Point-of-Care Ultrasound Educational Development in Australasia: A Scoping Review

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) technology is evolving rapidly and is being adopted by many health professionals in their clinical practice. Ultrasound is a complex skill requiring dedicated training. Appropriate integration of ultrasound education into medical, surgical, nursing and allied health professions is a current challenge worldwide. There are patient safety implications for use of ultrasound without adequate training and frameworks. The purpose of the review was to overview the status of PoCUS education in Australasia; investigate what is being taught and learned about ultrasound across the health professions; and identify potential gaps. The review was limited to postgraduate and qualified health professionals with established or emerging clinical use for PoCUS. A scoping review methodology was used to include literature in peer-reviewed articles, policies, guidelines, position statements, curricula and online material relating to ultrasound education. One hundred thirty-six documents were included. The literature revealed heterogeneity in ultrasound teaching and learning across the health professions. Several health professions lacked any defined scopes of practice, policies or curricula. Significant investment in resourcing ultrasound education is required to address the current needs in Australia and New Zealand.

Australasian emergency ultrasound: A survey on the current status

OBJECTIVE

Emergency ultrasound (EUS) has become an integral part of emergency medicine, and the core pillars of governance, infrastructure, administration, education and quality assurance (QA) are vital for its quality and continued growth. We aimed to assess the status of these vital pillars among Australasian EDs.

METHODS

A survey among the clinical leads in ultrasound (CLUS) in Australasian EDs from November 2020 to April 2021.

RESULTS

We analysed a total of 98 responses from CLUS representing 98 EDs. Most CLUS (85%) held EUS qualifications (CCPU 57%, DDU 18%, other 9%) but 15% had none. Only 66% of CLUS had dedicated clinical support time, and a mere 5% had administrative personnel support. Up to three ultrasound machines in 62% of EDs, but only 26% of EDs had secured image archiving facilities. In-house credentialing and the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) trainee special skills placement were available in 50% and 32% of EDs, respectively. Only 11% of EDs had regular EUS training for FACEMs, and only 66% of EDs had regular EUS education for emergency medicine trainees. Only 20 EDs had sonographer educators. Regarding EUS QA, only 33% of EDs provided formal EUS report, 23% of EDs conducted regular image reviews and 37% of EDs audited EUS performance. Only 35% of EDs had high-level disinfection equipment, and 56% of EDs had formal transducer disinfection protocols.

CONCLUSION

Despite ACEM recommendations for the practice of EUS, Australasian EDs still lack vital governance, administrative support, infrastructure, education and QA processes. Prompt actions such as ACEM mandating these recommendations are required to improve resource allocation by health services.

Time to establish pillars in point-of-care ultrasound

Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) has evolved rapidly and is used by many medical specialties. We propose five essential pillars of PoCUS that are necessary framework for hospital-based PoCUS training and credentialing programs. The pillars are: governance, infrastructure, administration, education and quality. It is time to establish these pillars to ensure the best practice in PoCUS use.