MicroRNA-145 and microRNA-486 are potential serum biomarkers for vascular calcification

INTRODUCTION

MicroRNAs (miRs) regulate vascular calcification (VC), their quantification may contribute to suspect the presence of VC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was performed in 4 phases. 1) miRs sequencing of rat calcified and non-calcified aortas. 2) miRs with the highest rate of change, plus miR-145 (the most abundant miR in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), were validated in aortas and serum from rats with and without VC. 3) The selected miRs were analyzed in epigastric arteries from kidney donors and recipients, and serum samples from general population. 4) VSMCs were exposed to different phosphorus concentrations and miR-145 and miR-486 were overexpressed to investigate their role in VC.

RESULTS

miR-145, miR-122-5p, miR-486 and miR-598-3p decreased in the rat calcified aortas, but only miR-145 and miR-486, were detected in serum. In human epigastric arteries, miR-145 and miR-486 were lower in kidney transplant recipients compared to donors. Both miRs inversely correlated with arterial calcium content and with VC (Kauppila index). In the general population, the severe VC was associated with the lowest serum levels of both miRs. The ROC curve showed that serum miR-145 was a good biomarker of VC. In VSMCs exposed to high phosphorus, calcium content, osteogenic markers (Runx2 and Osterix) increased, and the contractile marker (α-actin), miR-145 and miR-486 decreased. Overexpression of miR-145, and in lesser extent miR-486, prevented the increase in calcium content induced by high phosphorus, the osteogenic differentiation, and the loss of the contractile phenotype.

CONCLUSION

miR-145 and miR-486 regulate the osteogenic differentiation of VSMCs, their quantification in serum could serve as markers of VC.

Applicability of the Thrombin Generation Test to Evaluate the Hemostatic Status of Hemophilia A Patients in Daily Clinical Practice

Hemophilia A (HA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency due to various genetic mutations in the F8 gene. The disease severity inversely correlates with the plasma levels of functional FVIII. The treatment of HA patients is based on FVIII replacement therapy, either following a prophylactic or on-demand regime, depending on the severity of the disease at diagnosis and the patient’s clinical manifestations. The hemorrhagic manifestations are widely variable amongst HA patients, who may require monitoring and treatment re-adjustment to minimize bleeding symptoms. Notably, laboratory monitoring of the FVIII activity is difficult due to a lack of sensitivity to various FVIII-related molecules, including non-factor replacement therapies. Hence, patient management is determined mainly based on clinical manifestations and patient–clinician history. Our goal was to validate the ST Genesia^® automated thrombin generation analyzer to quantify the relative hemostatic status in HA patients. We recruited a cohort of HA patients from the Principality of Asturias (Spain), following treatment and at a stable non-bleeding phase. The entire cohort (57 patients) had been comprehensively studied at diagnosis, including FVIII and VWF activity assays and F8 genetic screening, and then clinically monitored until the Thrombin Generation Test (TGT) was performed. All patients were recruited prior to treatment administration, at the maximum time-window following the previous dose. Interestingly, the severe/moderate patients had a similar TGT compared to the mild patients, reflecting the non-bleeding phase of our patient cohort, regardless of the initial diagnosis (i.e., the severity of the disease), treatment regime, and FVIII activity measured at the time of the TGT. Thus, TGT parameters, especially the peak height (Peak), may reflect the actual hemostatic status of a patient more accurately compared to FVIII activity assays, which may be compromised by non-factor replacement therapies. Furthermore, our data supports the utilization of combined TGT variables, together with the severity of patient symptoms, along with the F8 mutation type to augment the prognostic capacity of TGT. The results from this observational study suggest that TGT parameters measured with ST Genesia^® may represent a suitable tool to monitor the hemostatic status of patients requiring a closer follow-up and a tailored therapeutic adjustment, including other hemophilia subtypes or bleeding disorders.

A single-oral bolus of 100,000 IU of cholecalciferol at hospital admission did not improve outcomes in the COVID-19 disease: the COVID-VIT-D-a randomised multicentre international clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D status has been implicated in COVID-19 disease. The objective of the COVID-VIT-D trial was to investigate if an oral bolus of cholecalciferol (100,000 IU) administered at hospital admission influences the outcomes of moderate-severe COVID-19 disease. In the same cohort, the association between baseline serum calcidiol levels with the same outcomes was also analysed.

METHODS

The COVID-VIT-D is a multicentre, international, randomised, open label, clinical trial conducted throughout 1 year. Patients older than 18 years with moderate-severe COVID-19 disease requiring hospitalisation were included. At admission, patients were randomised 1:1 to receive a single oral bolus of cholecalciferol (n=274) or nothing (n=269). Patients were followed from admission to discharge or death. Length of hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

In the randomised trial, comorbidities, biomarkers, symptoms and drugs used did not differ between groups. Median serum calcidiol in the cholecalciferol and control groups were 17.0 vs. 16.1 ng/mL at admission and 29.0 vs. 16.4 ng/mL at discharge, respectively. The median length of hospitalisation (10.0 [95%CI 9.0-10.5] vs. 9.5 [95%CI 9.0-10.5] days), admission to ICU (17.2% [95%CI 13.0-22.3] vs. 16.4% [95%CI 12.3-21.4]) and death rate (8.0% [95%CI 5.2-12.1] vs. 5.6% [95%CI 3.3-9.2]) did not differ between the cholecalciferol and control group. In the cohort analyses, the highest serum calcidiol category at admission (>25ng/mL) was associated with lower percentage of pulmonary involvement and better outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The randomised clinical trial showed the administration of an oral bolus of 100,000 IU of cholecalciferol at hospital admission did not improve the outcomes of the COVID-19 disease. A cohort analysis showed that serum calcidiol at hospital admission was associated with outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

COVID-VIT-D trial was authorised by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health products (AEMPS) and registered in European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT 2020-002274-28) and in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04552951 ).

Effects of calcitriol and paricalcitol on renal fibrosis in CKD

BACKGROUND

In chronic kidney disease, the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and renal inflammation stimulates renal fibrosis and the progression to end-stage renal disease. The low levels of vitamin D receptor (VDR) and its activators (VDRAs) contribute to worsen secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal fibrosis.

METHODS

The 7/8 nephrectomy model of experimental chronic renal failure (CRF) was used to examine the anti-fibrotic effects of treatment with two VDRAs, paricalcitol and calcitriol, at equivalent doses (3/1 dose ratio) during 4 weeks.

RESULTS

CRF increased the activation of the RAAS, renal inflammation and interstitial fibrosis. Paricalcitol treatment reduced renal collagen I and renal interstitial fibrosis by decreasing the activation of the RAAS through renal changes in renin, angiotensin receptor 1 (ATR1) and ATR2 mRNAs levels and renal inflammation by decreasing renal inflammatory leucocytes (CD45), a desintegrin and metaloproteinase mRNA, transforming growth factor beta mRNA and protein, and maintaining E-cadherin mRNA levels. Calcitriol showed similar trends without significant changes in most of these biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Paricalcitol effectively attenuated the renal interstitial fibrosis induced by CRF through a combination of inhibitory actions on the RAAS, inflammation and epithelial/mesenchymal transition.

Clinical Management of Hypertension, Inflammation and Thrombosis in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Impact on Survival and Concerns

The most severe clinical manifestations of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), are due to an unbalanced immune response and a pro-thrombotic hemostatic disturbance, with arterial hypertension or diabetes as acknowledged risk factors. While waiting for a specific treatment, the clinical management of hospitalized patients is still a matter of debate, and the effectiveness of treatments to manage clinical manifestations and comorbidities has been questioned. In this study, we aim to assess the impact of the clinical management of arterial hypertension, inflammation and thrombosis on the survival of COVID-19 patients. The Spanish cohorts included in this observational retrospective study are from HM Hospitales (2035 patients) and from Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (72 patients). Kaplan Meier survival curves, Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were employed, considering demographic variables, comorbidities and treatment arms (when opportune) as covariates. The management of arterial hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers is not detrimental, as was initially reported, and neither was the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). On the contrary, our analysis shows that the use on itself of corticosteroids is not beneficial. Importantly, the management of COVID-19 patients with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as an anticoagulant significantly improves the survival of hospitalized patients. These results delineate the current treatment options under debate, supporting the effectiveness of thrombosis prophylaxis on COVID-19 patients as a first-line treatment without the need for compromising the treatment of comorbidities, while suggesting cautiousness when administering corticosteroids.