Appraisal of evidence reliability and applicability of Paxlovid as treatment for SARS-COV-2 infection: A systematic review

This study aimed to clarify the beneficial effect and the clinical application value of Paxlovid in the treatment of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) through a systematic review. Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for interventional or observational studies on the efficacy and safety of Paxlovid in the treatment of SARS-COV-2. The relative and absolute effect sizes for the outcomes were calculated based on the data reported in the original intervention literature. The external applicability of the evidence was analysed in terms of clinical application scenarios, patient willingness, and cost utility. One interventional and three observational studies were conducted. Four studies published in 2022, had participation sample sizes ranging 1780-109,254. Based on the randomised controlled trial data, the risk of all-cause mortality, all-cause death, and hospitalisation was significantly reduced in the Paxlovid group. Serious adverse events were reduced during the study. Based on observational studies, Paxlovid can significantly reduce the risk of death and hospitalisation in older patients with COVID-19 (moderate certainty) and improve in-hospital disease progression, composite disease progression, and viral load (low certainty). Paxlovid did not improve the outcomes of death and hospitalisation (low certainty) in patients aged <65 years. As per the economic utility analysis, the economic cost of reducing one death dramatically decreased with increasing age. Early use of Paxlovid in the older adult population with COVID-19 is beneficial. However, in the setting of limited resources, Paxlovid should be prioritised for older patients.

Changing trends in clinical research literature on PubMed database from 1991 to 2020

Background

Clinical research publications have become the dominant source and basis of clinical evidence-based decision-making. Exploring the type and quantity of clinical research publications in the PubMed database is useful for clarifying the changing trends of clinical research development in recent years. Therefore, a longitudinal analysis of the type and quantity of clinical research publications in the PubMed database over three decades was conducted.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched to retrieve clinical research according to the type and year of publication from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 2020. The research types were classified as primary and secondary literature.

Results

A total of 1,078,404 primary literatures were retrieved and the constituent proportions were ranked from high to low as case report/series (27.54%), randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (23.62%), cohort studies (21.05%), cross-sectional studies (17.49%), case control studies (9.15%), non-RCTs (1.01%), and pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) (0.15%). Correspondingly, 1,302,173 secondary literatures were retrieved and ranked as narrative review (70.88%), systematic review (15.02%), systematic review and meta-analyses (13.89%), traditional meta-analyses (4.48%), expert consensus (2.31%), guidelines (1.49%), scoping reviews (0.68%), net meta-analyses (0.40%), and umbrella reviews (0.04%). The average annual growth rate for the primary literature was 10.28%, and ranked from high to low as PCTs (83.68%), cohort studies (17.74%), cross-sectional studies (17.61%), non-RCTs (12.11%), case control studies (8.86%), RCTs (7.68%), case report/series (7.51%); while that for the secondary literature was 10.57%, and ranked from high to low as net meta-analyses (48.97%), umbrella reviews (47.09%), scoping reviews (41.92%), systematic reviews and meta-analyses (33.44%), systematic reviews (33.05%), traditional meta-analyses (12.49%), expert consensuses (9.22%), narrative review (8.72%), and guidelines (2.82%).

Conclusion

Both the composition and number of clinical studies changed significantly from 1991 to 2020. Based on the trend, the case report/series, case control study, and narrative review are on the decline, while cohort study, cross-sectional study, systematic reviews, and systematic review and meta-analysis literature have increased. To improve the quality of clinical evidence, we recommend RCT and cohort study give priority to access to allocated research resources in future.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00717-9.

Diagnostic performance of microRNAs in testicular germ cell tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The sensitivity (Sen) of classic biomarkers for the diagnosis of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) is currently low. Previous studies have shown the diagnostic potential of microRNAs (miRNAs) for TGCTs; however, the results of these studies are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their diagnostic value. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched until September 30, 2020 and 18 trials from 11 studies involving 2,068 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Using a bivariate mixed-effects meta-analysis model, the pooled Sen, specificity (Spe), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval values of total miRNAs were 0.83 (0.73–0.90), 0.95 (0.89–0.98), 15.79 (7.41–33.66), 0.18 (0.11–0.29), 87.13 (41.99–180.82), and 0.95 (0.93–0.97), respectively; however, the observed values of single miR-371a-3p were  0.84 (0.76–0.90), 0.95 (0.91–0.98), 18.41 (9.69–34.97), 0.17 (0.11–0.26), 111.56 (47.72–260.80), and 0.97 (0.95–0.98), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that miRNAs that included miR-371a-3p showed higher predictive performance than those that did not (P < 0.05). This research identified that miR-371a-3p has a high diagnostic value for TGCTs, except teratoma.

Systematic review of the registered clinical trials for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

BACKGROUND

Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), many researchers in China have performed related clinical research. However, systematic reviews of the registered clinical trials are still lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of clinical trials for COVID-19 to summarize their characteristics.

METHODS

This study is based on the PRISMA recommendations in the Cochrane handbook. The Chinese Clinical Registration Center and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify registered clinical trials related to COVID-19. The retrieval inception date was February 9, 2020. Two researchers independently selected the literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 75 registered clinical trials (63 interventional studies and 12 observational studies) for COVID-19 were identified. The majority of clinical trials were sponsored by Chinese hospitals. Only 11 trials have begun to recruit patients, and none of the registered clinical trials have been completed; 34 trials were early clinical exploratory trials or in the pre-experiment stage, 13 trials were phase III, and four trials were phase IV. The intervention methods included traditional Chinese medicine in 26 trials, Western medicine in 30 trials, and integrated traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in 19 trials. The subjects were primarily non-critical adult patients (≥ 18 years old). The median sample size of the trials was 100 (IQR: 60-200), and the median length of the trial periods was 179 d (IQR: 94-366 d). The main outcomes were clinical observation and examinations. Overall, the methodological quality of both the interventional trials and observational studies was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive clinical trials on the treatment of COVID-19 using traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine are ongoing or will be performed in China. However, based on the uncertain methodological quality, small sample size, and long trial duration, we will not be able to obtain reliable, high-quality clinical evidence regarding the treatment of COVID-19 in the near future. Improving the quality of study design, prioritizing promising drugs, and using different designs and statistical methods are worth advocating and recommending for clinical trials of COVID-19 in the future.

Use of thiazide diuretics for the prevention of recurrent kidney calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Thiazide diuretics reduce the risk of recurrent kidney calculi in patients with kidney calculi or hypercalciuria. However, whether thiazide diuretics can definitely prevent recurrent kidney calculi remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of thiazide diuretics on recurrent kidney calculi.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched using the keywords thiazide diuretics and kidney calculi to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent kidney calculi, and the secondary outcome was the 24-h urinary calcium level. The pooled risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The evidence quality was graded using the GRADE criteria, and recommendations for recurrent kidney calculus prevention using thiazide diuretics were reassessed.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 571 patients were included. The pooled RR for the incidence of kidney calculi in the thiazide diuretic groups was 0.44 (95% CI 0.33-0.58, P < 0.0001) compared to that in the placebo and untreated groups; the pooled RD was - 0.23 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.16, P < 0.0001). The pooled SMD for the 24-h urinary calcium level was - 18.59 (95% CI - 25.11 to - 12.08, P < 0.0001). The thiazide diuretic groups had a high incidence of adverse reactions and low tolerance. The evidence quality for decrease in kidney calculus incidence using thiazide diuretics was low, while that for the 24-h urinary calcium level decrease among those with recurrent kidney calculi was moderate, and that for the decrease in kidney calculus incidence using short-acting and long-acting thiazide diuretics was low. The overall strength of recommendation for prevention of recurrent renal calculi using thiazide diuretics was not recommended. The subgroup and sensitivity analysis findings were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term use of thiazide diuretics reduces the incidence of recurrent renal calculi and 24-h urinary calcium level. However, the benefits are insufficient, and the evidence quality is low. Considering the adverse effects, poor patient compliance, and economic burden of long-term medication, their use in preventing recurrent kidney calculi is not recommended.

Comparative efficacy and safety of low-intensity warfarin therapy in preventing unprovoked recurrent venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although there exists potential risk of bleeding, extended 'lifelong' conventional-intensity [international normalized ratio (INR): 2.0-3.0] warfarin anticoagulation is recommended for unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients because of risk of recurrent VTE. Whether long-term low-intensity (INR: 1.5-2.0) warfarin therapy reduced the risk of major bleeding without substantially lowered antithrombotic efficacy is not well understood. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk-benefits of low-intensity warfarin therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases and included randomized control trials (RCTs) that reported efficacy (recurrent VTE) and safety (bleeding episodes) of low-intensity warfarin therapy compared with conventional-intensity warfarin or placebo from inception through Jun 2016.

RESULTS

Four RCTs reporting high GRADE quality evidence were included. Although the relative risk of recurrent VTE with low-intensity therapy was significantly increased [2.96 (95% CI: 1.40 to 6.24), P < .004] compared to conventional-intensity warfarin, there was significant decrease of relative risk when compared with placebo [0.37 (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.56), P < .00001]. As per included publications, no significant major bleeding episodes were observed in low-intensity warfarin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although less effective than conventional-intensity warfarin therapy this meta-analysis indicates that long-term low-intensity warfarin therapy is highly effective for preventing recurrent VTE than placebo, along with reduced risks of major bleeding and minimizing potential complications.

Genetic polymorphisms of ERCC1‑118, XRCC1‑399 and GSTP1‑105 are associated with the clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin‑based adjuvant chemotherapy

The aim of the present study was to determine whether specific molecular parameters may serve as predictors of treatment outcomes and toxicity of oxaliplatin (OXA)‑based chemotherapy, which is used as an adjuvant treatment in resected gastric cancer. All gastric cancer patients examined in the study received an OXA/5‑fluorouracil chemotherapeutic regimen. Genetic polymorphisms of certain platinum‑related genes were determined by the TaqMan 5' nuclease assay and direct sequencing. Relapse‑free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated according to each genotype. Following adjustment for the most relevant clinical variables, excision repair cross‑complimentary group 1 (ERCC1)‑118 and X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1‑399) demonstrated significant predictive value for RFS and OS. We also demonstrated that carrying at least one variant XRCC1 Arg399Gln or glutathione S-transferase π 1 (GSTP1) Ile105Val allele significantly increased the risk of any grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity. In particular, carrying at least one variant GSTP1 Ile105Val allele was also significantly correlated with an increased risk of grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity and neurotoxicity. Our data suggested that gastric cancer patients harboring ERCC1‑118 C/C and XRCC1‑399 A/G or A/A genotypes may benefit from receiving OXA‑based adjuvant chemotherapy, and carrying at least one variant XRCC1 Arg399Gln or GSTP1 Ile105Val allele may contribute to the occurrence of adverse drug effects associated with OXA‑based chemotherapy.

The effects of ERCC1 expression levels on the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells to platinum agents and survival in gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy

Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) is reported to be involved in the sensitivity of cancer cells to platinum-based chemotherapy. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of ERCC1 expression on the chemosensitivity of platinum agents in gastric cancer cell lines, and on survival in gastric cancer patients treated with surgery followed by oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. ERCC1 expression levels were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot analysis, respectively. The chemosensitivity of a series of gastric cancer cell lines to platinum agents in vitro was evaluated using CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit. The apoptotic effect of the drugs was evaluated by double staining with Annexin-V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI). The results demonstrated that the expression levels of ERCC1 mRNA were correlated with the chemosensitivity of platinum agents, and depletion of ERCC1 sensitized the relatively resistant MKN45 cells to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Univariate analyses revealed that patients with low ERCC1 levels had longer relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with high ERCC1 levels (median RFS, 18 vs. 7 months, P=0.001; median OS, 27 vs. 11 months, P=0.001). Multivariate analyses suggested that high ERCC1 expression is an independent prognostic marker of poor RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–4.25; P= 0.026] and OS (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.07–4.55; P=0.031). These results suggest that overexpression of ERCC1 is correlated with platinum drug resistance in gastric cancer cells, and that depletion of ERCC1 sensitizes gastric cancer cell lines to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Gastric cancer patients with low levels of ERCC1 expression demonstrate a benefit from oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Characteristics of general distribution of hepatitis B virus genotypes in China

BACKGROUND

Based on differences in the virus nucleotide sequence, hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes are presently divided into genotypes A-H. The geographic distributions of HBV genotypes differ in countries and regions. To determine the general characteristics of their distributions in the mainland of China, we reviewed articles on HBV genotypes published in China.

METHODS

The Wanfang Database and the CNKI Database were searched for original articles involving HBV in China, and then the data from the articles were classified according to genotype and latitude and analyzed using SPSS 11.0.

RESULTS

The main HBV genotypes were C, B and BC, and their rates were 50.99%, 35.58%, 6.07%, respectively; other genotypes were rare. There was a negative correlation between latitude and the rate of genotype B (r=-0.782, P<0.01), while a positive correlation existed between latitude and the rate of genotype C (r=0.646, P<0.01). No correlation was observed between latitude and the rates of other genotypes (r=0.294, P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In China, HBV genotype C predominates, followed by genotype C and mixed genotype BC; genotypes A, D and others are rare. With an increasing latitude, the distribution of genotype B decreases gradually, while that of genotype C tends to increase. The other genotypes do not show any changes.