1
|
Dineen S, Lynch PM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Bannon S, Taggart M, Reeves C, Modaro C, Overman M, Chang GJ, Skibber JM, You YN. A Prospective Six Sigma Quality Improvement Trial to Optimize Universal Screening for Genetic Syndrome Among Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016; 13:865-72. [PMID: 26150580 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving the quality of health care is a national priority, and providing patient-centered care is one of the 6 key areas for quality improvement. In the setting of patients with young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), appropriate genetic workup and testing for potential underlying inherited CRC syndromes is fundamental to patient-centered care. Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common of these inherited syndromes, and current recommendations from the NCCN and other professional societies advocate universal screening for LS among young patients with CRC. However, practical implementation of these guidelines often falls short. METHODS We conducted a prospective quality improvement intervention trial to optimize universal screening for LS in young (age <50 years) patients, involving 356 eligible patients during the 12-month preintervention period and 299 patients during the postintervention. RESULTS Applying the Six Sigma conceptual framework, we demonstrated a significant increase in use of tumor-based molecular testing and subsequent confirmatory germline mutation testing for LS. This led to identification of more patients to be managed as having LS and of more first- and second-degree relatives to benefit from the testing results. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the successful application of a quality improvement conceptual framework for the universal adoption of molecular biomarker testing in patients with cancer, and for improving adherence to NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for CRC Screening. As molecular and genetic testing is becoming increasingly common, we present a prototype study for improving the adoption of molecular studies and the provision of guideline-based patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Dineen
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick M Lynch
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah Bannon
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Melissa Taggart
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Colleen Reeves
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cathy Modaro
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Overman
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George J Chang
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John M Skibber
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Y Nancy You
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Pathology, Quality Improvement, and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tamm EP, Szklaruk J, Puthooran L, Stone D, Stevens BL, Modaro C. Quality initiatives: planning, setting up, and carrying out radiology process improvement projects. Radiographics 2012; 32:1529-42. [PMID: 22745219 DOI: 10.1148/rg.325125013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In the coming decades, those who provide radiologic imaging services will be increasingly challenged by the economic, demographic, and political forces affecting healthcare to improve their efficiency, enhance the value of their services, and achieve greater customer satisfaction. It is essential that radiologists master and consistently apply basic process improvement skills that have allowed professionals in many other fields to thrive in a competitive environment. The authors provide a step-by-step overview of process improvement from the perspective of a radiologic imaging practice by describing their experience in conducting a process improvement project: to increase the daily volume of body magnetic resonance imaging examinations performed at their institution. The first step in any process improvement project is to identify and prioritize opportunities for improvement in the work process. Next, an effective project team must be formed that includes representatives of all participants in the process. An achievable aim must be formulated, appropriate measures selected, and baseline data collected to determine the effects of subsequent efforts to achieve the aim. Each aspect of the process in question is then analyzed by using appropriate tools (eg, flowcharts, fishbone diagrams, Pareto diagrams) to identify opportunities for beneficial change. Plans for change are then established and implemented with regular measurements and review followed by necessary adjustments in course. These so-called PDSA (planning, doing, studying, and acting) cycles are repeated until the aim is achieved or modified and the project closed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric P Tamm
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|