonstrated efficacy in preventing in-breast tumor recurrence. Pre-operative administration of APBI may be advantageous as an intact breast tumor is smaller than its corresponding lumpectomy cavity, is easier to distinguish on treatment-planning images, and results in smaller and more accurately delineated target volumes. Pre-operative APBI may reduce the incidence of positive margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Investigation is needed in the correlation of MR imaging with pathologic response 6 weeks after SABR. Also, evidence suggests that SABR induces immune activation in the tumor microenvironment; evaluation of excised tumor tissue will give insight into these processes.

Trial Design:

Treatment Planning and Delivery: CT simulation and treatment are performed in the prone position. Diagnostic MRI is fused to planning CT. GTV is delineated on registered breast MRI and includes the intact breast tumor. CTV is 15mm expansion of GTV. PTV is 3 mm expansion of CTV. VMAT or IMRT are permitted. Daily image-guidance aligning to tumor and biopsy-fiducial is mandatory. All subjects undergo pre-operative SABR to 28.5 Gy in 3 fractions of 9.5 Gy on different days separated by ≤48 hours. CTCAE v4 is used to assess toxicity 4-5 weeks after SABR. Pre-operative diagnostic MRI is performed 5-6 weeks following SABR. Imaging parameters to be evaluated include changes in tumor size, enhancement, and tumor margin description. BCS will be 6-8 weeks following SABR.

Tissue pathology: Margin status and degree of pathologic response are recorded from breast-conserving excisions, specimens are archived for future analysis.

Eligibility Criteria:

Inclusion criteria are women age ≥50 with biopsy proven invasive breast adenocarcinoma with tumor size ≤2cm on MRI, cN0 M0, ER+/HER2-, without history of invasive malignancy or prior breast/thoracic radiotherapy.

Exclusion criteria are active scleroderma or lupus erythematosus with skin involvement, MRI defined tumor within 10 mm of skin, implanted hardware prohibiting appropriate treatment planning or delivery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, carrier of BRCA1 or 2 gene mutation, pregnancy.

Specific Aims:

The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast tumor, secondary endpoints are incidence of adequate surgical margins (defined as “no tumor on ink”) and MRI response following SABR. Analyses of tumor immune response and microenvironment on pathologic specimens following SABR will also be performed.

Statistical Methods:

Fisher's exact test will be performed to examine associations between patient/tumor characteristics and pCR and surgical margins; these associations will be explored with multivariable logistic and linear regressions.

Accrual:

Present accrual is 9 subjects.

Expected accrual is 22 subjects; if ≥3 pCR are noted in the initial cohort, accrual will be expanded to 40 subjects.

Citation Format: Liveringhouse CL, Diaz R, Ahmed KA, Lee MC, Czerniecki B, Laronga C, Khakpour N, Weinfurtner RJ, Rosa M, Montejo ME. Phase II trial of pre-operative stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-05.

Abstract P4-08-15: Locoregional recurrence in invasive breast cancer and association with tumor infiltrating leukocyte (TIL) presence

Background:

The presence of TILs has been correlated with clinical outcomes and response to therapy in breast cancer. However, evaluation of TILs in breast cancer has largely been based on pathologic examination of tumor samples. Here, we report the relationship between invasive breast cancer locoregional recurrence (LRR) and the presence of TILs estimated by transcriptomic analysis with the deconvolution algorithm CIBERSORT.

Methods:

Patients were identified from an IRB-approved prospective tissue collection protocol at one academic institution and two community hospitals. 526 primary breast tumor samples were identified and gene expression profiling was assessed with high density Affymetrix microarray chips. Proportions of 22 different TIL types in samples were inferred based on the CIBERSORT algorithm, which uses gene expression data to estimate TIL presence. TIL presence was determined by dichotomization at the level of the first quartile among all samples (&gt;Q1=TIL presence). Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were obtained by chart review. Time to event analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates and the log-rank test. Associations between patient factors, tumor factors, TIL presence, and LRR were explored with univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses. Factors significant on UVA (p&lt;0.10) were included on MVA. P&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant on MVA.

Results:

526 women with invasive breast cancer and available genomic profiling were retrospectively identified for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years. 70% of tumors were Stage I-II. 69% were luminal subtypes and 17% were triple negative. 37% received mastectomy, 25% received mastectomy + radiation, and 32% received breast conserving therapy. 64% received chemotherapy, and 62% received hormonal therapy. Median follow-up was 74.4 months. There were 61 LRRs. We found significant differences in time to LRR when comparing presence vs. no presence of resting memory CD4+ T-cells (RMCD4+) (p=0.01), activated natural killer cells (ANK) (p=0.003), and neutrophils (PMNs) (p=0.03). On UVA, factors associated with LRR were patient age at diagnosis (p=0.009), pathologic T stage (p=0.045), Estrogen receptor status (p=0.03), biologic subtype (p=0.01), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p=0.018), positive margins (p&lt;0.0001), receipt of hormonal therapy (0.014), and presence of tumor infiltrating RMCD4+ (p=0.012), ANK (p=0.0004), and PMNs (p=0.033). On MVA, factors remaining significant were LVI (HR 2.16 CI 1.13-4.13, p=0.011), positive margins (HR 4.36 CI 1.57-12.11, p=0.018), receipt of hormonal therapy (HR 0.31 CI 0.12-0.77, p=0.042), and presence of RMCD4+ (HR 0.48 CI 0.26-0.88, p=0.017), ANK (HR 0.43 CI 0.23-0.83, p=0.012), and PMNs (HR 2.15 CI 1.02-4.53, p=0.043).

Conclusion:

In this study of 526 women with invasive breast cancer, we identified that enrichment of certain TILs is associated with LRR. These results suggest genomic-based assays of TIL presence may be useful to predict LRR in invasive breast cancer.

Citation Format: Liveringhouse CL, Grass GD, Figura NB, Mills MN, Purcell JD, Rosensweig SR, Blumencranz PW, Allen KG, Ahmed KA, Harrison LB, Torres-Roca JF, Robinson TJ, Diaz R. Locoregional recurrence in invasive breast cancer and association with tumor infiltrating leukocyte (TIL) presence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-15.