1
|
Liang AC, Sanders NS, Anderson ES, Heeney ME, Hirschman CM, Kane AR, Wills CP. "ContraceptED": A Multidisciplinary Framework for Emergency Department-Initiated Contraception. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 81:630-636. [PMID: 36925395 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) are common access points for patients who are at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Low-barrier access to effective contraception represents a crucial and low-cost intervention to address this public health need. Same-day initiation of contraception during an ED visit is a unique opportunity to provide reproductive health care for high-risk patients with otherwise limited health care access. We collaborated with our obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) department, pharmacists, and a team of community health advocates to support emergency clinicians (namely, emergency physicians and advanced practice providers) in assessing pregnancy and contraceptive readiness, increasing proficiency in contraception counseling, prescribing hormonal contraception, counseling on barrier and emergency contraception, and inserting (and removing) the Nexplanon implant, a form of long-acting reversible contraception. With this novel approach, we found that emergency clinicians voluntarily participated in trainings on contraception, including low-threshold long-acting reversible contraception initiation; and, after completing these trainings, clinicians integrated these skills into their workflow in the ED. We report our results after screening 38 patients during our current Pilot Phase of implementing this program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Liang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA.
| | - Noah S Sanders
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | - Erik S Anderson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA; Department of Medicine-Substance Use Disorder Program, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | - Megan E Heeney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | - Claire M Hirschman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | - Amy R Kane
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, Berkeley, CA
| | - Charlotte P Wills
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rider AC, Anaebere TC, Nomura M, Duong D, Wills CP. A Structured Curriculum for Interprofessional Training of Emergency Medicine Interns. West J Emerg Med 2019; 21:149-151. [PMID: 31913836 PMCID: PMC6948681 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) has been shown to improve health outcomes and patient satisfaction. IPE is now represented in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s emergency medicine (EM) milestones given the team-based nature of EM. The Highland Allied Health Rotation Program (H-AHRP) was developed by residents to enhance and standardize IPE for EM residents in a single hospital setting. H-AHRP was incorporated into the orientation month for interns starting in the summer of 2016. EM interns were paired with emergency department preceptors in registered nursing (RN), respiratory therapy (RT), pharmacy (PH), laboratory (LAB), and social work (SW) in either a four-hour shadowing experience (RN, RT, PH) or lecture-based overview (LAB, SW). We conducted a survey before and after the program. Overall, the EM interns reported an improved understanding of the scope of practice and day-to-day logistics after working with the preceptors. They found the program helpful to their future as physicians and would recommend it to other residencies. The H-AHRP program allows for the early incorporation of IPE into EM training, enhances interns’ understanding of both the scope and logistics of their colleagues, and is a well-received effort at improving team-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley C Rider
- Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Tiffany C Anaebere
- Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California.,Dignity Health, St. Joseph's Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stockton, California
| | - Mariko Nomura
- Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - David Duong
- Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Charlotte P Wills
- Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jordan J, Linden JA, Maculatis MC, Hern HG, Schneider JI, Wills CP, Marshall JP, Friedman A, Yarris LM. Identifying the Emergency Medicine Personality: A Multisite Exploratory Pilot Study. AEM Educ Train 2018; 2:91-99. [PMID: 30051075 PMCID: PMC6001604 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to understand the personality characteristics of emergency medicine (EM) residents and assess consistency and variations among residency programs. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of residents (N = 140) at five EM residency programs in the United States completed three personality assessments: the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)-describing usual tendencies; the Hogan Development Survey (HDS)-describing tendencies under stress or fatigue; and the Motives, Values, and Preferences Inventory (MVPI)-describing motivators. Differences between EM residents and a normative population of U.S. physicians were examined with one-sample t-tests. Differences between EM residents by program were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance tests. RESULTS One-hundred forty (100%), 124 (88.6%), and 121 (86.4%) residents completed the HPI, HDS, and MVPI, respectively. For the HPI, residents scored lower than the norms on the adjustment, ambition, learning approach, inquisitive, and prudence scales. For the HDS, residents scored higher than the norms on the cautious, excitable, reserved, and leisurely scales, but lower on bold, diligent, and imaginative scales. For the MVPI, residents scored higher than the physician population norms on altruistic, hedonistic, and aesthetics scales, although lower on the security and tradition scales. Residents at the five programs were similar on 22 of 28 scales, differing on one of 11 scales of the HPI (interpersonal sensitivity), two of 11 scales of the HDS (leisurely, bold), and three of 10 scales of the MVPI (aesthetics, commerce, and recognition). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the personality characteristics of EM residents differ considerably from the norm for physicians, which may have implications for medical students' choice of specialty. Additionally, results indicated that EM residents at different programs are comparable in many areas, but moderate variation in personality characteristics exists. These results may help to inform future research incorporating personality assessment into the resident selection process and the training environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Jordan
- Department of Emergency MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLADepartment of Emergency MedicineHarbor‐UCLA Medical CenterTorranceCA
| | - Judith A. Linden
- Department of Emergency MedicineBoston University School of MedicineBoston Medical CenterBostonMA
| | | | - H. Gene Hern
- Department of Emergency MedicineUCSF School of MedicineOaklandCA
- Alameda Health System–Highland HospitalOaklandCA
| | - Jeffrey I. Schneider
- Department of Emergency MedicineBoston University School of MedicineBoston Medical CenterBostonMA
| | - Charlotte P. Wills
- Department of Emergency MedicineUCSF School of MedicineOaklandCA
- Alameda Health System–Highland HospitalOaklandCA
| | - John P. Marshall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical CenterBrooklynNY
| | | | - Lalena M. Yarris
- Department of Emergency MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quinley KE, Chong D, Prager S, Wills CP, Nagdev A, Kennedy S. Manual Uterine Aspiration: Adding to the Emergency Physician Stabilization Toolkit. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 72:86-92. [PMID: 29248332 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E Quinley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital of Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA.
| | - Deborah Chong
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Highland Hospital of Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | - Sarah Prager
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Charlotte P Wills
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital of Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | - Arun Nagdev
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital of Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pittman MA, Yarris LM, Lall MD, Smith JL, Wills CP, Ufberg JW, Hegarty CB, Love JN. Do Emergency Medicine Residency Graduates Feel Prepared to Manage Closed Fractures After Training? Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24:92-97. [PMID: 27477866 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fractures comprise 3% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Although emergency physicians are often responsible for managing most of the initial care of these patients, many report a lack of proficiency and comfort with these skills. The primary objective was to assess how prepared recent emergency medicine (EM) residency graduates felt managing closed fractures upon completion of residency. Secondary objectives included whether residency training or independent practice contributed most to the current level of comfort with these procedures and which fractures were most commonly reduced without orthopedic consultation. METHODS An anonymous online survey was sent to graduates from seven EM residency programs over a 3-month period to evaluate closed fracture reduction training, practice, and comfort level. Each site primary investigator invited graduates from 2010 to 2014 to participate and followed a set schedule of reminders. RESULTS The response rate was 287/384 (74.7%) and included 3-year (198/287, 69%) and 4-year (89/287, 31%) programs. Practice in community, academic, and hybrid ED settings was reported by 150/287 (52.3%), 64/287 (22.3%), and 73/287 (25.4%), respectively. It was indicated by 137/287 (47.7%) that they reduce closed fractures without a bedside orthopedic consultation greater than 75% of the time. The majority of graduates felt not at all prepared (35/287, 12.2%) or somewhat prepared (126/287, 43.9%) upon residency graduation. Postresidency independent practice contributed most to the current level of comfort for 156/287 (54.4%). The most common fractures requiring reduction were wrist/distal radius and/or ulna, next finger/hand, and finally, ankle/distal tibia and/or fibula. CONCLUSIONS Although most recent graduates feel at least "somewhat" prepared to manage closed fractures in the ED, most felt that independent practice was a greater contributor to their current level of comfort than residency training. Recent graduates indicate that fracture reduction without orthopedic consultation is common in today's clinical practice. This survey identifies common fractures requiring reduction which EM residencies may wish to consider prioritizing in their emergency orthopedic curricula to better prepare their residents for independent clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A. Pittman
- Department of Emergency Medicine Georgetown University Hospital/Washington Hospital Center Washington DC
- Department of Emergency Medicine Greenville Health System Greenville SC
| | - Lalena M. Yarris
- Department of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR
| | - Michelle D. Lall
- Department of Emergency Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA
| | - Jessica L. Smith
- Department of Emergency Medicine Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI
| | - Charlotte P. Wills
- Department of Emergency Medicine Oakland Alameda County Medical Center/Highland General Hospital Oakland CA
| | - Jacob W. Ufberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine Temple University School of Medicine Philadelphia PA
| | - Cullen B. Hegarty
- Department of Emergency Medicine Regions Hospital Emergency Medicine Residency Program St. Paul MN
| | - Jeffrey N. Love
- Department of Emergency Medicine Georgetown University Hospital/Washington Hospital Center Washington DC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hern HG, Wills CP, Alter HJ, Bowman SH, Burns BD, Loyd J, Schneider JI, Yarris LM. Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8:759-762. [PMID: 28018543 PMCID: PMC5180533 DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-16-00072.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residency applicants often have difficulty coordinating interviews with multiple programs. An online scheduling system might improve this process. OBJECTIVE The authors sought to determine applicant mean time to schedule interviews and satisfaction using online scheduling compared with manual scheduling. METHODS An electronic survey was sent to US graduates applying to any of 6 emergency medicine programs in the 2014-2015 application cycle. Of the participant programs, 3 used an online system and 3 did not. Applicants were asked to report estimated time to schedule with the online system compared to their average time using other methods, and to rate their satisfaction with the scheduling process. RESULTS Of 1720 applicants to at least 1 of the 6 programs, 856 completed the survey (49.8%). Respondents reported spending less time scheduling interviews using the online system compared to other systems (median of 5 minutes [IQR 3-10] versus 60 minutes [IQR 15-240], respectively, P < .0001). In addition, applicants preferred using the online system (93.6% versus 1.4%, P < .0001.) Applicants were also more satisfied with the ease of scheduling their interviews using the online system (91.5% versus 11.0%, P < .0001) and felt that the online system aided them in coordinating travel arrangements (74.7% versus 41.5%, P < .01.). CONCLUSIONS An online interview scheduling system is associated with time savings for applicants as well as higher satisfaction among applicants, both in ease of scheduling and in coordinating travel arrangements. The results likely are generalizable to other medical and surgical specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Gene Hern
- Corresponding author: H. Gene Hern Jr, MD, MS, Highland Hospital–Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1411 East 31st Street, Oakland, CA 94602, 510.437.4896,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hern HG, Trivedi T, Alter HJ, Wills CP. How Prevalent Are Potentially Illegal Questions During Residency Interviews? A Follow-up Study of Applicants to All Specialties in the National Resident Matching Program. Acad Med 2016; 91:1546-1553. [PMID: 27049540 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000001181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the prevalence and effects on applicants of being asked potentially illegal questions during the residency interview process by surveying all residency applicants to all specialties. METHOD The authors surveyed all applicants from U.S. medical schools to residency programs in all specialties in 2012-2013. The survey included questions about the prevalence of potentially illegal questions, applicants' level of comfort with such questions, and whether such questions affected how applicants ranked programs. Descriptive statistics, tests of proportions, t tests, and logistic regression modeling were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Of 21,457 eligible applicants, 10,976 (51.1%) responded to the survey. Overall, 65.9% (7,219/10,967) reported receiving at least one potentially illegal question. More female respondents reported being asked questions about gender (513/5,357 [9.6%] vs. 148/5,098 [2.9%]), marital status (2,895/5,283 [54.8%] vs. 2,592/4,990 [51.9%]), or plans for having children (889/5,241 [17.0%] vs. 521/4,931 [10.6%]) than male respondents (P < .001). Those in surgical specialties were more likely to have received a potentially illegal question than those in nonsurgical specialties (1,908/2,330 [81.9%] vs. 5,311/8,281 [64.1%]). Questions regarding their commitment to the program were reported by 15.5% (1,608/10,378) of respondents. Such potentially illegal questions negatively affected how respondents ranked programs. CONCLUSIONS Two-thirds of applicants reported being asked potentially illegal questions. More women than men reported receiving questions about marital status or family planning. Potentially illegal questions negatively influence how applicants perceive and rank programs. A formal interview code of conduct or interviewer training could help to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gene Hern
- H.G. Hern Jr is vice chair for education, Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California, and associate clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. T. Trivedi is an emergency medicine resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California. H.J. Alter is vice chair for research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California, and associate clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. C.P. Wills is residency director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California, and associate clinical professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hern HG, Johnson B, Alter HJ, Wills CP, Snoey ER, Simon BC. Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists. West J Emerg Med 2015; 16:331-5. [PMID: 25834683 PMCID: PMC4380392 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2014] [Revised: 12/28/2014] [Accepted: 01/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Applicants to residency face a number of difficult questions during the interview process, one of which is when a program asks for a commitment to rank the program highly. The regulations governing the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) match explicitly forbid any residency programs asking for a commitment. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of applicants from U.S. medical schools to five specialties during the 2006-2007 interview season using the Electronic Residency Application Service of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Applicants were asked to recall being asked to provide any sort of commitment (verbal or otherwise) to rank a program highly. Surveys were sent after rank lists were submitted, but before match day. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS There were 7,028 unique responses out of 11,983 surveys sent for a response rate of 58.6%. Of those who identified their specialty (emergency medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology [OBGYN], general surgery and orthopedics), there were 6,303 unique responders. Overall 19.6% (1380/7028) of all respondents were asked to commit to a program. Orthopedics had the highest overall prevalence at 28.9% (372/474), followed by OBGYN (23.7%; 180/759), general surgery (21.7%; 190/876), internal medicine (18.3%; 601/3278), and finally, emergency medicine (15.4%; 141/916). Of those responding, 38.4% stated such questions made them less likely to rank the program. CONCLUSION Applicants to residencies are being asked questions expressly forbidden by the NRMP. Among the five specialties surveyed, orthopedics and OBGYN had the highest incidence of this violation. Asking for a commitment makes applicants less likely to rank a program highly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gene Hern
- Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Brian Johnson
- Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Harrison J Alter
- Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Charlotte P Wills
- Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Eric R Snoey
- Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Barry C Simon
- Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hern HG, Wills CP, Johnson B. Change to an informal interview dress code improves residency applicant perceptions. West J Emerg Med 2015; 16:127-32. [PMID: 25671021 PMCID: PMC4307696 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2014.11.22982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Revised: 10/22/2014] [Accepted: 11/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Residency interview apparel has traditionally been the dark business suit. We changed the interview dress code from a traditionally established unwritten ‘formal’ attire to an explicitly described ‘informal’ attire. We sought to assess if the change in dress code attire changed applicants’ perceptions of the residency program or decreased costs. Methods The authors conducted an anonymous survey of applicants applying to one emergency medicine residency program during two application cycles ending in 2012 and 2013. Applicants were asked if the change in dress code affected their perception of the program, comfort level, overall costs and how it affected their rank lists. Results We sent the survey to 308 interviewed applicants over two years. Of those, 236 applicants completed the survey for a combined response rate of 76.6% (236/308). Among respondents, 85.1% (200 of 235) stated they appreciated the change; 66.7% (154 of 231) stated the change caused them to worry more about what to wear. Males were more uncomfortable than females due to the lack of uniformity on the interview day (18.5% of males [25/135] vs. 7.4% of females [7/95], collapsed results p-value 0.008). A total of 27.7% (64/231) agreed that the costs were less overall. The change caused 50 of 230 (21.7%) applicants to rank the program higher on their rank list and only one applicant to rank the program lower. Conclusion A change to a more informal dress code resulted in more comfort and fewer costs for applicants to a single residency program. The change also resulted in some applicants placing the program higher on their rank order list.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gene Hern
- Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Charlotte P Wills
- Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| | - Brian Johnson
- Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Soares WE, Sohoni A, Hern HG, Wills CP, Alter HJ, Simon BC. Comparison of the multiple mini-interview with the traditional interview for U.S. emergency medicine residency applicants: a single-institution experience. Acad Med 2015; 90:76-81. [PMID: 25319173 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is a validated interview technique used primarily to evaluate medical school applicants. No study has compared MMIs with traditional interviews (TIs) in the evaluation of U.S. emergency medicine residency (EMR) applicants. METHOD During the 2011-2012 interview season, a four-station MMI was incorporated into the interview process for EMR applicants at Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital (AHS). A postinterview anonymous questionnaire was offered to all applicants after they submitted their rank lists but prior to release of National Residency Matching Program results. Respondents rated their perceptions of the MMI and TI on a five-point Likert scale. McNemar chi-square test was used to explore differences in respondents' perceptions of interview styles. RESULTS One hundred ten interviewees completed the survey (73%). Overall, applicants found the TI more enjoyable than the MMI process (98 [89%] compared with 48 [44%], McNemar chi-square=28.66, P<.01) and preferred the TI process to the MMI (66 [60%] compared with 9 [10%], McNemar chi-square=40.81, P<.01). Sixteen applicants (14%) indicated that the use of the MMI would negatively affect their ranking of the program. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to prior studies, U.S. EMR applicants to AHS preferred the TI to the MMI. Further investigation into the use of the MMI for selecting U.S. EMR applicants is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Soares
- Dr. Soares is clinical associate, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Health Center-Tufts Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Sohoni is clinical instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, California. Dr. Hern is program director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, California. Dr. Wills is associate program director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, California. Dr. Alter is research director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, California. Dr. Simon is chair of emergency medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, California
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the prevalence of potentially illegal questions in residency interviews and to identify the impact of such questions on applicants' decisions to rank programs. METHOD Using an Electronic Residency Application Service-supported survey, the authors surveyed all applicants from U.S. medical schools to residency programs in five specialties (internal medicine, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics-gynecology [OB/GYN], and emergency medicine) in 2006-2007. The survey included questions about the frequency with which respondents were asked about gender, age, marital status, couples matching, current children, intent to have children, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation, and the effect that such questions had on their decision to rank programs. RESULTS Of 11,983 eligible applicants, 7,028 (58.6%) completed a survey. Of respondents, 4,557 (64.8%) reported that they were asked at least one potentially illegal question. Questions related to marital status (3,816; 54.3%) and whether the applicant currently had children (1,923; 27.4%) were most common. Regardless of specialty, women were more likely than men to receive questions about their gender, marital status, and family planning (P < .001). Among those respondents who indicated their specialty, those in OB/GYN (162/756; 21.4%) and general surgery (214/876; 24.4%) reported the highest prevalence of potentially illegal questions about gender. Being asked a potentially illegal question negatively affected how respondents ranked that program. CONCLUSIONS Many residency applicants were asked potentially illegal questions. Developing a formal interview code of conduct targeting both applicants and programs may be necessary to address the potential flaws in the resident selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gene Hern
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center, Oakland, California 94602, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|